scholarly journals Investigating the Palatability of Lamb and Beef Components Used in the Production of Pet Food for Cats

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 558
Author(s):  
Pavinee Watson ◽  
David Thomas ◽  
Adrian Hoggard ◽  
Michael Parker ◽  
Nicola Schreurs

The pet food industry continues to utilise large amounts of inedible meat components from the human food industry. Although used extensively in pet food formulations and as palatants, little is known about the palatability of individual meat components. The objectives of this study were to investigate the palatability of raw meat components commonly used in the production of pet food, using acceptance and preference testing. Those examined were lung, heart, kidney, tripe, liver and mechanically deboned meat (MDM) from lamb and beef. Two-bowl acceptance tests were used to develop an overall ranking of components within each species. Two-bowl preference tests between equivalent beef and lamb components were then used to determine whether a preference was exhibited for one species over the other. For the acceptance of components from lamb and beef, liver was the most palatable within both species, with kidney equivalent to liver when testing lamb components. The MDM was identified as the least palatable component from both species. When examining the preference between equivalent components between species, cats showed preferences for lamb over equivalent beef components, except for heart and liver which showed no difference in intake between the two species. Overall, cats were able to clearly rank the palatability of different components from lamb and beef, as well as between equivalent components from the two species. Selecting highly palatable ingredients whilst still meeting pet food manufacturing guidelines may play a role in improving overall diet palatability and acceptance by cats.

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 6074-2018
Author(s):  
WALDEMAR PASZKIEWICZ ◽  
KRZYSZTOF SZKUCIK ◽  
MONIKA ZIOMEK ◽  
MICHAŁ GONDEK ◽  
RENATA PYZ-ŁUKASIK

The objective of the research was to determine the occurrence of microorganisms of the Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. in raw and frozen (cooked) snail meat obtained from both free-living and farmed edible snails. The research material comprised meat samples collected from three snail species (25g from each), that is, Roman snail (Helix pomatia – HP), small brown garden snail (Cornu aspersum aspersum – CAA) and large brown garden snail (Cornu aspersum maxima – CAM). Roman snails came from their natural environment and were harvested in Wielkopolska Voivodeship and Lower Silesia Voivodeship (regions A and B, respectively). The Cornu genus snails were obtained from two heliciculture farms located in the abovementioned voivodeships (farms A and B, respectively). On both farms, the snails were maintained under the mixed rearing system. The raw meat samples taken from the edible portion of snails, that is, the foot with collar and a fragment of the mantle, were obtained after the snails were sacrificed in the laboratory. The frozen meat samples, on the other hand, came from a snail meat processing facility. A total of 300 samples were examined for the presence of Salmonella spp., and 240 for the presence of Listeria spp. The research also included pooled soil samples of 0.5 kg each collected from polytunnels (in the pre-fattening stage) and outdoor farming plots (in the fattening stage). The tests for the Salmonella presence were performed in accordance with Polish standard PN-EN ISO 6579:2003, and the test for Listeria complied with PN-EN ISO 11290-1:1999. Listeria monocytogenes was identified by the PCR technique. Salmonella spp. were not detected in any of the 300 samples of raw and cooked snail meat under study. Nor were these pathogens isolated from the soil samples. The absence of these bacteria in the raw meat samples indicates that Salmonella spp. did not occur in either the natural habitat of Roman snails or the two farms producing Cornu genus snails. On the other hand, bacteria of Listeria spp. were detected in 101 (42.1%) snail meat samples. A particularly high load of microbiota was found in raw meat, as these bacteria contaminated from 60% (for HP from region A and CAM from farm B) up to 75% (for CAA from farm A) of samples. Notably, a markedly lower percentage (35%) of samples containing Listeria spp. was found only among the Roman snail raw meat samples from the region B. Listeria spp. were also detected in all the soil samples. Thermal treatment of meat achieved a substantial reduction in the load of Listeria spp., but did not eliminate it. The frequency of this genus in frozen meat samples was from 63.5% (for CAM from farm A) to 15.4% (for CAA from farm B) of that in raw meat. The PCR technique was used identify 15 selected strains, including 11 from raw meat samples and 4 from cooked meat. A total of 5 isolates were recognized as Listeria monocytogenes (2.1% of all samples examined and 4.95% of samples with Listeria spp.). All of them originated from the raw meat of farmed snails, including one (CAA) from the farm A and four (3 CAA and 1 CAM) from the farm B. Bacteria of the Salmonella and Listeria genera occur in the natural habitat of edible snails, which poses a potential hazard to human health. Effective implementation of control programmes at the primary production stage is the first step that could considerably limit the presence of these pathogens in farmed snails and, consequently, in snail meat. .


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (04) ◽  
pp. 262-271
Author(s):  
Janine Starzonek ◽  
Lara von Lindeiner ◽  
Ingrid Vervuert

Zusammenfassung Gegenstand und Ziel Beurteilung veganer Alleinfuttermittel (AF) für adulte Katzen und Hunde sowie Überprüfung der Deklarationstreue. Material und Methoden Vier in Deutschland erhältliche vegane AF für Katzen und Hunde wurden auf ihre Nährstoffgehalte analysiert. Die benötigte Futtermenge wurde kalkulatorisch bestimmt und mit der Fütterungsempfehlung der Hersteller verglichen. Die Deklarationsangaben wurden auf die Einhaltung der Angaben aus der Verordnung (EG) 767/2009 überprüft. Eine Einschätzung der Versorgung mit Taurin und Vitaminen erfolgte anhand der Produktdeklarationen zu den ernährungsphysiologischen Zusatzstoffen. Ergebnisse Die Deklarationsangaben entsprachen vielfach den rechtlichen Vorgaben. Die Fütterungsempfehlung der Hersteller wich bei 2 von 4 AF deutlich von der kalkulierten Futtermenge ab und ergab eine Bedarfsdeckung von 64 bis 121 %. Die Zufuhr an einzelnen Mengen- und Spurenelementen lag beim adulten Hund 5,2- bis 8,2-fach, bei der adulten Katze 9,0- bzw. 11,4-fach über den Versorgungsempfehlungen. Die Vorgaben der European Pet Food Industry Federation wurden für die Rohprotein-, Rohfett- und Phosphorgehalte in jeweils einem Fall unterschritten, für Zink und Kupfer fanden sich sowohl Über- als auch Unterschreitungen der Empfehlungen. Eine Unterschreitung der Empfehlungen des National Research Councils (NRC) für den Zinkgehalt ergab sich bei einem AF. Die empfohlene Zufuhr an essenziellen Aminosäuren konnten die AF größtenteils abdecken; 2 AF deckten für Methionin und Cystin lediglich den Mindestbedarf ab, aber nicht die optimalen Versorgungsempfehlungen. Die Menge an zugesetztem Taurin entsprach nur bei einem AF für Katzen der empfohlenen Zufuhr. Die Empfehlungen für Vitamine konnten 3 AF über die Zusatzstoffe sicherstellen. Schlussfolgerung und klinische Relevanz Keines der veganen AF erfüllte uneingeschränkt die Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung für adulte Hunde und Katzen. Somit können Mängel in der Zufuhr einzelner Nährstoffe bei langfristiger Fütterung der untersuchten AF nicht ausgeschlossen werden.


PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e5828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo de Aro Galera ◽  
Adibe Luiz Abdalla Filho ◽  
Luiza Santos Reis ◽  
Janaina Leite de Souza ◽  
Yeleine Almoza Hernandez ◽  
...  

Background Brazil is a low- to medium-income country and has the second largest pet food market in the world with 8% of world pet food consumption. The lowest-income social class spends around 17% of their domestic budget on pet food and other items related to pets. Consumers are frequently misled by advertising as there is no precise information about the main sources of protein, carbohydrates and fat in the labels, and the Brazilian pet food industry can legally claim that their products contain certain items like salmon or beef even if they use just a flavoring compound. Methods The stable isotope methodology compares the stable isotope ratios of carbon (13C/12C) and nitrogen (15N/14N) between source and product. The 13C/12C ratio of a specific product (e.g., dog food) reveals the proportions of C4 (maize) and C3 (soybean, rice and wheat) plants in that product and the 15N/14N ratio reveals the proportion of the compounds derived from animals. With this isotopic data, we used MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope-mixing model, to estimate the proportion of maize, grains, poultry and beef in dog food. Results The δ13C values of dry dog food ranged from −24.2‰ to −12.8‰, with an average (± standard-deviation) of −17.1‰ ± 2.8‰. The δ13C values of wet pet food ranged from −25.4‰ to −16.9‰, with an average (± standard-deviation) of −21.2‰ ± 2.4‰, which was significantly lower (p < 0.01). The δ15N values of the dry and wet food ranged from 1.7‰ to 4.2‰, and from 0.5‰ to 5.5‰, respectively. The average δ15N values of dry food (2.9‰ ± 0.5‰) was not higher than the wet food (2.6‰ ± 1.3‰) (p > 0.01). The output of the MixSIAR showed a low proportion of bovine products in dry dog food samples. On the other hand, poultry was obviously the dominant ingredient present in most of the samples. Maize was the second dominant ingredient. Wet and dry dog food showed similar isotopic analysis results. The only difference was a lower proportion of maize and higher proportion of grains in wet dog food. Discussion The main finding is that dog food in Brazil is mostly made of approximately 60% (ranging from 32% to 86%) animal-based and 40% (ranging from 14% to 67%) plant-based products. Poultry and maize are the main ingredients. Poultry is added as a by-product or meal, which avoids competition between dogs and humans for meat products, while they can compete for maize. On the other hand, a large proportion of plant-based products in dog food decreases the energy and environmental footprint, since plant-based food products tend to be less harmful compared to animal-based products. Labels can mislead consumers by showing pictures of items that are not necessarily part of the product composition and by not showing the detailed information on the proportion of each ingredient. This information would allow customers to make their own choices considering their pet’s nutrition, the competition between animals and humans for resources and environmental sustainability.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Lawrence ◽  
A. W. Illius

AbstractCurrent methodologies for measuring choices are the product of early psychological research into behavioural mechanisms, particidarly learning. In applied behaviour studies, much of the emphasis has been on the use of preference tests to assess animals’ motivation, and hence proximate need for, various forms of stimulation. Preference tests are based on a modular view of animal behaviour, where animals are presented with physical compartments each containing different resources such as food or social partners. An obvious limitation of the approach is that simple preference tests may do little justice to the complexity of animals’ behavioural organization and environmental preferences. Variability of choice behaviour also poses a considerable problem, as it may prevent us understanding and interpreting short-term choices and consequently describing the proximate needs of the animal. We also believe that the approach of applying consumer economics to quantify the value of resources to animals is increasingly moving preference testing away from measuring proximate to measuring ultimate need. This shift in emphasis does not appear to have been recognized. The risk is that the approach will only identify basic needs (e.g. related to growth and reproduction) but be insensitive to the proximate behavioural needs that it set out to quantify. In general, the focus of welfare-related preference testing should shift from the measurement and description of preferences to the more strategic task of understanding the rules governing short-term choices. We will be unable to measure proximate need unless we can develop a theoretical framework better able to interpret short-term behavioural choices.


Author(s):  
N. Cioica ◽  
C. Cota ◽  
Mihaela Nagy ◽  
G. Fodorean

Bioplastics constitute a great opportunity for agriculture, industry and environment. On the one hand, the basic raw material used to fabricate bioplastics is made from renewable agricultural materials, on the other hand, bioplastics have a wide application as packaging and protections in the food and non-food industry as catering products as protection films and foils and as compostable items in agriculture. Also very important is that after achieving the purpose for which they are produced, bioplastics become waste and their cycle is closed as they can be used as compost for agriculture.


Author(s):  
Toshiaki Watanabe ◽  
Hironori Maehara ◽  
Asuka Oda ◽  
Shigeru Itoh

In the food industry, it is hoping high value-aided product and the increase in efficiency of food processing. On the other hand, we get an experimental result that the load of the shock wave improves an extraction of food, and soften food. But, the safe and high efficiency pressure vessel for the processing is necessary to apply these technologies to the food processing field actually. Therefore, we are planning the development of the pressure vessel for food processing. The fundamental data of the shock loading to food are necessary in order to make suitable vessel. As for these data, it is variety the specifications required by the kind of food and effect to expect. We report the result that shock wave loading was done to various food.


1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Morrison

When a triangle taste test, i.e., “Which of these three stimuli is different from the other two?”, is given twice to each subject, a natural question to ask is: “Are the subjects who got both tests correct really better discriminators than the other subjects who got 0 or 1 correct?” Surprisingly enough, the answer to this question has nothing to do with the number of subjects who got both correct, i.e., the twos. Rather, it is the ratio of the ones to the zeroes that supplies the necessary information. This information on the subject's abilities to discriminate can be used to develop a weighted voting procedure for subsequent preference tests.


2020 ◽  
Vol 186 (9) ◽  
pp. 287.2-287
Author(s):  
Sarah Hormozi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document