scholarly journals Birth-and-Death Evolution and Reticulation of ITS Segments of Metschnikowia andauensis and Metschnikowia fructicola rDNA Repeats

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Sipiczki ◽  
Eniko Horvath ◽  
Walter P. Pfliegler
EFSA Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Maria Arena ◽  
Domenica Auteri ◽  
Stefania Barmaz ◽  
Giulia Bellisai ◽  
...  

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1829
Author(s):  
Giorgia Fedele ◽  
Chiara Brischetto ◽  
Elisa González-Domínguez ◽  
Vittorio Rossi

Six commercial biocontrol agents (BCAs: Aureobasidium pullulans, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. amyloliquefaciens plantarum, B. subtilis, Metschnikowia fructicola, or Trichoderma atroviride) were applied to bunch trash that was then incubated at one of five temperatures (T, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C) and one of five relative humidity levels (RH, 60, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). After 1 to 13 days of incubation (BCA colonization period), the number of colony forming units (CFUs) was assessed. The colonization of bunch trash in response to T/RH conditions and BCA colonization period differed among the BCAs; the coefficients of variation among the BCAs ranged from 104.6 to 397.7%. Equations were developed that accounted for the combined effects of the T, RH, and BCA colonization period on BCA colonization of bunch trash. Assuming that the equations, which had an R2 > 0.87, correctly predict BCA growth under field conditions, they would help farmers select the BCA to be used for a specific application based on weather conditions at the time of treatment and in the following days. The equations would also help predict how long an early season BCA application remains effective and thereby help farmers decide whether and when a second BCA application may be needed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Liu ◽  
Michael Wisniewski ◽  
Samir Droby ◽  
Shiping Tian ◽  
Vera Hershkovitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Florian M. Freimoser ◽  
Maria Paula Rueda-Mejia ◽  
Bruno Tilocca ◽  
Quirico Migheli

Abstract Yeasts occur in all environments and have been described as potent antagonists of various plant pathogens. Due to their antagonistic ability, undemanding cultivation requirements, and limited biosafety concerns, many of these unicellular fungi have been considered for biocontrol applications. Here, we review the fundamental research on the mechanisms (e.g., competition, enzyme secretion, toxin production, volatiles, mycoparasitism, induction of resistance) by which biocontrol yeasts exert their activity as plant protection agents. In a second part, we focus on five yeast species (Candida oleophila, Aureobasidium pullulans, Metschnikowia fructicola, Cryptococcus albidus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae) that are or have been registered for the application as biocontrol products. These examples demonstrate the potential of yeasts for commercial biocontrol usage, but this review also highlights the scarcity of fundamental studies on yeast biocontrol mechanisms and of registered yeast-based biocontrol products. Yeast biocontrol mechanisms thus represent a largely unexplored field of research and plentiful opportunities for the development of commercial, yeast-based applications for plant protection exist.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
VERA HERSHKOVITZ ◽  
CLARITA BEN-DAYAN ◽  
GINAT RAPHAEL ◽  
METSADA PASMANIK-CHOR ◽  
JIA LIU ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document