scholarly journals Processing Speed and Time since Diagnosis Predict Adaptive Functioning Measured with WeeFIM in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4776
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Oprandi ◽  
Viola Oldrati ◽  
Morena delle Fave ◽  
Daniele Panzeri ◽  
Lorenza Gandola ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Brain tumor (BT) survivors show difficulties in the acquisition of developmental milestones, related to academic achievement, vocational employment, social relationships, and autonomy. The skills underlying adaptive functioning (AF) are usually damaged in BT survivors due to the presence of the brain tumor, treatment-related factors, and other neurological sequelae. In this study, we aimed to explore the contribution of different cognitive factors in children with BT to AF, considering diagnosis-related variables. (2) Methods: Standardized cognitive assessment was undertaken and clinical information was collected from a retrospective cohort of 78 children with a BT, aged between 6 and 18 year old at the time of the assessment. Regression models were computed to investigate the influence of the selected variables on daily functional skills as measured by the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). (3) Results: The analyses showed that the main explanatory variables are processing speed and time since diagnosis. Other clinical variables, such as age at diagnosis and hydrocephalus, differentially influence functional skills according to distinct domains (i.e., self-care, mobility, and cognition). (4) Conclusions: The main explanatory variables of AF that emerged in our models point to a potential target of improving AF management in pediatric BT survivors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P Gross ◽  
Stephanie Powell ◽  
Frank Zelko ◽  
William Hartsell ◽  
Stewart Goldman ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundSurvivors of pediatric brain tumors are at risk for impaired development in multiple neuropsychological domains. The purpose of this study was to compare neuropsychological outcomes of pediatric brain tumor patients who underwent X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) versus proton radiotherapy (PRT).MethodsPediatric patients who underwent either XRT or PRT and received posttreatment age-appropriate neuropsychological evaluation—including measures of intelligence (IQ), attention, memory, visuographic skills, academic skills, and parent-reported adaptive functioning—were identified. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in neuropsychological outcomes and included tests for interaction between treatment cohort and follow-up time.ResultsBetween 1998 and 2017, 125 patients with tumors located in the supratentorial (17.6%), midline (28.8%), or posterior fossa (53.6%) compartments received radiation and had posttreatment neuropsychological evaluation. Median age at treatment was 7.4 years. The PRT patient cohort had higher estimated SES and shorter median time from radiotherapy completion to last neuropsychological evaluation (6.7 vs 2.6 y, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PRT was associated with higher full-scale IQ (β = 10.6, P = 0.048) and processing speed (β = 14.4, P = 0.007) relative to XRT, with trend toward higher verbal IQ (β = 9.9, P = 0.06) and general adaptive functioning (β = 11.4, P = 0.07). Planned sensitivity analyses truncating follow-up interval in the XRT cohort re-demonstrated higher verbal IQ (P = 0.01) and IQ (P = 0.04) following PRT, with trend toward improved processing speed (P = 0.09).ConclusionsPRT is associated with favorable outcomes for intelligence and processing speed. Combined with other strategies for treatment de-intensification, PRT may further reduce neuropsychological morbidity of brain tumor treatment.


Author(s):  
Emma J Verwaaijen ◽  
Coriene E Catsman-Berrevoets ◽  
Heleen Maurice-Stam ◽  
Arianne B Dessens ◽  
Richelle Waslander ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) experience disease- and treatment-related sequelae. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of participation limitations, impairments in functioning, fatigue, and the association between patient, tumor- and treatment-related factors and these outcomes. Methods Children (4-18 years) after treatment for a brain tumor between 2005-2014 at the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, were eligible. The parent-reported Child and Family Follow-up Survey developed to measure participation and impairments in functioning in youth with acquired brain injury, was used. Fatigue was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale. Associations with patient, tumor- and treatment-related factors were explored using univariable analyses. Results Ninety-one PBTS (median age: 11.3 years [range: 9.5-14.1], time since treatment: 3.9 years [range: 4-6.2]) were included (response rate: 55%). Participation limitations were reported in 53% and were associated with impairments in functioning (15-67%) (p≤0.01) and fatigue (p≤0.03). Parent- and child-reported fatigue was increased compared to normative values (p=≤0.02). History of hydrocephalus was associated with increased fatigue (p≤0.04). Younger age at diagnosis and longer time since diagnosis were associated with impairments in functioning and cognitive fatigue (p=&lt;0.05). Participation limitations, impairments in functioning and fatigue were similar in PBTS who were &lt;3 or ≥3 years since completion of treatment. Conclusion More than half of PBTS reported limited participation ability, which is associated with impairments in functioning and fatigue. The complication hydrocephalus seems to lead to more fatigue. Participation limitations, impairments in functioning and fatigue appear not to diminish in the longer term.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii31-ii31
Author(s):  
Mitsuyo Ikeda ◽  
Shin Yamada ◽  
Yasutomo Okajima ◽  
Kuniaki Saito ◽  
Keiichi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDS Importance of early intensive rehabilitation is recently emphasized not only for Stroke Unit but for Intensive Care Unit. We have started such early comprehensive rehabilitation for patients after brain tumor surgery. Rehabilitation therapists were specially assigned to our brain surgery unit as members of the ward staffers. The purpose of this study is to show how this rehabilitation trial works for post-surgery patients with glioma. METHODS Thirty-two patients with glioma (20 males and 12 females) who were admitted to our institution in the year of 2018 were included. Mean age was 61.8±13.3 years; glioblastoma was the major tumor type (24 patients). We retrospectively analyzed rehabilitation outcome focusing on improvement of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores during hospitalization. RESULTS Mean duration from surgery to the first rehabilitation intervention was 2.4±1.2 days, and mean hospital stay was 74.4±31.4days. Twenty patients were discharged to home (62 %) and 12 were transferred to other hospitals for convalescence. Motor, cognitive and total FIM scores were 41.0±22.2, 18.0±7.5, and 59.1±27.3 before surgery, whereas they were 61.4±28.6, 21.8±9.4, and 83.2±36.9, respectively, at discharge. Motor FIM items revealed more remarkable improvement than those of cognitive ones. Since starting the early intensive rehabilitation trial, patients with brain tumor have been systematically rehabilitated with an organized manner before and after surgery. CONCLUSION Early intensive rehabilitation for patients with brain tumor is recommended to be done by on-ward therapists who are assigned to work specially as members of the ward. Both motor and cognitive improvement is expected during hospitalization even in patients with malignant brain tumor.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimilia Papazoglou ◽  
Tricia Z. King ◽  
Robin D. Morris ◽  
Nicolas S. Krawiecki

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1979-1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Kahalley ◽  
Heather M. Conklin ◽  
Vida L. Tyc ◽  
Melissa M. Hudson ◽  
Stephanie J. Wilson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii466-iii466
Author(s):  
Manisha Jogendran ◽  
Rebecca Ronsley ◽  
Ran D Goldman ◽  
Sylvia Cheng

Abstract Delayed diagnosis of CNS tumors in children is well documented, partially due to challenges in recognizing rare diagnoses. Our objective was to describe Canadian family physicians’ attitudes and confidence in diagnosing and managing pediatric CNS tumors. A standardized questionnaire was administered at a Canadian national family physicians’ conference. Items were based on observations from our institutional study of prediagnostic symptomatic interval in pediatric CNS tumors. 449 surveys were completed. 302/443 (68%) physicians practice in cities. 153/447 (34%) report encountering parents that inquire about their children having brain tumors. 261/449 (58%) have not managed a pediatric brain tumor. 153/447 (34%) report they are not confident, 255/447 (57%) somewhat confident and 39/447 (9%) confident in managing a suspected brain tumor in a stable child. 259/447 (58%) would refer directly to a hospital/specialist. The reported median time for suspicion of a brain tumor was 8–14 days for children with vomiting and/or headache and 1 day for children with seizure and/or ataxia. 410/447 (97%) report not knowing any guidelines to help with management. 235/447 (53%) suggested barriers they experience to include 52/235 (22%) wait times for imaging/specialists, 37/235 (16%) geographical location of the child, 27/235 (12%) knowledge, 25/235 (11%) access to imaging/specialist, and 15/235 (6%) patient-related factors or system barriers, and 8/235 (3%) specialist attitudes. 68/235 (29%) identified no barriers in their practice. This study provides insight into family physicians’ perceived challenges and barriers in diagnosing and managing new suspected pediatric CNS tumors. Educational effort and overcoming systemic perceived barriers may increase physicians’ confidence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii432-iii433
Author(s):  
Muhammad Baig ◽  
Ineke Olsthoorn ◽  
Grace Yang ◽  
Wafik Zaky ◽  
Peter Stavinoha

Abstract BACKGROUND Predicting neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) patients is challenging. Rarity of PBT makes inclusion of detailed risk factors (e.g., treatment modality, intensity, individual complications) difficult when sample sizes are small. The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) summarizes complications and treatment factors associated with neurocognitive risks and has modest validation. Recently, the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) was developed to evaluate the impact of treatment intensity on psychosocial outcomes but has not been compared to neurocognitive outcomes. This study compared the NPS and PNORTI in terms of relationship to neurocognitive outcomes known to be at risk in PBT survivors. METHODS 88 PBT survivors’ neuropsychological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI. Variables of interest included IQ, working memory, and processing speed. RESULTS NPS associated with lower IQ (rs=-.476, p=.001), lower working memory (rs=-.323, p=.010), and lower processing speed (rs=-.389, p=.007) in patients diagnosed at a younger age, but only processing speed for children diagnosed after age 7 years (rs=-.262, p=.036). PNORTI was not correlated with neurocognitive variables for either group. CONCLUSION NPS has value in predicting neurocognitive outcomes, though much more in a younger age at diagnosis group compared to older patients. The PNORTI did not demonstrate predictive value for these neurocognitive domains in our sample. Given the potential clinical and research value of a summary rating of treatment burden relating to long-term outcome, future research should include relationship to psychosocial outcomes and quality of life.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen R. Hoskinson ◽  
Kelly R. Wolfe ◽  
Keith Owen Yeates ◽  
E. Mark Mahone ◽  
Kim M. Cecil ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document