scholarly journals The Critical Choice of Animal Models in Nanomedicine Safety Assessment: A Lesson Learned From Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bedőcs ◽  
János Szebeni
ILAR Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey I Everitt ◽  
Piper M Treuting ◽  
Cheryl Scudamore ◽  
Rani Sellers ◽  
Patricia V Turner ◽  
...  

AbstractIn translational research, animal models are an important tool to aid in decision-making when taking potential therapies into human clinical trials. Recently, there have been a number of papers that have suggested limited concordance of preclinical animal experiments with subsequent human clinical experience. Assessments of preclinical animal studies have led to concerns about the reproducibility of data and have highlighted the need for an emphasis on rigor and quality in the planning, conduct, analysis, and reporting of such studies. The incorporation of a wider role for the comparative pathologist using pathology best practices in the planning and conduct of animal model-based research is one way to increase the quality and reproducibility of data. The use of optimal design and planning of tissue collection, incorporation of pathology methods into written protocols, conduct of pathology procedures using accepted best practices, and the use of optimal pathology analysis and reporting methods enhance the quality of the data acquired from many types of preclinical animal models and studies. Many of these pathology practices are well established in the discipline of toxicologic pathology and have a proven and useful track record in enhancing the data from animal-based studies used in safety assessment of human therapeutics. Some of this experience can be adopted by the wider community of preclinical investigators to increase the reproducibility of animal study data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry J. Morgan ◽  
Jessica Couch ◽  
Peggy Guzzie-Peck ◽  
Douglas A. Keller ◽  
Ray Kemper ◽  
...  

An Innovation and Quality (IQ) Consortium focus group conducted a cross-company survey to evaluate current practices and perceptions around the use of animal models of disease (AMDs) in nonclinical safety assessment of molecules in clinical development. The IQ Consortium group is an organization of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with the mission of advancing science and technology. The survey queried the utilization of AMDs during drug discovery in which drug candidates are evaluated in efficacy models and limited short-duration non-Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) toxicology testing and during drug development in which drug candidates are evaluated in GLP toxicology studies. The survey determined that the majority of companies used AMDs during drug discovery primarily as a means for proactively assessing potential nonclinical safety issues prior to the conduct of toxicology studies, followed closely by the use of AMDs to better understand toxicities associated with exaggerated pharmacology in traditional toxicology models or to derisk issues when the target is only expressed in the disease state. In contrast, the survey results indicated that the use of AMDs in development is infrequent, being used primarily to investigate nonclinical safety issues associated with targets expressed only in disease states and/or in response to requests from global regulatory authorities.


2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayne C. Gad

Both the pig and the ferret are used as animal models in toxicology and drug development, with the pig having been subject to a significant increase in usage (particularly in Europe) over the last 5 years. These two species are quite different from primates and dogs, the “standard” nonrodent models. This article seeks to both survey the rationales for and extent of use of the pig and ferret, and to highlight consideration and key factors in their use in studies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry J. Morgan ◽  
Chandikumar S. Elangbam ◽  
Shawn Berens ◽  
Evan Janovitz ◽  
Allison Vitsky ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1433-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen D Westphal ◽  
Richard B Raybourne

Abstract Bioengineered crops represent an important advancement for farmers who want to avoid losses caused by insect infestations or adverse environmental conditions. However, the use of modern biotechnology has raised questions regarding the safety of bioengineered foods because of the potential allergenicity of proteins expressed by the newly introduced genes. Standard approaches for safety assessment of these foods are still evolving. Animal models have been suggested as a tool that could help evaluate the potential allergenicity of such compounds. Several investigators are developing animal models to evaluate novel proteins, but none of these have yet been validated. This article reviews the published murine models, rat and mouse in particular, and the different methods used to evaluate parameters related to allergy. It also addresses the factors involved in the development of a model. Finally, it raises some questions that should be considered by the international community so that financial and intellectual efforts can be addressed in a unified manner.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Tomohiro ◽  
Takeshi Okabe ◽  
Yasushi Kimura ◽  
Kiyoshi Kinoshita ◽  
Mitsunori Maeda ◽  
...  

In nonclinical safety studies for new drug development, healthy animals have been commonly used. However, in some cases, the use of animal models of human disease is considered to be more favorable in evaluating risks in patients. To elucidate the current status of the use of animal models for nonclinical safety assessment, an internal questionnaire from the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and surveys (questionnaire period: August 27 to September 30, 2015) of both common technical documents and review reports of approved drugs (approval period: May 1999 to May 2017) disclosed by the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency were conducted. Although there were some concerns and limitations raised, the survey results revealed that animal models have been used in nonclinical safety assessment on a case-by-case basis and that nonclinical safety studies using animal models were included in the data packages of several approved drugs in Japan. The survey results also revealed that nonclinical safety studies using animal models have become more frequent in the past few years. In almost all cases, useful information, such as signs of toxicity under disease conditions and mechanisms of toxic change, was obtained from the results of nonclinical studies using animal models. [Box: see text]


1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayne C. Gad

The intranasal route has gained increased popularity in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years, particularly because of the number of new peptide therapeutic agents. This has led to a corresponding increase in both interest in and performance of toxicity (or as they are called in the pharmaceutical industry, safety assessment) studies by this route. This report reviews the considerations specific to the intranasal route: formulations, devices for administration, special safety concerns, and animal models employed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019262332110034
Author(s):  
Radhakrishna Sura ◽  
Julie Hutt ◽  
Sherry Morgan

Nonclinical evaluation of human safety risks for new chemical entities (NCEs) is primarily conducted in conventional healthy animals (CHAs); however, in certain instances, animal models of diseases (AMDs) can play a critical role in the understanding of human health risks. Animal models of diseases may be especially important when there is a need to understand how disease conditions associated with the intended indication might impact risk assessment of NCEs or when CHAs lack the human-specific target of interest (receptor, etc). Although AMDs have potential benefits over CHAs, they also have limitations. Understanding these limitations and optimizing the AMDs of interest should be done prior to proceeding with studies that will guide development of NCE. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the major pros and cons of utilization of AMDs in nonclinical safety assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document