scholarly journals Application of PRECEDE-PROCEED Planning Model in Transforming the Clinical Decision Making Behavior of Physical Therapists in Myanmar

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyu Hnin Hlaing ◽  
Patricia E. Sullivan ◽  
Pakaratee Chaiyawat
2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 918-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Schreiber ◽  
Perri Stern ◽  
Gregory Marchetti ◽  
Ingrid Provident

BackgroundThe physical therapy profession has been perceived as one that bases its practice largely on anecdotal evidence and that uses treatment techniques for which there is little scientific support. Physical therapists have been urged to increase evidence-based practice behaviors as a means to address this perception and to enhance the translation of knowledge from research evidence into clinical practice. However, little attention has been paid to the best ways in which to support clinicians’ efforts toward improving evidence-based practice.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to identify, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies aimed at enhancing the ability of 5 pediatric physical therapists to integrate scientific research evidence into clinical decision making.DesignThis study was a formative evaluation pilot project.MethodsThe participants in this study collaborated with the first author to identify and implement strategies and outcomes aimed at enhancing their ability to use research evidence during clinical decision making. Outcome data were analyzed with qualitative methods.ResultsThe participants were able to implement several, but not all, of the strategies and made modest self-reported improvements in evidence-based practice behaviors, such as reading journal articles and completing database searches. They identified several barriers, including a lack of time, other influences on clinical decision making, and a lack of incentives for evidence-based practice activities.ConclusionsThe pediatric physical therapists who took part in this project had positive attitudes toward evidence-based practice and made modest improvements in this area. It is critical for the profession to continue to investigate optimal strategies to aid practicing clinicians in applying research evidence to clinical decision making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 891-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Clark ◽  
Cara N. Whalen Smith ◽  
Lori Kohls ◽  
Ines Musabyemariya ◽  
Egide Kayonga Ntagungira ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane U Jette ◽  
Lisa Grover ◽  
Carol P Keck

Abstract Background and Purpose. One of the roles of rehabilitation professionals in the acute care setting is making recommendations for patients' discharge placement. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the decision-making process of physical therapists and occupational therapists when recommending discharge destination for patients following acute care hospitalization. Subjects. Participants were 7 physical therapists and 2 occupational therapists in an acute care rotation at a large academic medical center. Methods. A grounded-theory strategy was used. Three interviews were conducted and guided by questions about participants' approaches to discharge decision making. Information from the interview transcripts was used to define constructs. A model was generated to explain the relationships among the constructs. Results. Decision making regarding discharge recommendations was guided by 4 constructs: patients' functioning and disability, patients' wants and needs, patients' ability to participate in care, and patients' life context. Information was filtered through therapists' experiences and modified by the health care team's opinions and by health care regulations. Discussion and Conclusion. The decision making of the rehabilitation professionals studied in recommending discharge placements for their patients reflects consideration of patients as individuals and the environments in which they live. Information about patients is filtered through the experience of therapists and influenced by health care regulations and opinions of other health care professionals, the patients, and their associates. The findings might be used in teaching clinical decision making to clinicians and students as they learn to make discharge recommendations.


Author(s):  
Nívea Renata Oliveira Monteiro ◽  
Maycon Sousa Pegorari ◽  
Daniela Gonçalves Ohara ◽  
Vânia Tiê Koga Ferreira ◽  
Areolino Pena Matos

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Flannery Wainwright ◽  
Katherine F. Shepard ◽  
Laurinda B. Harman ◽  
James Stephens

Background Prior experience informs clinical decision making and shapes how reflection is used by novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians. Objectives The aims of this research were: (1) to determine the types and extent of reflection that informs the clinical decision-making process and (2) to compare the use of reflection to direct and assess clinical decisions made by novice and experienced physical therapists. Design Qualitative research methods using grounded theory were used to gain insight into how physical therapists use reflection to inform clinical decision making. Methods Three participant pairs (each pair consisting of one novice and one experienced physical therapist) were purposively selected from 3 inpatient rehabilitation settings. Case summaries of each participant provided the basis for within- and across-case analysis. Credibility of these results was established through member check of the case summaries, presentation of low-inference data, and triangulation across multiple data sources and within and across the participant groups. Results Although all participants engaged in reflection-on-action, the experienced participants did so with greater frequency. The experienced participants were distinguished by their use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment during therapist-patient interactions. An intermediate effect beyond novice practice was observed. Conclusions The results of this study may be used by educators and employers to develop and structure learning experiences and mentoring opportunities to facilitate clinical decision-making abilities and the development of the skills necessary for reflection in students and novice practitioners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document