scholarly journals Hepatic Artery Infusion of Floxuridine in Combination With Systemic Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in Two Centers

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changli Peng ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Juxiong Xiao ◽  
Chunhui Zhou ◽  
Xiaodong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hepatic Artery ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
First Line

AimTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR) in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer liver metastases (PCLM).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data of 347 patients with PCLM who underwent first-line chemotherapy at two Chinese centers between 2012 and 2019. Propensity score matching between patients with and without HAI was performed to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) between groups were compared. HAI pump functionality was recorded.ResultsData of 258 patients (62 patients with HAI and 196 patients without HAI) were used for matching. After 1:1 ratio matching, 62 patients per group were included. The intrahepatic ORR was 66.1% in the HAI group and 22.6% in the non-HAI group (P < 0.001), and the extrahepatic ORR was 25.0 versus 28.9% (P = 0.679). The median OS was significantly longer in HAI group (14.0 versus 10.8 months, P = 0.001). Multivariance COX regression showed HAI led to a decrease in hazard ratio for death by 61.8% (HR = 0.382; 95% CI: 0.252–0.578; P< 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients without EHM, with higher intrahepatic tumor burden and with synchronous liver metastasis benefited more from HAI. Dysfunction of HAI pump occurred in 5.7% of patients during the period of follow-up.ConclusionsIn patients with PCLM, first-line treatment with HAI FUDR plus SCT resulted in higher intrahepatic response and better OS.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Lenvatinib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center, Propensity Score Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaejun Lee ◽  
Ji Won Han ◽  
Pil Soo Sung ◽  
Soon Kyu Lee ◽  
Hyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy

The comparative efficacy and safety between lenvatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still unclear. This multicenter historical cohort study enrolled 244 patients who were treated with HAIC (n = 173) or lenvatinib (n = 71) between 2012 and 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 52 patients were selected per group. Clinical outcomes and safety were compared. Objective response rate (ORR) was not different between the two groups (26.0% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.736). Before PSM, HAIC group had a higher proportion of Child-Pugh B and portal vein tumor, whereas lenvatinib group had more patients with extrahepatic metastases, which was adjusted after PSM. There were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after PSM (HAIC vs. lenvatinib, median PFS, 3.6 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.706; median OS 10.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.106). Multivariate Cox-regression showed that alpha-fetoprotein ≤ 1000 ng/mL was only associated factor for OS after PSM in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.421, P = 0.011). Subgroup analysis for patients with high tumor burden beyond the REFLECT eligibility criteria revealed that HAIC group (n = 29) had a significantly longer OS than did lenvatinib group (n = 30) (10.0 vs. 5.4 months, P=0.004). More patients in HAIC group achieved better liver function than those in lenvatinib group at the time of best responses. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events between the two groups. Therefore, lenvatinib is comparable to HAIC in terms of ORR and OS in unresectable HCC meeting REFLECT eligibility criteria.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Lenvatinib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center, Propensity Score Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4045
Author(s):  
Jaejun Lee ◽  
Ji-Won Han ◽  
Pil-Soo Sung ◽  
Soon-Kyu Lee ◽  
Hyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy

The comparative efficacy and safety between lenvatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear. This multicenter historical cohort study enrolled 244 patients who were treated with HAIC (n = 173) or lenvatinib (n = 71) between 2012 and 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 52 patients were selected per group. Clinical outcomes and safety were compared. Objective response rate (ORR) was not different between the two groups (26.0% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.736). Before PSM, the HAIC group had a higher proportion of Child-Pugh B and portal vein tumor, whereas the lenvatinib group had more patients with extrahepatic metastases, which was adjusted after PSM. There were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after PSM (HAIC vs. lenvatinib, median PFS, 3.6 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.706; median OS 10.8 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.106). Multivariate Cox-regression showed that alpha-fetoprotein ≤1000 ng/mL was only an associated factor for OS after PSM in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.421, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis for patients with a high tumor burden beyond the REFLECT eligibility criteria revealed that the HAIC group (n = 29) had a significantly longer OS than did the lenvatinib group (n = 30) (10.0 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.004). More patients in the HAIC group achieved better liver function than those in the lenvatinib group at the time of best responses. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events between the two groups. Therefore, lenvatinib is comparable to HAIC in terms of ORR and OS in unresectable HCC meeting REFLECT eligibility criteria.

scholarly journals Combined Systemic and Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Chemo-Therapy as a Liver-Directed Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis-Review of Literature and Case Discussion

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283
Author(s):  
Salman Chaudhry ◽  
Ryan C. Fields ◽  
Patrick M. Grierson ◽  
Kian-Huat Lim
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Hepatic Artery ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Colorectal Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
Systemic Treatments

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy and the second most common cause of death in the US. Liver is the most common site of colorectal metastases. About 13% of patients with colorectal cancer have liver metastasis on initial presentation and 50% develop them during the disease course. Although systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the mainstay treatment for patients with metastatic disease, for selected patients with predominant liver metastasis, liver-directed approaches may provide prolonged disease control when combined with systemic treatments. Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy is an approach which allows direct infusion of chemotherapeutic into the liver and is especially useful in the setting of multifocal liver metastases. When combined with systemic chemotherapy, HAIP improves the response rate, provides more durable disease control, and in some patients leads to successful resection. To ensure safety, use of HAIP requires multidisciplinary collaboration between interventional radiologists, medical oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons and treatment nurses. Here, we review the benefits and potential risks with this approach and provide our single institution experience on two CRC patients successfully treated with HAIP in combination with systemic chemotherapy. We provide our recommendations in adopting this technique in the current era for patient with colorectal liver metastases.

scholarly journals Comparison between Y90 Radioembolization Plus Sorafenib and Y90 Radioembolization alone in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 897
Author(s):  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
Irene Bargellini ◽  
Marina Cela ◽  
Ivan Cincione ◽  
Rodolfo Sacco
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Y90 Radioembolization ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Adjuvant sorafenib may enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in comparison to radioembolization alone. Methods: Out of 175 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with radioembolization between 2011 and 2018, after propensity score matching, two groups were compared: a group of 45 patients that underwent radioembolization while being on sorafenib (Group 1) and a second group of 90 patients that underwent radioembolization alone (Group 2). Results: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced concerning liver function and tumor burden. No significant differences in survival outcomes were identified (median overall survival 10 vs. 10 months; p = 0.711), median progression-free survival 6 vs. 7 months (p = 0.992) in Group 1 and Group 2). The objective response rate in Group 1 vs. Group 2 was 45.5% vs. 42.8% (p = 1) according to mRECIST. No differences in toxicity nor in liver decompensation rates were registered. Conclusions: The association of sorafenib does not prolong survival nor delay progression in patients treated with radioembolization. Liver toxicity does not differ among the two therapeutic schemes.

A Phase I/Ib trial of Ad-REIC in liver cancer: study protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (31) ◽  
pp. 3547-3554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astushi Oyama ◽  
Hidenori Shiraha ◽  
Daisuke Uchida ◽  
Masaya Iwamuro ◽  
Hironari Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Liver Tumor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Immortalized Cells ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the administration of adenoviral vector expressing the human-reduced expression in immortalized cells (Ad-REIC) to a liver tumor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer. A Phase I clinical study of Ad-REIC administration to a liver tumor in a patient with HCC or liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer will be conducted. The study is a single-arm, prospective, nonrandomized, noncomparative, open-label, single-center trial performed in Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. Ad-REIC will be injected into the liver tumor under ultrasound guidance. Ad-REIC administration will be repeated a total of three-times every 2 weeks. The primary end point is the dose-limiting toxicity and incidence of adverse events. The secondary end points are the objective response rate and disease control rate. This study aims to expand the indication of Ad-REIC by assessing its safety and efficacy in patients with HCC or liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer.

scholarly journals Hepatic artery infusion pump for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with liver metastasis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-339
Author(s):  
Changli Peng ◽  
Chunhui Zhou ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Haiping Li ◽  
Liangrong Shi
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Artery ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Extrahepatic Metastases ◽  
Grade 3

AbstractTo evaluate the benefits and risks of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) gemcitabine and floxuridine (FUDR) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases. HAI catheter systems were implanted under the guide of digital subtract angiography (DSA) in 16 patients with unresectable nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases. HAI gemcitabine and FUDR in combination with radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy were delivered. Disease control rate (DCR) of intrahepatic lesions is 100%, objective response rate (ORR) of intrahepatic lesions is 87.5%, including 4 patients (25%) with complete response (CR), 10 patients (62.5%) with partial response (PR) and 2 patients (12.5%) with stable disease (SD). The median overall survival (mOS) was 30 months. There was no significant difference between patients with < 9 intrahepatic lesions and patients with ≥ 9 intrahepatic lesions (31 months vs. 24 months, P = 0.562). Patients without extrahepatic metastases has longer survival than patients with extrahepatic metastases (31 months vs. 17 months, P = 0.005). In all 72 cycles of HAI, the main grade 3/4 toxicities related to HAI include: leukopenia occur in 8 cycles (11.1%), thrombocytopenia in 5 cycles (6.9%), AST/ALT elevation in 12 cycles (16.7). Catheter related complications occurred in 2 patients (12.5%). HAI gemcitabine and FUDR is effective to improve DCR of intrahepatic lesions and prolong mOS for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma liver metastases, and is associated with a relative low rate of toxicity.

Retrospective analysis of the effects of systemic chemotherapy to the ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 731-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Sekine ◽  
Tetsuya Hamaguchi ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Shoko Nakamura ◽  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ovarian Metastases ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Metastatic Sites

731 Background: Ovarian metastases from colorectal cancers are relatively rare. Since most ovarian metastases are also associated with other metastatic sites, the prognosis is reported to be poor. It is not fully understood whether the response to systemic chemotherapy of ovarian metastases differs from that to other metastatic sites. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer treated at our hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. Results: Among the 635 female patients with relapsed or metastatic colorectal cancer, 57 (9.0%) had ovarian metastases before the first-line treatment; 37 patients received palliative chemotherapy, and 20 patients were initially treated by surgical resection. In addition, 38 cases of ovarian metastases developed after the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. Overall, 95 patients (15.0%) with ovarian metastases were treated during this period. The objective response rate for systemic chemotherapy of ovarian metastases was lower than that for other metastatic sites (22.9 % vs 60.9 % for first-line, 3.4 % vs 13.6 % for second-line, 11.1 % vs 26.6 % for third-line, and 0% vs 18.2 % for fourth-line, respectively). After the initiation of chemotherapy, surgical resection of ovarian metastases was positively associated with a longer overall survival (26.8 months for cytoreductive surgery and 17.0 months for only systemic chemotherapy, p < 0.001), especially when the other metastatic sites had not progressed after chemotherapy. Conclusions: Ovarian metastases are less responsive to systemic chemotherapy compared to the extra-ovarian metastases. Our data also suggest that multi-disciplinary treatment strategy including systemic chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery might improve the prognosis of ovarian metastases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document