scholarly journals Natural and Synthetic Estrogens in Chronic Inflammation and Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 206
Author(s):  
Chandra K. Maharjan ◽  
Jiao Mo ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Myung-Chul Kim ◽  
Samuel Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Chronic Inflammation ◽  
Mammary Epithelial ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Advance Breast Cancer ◽  
Synthetic Estrogens ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The oncogenic role of estrogen receptor (ER) signaling in breast cancer has long been established. Interaction of estrogen with estrogen receptor (ER) in the nucleus activates genomic pathways of estrogen signaling. In contrast, estrogen interaction with the cell membrane-bound G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) activates the rapid receptor-mediated signaling transduction cascades. Aberrant estrogen signaling enhances mammary epithelial cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis, hence is an important step towards breast cancer initiation and progression. Meanwhile, a growing number of studies also provide evidence for estrogen’s pro- or anti-inflammatory roles. As other articles in this issue cover classic ER and GPER signaling mediated by estrogen, this review will discuss the crucial mechanisms by which estrogen signaling influences chronic inflammation and how that is involved in breast cancer. Xenoestrogens acquired from plant diet or exposure to industrial products constantly interact with and alter innate estrogen signaling at various levels. As such, they can modulate chronic inflammation and breast cancer development. Natural xenoestrogens generally have anti-inflammatory properties, which is consistent with their chemoprotective role in breast cancer. In contrast, synthetic xenoestrogens are proinflammatory and carcinogenic compounds that can increase the risk of breast cancer. This article also highlights important xenoestrogens with a particular focus on their role in inflammation and breast cancer. Improved understanding of the complex relationship between estrogens, inflammation, and breast cancer will guide clinical research on agents that could advance breast cancer prevention and therapy.

scholarly journals Regulatory Interplay between miR-181a-5p and Estrogen Receptor Signaling Cascade in Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Rosaria Benedetti ◽  
Chiara Papulino ◽  
Giulia Sgueglia ◽  
Ugo Chianese ◽  
Tommaso De Marchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Mirna Expression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Alpha ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Signaling

The efficacy and side effects of endocrine therapy in breast cancer (BC) depend largely on estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) expression, the specific drug administered, and treatment scheduling. Although the benefits of endocrine therapy outweigh any adverse effects in the initial stages of BC, later- or advanced-stage tumors acquire resistance to treatments. The mechanisms underlying tumor resistance to therapy are still not well understood, posing a major challenge for BC patient care. Epigenetic regulation and miRNA expression may be involved in the switch from a treatment-sensitive to a treatment-resistant state and could provide a valid therapeutic strategy for ERα negative BC. Here, a hybrid lysine-specific histone demethylase inhibitor, MC3324, displaying selective estrogen receptor down-regulator-like activities in BC, was used to highlight the interplay between epigenetic and ERα signaling. MC3324 anticancer action is mediated by microRNA (miRNA) expression regulation, indicating an innovative function for this molecule. Integrated analysis suggests a crosstalk between estrogen signaling, ERα interactors, miRNAs, and their putative targets. Specifically, miR-181a-5p expression is regulated by MC3324 and has an impact on cellular levels of ERα. A comparison of breast tumor versus healthy mammary tissues confirmed the important role of miR-181a-5p in ERα regulation and points to its putative predictive function in BC therapy.

scholarly journals AKT Alters Genome-Wide Estrogen Receptor α Binding and Impacts Estrogen Signaling in Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 7487-7503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri ◽  
Guohua Wang ◽  
Hitesh Appaiah ◽  
Nikhil Luktuke ◽  
Jason S. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Extracellular Signal

ABSTRACT Estrogen regulates several biological processes through estrogen receptor α (ERα) and ERβ. ERα-estrogen signaling is additionally controlled by extracellular signal activated kinases such as AKT. In this study, we analyzed the effect of AKT on genome-wide ERα binding in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Parental and AKT-overexpressing cells displayed 4,349 and 4,359 ERα binding sites, respectively, with ∼60% overlap. In both cell types, ∼40% of estrogen-regulated genes associate with ERα binding sites; a similar percentage of estrogen-regulated genes are differentially expressed in two cell types. Based on pathway analysis, these differentially estrogen-regulated genes are linked to transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), NF-κB, and E2F pathways. Consistent with this, the two cell types responded differently to TGF-β treatment: parental cells, but not AKT-overexpressing cells, required estrogen to overcome growth inhibition. Combining the ERα DNA-binding pattern with gene expression data from primary tumors revealed specific effects of AKT on ERα binding and estrogen-regulated expression of genes that define prognostic subgroups and tamoxifen sensitivity of ERα-positive breast cancer. These results suggest a unique role of AKT in modulating estrogen signaling in ERα-positive breast cancers and highlights how extracellular signal activated kinases can change the landscape of transcription factor binding to the genome.

scholarly journals G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30 and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atanas Ignatov ◽  
Tanja Ignatov ◽  
Christine Weißenborn ◽  
Holm Eggemann ◽  
Joachim Bischoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Tamoxifen Resistance ◽  
G Protein Coupled

scholarly journals G protein-coupled kisspeptin receptor induces metabolic reprograming and tumorigenesis in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Dragan ◽  
Mai-Uyen Nguyen ◽  
Stephania Guzman ◽  
Cameron Goertzen ◽  
Muriel Brackstone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Negative

scholarly journals The G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) Expression Correlates with Pro-Metastatic Pathways in ER-Negative Breast Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Talia ◽  
Ernestina De Francesco ◽  
Damiano Rigiracciolo ◽  
Maria Muoio ◽  
Lucia Muglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Bioinformatics Analysis ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
R Package ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Pathway Enrichment Analysis ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, formerly known as GPR30) is a seven-transmembrane receptor that mediates estrogen signals in both normal and malignant cells. In particular, GPER has been involved in the activation of diverse signaling pathways toward transcriptional and biological responses that characterize the progression of breast cancer (BC). In this context, a correlation between GPER expression and worse clinical-pathological features of BC has been suggested, although controversial data have also been reported. In order to better assess the biological significance of GPER in the aggressive estrogen receptor (ER)-negative BC, we performed a bioinformatics analysis using the information provided by The Invasive Breast Cancer Cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets. Gene expression correlation and the statistical analysis were carried out with R studio base functions and the tidyverse package. Pathway enrichment analysis was evaluated with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway on the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) website, whereas gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed with the R package phenoTest. The survival analysis was determined with the R package survivALL. Analyzing the expression data of more than 2500 primary BC, we ascertained that GPER levels are associated with pro-migratory and metastatic genes belonging to cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, and focal adhesion (FA) signaling pathways. Thereafter, evaluating the disease-free interval (DFI) in ER-negative BC patients, we found that the subjects expressing high GPER levels exhibited a shorter DFI in respect to those exhibiting low GPER levels. Overall, our results may pave the way to further dissect the network triggered by GPER in the breast malignancies lacking ER toward a better assessment of its prognostic significance and the action elicited in mediating the aggressive features of the aforementioned BC subtype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document