Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background. Infertility is an emerging health issue for men. Comparative efficacy of different pharmacological interventions on male infertility is not clear. The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions among men with idiopathic male infertility. All randomized control trials evaluating the effectuality of interventions on male infertility were included for network meta-analysis (NMA) from inception to 31 April 2020, systematically performed using STATA through the random effect model. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020152891).Results. The outcomes of interest were semen and hormonal parameters. Treatment effects (p < 0.05) were estimated through WMD at the confidence interval of 95%. Upon applying exclusion criteria, n=28 RCTs were found eligible for NMA. Results from NMA indicated that consumption of supplements increases sperm concentration levels [6.26, 95% CI 3.32, 9.21] in comparison to SERMs [4.97, 95% CI 1.61, 8.32], hormones [4.14, 95% CI 1.83, 6.46], and vitamins [0.15, 95% CI −20.86, 21.15)] with placebo, whereas the use of SERMs increased percentage sperm motility [6.69, 95% CI 2.38, 10.99] in comparison to supplements [6.46, 95% CI 2.57, 10.06], hormones [3.47, 95% CI 0.40, 6.54], and vitamins [−1.24, 95% CI −11.84, 9.43] with placebo. Consumption of hormones increased the sperm morphology [3.71, 95% CI, 1.34, 6.07] in contrast to supplements [2.22, 95% CI 0.12, 4.55], SERMs [2.21, 95% CI −0.78, 5.20], and vitamins [0.51, 95% CI −3.60, 4.62] with placebo. Supplements boosted the total testosterone levels [2.70, 95% CI 1.34, 4.07] in comparison to SERMs [1.83, 95% CI 1.16, 2.50], hormones [0.40, 95% CI −0.49, 1.29], and vitamins [−0.70, 95% CI −6.71, 5.31] with placebo. SERMs increase the serum FSH levels [3.63, 95% CI 1.48, 5.79] better than hormones [1.29, 95% CI −0.79, 3.36], vitamins [0.03, 95% CI −2.69, 2.76], and supplements [−4.45, 95% CI −7.15, −1.76] in comparison with placebo.Conclusion. This review establishes that all interventions had a significantly positive effect on male infertility. Statistically significant increased sperm parameters were noted in combinations of zinc sulfate (220 mg BID), clomiphene citrate (50 mg BID), and testosterone undecanoate and CoQ10; tamoxifen citrate and FSH were shown to improve the hormonal profile in infertile males.

Download Full-text

Western Dietary Pattern Reduced Male Fertility: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Journal of Nutrition and Food Security ◽

10.18502/jnfs.v3i4.168 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Shirin Hasanizadeh ◽

Amin Salehi-Abargouei ◽

Mahdieh Hosseinzadeh

Keyword(s):

Male Infertility ◽

Dietary Patterns ◽

Significant Relationship ◽

Dietary Pattern ◽

Male Fertility ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Sperm Concentration ◽

Processed Meat

Background: Previous studies have investigated the associations between dietary patterns and male infertility, but found contradictory results. So, this meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between dietary patterns and male infertility. Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify the studies over association between dietary patterns and male infertility. The western and healthy dietary patterns were selected in this regard. The random-effect model was used to compute the summary risk estimates. Results: We found eight articles, of which five (n = 7679 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. This meta-analysis determined that the western dietary patterns containing high levels of processed, meat, high-fat dairy, and low levels of vegetables, fruit, and whole grains could significantly reduce the sperm concentration (MD = -0.07, P = 0.01). However, no significant relationship was observed between this dietary pattern and the sperm motility and morphology (MD = 0.01, P = 0.71, MD = 0.2, P = 0.39, respectively). Moreover, regarding the healthy dietary pattern, which contains high level of fruit, vegetables, whole grain, low-fat dairy, as well as low level of red meat and processed food, no significant relationship was observed (sperm concentration: MD = 0.11, P = 0.11, morphology: MD = -0.02, P = 0.42 and motility: MD = 0.35, P = 0.09). Conclusions: Findings of our meta-analysis suggested that the western dietary patterns could decrease the sperm concentration and reduce male fertility. Further prospective studies are required to confirm this result.

Download Full-text

Semen parameters in men recovered from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-912054/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sagar Tiwari ◽

Niranjan KC ◽

Sajan Thapa ◽

Anuja Ghimire ◽

Sanjeev M Bijukchhe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Sex Hormones ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Sperm Concentration ◽

Semen Parameters ◽

Sexual Hormones ◽

Effect Model ◽

Semen Volume

Abstract Background: The novel beta-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has infected millions of people globally with high risk among male then female. However, the effect of COVID-19 andrology is still a subject of dispute. We planned to analyze the overall consequences of COVID-19 on semen parameters and male sex hormones.Main text: Systematic search was performed on MEDLINE and Scopus database until June 11 2021. We included observational studies, which reported mean ± standard deviation of the semen parameters and serum sex hormones of those reproductive-aged male recovered from COVID-19 and controls who did not suffered from COVID-19. We used Random-effect model to pool the studies, as heterogeneity was present. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Q test and I2. All studies were assessed with their quality and publication bias.We assessed 966 articles for eligibility and found 7 eligible studies meeting PICO criteria. This include 934 participants with mean age 37.34 ± 10.5. Random-effect model meta-analysis showed that men recovered form COVID-19 had semen parameters less than those who had not suffered from COVID-19. The overall mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] in semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm number, and progressive sperm motility was -0.20 (-0.45, 0.05), -16.59 (-34.82, 1.65), -45.44 (-84.56, -6.31), -1.73(-8.20, 4.75) respectively. Considering sex hormones; Luteinizing hormone and prolactin was found more among those recovered with the significant MD (95% CI) of 3.47 (1.59, 5.35) and 3.21 (1.71, 4.72) respectively.Conclusion: Both the semen parameters and sexual hormones were found to be affected after infected with COVID-19. However, the mechanism for testicular involvement remains doubtful.This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021259445)

Download Full-text

The Efficacy and Safety of Letrozole or Anastrozole in The Treatment of Specific Male Infertility Patients: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1084887/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Bin Guo ◽

Jiao-jiao Li ◽

Ya-ling Ma ◽

Yu-tao Zhao ◽

Jian-guo Liu

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Male Infertility ◽

Pregnancy Rate ◽

Sperm Count ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Sperm Concentration ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Testosterone Undecanoate ◽

Testosterone Levels ◽

Infertility Patients

Abstract Background: Letrozole (LE) or anastrozole (AZ) is clinically beneficial in male infertility patients with a low testosterone-estradiol ratio (T/E2). Many scholars believe it has the potential to become one of the effective drugs to treat male infertility. But some relevant research results are different or even the opposite. Study Question: The purpose of this report is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of letrozole or anastrozole in the treatment of specific male infertility patients. Data Sources: We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang Date through August 2021 for all studies.Study Design: We conducted a systematic review with meta- analysis of the all available literature reporting sperm conventional parameters, gonadotropin and testosterone levels, and/or the pregnancy rate. Results: The total of 10 studies involving 280 patients were included. LE or AZ administration increased significantly sperm concentration, total sperm count, and serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone levels and T / E2 compared with baseline values, but E2 levels were significantly reduced. In contrast, LE or AZ did not have any significant effect on sperm concentration and motility and pregnancy rate, but improved total sperm count, sperm morphology, compared to the control group, which included studies done with Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SEMR) or testosterone undecanoate (TU). Conclusion: LE or AZ may be effective in the treatment of low T / E2 male infertility, perhaps better than other anti-estrogen or exogenous testosterone supplementation. In addition, we should pay special attention to the changes of E2 during treatment.

Download Full-text

Semen parameters in men recovered from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Middle East Fertility Society Journal ◽

10.1186/s43043-021-00089-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 26 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sagar Tiwari ◽

Niranjan KC ◽

Sajan Thapa ◽

Anuja Ghimire ◽

Sanjeev Bijukchhe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sex Hormones ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Sperm Concentration ◽

Semen Parameters ◽

The Novel ◽

Sexual Hormones ◽

Effect Model ◽

Semen Volume

Abstract Background The novel beta-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has infected millions of people globally with high risk among males than females. However, the effect of COVID-19 andrology is still a subject of dispute. We planned to analyze the overall consequences of COVID-19 on semen parameters and male sex hormones. Main text Systematic search was performed on MEDLINE and Scopus database until 11 June 2021. We included observational studies, which reported mean ± standard deviation of the semen parameters and serum sex hormones of those reproductive-aged males recovered from COVID-19 and controls who did not suffered from COVID-19. We used Random-effect model to pool the studies, as heterogeneity was present. The Q test and I2 evaluated heterogeneity. All articles were assessed with their quality and publication bias. We assessed 966 articles for eligibility and found seven eligible studies. These 7 studies included 934 participants with mean age 37.34 ± 10.5 years. Random-effect model meta-analysis showed that men who recovered from COVID-19 had semen parameters less than those who had not suffered from COVID-19. The overall mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] in semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm number, and progressive sperm motility was − 0.20 (− 0.45, 0.05) ml, − 16.59 (− 34.82, 1.65) millions/ml, − 45.44 (− 84.56, − 6.31) millions per ejaculate, − 1.73 (− 8.20, 4.75) percentage respectively. Considering sex hormones, luteinizing hormone and prolactin levels were higher among those recovered with a significant MD (95% CI) of 3.47 (1.59, 5.35)U l−1 and 3.21 (1.71, 4.72)ng ml−1 respectively. Conclusion We found that COVID-19 affects both semen parameters and sexual hormones. However, the mechanism for testicular involvement remains doubtful. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42021259445

Download Full-text

Prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in Chinese children

BMC Pediatrics ◽

10.1186/s12887-021-02706-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Shasha Guo ◽

Qiang Sun ◽

Xinyang Zhao ◽

Liyan Shen ◽

Xuemei Zhen

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Healthcare Research ◽

Chinese Children ◽

Rural Setting ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Utilization ◽

At Home

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance poses a significant threat to public health globally. Irrational utilization of antibiotics being one of the main reasons of antibiotic resistant. Children as a special group, there's more chance of getting infected. Although most of the infection is viral in etiology, antibiotics still are the most frequently prescribed medications for children. Therefore, high use of antibiotics among children raises concern about the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. This systematic review aims to measuring prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in children in China. Methods English and Chinese databases were searched to identify relevant studies evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in Chinese children (0-18 years), which were published between 2010 and July 2020. A Meta-analysis of prevalence was performed using random effect model. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and modified Jadad score was used to assess risk of bias of studies. In addition, we explored the risk factors of antibiotic utilization in Chinese children using qualitative analysis. Results Of 10,075 studies identified, 98 eligible studies were included after excluded duplicated studies. A total of 79 studies reported prevalence and 42 studies reported risk factors for antibiotic utilization in children. The overall prevalence of antibiotic utilization among outpatients and inpatients were 63.8% (35 studies, 95% confidence interval (CI): 55.1-72.4%), and 81.3% (41 studies, 95% CI: 77.3-85.2%), respectively. In addition, the overall prevalence of caregiver’s self-medicating of antibiotics for children at home was 37.8% (4 studies, 95% CI: 7.9-67.6%). The high prevalence of antibiotics was associated with multiple factors, while lacking of skills and knowledge in both physicians and caregivers was the most recognized risk factor, caregivers put pressure on physicians to get antibiotics and self-medicating with antibiotics at home for children also were the main factors attributed to this issue. Conclusion The prevalence of antibiotic utilization in Chinese children is heavy both in hospitals and home. It is important for government to develop more effective strategies to improve the irrational use of antibiotic, especially in rural setting.

Download Full-text

A meta-analysis comparing short-term weight and cardiometabolic changes between olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-87285-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Manit Srisurapanont ◽

Sirijit Suttajit ◽

Surinporn Likhitsathian ◽

Benchalak Maneeton ◽

Narong Maneeton

Keyword(s):

Weight Gain ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Dropout Rates ◽

Lower Percentage ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Weight Changes ◽

Short Term ◽

Short Term Treatment

AbstractThis study compared weight and cardiometabolic changes after short-term treatment of olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine. Eligible criteria for an included trial were ≤ 24 weeks, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine treatments in patients/healthy volunteers and reported weight or cardiometabolic outcomes. Three databases were searched on October 31, 2020. Primary outcomes included weight changes and all-cause dropout rates. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were computed and pooled using a random-effect model. This meta-analysis included four RCTs (n = 1195). The heterogeneous data revealed that weight changes were not significantly different between olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine groups (4 RCTs, SDM = − 0.19, 95% CI − 0.45 to 0.07, I2 = 75%). The whole-sample, pooled RR of all-cause dropout rates (4 RCTs, RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.23, I2 = 0%) was not significant different between olanzapine/samidorphan and olanzapine groups. A lower percentage of males and a lower initial body mass index were associated with the greater effect of samidorphan in preventing olanzapine-induced weight gain. Current evidence is insufficient to support the use of samidorphan to prevent olanzapine-induced weight gain and olanzapine-induced cardiometabolic abnormalities. Samidorphan is well accepted by olanzapine-treated patients.

Download Full-text

Low versus high level of physical resemblance in simulation for the acquisition of basic surgical skill: a meta-analysis

BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning ◽

10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000797 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. bmjstel-2020-000797

Author(s):

Fabrizio Consorti ◽

Gianmarco Panzera

Keyword(s):

Undergraduate Students ◽

Scoring System ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Surgical Skill ◽

Undergraduate Medical Students ◽

Study Selection ◽

High Level ◽

Physical Resemblance

BackgroundMany studies explored the use of simulation in basic surgical education, with a variety of devices, contexts and outcomes, with sometimes contradictory results.ObjectivesThe objectives of this meta-analysis were to focus the effect that the level of physical resemblance in a simulation has on the development of basic surgical skill in undergraduate medical students and to provide a foundation for the design and implementation of a simulation, with respect to its effectiveness and alignment with the learning outcomes.Study selectionWe searched PubMed and Scopus database for comparative randomised studies between simulations with a different level of resemblance. The result was synthesised as the standardised mean difference, under a random effect model.FindingsWe selected 12 out of 2091 retrieved studies, reporting on 373 undergraduate students (mean of subjects 15.54±6.89). The outcomes were the performance of simple skills and the time to complete a task. Two studies reported a scoring system; seven studies reported time for a task; and three studies reported both. The total number of measures included in the meta-analysis was 456 for score and 504 for time. The pooled effect size did not show any significant advantage in a simulation of a high level of physical resemblance over a lower level, both for the scoring system (−0.19, 95% CI −0.44 to 0.06) and for time (−0.14, 95% CI −0.54 to 0.27).ConclusionSimulations with a low level of physical resemblance showed the same effect as the simulation using a higher level of resemblance on the development of basic surgical skills in undergraduate students.

Download Full-text

Alteration of Postural Balance in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽

10.3390/diagnostics11010127 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 127

Author(s):

David Núñez-Fuentes ◽

Esteban Obrero-Gaitán ◽

Noelia Zagalaz-Anula ◽

Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera ◽

Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Postural Balance ◽

Fibromyalgia Syndrome ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Functional Balance ◽

Sensory Organization ◽

Effect Model

Balance problems are one of the most frequent symptoms in patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS). However, the extent and nature of this balance disorder are not known. The objective of this work was to determine the best evidence for the alteration of postural balance in patients with FMS and analyze differences with healthy controls. To meet this objective, a systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. A bibliographical search was carried out in PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and SciELO. Observational studies that assessed postural balance in patients with FMS compared to healthy subjects in baseline conditions, were selected. In a random-effect model, the pooled effect was calculated with the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Nineteen studies reporting data of 2347 participants (95% female) were included. FMS patients showed poor balance with a large effect on static (SMD = 1.578; 95% CI = 1.164, 1.992), dynamic (SMD = 0.946; 95% CI = 0.598, 1.294), functional balance (SMD = 1.138; 95% CI = 0.689, 1.588) and on balance confidence (SMD = 1.194; 95% CI = 0.914, 1.473). Analysis of the Sensory Organization Test showed large alteration of vestibular (SMD = 1.631; 95% CI = 0.467, 2.795) and visual scores (SMD = 1.317; 95% CI = 0.153, 2.481) compared to healthy controls. Patients with FMS showed worse scores for different measures of postural balance compared to healthy controls. Concretely, FMS patients appear to have poor vestibular and visual scores with a possible somatosensory dependence.

Download Full-text

The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment among Chinese People: A Meta-Analysis

Neuroepidemiology ◽

10.1159/000512597 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 55 (2) ◽

pp. 79-91

Author(s):

Yan Deng ◽

Siqi Zhao ◽

Guangwen Cheng ◽

Jiajia Yang ◽

Benchao Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Diagnostic Criteria ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Internal Validity ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Chinese Elderly ◽

Pooled Prevalence

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) induced the majority number of dementia patients. The prevalence of MCI in China varied across studies with different screening tools and diagnostic criteria. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled MCI prevalence among the population aged 55 years and older in China. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBMdisc were searched for studies on prevalence of MCI among Chinese elderly between January 1, 1980, and February 10, 2020. The quality assessment was conducted via external validity, internal validity, and informativity, the pooled prevalence was calculated through the random-effect model, and the homogeneity was evaluated by Cochran’s Q test and I2. Results: Fifty-three studies with 123,766 subjects were included. The pooled prevalence of MCI among Chinese elderly was 15.4% (95% CI: 13.5–17.4%). Subgroup analyses indicated that the prevalence calculated with different screening tools was 20.2% (95% CI: 15.1–25.9%) for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and 13.0% (95% CI: 10.7–15.5%) for Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). According to different diagnostic criteria, the prevalence was 14.8% (95% CI: 12.2–17.6%) for Petersen criteria, 15.0% (95% CI: 12.7–17.5%) for DSM-IV, and 21.2% (95% CI: 17.5–25.2%) for Chinese Expert Consensus on Cognitive Impairment (CECCI). Besides, women, older adults, illiterate people, rural residents, and those who lived with unhealthy lifestyles and morbidity showed higher prevalence. Conclusions: The prevalence of MCI in China was 15.4%, which varied by demographics, lifestyles, morbidity, screening tools, and diagnostic criteria. In further studies, screening tools and diagnosis criteria should be considered when estimating MCI prevalence.

Download Full-text

Magnitude and determinants of neural tube defect in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth ◽

10.1186/s12884-021-03848-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Daniel Atlaw ◽

Yohannes Tekalegn ◽

Biniyam Sahiledengle ◽

Kenbon Seyoum ◽

Damtew Solomon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Neural Tube ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Folic Acid Supplementation ◽

Maternal Exposure ◽

X Ray ◽

Effect Model ◽

Pooled Prevalence

Abstract Background Neural tube defects (NTDs) are a group of disorders that arise from the failure of the neural tube close between 21 and 28 days after conception. About 90% of neural tube defects and 95% of death due to these defects occurs in low-income countries. Since these NTDs cause considerable morbidity and mortality, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of NTDs in Africa. Methods The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO number: CRD42020149356). All major databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, African Journals Online (AJOL), and Google Scholar search engine were systematically searched. A random-effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of NTDs in Africa, and Cochran’s Q-statistics and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity between included studies. Publication bias was assessed using Begg ’s tests, and the association between determinant factors and NTDs was estimated using a random-effect model. Results Of the total 2679 articles, 37 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of NTDs in Africa was 50.71 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 48.03, 53.44). Folic acid supplementation (AOR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19–0.85), maternal exposure to pesticide (AOR: 3.29; 95% CI: 1.04–10.39), mothers with a previous history of stillbirth (AOR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.99–5.65) and maternal exposure to x-ray radiation (AOR 2.34; 95% CI: 1.27–4.31) were found to be determinants of NTDs. Conclusions The pooled prevalence of NTDs in Africa was found to be high. Maternal exposure to pesticides and x-ray radiation were significantly associated with NTDs. Folic acid supplementation before and within the first month of pregnancy was found to be a protective factor for NTDs.

Download Full-text