scholarly journals Comprehensive Treatment of Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Lenvatinib Followed by Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanfang Liu ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Wenguang Zhang ◽  
Huibin Lu ◽  
Zhanguo Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Tumour Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Aim: This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 22 patients with advanced HCC from March 2018 to December 2019. All the patients received comprehensive treatment with TACE plus lenvatinib followed by camrelizumab. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Treatment response and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the whole cohort were 68.2 and 100% at the first month and 72.7 and 95.5% at the third month, respectively. The median OS was 24 months (95% CI, 20.323–27.677 months), and the median PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI, 8.846–13.954 months). The majority of treatment-related adverse reactions were mild or moderate, except for 4 that developed to grade 3–4 (3 reactions of grade 3, 1 reaction of grade 4). No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred.Conclusion:Trans-arterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib and camrelizumab shows good results incontrolling tumour progression and prolonging median OS in patients with advanced HCC.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

A phase II study of anti–PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus FOLFOX4 or GEMOX systemic chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary tract cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4074-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jianping Xiong ◽  
Zhenggang Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

4074 Background: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients (pts) have very limited treatment options. Considering the immunogenic effects of oxaliplatin, combination of camrelizumab with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy might bring a better clinical benefit. Methods: That was an ongoing single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial. Advanced HCC or BTC pts naive to systemic treatment were given camrelizumab (3 mg/kg i.v., every 2 weeks) plus typical FOLFOX4 (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) or GEMOX (gemcitabine and oxaliplatin) regimen. Primary endpoints were confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 and safety per CTC AE 4.03. Results: From Apr 27, 2017 to Oct 31, 2018, 34 Chinese HCC and 47 BTC pts were treated, in which 27 (79.4%) HCC and 17 (36.2%) BTC pts were HBV-infected. In the 34 evaluable HCC pts, confirmed ORR was 26.5% and disease control rate (DCR) was 79.4%. Median time to response (TTR) was 2.0 mo (range 1.5–5.7). Six of the 9 responses were still ongoing, and median duration of response (DoR) was not reached (range 3.3–11.5+ mo). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 mo. At data cutoff, 61.7% BTC pts were still receiving study drug. In the 43 evaluable BTC pts, with a median duration of exposure of 2.9 mo, confirmed ORR was 7.0% and DCR was 67.4%. Median TTR was 1.9 mo (range 1.8–2.1). Median DoR was 5.3 mo (range 3.7–7.0). Median PFS was not reached yet. Median estimates for overall survival in both HCC and BTC were also not reached. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 85.3% of HCC and 57.4% of BTC pts, most commonly neutrophil count decreased (HCC: 55.9%; BTC: 29.8%), white blood cell decreased (HCC: 38.2%; BTC: 21.3%), platelet count decreased (HCC: 17.6%; BTC: 12.8%), and anaphylaxis (BTC: 19.1%). Only one BTC pt stopped treatment due to a TRAE (recurrent Grade 2 anemia related to FOLFOX4). Grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred only in 5.9% of HCC (lipase increased) and 3.8% of BTC pts (anaphylaxis). Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus FOLFOX4 or GEMOX chemotherapy was tolerable and might offer a new promising choice for advanced HCC and BTC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03092895.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Plus Anti-PD1 Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Real-World Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Xu Li ◽  
Wen-Xiang Deng ◽  
Shi-Ting Huang ◽  
Xiao-Feng Lin ◽  
Mei-Ying Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Sorafenib Group ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background: The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than sorafenib or TACE monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) plus monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) versus TACE plus sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC.Methods: Patients with advanced HCC who treated with RT plus anti-PD1 and TACE plus sorafenib were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and OS were calculated to assess the antitumor response and the treatment-related adverse events to the safety.Results: Between January 2018 to March 2021, 37 patients underwent RT plus anti-PD1 and 41 patients underwent TACE plus sorafenib. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The ORR and DCR were significantly higher in the RT+PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group according to RECIST 1.1 (54.05% vs 12.20%, P < 0.001; 70.27% vs 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively) and according to mRECIST (56.76% vs 31.71%, P = 0.039; 70.27% vs 46.37%, P = 0.041; respectively). RT plus anti-PD1 provided significantly better PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.30-0.86; p=0.017) than TACE plus sorafenib. Moreover, patients with RT plus anti-PD1 had significantly higher 3-, 6-, and 9-month OS rates than those with TACE plus sorafenib(97.3% vs 92.30%, P < 0.001; 91.89% vs 68.60%, P < 0.001; 75.5% vs 60.60%, P < 0.001; respectively). The median OS was more favorable 17.4 months for the RT+PD1 group and 11.9 months for the TACE plus sorafenib group. No treatment-related death was observed. Grade 3 or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred significantly less in patients in the RT+PD1 group than the TACE plus sorafenib group (29.7% vs 75.6%, p < 0.001), and all TRAEs were manageable.Conclusions: In this real-world study, RT plus anti-PD1 showed significantly promising efficacy and manageable safety than TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. The study provides evidence on a new therapeutic method in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
Roland Ching-Yu Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Progression ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Advanced Hcc

330 Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in advanced HCC patients with progression on prior ICIs. Methods: Advanced HCC patients with documented tumour progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analysed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range 51-83). 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range 2.76-30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% C.I. 1.61-4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% C.I. 3.99-17.8) and the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6% respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001 respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced grade 3 or above TRAEs. Conclusions: Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumour activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of the Arsenic Trioxide/Lipiodol Emulsion in the Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zhaonan Li ◽  
Quanjing Chen ◽  
Wenguang Zhang ◽  
Guangyan Si ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Lipiodol Emulsion ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Purpose. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the arsenic trioxide (ATO)/lipiodol emulsion in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods. From December 2015 to February 2017, a total of 87 patients were consecutively enrolled and underwent ATO-TACE (aTACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced HCC. The treatment response and adverse events were assessed at the first month and third month after aTACE therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events were also analyzed. Results. 87 patients (57 men; 30 women) were enrolled in the present study. Compared to that at the pre-aTACE examination, the levels of AST and ALT were elevated at the first week after procedure (65.84 U/L ± 22.93 U/L vs. 54.15 U/L ± 19.60 U/L, p = 0.032 ; 63.44 U/L ± 22.50 U/L vs. 51.60 U/L ± 13.89 U/L, p = 0.027 , respectively). Most of the adverse events were grade 1 or 2 according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE). Of the exception, 4 persons (2%) did have grade 3 hand-foot skin reactions, 1 (1%) had grade 3 diarrhea, 1 (1%) had grade 3 hypertension, and 3 (3%) had grade 3 proteinuria and forced to reduce the dose of apatinib by half. The survival analysis of the combination with aTACE and apatinib therapy found that the median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.543–11.857), and the median OS was 23.300 months (95% CI: 20.833–25.767). Additionally, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression revealed that the tumor burden (≤50%) and the patients without portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) significantly impacted the patient’s PFS and OS and were related to better survival. Conclusion. aTACE combined with apatinib is a safe and promising treatment approach for patients with advanced HCC. Additionally, tumor burden (≤50%) and the patients without PVTT are associated with better PFS and OS.

scholarly journals Regorafenib Combined With Sintilimab Versus Regorafenib as Second-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjun Huang ◽  
Yongjian Guo ◽  
Wensou Huang ◽  
Zining Xu ◽  
Liteng Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab (rego-sintilimab) as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who failed prior sorafenib or lenvatinib.Methods: This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received rego-sintilimab (rego-sintilimab group) or regorafenib alone (regorafenib group) as second-line treatment from January 2019 to December 2020. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Results: Eighty-three patients were included: 48 received rego-sintilimab and 35 received regorafenib. Rego-sintilimab group had higher ORR (33.3% vs 14.3%, P =.049), longer PFS (median, 5.1 vs 3.0 months; P =.001), and better OS (median, 13.3 vs 9.1 months; P =.001) than regorafenib group. Regorafenib alone, Child-Pugh B, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >3.5 were independent prognostic factors for poor OS in uni- and multi-variable analyses. Subgroup analyses showed that, in patients with Child-Pugh A (16.4 vs 11.5 months; P =.005), Child-Pugh B (8.8 vs 6.4 months; P =.032), or NLR ≤3.5 (16.3 vs 11.5 months; P =.012), rego-sintilimab group had significantly better median OS than regorafenib group, whereas median OS was not significantly different between the two groups in patients with NLR >3.5 (8.4 vs 7.0 months; P =.288). The incidences of grade 3/4 adverse events were similar between the two groups (39.4% vs 34.1%; P =.445).Conclusion: Rego-sintilimab was tolerable and led to better OS than regorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced HCC patients, especially in those with NLR ≤3.5.

scholarly journals Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gerry Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Cho Wing Li ◽  
Roland Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Advanced Hcc

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51–83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76–30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced Grade 3 or above TRAEs.ConclusionsIpilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

scholarly journals Avelumab in Combination with Axitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the Phase 1b VEGF Liver 100 Trial

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (<i>n</i> = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (<i>n</i> = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (<i>n</i> = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.

DEDUCTIVE: A study of tivozanib in combination with durvalumab in subjects with untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma—Phase Ib results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 294-294
Author(s):  
Renuka V. Iyer ◽  
Daneng Li ◽  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Alexandria T. Phan ◽  
Michael N. Needle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Improve Patient

294 Background: A recent ph3 study combining bevacizumab (VEGF-A Mab) with atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) has shown significant improvements in OS and PFS demonstrating that a combination of VEGF and PDL1 inhibition can improve patient outcomes over sorafenib. Tivozanib (T, a potent and selective VEGFR 1, 2 & 3 TKI) and durvalumab (D, a PD-L1 antibody) have both demonstrated single agent activity in HCC and have been combined safely with other therapies. T blocks all three VEGF receptors, and when combined with a PD-L1 inhibitor may improve patient outcomes. The ph1 portion of this study combines T with D to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and provide preliminary safety and efficacy data. Methods: Major eligibility criteria are adults with documented advanced HCC, Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG 0 or 1, creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min. Major exclusion criteria are co-infection with HBV and HCV and significant organ dysfunction. The starting dose is the combination of T 1 mg orally for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment and D 1500 mg intravenously every 28 days. A DLT is generally defined as the occurrence of any Grade ≥3 immune or non-immune adverse event (AE) in Cycle 1 that is at least possibly related to the investigational regimen other than any grade of vitiligo or alopecia or Grade 3 controllable hypertension in cycle 1. The primary objective is to establish the RP2D and the safety and tolerability for this combination in patients with advanced HCC. Patients will be treated until progression of disease, unacceptable side effects, or death. Outcome measures will be AEs per CTCAE v.5 and cross-sectional imaging performed every 8 weeks. Results: Seven patients were enrolled in phase I. Six were male; the median age was 75 (range 40 to 82). One patient had mild elevation of LFTs and did not complete the 21-day course of T and was replaced. No patient experienced a >=grade 3 AE in cycle 1. The most common AEs, each seen in two of seven patients, were anorexia, cough, diarrhea, dysphonia, fatigue, hypertension, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Two of seven have achieved a partial response. Conclusions: The combination of T with D in patients with untreated advanced HCC is well tolerated. The RP2D for the combination is T 1 mg orally for 21 days on treatment followed by 7 days off treatment and D 1500 mg intravenously every 28 days. In the phase II portion of the study an additional 30 patients will be treated at the RP2D. Secondary objectives are to assess the objective response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03970616.

Sorafenib versus cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, single-institution study.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 339-339
Author(s):  
S. Lee ◽  
S. Yoon ◽  
S. Shin ◽  
H. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Sorafenib Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Novel Target

339 Background: Prior to the sorafenib era, most of the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients had to rely only on conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. But the introduction of sorafenib in 2008 had given HCC patients additional option for their treatment. However, given that sorafenib has been a nonreimbursable drug under the Korea public health system, most of treatment strategy has largely been determined by patients' affordability of the drug rather than by difference in efficacy and toxicity of the two treatments. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of the two treatments by observing HCC patients. Methods: From January 2002 to December 2009, 173 patients with unresectable HCC had been retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 44 (25.4%) had been treated with sorafenib and the remaining had received cytotoxic chemotherapy. We evaluated objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles. Results: The median OS of sorafenib group was 23.0 weeks (95% CI, 8.1-37.9) vs. 43.6 weeks (95% CI, 34.0-37.9) for cytotoxic chemotherapy group. The median PFS for sorafenib group was 11.1 weeks (95% CI, 6.5-15.8) versus 12.4 weeks (95% CI, 8.1-16.7) for cytotoxic chemotherapy group. However, the difference in both findings had not been statistically significant (p=0.105 and p=0.496, respectively). ORR and DCR for sorafenib group were 2.3% and 52.3% versus 6.2% and 43.4% for cytotoxic chemotherapy group, respectively. Patients treated with chemotherapy had shown higher frequencies of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 19.7%, (vs. 0% for sorafenib). However, the group with sorafenib had reported a higher rate of all grade dermatologic toxicities such as hand-foot skin reaction, rash and pruritus. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that efficacy of conventional chemotherapy is not inferior to that of sorafenib. Further research including novel target agent and cytotoxic chemotherapy is needed to improve clinical outcomes for advanced HCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document