scholarly journals Update on Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer With Non-BRCA Mutations

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Xu ◽  
Zhengyu Li

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) has become an important maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer after surgery and cytotoxic chemotherapy, which has changed the disease management model of ovarian cancer, greatly decreased the risk of recurrence, and made the prognosis of ovarian cancer better to certain extent. The three PARPis currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of ovarian cancer are Olaparib, Niraparib and Rucaparib. With the incremental results from new clinical trials, the applicable population of PARPi for ovarian cancer have expanded to population with non-BRCA mutations. Although BRCA mutated population are still the main beneficiaries of PARPi, recent clinical trials indicated PARPis’ therapeutic potential in non-BRCA mutated population, especially in homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) positive population. However, lack of unified HRD status detection method poses a challenge for the accurate selection of PARPi beneficiaries. The reversal of homologous recombination (HR) function during the treatment will not only cause resistance to PARPis, but also reduce the accuracy of the current method to determine HRD status. Therefore, the development of reliable HRD status detection methods to determine the beneficiary population, as well as rational combination treatment are warranted. This review mainly summarizes the latest clinical trial results and combination treatment of PARPis in ovarian cancer with non-BRCA mutations, and discusses the application prospects, including optimizing combination therapy against drug resistance, developing unified and accurate HRD status detection methods for patient selection and stratification. This review further poses an interesting topic: the efficacy and safety in patients retreated with PARPis after previous PARPi treatment---“PARPi after PARPi”.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey N. Weitzel ◽  
Jessica Clague ◽  
Arelis Martir-Negron ◽  
Raquel Ogaz ◽  
Josef Herzog ◽  
...  

PurposeTo determine the prevalence and type of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations among Hispanics in the Southwestern United States and their potential impact on genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA).Patients and MethodsHispanics (n = 746) with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were enrolled in an institutional review board–approved registry and received GCRA and BRCA testing within a consortium of 14 clinics. Population-based Hispanic breast cancer cases (n = 492) enrolled in the Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry, negative by sequencing for BRCA mutations, were analyzed for the presence of the BRCA1 ex9-12del large rearrangement.ResultsDeleterious BRCA mutations were detected in 189 (25%) of 746 familial clinic patients (124 BRCA1, 65 BRCA2); 21 (11%) of 189 were large rearrangement mutations, of which 62% (13 of 21) were BRCA1 ex9-12del. Nine recurrent mutations accounted for 53% of the total. Among these, BRCA1 ex9-12del seems to be a Mexican founder mutation and represents 10% to 12% of all BRCA1 mutations in clinic- and population-based cohorts in the United States.ConclusionBRCA mutations were prevalent in the largest study of Hispanic breast and/or ovarian cancer families in the United States to date, and a significant proportion were large rearrangement mutations. The high frequency of large rearrangement mutations warrants screening in every case. We document the first Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del), which, along with other recurrent mutations, suggests the potential for a cost-effective panel approach to ancestry-informed GCRA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor

Bevacizumab (Avastin) is an approved treatment option by the European Medicines Agency (1) for more than a quarter billion women in the European Union, and despite having its indication withdrawn by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011 is still utilized in clinical trials in the United States (2, 3). We mined published microarray data (4) from the PROMIX trial to understand in an unbiased fashion genes most transcriptionally perturbed by bevacizumab administration and how this interacted with a standard anthracycline and taxane chemotherapeutic regimen, epirubicin and docetaxel. We report here the differential and increased expression of the hepatic leukemia factor (5, 6) in the primary tumors of women treated with bevacizumab for breast cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Ilary Ruscito ◽  
Susana Banerjee

It has been well established that failure in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) mechanism for DNA double strand repair causes genomic instability and increases the risk for cell transformation. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are currently known to be the most frequent responsible for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) but HRD can occur through other processes including mutations and epigenetic aberration of HRD-related genes and the indirect interaction of BRCA proteins with other proteins involved in the DNA repair. Current efforts in this field are concentrating in identifying an HRD molecular signature able to predict response to chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors, thus allowing to extend novel targeted treatments beyond germline BRCA mutated ovarian cancer patients. The aim of this brief review is to summarize the current evidence regarding HRD beyond germline BRCA mutations and therapeutic approaches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1586-1586
Author(s):  
Kirsten M Timms ◽  
Gordon B. Mills ◽  
Michael Perry ◽  
Alexander Gutin ◽  
Jerry Lanchbury ◽  
...  

1586 Background: Clinical trials have explored the utility of various genomic instability (GI) scores or gene panels to assess deficiencies in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway and support PARP inhibitor use in ovarian cancer; however, these methods of assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be equivalent. The myChoice HRD test is the only analytically and clinically validated, FDA-approved HRD test that includes BRCA1/2 mutation status and three measures of GI. We compared the proportion of patients identified as candidates for PARP inhibitor use by two measures of HRD [percent loss of heterozygosity (%LOH), 11-gene panel] to myChoice HRD. Methods: Whole-genome SNP analysis was used to reconstruct ovarian tumor genomic profiles to calculate the myChoice HRD score and %LOH in 2 cohorts (clinical laboratory cohort, N = 3,278; SCOTROC4 trial, N = 248). Mutation screening for a set of 11 genes in the HR pathway ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D) was performed for a subset of tumors from the SCOTROC trial (n = 187). Samples were considered positive if the myChoice HRD score was above the threshold (threshold scores of 42 and 33 were assessed), %LOH above the threshold (16%), or a pathogenic variant in one of the 11 HR genes. The correlation between positive results from %LOH and the 11-gene panel were compared to myChoice HRD. Percent positive agreement (PPA) was the proportion of positive test results from myChoice HRD that were also positive by %LOH or the 11-gene panel. Results: The table shows the correlation and PPA between myChoice HRD, %LOH, and the 11-gene panel. Overall, 19%-61% of patients identified as positive by myChoice HRD would have been missed by %LOH or the 11-gene panel in these two cohorts. Conclusions: These data show that HRD tests used in published and ongoing clinical trials are not equivalent, and they should not be considered interchangeable in predicting PARP inhibitor response in clinical practice. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19399-e19399
Author(s):  
Courtney Penn ◽  
Melissa Wong ◽  
Christine S. Walsh

e19399 Background: The recent SOLO1, PRIMA, and PAOLA trials all reported positive efficacy results, making it difficult to determine optimal upfront maintenance therapy for patients with primary, advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the maintenance strategies outlined in these trials for BRCA-positive patients, homologous-recombination deficient patients without a BRCA mutation (HRD-positive), and homologous-recombination proficient (HRD-negative) patients. Methods: Three decision analysis models were developed, one for each mutation status. We evaluated olaparib (SOLO1), olaparib/bevacizumab (PAOLA), bevacizumab alone (PAOLA), and niraparib (PRIMA) maintenance strategies. Base case 1 assessed olaparib vs olaparib/bevacizumab vs bevacizumab vs niraparib vs no maintenance therapy in BRCA-positive patients. Base cases 2 and 3 assessed olaparib/bevacizumab vs bevacizumab vs niraparib vs no maintenance therapy in HRD-positive and HRD-negative patients, respectively. Time horizon was 24 months. Costs, measured in U.S. dollars, were estimated from Medicare claims, wholesale acquisition prices, and previously published sources. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were in dollars per progression-free life-year saved (PF-LYS). One-way sensitivity analyses were performed varying drug cost and progression-free survival. Results: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/PF-LYS, none of the drug maintenance strategies could be considered cost effective compared with observation. In BRCA-positive patients (base case 1), olaparib monotherapy was the most cost-effective strategy, yielding an ICER of $181,059/PF-LYS. The third-party payer cost per 28-day supply of olaparib would need to be reduced from approximately $17,000 to $9,200 to be considered cost effective compared with observation. In HRD-positive patients (base case 2) and HRD-negative patients (base case 3), bevacizumab monotherapy was the most cost-effective option, with ICERs of $326,491/PF-LYS and $253,937/PF-LYS respectively. Conclusions: At current costs, maintenance therapy for primary ovarian cancer is not cost effective, regardless of mutation status. In BRCA-positive women, lowering the cost of olaparib may make it cost effective compared with observation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor

Bevacizumab (Avastin) is an approved treatment option by the European Medicines Agency (1) for more than a quarter billion women in the European Union, and despite having its indication withdrawn by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011 is still utilized in clinical trials in the United States (2, 3). We mined published microarray data (4) from the PROMIX trial to understand in an unbiased fashion genes most transcriptionally perturbed by bevacizumab administration and how this interacted with a standard anthracycline and taxane chemotherapeutic regimen, epirubicin and docetaxel. We report here the induction of the myosin heavy chain MYH11 (5) in the primary tumors of women with breast cancer treated with bevacizumab.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor

Bevacizumab (Avastin) is an approved treatment option by the European Medicines Agency (1) for more than a quarter billion women in the European Union, and despite having its indication withdrawn by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011 is still utilized in clinical trials in the United States (2, 3). We mined published microarray data (4) from the PROMIX trial to understand in an unbiased fashion genes most transcriptionally perturbed by bevacizumab administration and how this interacted with a standard anthracycline and taxane chemotherapeutic regimen, epirubicin and docetaxel. We report here the striking induction of the SRY-box morphogen transcription factor SOX17 (5-7) in the primary tumors of women with breast cancer treated with bevacizumab.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5553-5553
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Dov Hershkovizh ◽  
Eliya Shachar ◽  
Lyri Adar ◽  
Miriam R. Brezis ◽  
...  

5553 Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and the most common cause of gynecologic cancer mortality in the United States. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), including the BRCA mutations, are found in 50% of OC tumors. Next generation sequencing (NGS) provides understanding the underlying molecular and genetic patterns to improve OC treatment. This study examines the prognostic and predictive biomarkers identified with NGS in hopes to improve OC patients outcomes. Methods: The patient cohort included 890 consecutive OC patients treated between 2002 and 2020,at the Tel-Aviv Medical Center. We retrospectively evaluated patients with histopathologically confirmed OC. Cox models were used to analyze the clinical impact of various mutations and biomarkers among OC patients with and without FoundationOne CDx NGS testing, by assessing overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and physicians' timing preferences for referral to NGS testing. Results: Among the 890 OC patients, 103 (11.57%) completed NGS molecular testing. The median OS among patients with and without NGS testing, adjusted for age, stage and recurrence status, was 73.36 and 68.50 months, respectively (P =.02). The median PFS was 17.23 and 17.43 months, respectively (P =.77). We also evaluated physicians' preferences regarding timing of molecular profiling, upon diagnosis, after first recurrence and at advanced line of treatment in 31.95%, 36.08% and 26.8% of practitioners, respectively. Of the patients who completed NGS, 48 (52.75%) harbored actionable mutations, and 21 patients (43.75%) received matched targeted therapy. Forty-five patients were microsatellite stable (MSS) (45%), 55 with undetermined status (55%) and 0 patients with MSI-H. Forty-one (71.93%) patients had low ( < 5) tumor mutation burden status (TMB), 16 (28.07%) intermediate (5-15) and none with high ( > 15) TMB. There was no noticeable survival difference when comparing low with intermediate TMB (P = 0.3). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was a significant prognostic biomarker. Patients with high LOH (hLOH > = 16%) had longer OS compared to low LOH (lLOH < 16%), 99.02 vs. 50.23 months, respectively (P <.005). Patients with hLOH and BRCA mutations (BRCA+) had longer OS compared to hLOH/BRCA WT (BRCA-), lLOH/BRCA+, and lLOH/BRCA-, with an unreached median OS of 91.5 vs. 60.48 vs. 45.21 months, respectively (P =.005). Conclusions: Our work demonstrates the clinical benefit of NGS personalized medicine as a cornerstone of future treatment strategies in OC. Our study suggests an OS benefit among the NGS tested cohort. We identified LOH as a prognostic biomarker. Prospective studies evaluating larger cohorts are necessary to generate a more extensive evaluation of additional prognostic and predictive biomarkers among OC patients.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Marjorie E Zettler ◽  
Andrew J Klink ◽  
Bruce Feinberg

Introduction: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi's) represent a newer class of antineoplastic agents targeting cancers with defective DNA-damage repair. PARPi's indications include subtypes of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer as well as subsets of patients with breast pancreatic and prostate cancers. There are currently 4 PARPi approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): olaparib (approved 12/19/2014), rucaparib (approved 12/19/2016), niraparib (approved 3/27/2017), and talazoparib (approved 10/16/2018). The incidence of AML/MDS is known to be increased following chemotherapy, with a standardized incidence ratio (observed number of cases of AML/MDS among those treated with chemotherapy/expected number of cases in the general population) of 5.8 among patients with ovarian cancer, and 3.8 among patients with breast cancer (Morton et al, JAMA Onc 2018). All 4 PARPi also carry the potential risk of AML/MDS as an adverse event (AE), but a causal relationship has not been established. Notably, almost all patients treated with a PARPi would have exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to or during PARPi therapy. For patients treated with PARPi's in clinical trials, the duration of therapy prior to cases of AML/MDS emerging ranged from &lt;1 month to 28 months. The incidence of AML/MDS observed in clinical trials with olaparib was &lt;1.5%, rucaparib 1.1%, niraparib 0.8%, and talazoparib 0.3%. Real-world data regarding this rare but life-threatening AE in PARPi-treated patients is needed. We evaluated reports of AML/MDS associated with PARPi's in the post-approval setting. Methods: The FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database was queried for AEs associated with any of the 4 approved PARPi's, from the date of the initial FDA approval for each agent (irrespective of the indication) through March 31, 2020. The FAERS database contains de-identified reports of product-related AEs, coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and classified as serious or non-serious. Cases reported outside the United States were excluded. The proportion of AML/MDS reports was analyzed overall and by PARPi. To account for the variation in length of time on the market due to the different approval dates, reports of AML/MDS for each PARPi were analyzed in the first 17 months after approval (the post-marketing period for the most recently approved agent). The indication for which the PARPi was used, the sex and age of the patient experiencing the AE, and the seriousness and outcome of the AE were assessed. Comparisons of the proportion of AML/MDS cases by agent were made using the Chi-square test; statistical significance was determined at a two-sided α=0.05. Results: A total of 12823 post-marketing AE reports were associated with PARPi's, with 88 (0.7%) reporting cases of AML/MDS (Table). The largest proportion of AML/MDS cases were associated with olaparib (54 of a total of 2121 AE reports; 2.5%, p&lt;0.00001 vs. all other PARPi), followed by niraparib (23 of a total of 5879 AE reports; 0.4%) and rucaparib (11 of a total of 4707 AE reports; 0.2%). No AML/MDS cases were associated with talazoparib (0 of a total 116 AE reports). During the first 17 months following each agent's approval, 14 cases of AML/MDS were reported in association with olaparib, 10 with rucaparib, 9 with niraparib, and 0 with talazoparib. The majority of cases of AML/MDS occurred in women (73%), and the most common indication for treatment was ovarian cancer (52%). The median age of the patients in the AML/MDS reports was 66 years. Nearly all cases were classified as serious (98%), and the outcome of the AE was death for 28% of cases, hospitalization for 17% of cases. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis found that AML/MDS associated with PARPi's was reported rarely in the post-marketing setting, and that 60% involved olaparib. This study is limited by its retrospective design, and the possibility of under-reporting of cases to the FAERS database. Additionally, the time elapsed since approval differed by agent, and lower observed incidence of AML/MDS for some agents may reflect the limited duration of surveillance. No data is available in the case reports regarding length of exposure to chemotherapy. This real-world analysis complements existing clinical trial data and provides insight into AML/MDS associated with 4 different PARPi's in clinical practice. Disclosures Gajra: Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Zettler:Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Klink:Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Feinberg:Cardinal Health: Current Employment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deana S. Shenaq ◽  
Farbod Rastegar ◽  
Djuro Petkovic ◽  
Bing-Qiang Zhang ◽  
Bai-Cheng He ◽  
...  

Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) are nonhematopoietic multipotent cells capable of differentiating into mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal lineages. While they can be isolated from various tissues, MPCs isolated from the bone marrow are best characterized. These cells represent a subset of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) which, in addition to their differentiation potential, are critical in supporting proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. They are of clinical interest because they can be easily isolated from bone marrow aspirates and expanded in vitro with minimal donor site morbidity. The BMSCs are also capable of altering disease pathophysiology by secreting modulating factors in a paracrine manner. Thus, engineering such cells to maximize therapeutic potential has been the focus of cell/gene therapy to date. Here, we discuss the path towards the development of clinical trials utilizing BMSCs for orthopaedic applications. Specifically, we will review the use of BMSCs in repairing critical-sized defects, fracture nonunions, cartilage and tendon injuries, as well as in metabolic bone diseases and osteonecrosis. A review of www.ClinicalTrials.gov of the United States National Institute of Health was performed, and ongoing clinical trials will be discussed in addition to the sentinel preclinical studies that paved the way for human investigations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document