scholarly journals Real-World Multicenter Experience in Tumor Debulking Prior to Blinatumomab Administration in Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Cristina Papayannidis ◽  
Federico Lussana ◽  
Nicola Fracchiolla ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
...  

Blinatumomab is an immunotherapeutic agent with dual specificity for CD3 and CD19 that is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). A steroid based pre-treatment is recommended before administering blinatumomab to patients with a high tumor burden to minimize the risk of tumor lysis syndrome, but the optimal debulking regimen and whether it can improve responses remain unclear. The present study retrospectively evaluated real-world outcomes following tumor debulking and blinatumomab infusion in R/R B-ALL adult patients treated at 7 Italian centers. Data were collected from 34 patients. The choice of the cytoreductive therapy was made by the treating clinician on an individual patient basis; regimens included chemotherapy (n=23), steroids (n=7) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or in combination (n=4). The rate of complete responses (CR) and complete minimal residual disease (MRD) responses in CR patients were 67.6% and 81% respectively, after 2 cycles of blinatumomab. Moreover, among patients with a high tumor burden 50% obtained a CR, with 89% of them also achieving a complete MRD response. Favorable responses were also obtained in patients over 50 years of age at treatment initiation. Overall, 7 of 23 patients in CR after blinatumomab underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The results of this retrospective study highlight the heterogeneity in the use of pre-blinatumomab tumor debulking in real-life clinical practice. Nonetheless, debulking pre-treatment enhanced responses to blinatumomab compared to historic studies, indicating that this strategy may help to improve outcomes for R/R B-ALL patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. S198-S199
Author(s):  
M. Bejarano ◽  
V. Fcush-Tarlovsky ◽  
K. Alvarez-Altamirano ◽  
E.A. Rosas-Gonzalez ◽  
A. Martínez Tovar ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (16) ◽  
pp. 1832-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Lafage-Pochitaloff ◽  
Laurence Baranger ◽  
Mathilde Hunault ◽  
Wendy Cuccuini ◽  
Christine Lefebvre ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple cytogenetic subgroups have been described in adult Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), often comprising small numbers of patients. In this study, we aimed to reassess the prognostic value of cytogenetic abnormalities in a large series of 617 adult patients with Ph-negative BCP-ALL (median age, 38 years), treated in the intensified Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL)-2003/2005 trials. Combined data from karyotype, DNA index, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction screening for relevant abnormalities were centrally reviewed and were informative in 542 cases (88%), allowing classification in 10 exclusive primary cytogenetic subgroups and in secondary subgroups, including complex and monosomal karyotypes. Prognostic analyses focused on cumulative incidence of failure (including primary refractoriness and relapse), event-free survival, and overall survival. Only 2 subgroups, namely t(4;11)/KMT2A-AFF1 and 14q32/IGH translocations, displayed a significantly worse outcome in this context, still observed after adjustment for age and after censoring patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission at SCT time. A worse outcome was also observed in patients with low hypodiploidy/near triploidy, but this was likely related to their higher age and worse tolerance to therapy. The other cytogenetic abnormalities, including complex and monosomal karyotypes, had no prognostic value in these intensive protocols designed for adult patients up to the age of 60 years.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5079-5079
Author(s):  
Amber C. King ◽  
Rachel Bolanos ◽  
Kelly Velasco ◽  
Huakang Tu ◽  
Faraz Zaman ◽  
...  

Introduction: Blinatumomab is a bispecific, CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager (BiTE®) that activates endogenous cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells and is FDA-approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Subgroup analyses of pivotal trials revealed lower response rates and higher risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in blinatumomab recipients with high pre-treatment tumor (B-ALL) burden. It has therefore been hypothesized that cytoreduction prior to blinatumomab initiation may improve response and reduce risk of severe CRS in patients (pts) with high baseline B-ALL burden. We therefore sought to describe pt and disease characteristics at diagnosis, patterns of pre-blinatumomab cytoreduction, and treatment outcomes in pts with high burden of R/R B-ALL treated with blinatumomab at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of adult (≥ 18 years-old) pts with morphologic R/R B-cell ALL (i.e. ≥5% BM blasts and/or radiographically evident EM disease) treated with blinatumomab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between January 2011 and March 2019 and characterized pts with ≥ 50% bone marrow (BM) blasts by morphology or ≥ 15,000 peripheral blood blasts/µL as having "high-burden" B-ALL. CRS and neurologic toxicity (NTX) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Objectives included describing cytoreductive therapy given pre-blinatumomab and determining rates of NTX and CRS (any grade and grade ≥3) and morphologic complete response (CR) following 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab. Results: We identified 14 pts with high-burden R/R B-ALL prior to blinatumomab. These pts had a median age of 52 years (range, 23 - 69 years) and median BM blasts of 73% (range, 52 - >95%, n=12 pts with evaluable BM). Of these 14 pts, 8 received cytoreductive therapy prior to blinatumomab initiation. Cytoreductive regimens included dexamethasone alone (n=4), cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone (n=2), dexamethasone and vincristine (n=1), or cyclophosphamide + vincristine + dexamethasone (n=1). One pt transitioned to hospice care prior to completing cycle 1 (C1) of blinatumomab and was considered non-evaluable for response. CR was achieved in 6 of the 13 evaluable pts, including 4 of 7 evaluable pts who received cytoreductive therapy and 2 of 6 pts who did not receive cytoreductive therapy. One pt achieved CR in BM but exhibited refractory extramedullary disease. CRS was observed during C1 of blinatumomab in 11/14 pts (grade 1, n=7; grade 2, n=3; grade 3, n=1). The pt with grade 3 CRS had received blinatumomab without cytoreductive therapy. In 4 pts, blinatumomab was temporarily discontinued for management of CRS. NTX of any grade occurred in 4/13 pts during C1, including 1 pt w/grade 3 NTX (depressed level of consciousness), and was reversible in all cases; the pt with grade 3 NTX had full resolution of symptoms following brief interruption of blinatumomab and administration of dexamethasone. Conclusions: Real-world clinical experience with blinatumomab in pts with high-burden B-ALL at a single institution suggested an efficacy and safety profile comparable to what has been reported in the overall population in clinical trials. Compared to published clinical trial experience, rates and severity of CRS following blinatumomab were similar and rates of NTX appeared slightly higher in this small series. Administration of cytoreductive therapy prior to blinatumomab for pts with high-burden B-ALL appears safe, with no additional toxicities. Larger studies will be required to assess whether pts with high-burden B-ALL treated (vs not treated) with cytoreductive therapy prior to blinatumomab exhibit significantly higher rates of CR. Disclosures King: Incyte: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board ; Astrazeneca: Other: Advisory board. Bolanos:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Velasco:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Tu:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Zaman:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document