scholarly journals The Effect of 10 Most Common Nonurological Primary Cancers on Survival in Men With Secondary Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wenzel ◽  
Luigi Nocera ◽  
Christoph Würnschimmel ◽  
Claudia Collà Ruvolo ◽  
Zhe Tian ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis study aims to test the effect of the 10 most common nonurological primary cancers (skin, rectal, colon, lymphoma, leukemia, pancreas, stomach, esophagus, liver, lung) on overall mortality (OM) after secondary prostate cancer (PCa).Material and MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, patients with 10 most common primary cancers and concomitant secondary PCa (diagnosed 2004–2016) were identified and were matched in 1:4 fashion (age, year at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, treatment type, TNM stage) with primary PCa controls. OM was compared between secondary and primary PCa patients and was stratified according to primary cancer type, as well as according to time interval between primary cancer vs. secondary PCa diagnoses.ResultsWe identified 24,848 secondary PCa patients (skin, n = 3,871; rectal, n = 798; colon, n = 3,665; lymphoma, n = 2,583; leukemia, n = 1,102; pancreatic, n = 118; stomach, n = 361; esophagus, n = 219; liver, n = 160; lung, n = 1,328) vs. 531,732 primary PCa patients. Secondary PCa characteristics were less favorable than those of primary PCa patients (PSA and grade), and smaller proportions of secondary PCa patients received active treatment. After 1:4 matching, all secondary PCa exhibited worse OM than primary PCa patients. Finally, subgroup analyses showed that the survival disadvantage of secondary PCa patients decreased with longer time interval since primary cancer diagnosis and subsequent secondary PCa.ConclusionPatients with secondary PCa are diagnosed with less favorable PSA and grade. Even after matching for PCa characteristics, secondary PCa patients still exhibit worse survival. However, the survival disadvantage is attenuated, when secondary PCa diagnosis is made after longer time interval, since primary cancer diagnosis.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3463-3463
Author(s):  
Micah Denay McCumber ◽  
Aaron Mark Wendelboe ◽  
Janis Campbell ◽  
Kai Ding ◽  
Michele G Beckman ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Active cancer contributes a 4-7 fold increased risk for VTE; however, the incidence of VTE stratified by subpopulations of patients diagnosed with cancer, especially race/ethnicity, is uncertain. Objective: Describe the incidence of VTE among adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a cancer diagnosis in Oklahoma County, OK according to age, gender, race, and cancer type. Methods: In collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we established a population-based surveillance system for VTE in Oklahoma County, OK between April 1, 2012-March 31, 2014 to estimate the incidences of first-time and recurrent VTE events. The Commissioner of Health made VTE a reportable condition and delegated surveillance-related responsibilities to the University of Oklahoma, College of Public Health. Active surveillance involved reviewing imaging studies (e.g., chest computed tomography and compression ultrasounds of the extremities) from all inpatient and outpatient facilities in the county and collecting demographic, treatment and risk factor data on all VTE case-patients. Patients were linked to the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry. Any patient with a cancer diagnosis since 1997, excluding basal or squamous cell carcinoma, were included in the population-at-risk. Active cancer was defined as metastatic or a diagnosis ≤6 months before their VTE diagnosis. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rates (IRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which are reported per 1,000 person years (PY). Estimates with <10 events were suppressed. Results: Among all patients aged ≥18 years with a cancer diagnosis since 1997, 1.5% (n = 881) had a VTE event during the 2-year surveillance period. The overall annual age-adjusted incidence of VTE among those with cancer was 6.8 per 1,000 PY (95% CI: 5.81, 7.95). The demographic-specific incidence rates are summarized in Table 1. The VTE incidence did not significantly differ by sex. When stratified by age, annual VTE incidence was similar among those aged 18-39 years (6.1/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 4.35, 8.61), 40-59 years (6.2/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 5.4, 7.14), and 60-79 years (7.2/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 6.55, 7.90), however, the incidence was significantly higher (p<0.05) in those aged 80+ years (10.1/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 8.77, 11.61). When patients with a cancer diagnosis were stratified by race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic blacks had the highest VTE incidence (11.7/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 10.00, 13.59), followed by Hispanics (8.0/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 5.66, 11.44), non-Hispanic whites (6.9/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 6.41, 7.48), other non-Hispanic/unknown (5.8/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 3.45, 9.85), and non-Hispanic Native Americans (2.6/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 1.39, 4.79). VTE incidence was highest among those with active cancer or a history of cancer within the past three years, after which it appeared to decrease. When stratified by primary cancer type, VTE incidence was highest among those with brain cancer (16.6/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 11.06, 25.04) and lowest among those with prostate cancer (5.2/1,000 PY, 95% CI: 4.20, 6.44). As shown in Table 2, when stratified by cancer type, the incidence of VTE was higher (non-overlapping CIs) among those with active cancer compared to those with a history of cancer >6 months for several tumor types. Discussion: The incidence of VTE among those with cancer differs by race/ethnicity, with non-Hispanic blacks bearing the highest burden of disease. The risk of VTE persists and is particularly elevated up to three years after a cancer diagnosis. Disclosures Raskob: Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 295-295
Author(s):  
Simron Singh ◽  
Lorraine Lipscombe ◽  
Hadas Fischer ◽  
Jill Tinmouth ◽  
Peter Austin ◽  
...  

295 Background: The Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign aims to start conversations about unnecessary treatments and procedures in order to improve quality of care. In particular, the CWC campaign in cancer seeks to reduce interventions that are not supported by evidence and contribute to unnecessary rising costs of cancer care. We sought to document the performance of cancer screening for a new primary cancer in patients with existing metastatic cancer (CWC statement #2). Methods: We used population-based administrative health care databases from Ontario, Canada held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). The cohort included all adult residents of Ontario of eligible screening age (age 50 or older) diagnosed with incident, stage 4 (metastatic) colorectal cancer (CRC), lung, breast, or prostate cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. We examined screening tests for CRC and breast cancer in the first 1 and 3 years after diagnosis of an unrelated cancer. Given the high mortality rate in this population, screening rates were calculated using the cumulative incidence function which takes into account the competing risk of death or the occurrence of the cancer for which the patient was being screened (prior to being screened). Results: Among the 20,992 patients with stage 4 lung, breast, or prostate cancer, CRC screening within 1 year of cancer diagnosis occurred in 2.8%, 6.1%, and 13.0%, respectively. Within 3 years of diagnosis, screening rates were 3.9%, 11.9%, and 26.9%, respectively. Among the 10,034 women with metastatic CRC or lung cancer, breast cancer screening within 1 year of cancer diagnosis occurred in 8.0% and 8.7% of women, respectively. Within 3 years of diagnosis, screening rates were13.1% and 10.2%, respectively. Screening rates were higher in patients age 50-74 than those ≥75 years. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that up to one quarter of patients with metastatic cancer receive subsequent screening tests for other cancers, which are unnecessary as these patients are unlikely to benefit. Further studies are warranted to examine resource implications, potential patient and societal harms, and the future impact of the CWC campaign on this practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 319-319
Author(s):  
Grace L. Lu-Yao ◽  
William Kevin Kelly ◽  
Andrew E. Chapman

319 Background: Data from clinical trials has shown that octogenarians are at increased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM). Patients with significant comorbidities were excluded from the trials; consequently, the findings from clinical trials may not be applicable to the general population. Data on patients age 80+ with metastatic prostate cancer in the general population are limited. This population-based study assesses PCSM for metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed at age 70+. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified 418,982 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at age 70+ between 01/01/2004-12/31/13, of which 12,749 had metastatic prostate cancer. The SEER database covers about 28% of the US population from all racial/ethnic groups. We used Cox proportional hazards (PH) model to calculate cause specific hazard ratio adjusted by age, race, marital status, urban-rural classification, income level, insurance type, primary cancer therapy, stage, and diagnosis period. Results: Of the 12,749 patients, 49.4% of the patients were in their 70's and 8.3% in their 90's+, with 79.1% of patients white and 57.1% married. About 17% of these patients received radiotherapy as their primary cancer treatment. The distribution of M1 subtype is: M1a (4.2%), M1b (68.5%), M1c (22.7%), M1 Not Otherwise Specified (or NOS,4.6%). The median survival for patients with M1 prostate cancer aged 70-79, 80-89 and 90+ were 25, 15, and 7 months, respectively. Compared to patients diagnosed in their 70's, there was 38% and 109% increase in PCSM among those diagnosed at ages 80-89 and 90+ respectively (Table). Conclusions: PCSM increases among geriatric patients with metastatic prostate cancer after accounting for potential confounding factors. Further investigation is needed to shed light on the underlying biological mechanisms. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Würnschimmel ◽  
Luigi Nocera ◽  
Mike Wenzel ◽  
Claudia Collà Ruvolo ◽  
Zhe Tian ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE:To test the effect of race/ethnicity on Social Security Administration (SSA) life tables’ life-expectancy (LE) predictions in localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We hypothesized that LE will be affected by race/ethnicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We relied on the 2004-2006 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients treated with either RP or EBRT. SSA life tables were used to compute 10-year LE predictions and were compared to OS. Stratification was performed according to treatment type (RP/EBRT) and race/ethnicity (Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic/Latino and Asian). RESULTS:Of 55,383 assessable patients, 40,490 were Caucasian (RP 49.3% vs. EBRT 50.7%), 7,194 African-American (RP 41.3% vs. EBRT 50.7%), 4,716 Hispanic/Latino (RP 51.0% vs. EBRT 49.0%) and 2,983 were Asian (RP 41.6% vs. EBRT 58.4%). In both RP and EBRT patients, OS exceeded life tables’ LE predictions, except for African-Americans. However, in RP patients, the magnitude of the difference was greater than in EBRT. Moreover, in RP patients, OS of African-Americans virtually perfectly followed predicted LE. Conversely, in EBRT patients, the OS of African-American patients was worse than predicted LE. CONCLUSIONS:OS in RP and EBRT treated PCa patients is invariably better than respective life tables’ derived LE predictions for Caucasians, Hispanic/Latinos and Asians, but not for African-Americans. The recorded survival disadvantage in African-American RP and EBRT patients, and if applicable also in other African-American populations, warrants detailed consideration and possibly corrective measures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902091598
Author(s):  
Wenli Jiang ◽  
Youlutuziayi Rixiati ◽  
Bingqing Zhao ◽  
Yongcheng Li ◽  
Chuangang Tang ◽  
...  

Purpose: Evidence on the incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of bone metastases among patients with systemic malignancy is limited. This study aimed to evaluate it using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: We collected patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors deriving outside of the bone, hematologic malignancies, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma, and myeloma from the SEER database (from 2010 to 2013). The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of these systemic malignancies with bone metastases were then analyzed. Results: A total of 67,605 patients with bone metastases at cancer diagnosis were included. The highest rate of bone metastases was observed in patients with small-cell lung cancer at the time of alternative primary site cancer diagnosis. Among 226,816 cases with metastatic disease, cases with breast cancer (65.58%), and prostate cancer (89.60%) had a high incidence proportion (>10%) of identified bone metastases. Patients with additional bone metastases resulting from prostate cancer, breast cancer, and testis cancer presented the best survival time. Conclusions: Incidence and prognosis differ considerably among bone metastases with different primary malignancy sites. These results may encourage appropriate application of bone imaging.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
Andrea Salonia ◽  
Pierre I. Karakiewicz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Alberto Briganti ◽  
Tommaso C. Camerata ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
Giorgia Tema ◽  
Riccardo Lombardo ◽  
Alberto Trucchi ◽  
Mariangela Bellangino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document