scholarly journals Vertical Variability in Bark Hydrology for Two Coniferous Tree Species

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ilek ◽  
John T. Van Stan ◽  
Karolina Morkisz ◽  
Jarosław Kucza

As the outermost layer of stems and branches, bark is exposed to the influence of atmospheric conditions, i.e., to changes in the air’s relative humidity and wetting during storms. The bark is involved in water interception by tree canopies and stemflow generation, but bark–water relations are often overlooked in ecohydrological research and insufficiently understood. Relative to other canopy ecohydrological processes, little is known about vertical variation in bark properties and their effect on bark hydrology. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze changes in physical properties (thickness, outer to total bark thickness ratio, density, and porosity) and hydrology (bark absorbability, bark water storage capacity, and hygroscopicity) vertically along stems of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) trees. Our null hypotheses were that bark hydrology is constant both with tree height and across measured physical bark properties. We found that bark thickness and the ratio of outer-to-total bark thickness decreased with tree height for both species, and this was accompanied by an increase in the bark water storage capacity. In contrast, the bark’s density, porosity, and hygroscopicity remained relatively constant along stems. These results inform ecohydrological theory on water storage capacity, stemflow initiation, and the connection between the canopy water balance and organisms that colonize bark surfaces.

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 575
Author(s):  
Anna Klamerus-Iwan ◽  
Jarosław Lasota ◽  
Ewa Błońska

The aim of the study was to determine the water storage capacity and absorbability of deadwood of different tree species with varying degrees of decomposition. Coniferous (Silver fir—Abies alba Mill.) and deciduous (Common hornbeam—Carpinus betulus L., Common ash—Fraxinus excelsior L., Common alder—Alnus glutinosa Gaertn., and Common aspen—Populus tremula L.) species were selected for the research. The study focuses on the wood of dead trees at an advanced stage of decomposition. Deadwood samples were collected at the Czarna Rózga Nature Reserve in central Poland. Changes over time of the water absorbability and water storage capacity of deadwood were determined under laboratory conditions. The research confirmed the significance of the wood species and the degree of wood decomposition in shaping the water storage capacity and absorbability of deadwood in forest ecosystems. Fir wood was characterized by having the highest water storage capacity and water absorbability. Among deciduous species under analysis, aspen wood was characterized by having the highest water storage capacity and absorbability. Our research has confirmed that deadwood may be a significant reservoir of water in forests.


Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1158
Author(s):  
Klamerus-Iwan Anna ◽  
Łagan Sylwia ◽  
Zarek Marcin ◽  
Słowik-Opoka Ewa ◽  
Bartłomiej Wojtan

Leaf surface wettability and factors which determine it are key in determining the water storage capacity of tree crowns and thus the interception of entire stands. Leaf wettability, expressed as the droplet inclination angle, and the surface free energy largely depend not only on the chemical composition of the leaves but also on their texture. The study concerns 12 species of trees common in Central Europe. The content of epicuticular waxes was determined in the leaves, and values ranging from 9.145 [µg/cm2] for horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.) to 71.759 [µg/cm2] for birch (Betula pendula Roth.) were obtained. Each additional µg/cm2 increases the canopy water storage capacity by 0.067 g g−1. For all species, the inclination angles of water, diiodomethane and glycerin droplets to the leaf surface were measured and the surface free energy was calculated. It is shown that it is the wax content and the species that constitute independent predictors of water storage capacity. These factors explain the 95.56% effect on the value of canopy water storage capacity. The remaining 4.44% indicate non-species-related individual features or the ability to mitigate pollutants as well as possible environmental factors. Wax analyzed separately from other factors causes a slight increase (by 0.067 g/g) of S. Nevertheless, the influence of the surface condition as a result of species-related variability is decisive for the value of the canopy water storage capacity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-122
Author(s):  
Anna Ilek ◽  
Jarosław Kucza ◽  
Karolina Morkisz

AbstractThe subject of the present research is the water storage capacity of bark of seven forest tree species: Pinus sylvestris L., Larix decidua Mill., Abies alba Mill., Pinus sylvestris L., Quercus robur L., Betula pendula Ehrh. and Fagus sylvatica L. The aim of the research is to demonstrate differences in the formation of bark water storage capacity between species and to identify factors influencing the hydrological properties of bark. The maximum water storage capacity of bark was determined under laboratory conditions by performing a series of experiments simulating rainfall and by immersing bark samples in containers filled with water. After each single experiment, the bark samples were subjected to gravity filtration in a desiccator partially filled with water. The experiments lasted from 1084 to 1389 hours, depending on the bark sample. In all the studied species, bark sampled from the thinnest trees is characterized by the highest water storage capacity expressed in mm H2O · cm-3, while bark sampled from the thickest trees - by the lowest capacity. On the other hand, bark sampled from the thickest trees is characterized by the highest water storage capacity expressed in H2O · cm-2whereas bark from the thinnest trees - by the lowest capacity. In most species tested, as the tree thickness and thus the bark thickness and the coefficient of development of the interception surface of bark increase, the sorption properties of the bark decrease with bark depth, and the main role in water retention is played by the outer bark surface. The bark of European beech is an exception because of the smallest degree of surface development and because the dominant process is the absorption of water. When examining the hydrological properties of bark and calculating its parameters, one needs to take into account the actual surface of the bark of trees. Disregarding the actual bark surface may lead to significant errors in the interpretation of research results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 1176-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klamerus-Iwan Anna ◽  
Gloor Emanuel ◽  
Sadowska-Rociek Anna ◽  
Ewa Błońska ◽  
Jarosław Lasota ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 352 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 288-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Kume ◽  
Odair J. Manfroi ◽  
Koichiro Kuraji ◽  
Nobuaki Tanaka ◽  
Toshinobu Horiuchi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 819-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G Pypker ◽  
Michael H Unsworth ◽  
Barbara J Bond

To determine how epiphytes affect the canopy hydrology of old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) forests, we measured rainfall interception by individual branches and an entire stand from March 2003 to May 2004. Epiphyte-laden branches at heights of 3.1, 24.8 and 46.5 m remained partially saturated for most of the wet season and required more than 30 mm of rainfall to become saturated. We used the mean, minimum, and individual storm methods to estimate canopy water storage capacity. Canopy water storage capacity averaged 3.1–5.0 mm, but these are probably underestimates of the maximum canopy water storage capacity, because the canopy was partially saturated prior to most storm events and the saturation of the canopy was delayed by preferential flow through the epiphyte-laden branches. Contrary to expectation, the water stored on epiphyte-laden branches after exposure to natural rainfall increased with rainfall intensity because the rough three-dimensional structure of the lichen and bryophyte mats limits water loss from raindrop splash and impedes the drainage of water from the branch. We conclude that epiphytic lichens and bryophytes increase canopy water storage capacity, prolong the time required for the canopy to saturate and dry, and alter the transfer of water through the canopy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Hembre ◽  
Abigail Meyer ◽  
Tana Route ◽  
Abby Glauser ◽  
Daniel E. Stanton

Epiphytes, including bryophytes and lichens, can significantly change the water interception and storage capacities of forest canopies. However, despite some understanding of this role, empirical evaluations of canopy and bole community water storage capacity by epiphytes are still quite limited. Epiphyte communities are shaped by both microclimate and host plant identity, and so the canopy and bole community storage capacity might also be expected to vary across similar spatial scales. We estimated canopy and bole community cover and biomass of bryophytes and lichens from ground-based surveys across a temperate-boreal ecotone in continental North America (Minnesota). Multiple forest types were studied at each site, to separate stand level and latitudinal effects. Biomass was converted into potential canopy and bole community storage on the basis of water-holding capacity measurements of dominant taxa. Bole biomass and potential water storage was a much larger contributor than outer canopy. Biomass and water storage capacity varied greatly, ranging from 9 to >900kg ha–1 and 0.003 to 0.38 mm, respectively. These values are lower than most reported results for temperate forests, which have emphasized coastal and old-growth forests. Variation was greatest within sites and appeared to reflect the strong effects of host tree identity on epiphyte communities, with conifer-dominated plots hosting more lichen-dominated epiphyte communities with lower potential water storage capacity. These results point to the challenges of estimating and incorporating epiphyte contributions to canopy hydrology from stand metrics. Further work is also needed to improve estimates of canopy epiphytes, including crustose lichens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document