scholarly journals Reproducing Human Arm Strategy and Its Contribution to Balance Recovery Through Model Predictive Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keli Shen ◽  
Ahmed Chemori ◽  
Mitsuhiro Hayashibe

The study of human balance recovery strategies is important for human balance rehabilitation and humanoid robot balance control. To date, many efforts have been made to improve balance during quiet standing and walking motions. Arm usage (arm strategy) has been proposed to control the balance during walking motion in the literature. However, limited research exists on the contributions of the arm strategy for balance recovery during quiet standing along with ankle and hip strategy. Therefore, in this study, we built a simplified model with arms and proposed a controller based on nonlinear model predictive control to achieve human-like balance control. Three arm states of the model, namely, active arms, passive arms, and fixed arms, were considered to discuss the contributions of arm usage to human balance recovery during quiet standing. Furthermore, various indexes such as root mean square deviation of joint angles and recovery energy consumption were verified to reveal the mechanism behind arm strategy employment. In this study, we demonstrate to computationally reproduce human-like balance recovery with and without arm rotation during quiet standing while applying different magnitudes of perturbing forces on the upper body. In addition, the conducted human balance experiments are presented as supplementary information in this paper to demonstrate the concept on a typical example of arm strategy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 469-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salam Nema ◽  
Piotr Kowalczyk ◽  
Ian Loram

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 2802-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars B. Oude Nijhuis ◽  
John H. J. Allum ◽  
George F. Borm ◽  
Flurin Honegger ◽  
Sebastiaan Overeem ◽  
...  

Support-surface movements are commonly used to examine balance control. Subjects typically receive a series of identical or randomly interspersed multidirectional balance perturbations and the atypical “first trial reaction” (evoked by the first perturbation) is often excluded from further analysis. However, this procedure may obscure vital information about neurophysiological mechanisms associated with the first perturbation and, by analogy, fully unexpected falls. We studied first trial reactions, aiming to clarify their directional impact on postural control and to characterize the underlying neurophysiological substrate. We instructed 36 subjects to maintain balance following support-surface rotations in six different directions. Perturbations in each direction were delivered in blocks, consisting of 10 serial stimuli. Full body kinematics, surface reactive forces, and electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded. Regardless of direction, for the very first rotation, displacement of the center of mass was 15% larger compared with the ensuing nine identical rotations ( P < 0.0001). This first trial reaction immediately reemerged whenever a new perturbation direction was introduced. First trial reactions (and near-falls) were greatest for backward-directed rotations and smallest for laterally directed rotations. This directional dependence coincided with early changes in vertical head accelerations. First trial reactions in EMG responses involved larger amplitudes in general and earlier muscle response onsets in upper body muscles. These findings show that first trial reactions are associated with significantly increased postural instability, mainly due to increased response amplitudes. Although rapid habituation occurs following presentation of identical stimuli, subjects immediately become unstable again when the perturbation direction suddenly changes. Excessive responses due to a failure to combine proprioceptive and vestibular cues effectively may explain this instability seen with first trials, particularly when falling backward.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4090
Author(s):  
Daniel Pacheco Pacheco Quiñones ◽  
Maria Paterna ◽  
Carlo De De Benedictis

Objective clinical analyses are required to evaluate balance control performance. To this outcome, it is relevant to study experimental protocols and to develop devices that can provide reliable information about the ability of a subject to maintain balance. Whereas most of the applications available in the literature and on the market involve shifting and tilting of the base of support, the system presented in this paper is based on the direct application of an impulsive (short-lasting) force by means of an electromechanical device (named automatic perturbator). The control of such stimulation is rather complex since it requires high dynamics and accuracy. Moreover, the occurrence of several non-linearities, mainly related to the human–machine interaction, signals the necessity for robust control in order to achieve the essential repeatability and reliability. A linear electric motor, in combination with Model Predictive Control, was used to develop an automatic perturbator prototype. A test bench, supported by model simulations, was developed to test the architecture of the perturbation device. The performance of the control logic has been optimized by iterative tuning of the controller parameters, and the resulting behavior of the automatic perturbator is presented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1639 ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
ChengYe Wu ◽  
Qing Wei ◽  
Cong Zhang ◽  
HongLei An

2018 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Ulonska ◽  
Daniel Waldschitz ◽  
Julian Kager ◽  
Christoph Herwig

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document