scholarly journals Time-Based Decision Making for Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Grøan ◽  
Johanna Ospel ◽  
Soffien Ajmi ◽  
Else Charlotte Sandset ◽  
Martin W. Kurz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Visual Aids ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Aid Decision ◽  
Delayed Time

Decision making in the extended time windows for acute ischemic stroke can be a complex and time-consuming process. The process of making the clinical decision to treat has been compounded by the availability of different imaging modalities. In the setting of acute ischemic stroke, time is of the essence and chances of a good outcome diminish by each passing minute. Navigating the plethora of advanced imaging modalities means that treatment in some cases can be inefficaciously delayed. Time delays and individually based non-programmed decision making can prove challenging for clinicians. Visual aids can assist such decision making aimed at simplifying the use of advanced imaging. Flow charts are one such visual tool that can expedite treatment in this setting. A systematic review of existing literature around imaging modalities based on site of occlusion and time from onset can be used to aid decision making; a more program-based thought process. The use of an acute reperfusion flow chart helping navigate the myriad of imaging modalities can aid the effective treatment of patients.

scholarly journals Visual Aids for Patient, Family, and Physician Decision Making About Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivie Tokunboh ◽  
Marta Vales Montero ◽  
Matheus Fellipe Zopelaro Almeida ◽  
Latisha Sharma ◽  
Sidney Starkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Visual Aids ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Physician Decision Making

scholarly journals A New Era of Extended Time Window Acute Stroke Interventions Guided by Imaging

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Bhavya Rehani ◽  
Simon G. Ammanuel ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Wade Smith ◽  
Daniel L. Cooke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
New Era ◽  
Current Standard Treatment ◽  
New Evidence

Ischemic stroke is one of the most debilitating and deadliest conditions worldwide. Intravenous t-PA is the current standard treatment within 4 hours after onset of symptoms. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of neurointerventional intra-arterial treatment in acute ischemic stroke. About 20% of acute ischemic stroke are classified as wake-up strokes, which falls out of the conventional treatment time window. New evidence suggests that some patients with longer time from symptom onset (up to 24 hours) may benefit from thrombectomy, probably in part due to variations in collateral circulation among individual patients. Advanced imaging can play a crucial role in identifying patients who could benefit from endovascular intervention presenting within extended treatment time windows. In this article, we review the advanced imaging algorithm for ischemic stroke workup in the multiple studies published to date and summarize the results of the clinical trials for late ischemic stroke that can be clinically useful.

scholarly journals Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110211
Author(s):  
Georgios Magoufis ◽  
Apostolos Safouris ◽  
Guy Raphaeli ◽  
Odysseas Kargiotis ◽  
Klearchos Psychogios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Late Presenters

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.

Abstract 115: Improving Door-to-Needle Times in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interim Findings From Target: Stroke Phase II

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Margueritte Cox ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Mathew J Reeves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
First Year ◽  
Rate Of Increase

Background: The benefits of intravenous tPA in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent with guidelines recommending a door-to-needle (DTN) time of ≤60 minutes. The implementation of Target: Stroke Phase I in 2010 was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients with DTN times ≤60 minutes in the US from 28.9% in 2009 to 51.0% in 2013. This study aims to assess whether these improvements in DTN times could be maintained or further improved since the launch of Target: Stroke Phase II in Q2 2014. Methods: Target: Stroke Phase II identified and disseminated additional best practice strategies, provided updated clinical decision support tools, and set new hospital recognition goals. Rates of DTN times ≤60 minutes were compared during final 4 quarters of Phase I (Q4 2012-Q3 2013) vs. Phase II (Q2 2014-Q1 2015) and overall by linear weighted regression. Results: There were 99,176 intravenous tPA treated patients from 1228 GWTG-Stroke hospitals. Patient characteristics were similar during Phase I and II. Median DTN time significantly declined from the last 4 quarters of Phase I to the first 4 quarters of Phase II: 61 minutes (IQR 47-81) to 57 minutes (IQR 43-74) (P<0.0001). The % of patients with DTN times ≤60 minutes increased from last 4 quarters of Phase I to Phase II: 49.7% to 58.5%, absolute difference +8.8%, (P<0.0001). The % of patients with DTN times ≤45 minutes also increased from Phase I to Phase II: 22.0% to 29.2%, absolute difference +7.2%, (P<0.0001). The estimated annual rate of increase in patients with DTN times ≤60 minutes was 0.6% per year pre-Target Stroke, 5.6% per year during Phase I, and 8.6% in the first year of Phase II (P<0.0001) (Figure). Conclusions: The timeliness of tPA administration is continuing to improve in GWTG-Stroke hospitals participating in Target: Stroke Phase II. Nevertheless, ongoing quality improvement efforts will be required to meet the goals of ≥75% of patients with DTN times ≤60 minutes and ≥50% of patients with DTN times ≤ 45 minutes.

Abstract TP32: Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond the 6 Hour Window

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Mao ◽  
Sameer Sharma ◽  
Hesham Masoud ◽  
Julius G Latorre
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Mr Clean ◽  
Insight Into

Background: Recent randomized trials demonstrated the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in managing acute ischemic stroke (AIS), though EVT was initiated <6 hours from time last seen well in nearly all patients, and posterior circulation strokes were excluded. Current data is limited for patients receiving EVT >6 hours, and more so for those with posterior circulation strokes. We aim to assess safety and clinical outcome of EVT in patients presenting >6 hours, with anterior or posterior circulation strokes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with AIS receiving EVT >6 hours between 2012-2015, including those with unknown time of onset and wake-up strokes. Outcomes observed include mRS at ≥90 days, rates of recanalization (TICI 2b-3), sICH and mortality. Results: A total of 34 patients were identified presenting with AIS and receiving EVT >6 hours, including 25 anterior and 9 posterior circulation strokes. See Table 1 for comparison with published data from recent EVT trials. Conclusion: Our results are not significantly different from some of the recent trials. MR CLEAN, the only trial that did not employ advanced imaging in patient selection, had similar outcomes. The IV-tPA only groups of recent trials (where data is available) also produced comparable results. It should be noted that the patients in our study all have large vessel occlusions and high NIHSS, are mostly ineligible for tPA, and thus would be expected to have very poor outcomes without treatment. Our data supports the possibility of expanding the EVT window to >6 hours, and with advanced imaging screening, better rates of functional outcome/mortality may still be achieved. DAWN and DEFUSE3 trials currently underway should provide further insight into this subject.

Management of acute ischemic stroke

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. l6983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Phipps ◽  
Carolyn A Cronin
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Stroke is the leading cause of long term disability in developed countries and one of the top causes of mortality worldwide. The past decade has seen substantial advances in the diagnostic and treatment options available to minimize the impact of acute ischemic stroke. The key first step in stroke care is early identification of patients with stroke and triage to centers capable of delivering the appropriate treatment, as fast as possible. Here, we review the data supporting pre-hospital and emergency stroke care, including use of emergency medical services protocols for identification of patients with stroke, intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke including updates to recommended patient eligibility criteria and treatment time windows, and advanced imaging techniques with automated interpretation to identify patients with large areas of brain at risk but without large completed infarcts who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy in extended time windows from symptom onset. We also review protocols for management of patient physiologic parameters to minimize infarct volumes and recent updates in secondary prevention recommendations including short term use of dual antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent stroke in the high risk period immediately after stroke. Finally, we discuss emerging therapies and questions for future research.

scholarly journals Emergency Medical Services Support for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Thrombolysis at a Primary Stroke Center

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. JCNSD.S2221
Author(s):  
Byron R. Spencer ◽  
Omar M. Khan ◽  
Bentley J. Bobrow ◽  
Bart M. Demaerschalk
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Field Assessment ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is a vital link in the overall chain of stroke survival. A Primary Stroke Center (PSC) relies heavily on the 9-1-1 response system along with the ability of EMS personnel to accurately diagnose acute stroke. Other critical elements include identifying time of symptom onset, providing pre-hospital care, selecting a destination PSC, and communicating estimated time of arrival (ETA). Purpose Our purpose was to evaluate the EMS component of thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke patient care at our PSC. Methods In a retrospective manner we retrieved electronic copies of the EMS incident reports for every thrombolysed ischemic stroke patient treated at our PSC from September 2001 to August 2005. The following data elements were extracted: location of victim, EMS agency, times of dispatch, scene, departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, recordings of time of stroke onset, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cardiac rhythm, blood glucose (BG), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Cincinnati Stroke Scale (CSS) elements, emergency medical personnel field assessment, and transport decision making. Results Eighty acute ischemic stroke patients received thrombolysis during the study interval. Eighty-one percent arrived by EMS. Two EMS agencies transported to our PSC. Mean dispatch-to-scene time was 6 min, on-scene time was 16 min, transport time was 10 min. Stroke onset time was recorded in 68%, BP, HR, and cardiac rhythm each in 100%, BG in 81%, GCS in 100%, CSS in 100%, and acute stroke diagnosis was made in 88%. Various diagnostic terms were employed: cerebrovascular accident in 40%, unilateral weakness or numbness in 20%, loss of consciousness in 16%, stroke in 8%, other stroke terms in 4%. In 87% of incident reports there was documentation of decision-making to transport to the nearest PSC in conjunction with pre-notification. Conclusion The EMS component of thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke patients care at our PSC appeared to be very good overall. Diagnostic accuracy was excellent, field assessment, decision-making, and transport times were very good. There was still room for improvement in documentation of stroke onset and in employment of a common term for acute stroke.

scholarly journals Factors that influence clinicians’ decisions to offer intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients with uncertain treatment indication: Results of a discrete choice experiment

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aoife De Brún ◽  
Darren Flynn ◽  
Laura Ternent ◽  
Christopher I Price ◽  
Helen Rodgers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase

Background Treatment with intravenous alteplase for eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke is underused, with variation in treatment rates across the UK. This study sought to elucidate factors influencing variation in clinicians’ decision-making about this thrombolytic treatment. Methods A discrete choice experiment using hypothetical patient vignettes framed around areas of clinical uncertainty was conducted with UK-based clinicians. Mixed logit regression analyses were conducted on the data. Results A total of 138 clinicians completed the discrete choice experiment. Seven patient factors were individually predictive of increased likelihood of immediately offering IV alteplase (compared to reference levels in brackets): stroke onset time 2 h 30 min [50 min]; pre-stroke dependency mRS 3 [mRS 4]; systolic blood pressure 185 mm/Hg [140 mm/Hg]; stroke severity scores of NIHSS 5 without aphasia, NIHSS 14 and NIHSS 23 [NIHSS 2 without aphasia]; age 85 [68]; Afro-Caribbean [white]. Factors predictive of withholding treatment with IV alteplase were: age 95 [68]; stroke onset time of 4 h 15 min [50 min]; severe dementia [no memory problems]; SBP 200 mm/Hg [140 mm/Hg]. Three clinician-related factors were predictive of an increased likelihood of offering IV alteplase (perceived robustness of the evidence for IV alteplase; thrombolyzing more patients in the past 12 months; and high discomfort with uncertainty) and one with a decreased likelihood (high clinician comfort with treating patients outside the licensing criteria). Conclusions Both patient- and clinician-related factors have a major influence on the use of alteplase to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke. Clinicians’ views of the evidence, comfort with uncertainty and treating patients outside the license criteria are important factors to address in programs that seek to reduce variation in care quality regarding treatment with IV alteplase. Further research is needed to further understand the differences in clinical decision-making about treating patients with acute ischemic stroke with IV alteplase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document