Nonlinear Numerical Assessment of Exterior Beam-Column Connections with Low-Strength Concrete

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Basem S. Abdelwahed ◽  
Mosbeh R. Kaloop ◽  
Waleed E. El-Demerdash

The ductility and capacity of reinforced concrete beam-column connections depend mainly on the concrete’s strength and the provided reinforcements. This study investigates numerically the role of low-strength concrete in beam-column joints utilizing ABAQUS software. In this simulation, a newly developed stress-inelastic strain relationship for both confined and unconfined low-strength concrete is used. This study recommended a specific value of the concrete dilation angle for both substandard and standard joints. Also, stirrups’ yield strength value was found to play an insignificant role in improving the shear resistance of such joints with low-strength. In addition, the joint shear strength prediction using empirical models that implicitly consider the stirrups contribution in improving joint resistance was found to be better than the prediction of other models that explicitly consider the stirrups’ presence. The numerical results also showed that the use of a diagonal steel haunch as a joint retrofitting technique significantly increases the joint shear capacity and changes its brittle shear failure into a ductile beam flexural failure.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Stefanus Adi Kristiawan ◽  
Halwan Alfisa Saifullah ◽  
Agus Supriyadi

Deteriorated concrete cover, e.g., spalling or delamination, especially when it occurs at the web of a reinforced concrete (RC) beam within the shear span, can reduce the shear capacity of the beam. Patching of this deteriorated area may be the best option to recover the shear capacity of the beam affected. For this purpose, unsaturated polyester resin mortar (UPR mortar) has been formulated. This research aims to investigate the efficacy of UPR mortar in limiting the shear cracking and so restoring the shear capacity of the deteriorated RC beam. The investigation is carried out by an experimental and numerical study. Two types of beams with a size of 150 × 250 × 1000 mm were prepared. The first type of beams was assigned as a normal beam. The other was a beam with a cut off in the non-stirrup shear span, which was eventually patched with UPR mortar. Two reinforcement ratios were assigned for each type of beams. The results show that UPR mortar is effective to hamper the propagation of diagonal cracks leading to increase the shear failure load by 15–20% compared to the reference (normal) beam. The increase of shear strength with the use of UPR mortar is consistently confirmed at various reinforcement ratios.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Dafu Cao ◽  
Jiaqi Liu ◽  
Wenjie Ge ◽  
Rui Qian

In order to study the influence of the axial compression ratio and steel ratio on the shear-carrying capacity of steel-truss-reinforced beam-column joints, five shear failure interior joint specimens were designed. The effect of different coaxial pressure ratios (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) and steel contents on the strain, ultimate bearing capacity, seismic performance, and failure pattern of cross-inclined ventral and chord bars in the joint core area was investigated. The experimental results show that the load-displacement hysteretic curves of all test specimens exhibit a bond-slip phenomenon. With the increase of the axial compression ratio, the ultimate bearing capacity of the joint core increases by 3.4% and 5.9%, respectively. While the ductility decreases by 10.3% and 13.1%, and the energy consumption capacity decreases by 3.2% and 5.8%, respectively. The shear capacity and ductility of the member with cross diagonal ventral steel angle in the joint core are increased by 12.9% and 13.4%, respectively. The shear capacity and ductility of the joint can be significantly improved by increasing the amount of steel in the core area. The expression of shear capacity suitable for this type of joint is obtained by fitting analysis, which can be used as a reference for engineering design.


1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (160) ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Z. Mohamed ◽  
L. A. Clark

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document