scholarly journals Sensitivity and Specificity of CD19.CAR-T Cell Detection by Flow Cytometry and PCR

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3208
Author(s):  
Nicola Schanda ◽  
Tim Sauer ◽  
Alexander Kunz ◽  
Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss ◽  
Brigitte Neuber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Detection ◽  
Protein L ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car Detection ◽  
Car T ◽  
Background Staining ◽  
Detection Reagent

Chimeric-antigen-receptor-T (CAR-T) cells are currently revolutionizing the field of cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need for CAR-T cell monitoring by clinicians to assess cell expansion and persistence in patients. CAR-T cell manufacturers and researchers need to evaluate transduction efficiency and vector copy number for quality control. Here, CAR expression was analyzed in peripheral blood samples from patients and healthy donors by flow cytometry with four commercially available detection reagents and on the gene level by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Flow cytometric analysis of CAR expression showed higher mean CAR expression values for CD19 CAR detection reagent and the F(ab’)2 antibody than Protein L and CD19 Protein. In addition, the CD19 CAR detection reagent showed a significantly lower median background staining of 0.02% (range 0.007–0.06%) when compared to the F(ab’)2 antibody, CD19 protein and Protein L with 0.80% (range 0.47–1.58%), 0.65% (range 0.25–1.35%) and 0.73% (range 0.44–1.23%). Furthermore, flow cytometry-based CAR-T cell frequencies by CD19 CAR detection reagent showed a good correlation with qPCR results. In conclusion, quality control of CAR-T cell products can be performed by FACS and qPCR. For the monitoring of CAR-T cell frequencies by FACS in patients, CAR detection reagents with a low background staining are preferable.

scholarly journals CD19.CAR-T Cell Analysis Using Flow Cytometry and PCR

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4797-4797
Author(s):  
Nicola Schanda ◽  
Alexander Kunz ◽  
Tim Sauer ◽  
Maria-Luisa Schubert ◽  
Felix Korell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Protein L ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car Detection ◽  
Car T ◽  
Detection Reagent

Abstract Introduction: After approval of CD19.CAR-T cell therapy by both FDA and EMA, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has been established as a new and innovative therapy method for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Because of this, there is great need for reliable methods for CAR-T cell monitoring by clinicians to further assess cell expansion, distribution and persistence in patients. This is both necessary for CAR-T cell manufacturing sites and researchers to assess transduction efficiency and vector copy numbers per cell. Therefore, we analyzed CAR expression of CD19.CAR-T cells using flow cytometry as well as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Methods: In this study, four different commercially available CD19.CAR-T cell staining reagents (Protein L, CD19 protein, F(ab`)2 antibody, and CD19.CAR-T cell detection reagent) were used to evaluate CAR-T cell products and peripheral blood samples of both patients and healthy donors by flow cytometry. Furthermore, qPCR was performed with data comparison using flow cytometry results. Results: Flow cytometric analysis of CAR expression showed higher mean CAR expression values for CD19 CAR detection reagent and the F(ab')2 antibody than Protein L and CD19 Protein. Moreove, the CD19 CAR detection reagent showed a significantly lower median background staining of 0.02% (range 0.007-0.06%) when compared to F(ab')2 antibody, CD19 protein and Protein L with 0.80% (range 0.47-1.58%.), 0.68% (range 0.30-1.38%) and 0.73% (range 0.44-1.23%). Furthermore, flow cytometry-based CAR-T cell frequencies by CD19 CAR detection reagent showed a good correlation with qPCR results. Conclusion: CAR-T staining was successfully performed with all tested commercially available CAR detection reagents. Evaluation of manufactured CAR-T cells as well as quality control was comparably done using FACS and qPCR. Because of lower frequencies of CAR-T cells in the patient samples, CAR-T cell staining reagents with a low background staining should be preferably used. Disclosures Sauer: Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Schubert: Gilead: Consultancy. Müller-Tidow: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Schmitt: TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Apogenix: Research Funding; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants. Schmitt: Hexal: Other: Travel grant; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grant; TolerogenixX Ltd: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Comparison of FACS and PCR for Detection of BCMA-CAR-T Cells

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 903
Author(s):  
Avinoam Reichman ◽  
Alexander Kunz ◽  
Jara J. Joedicke ◽  
Uta E. Höpken ◽  
Anna Keib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Background Staining

Chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is already widely used to treat patients who are relapsed or refractory to chemotherapy, antibodies, or stem-cell transplantation. Multiple myeloma still constitutes an incurable disease. CAR-T-cell therapy that targets BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) is currently revolutionizing the treatment of those patients. To monitor and improve treatment outcomes, methods to detect CAR-T cells in human peripheral blood are highly desirable. In this study, three different detection reagents for staining BCMA-CAR-T cells by flow cytometry were compared. Moreover, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect BCMA-CAR-T cells was established. By applying a cell-titration experiment of BCMA-CAR-T cells, both methods were compared head-to-head. In flow-cytometric analysis, the detection reagents used in this study could all detect BCMA-CAR-T cells at a similar level. The results of false-positive background staining differed as follows (standard deviation): the BCMA-detection reagent used on the control revealed a background staining of 0.04% (±0.02%), for the PE-labeled human BCMA peptide it was 0.25% (±0.06%) and for the polyclonal anti-human IgG antibody it was 7.2% (±9.2%). The ability to detect BCMA-CAR-T cells down to a concentration of 0.4% was similar for qPCR and flow cytometry. The qPCR could detect even lower concentrations (0.02–0.01%). In summary, BCMA-CAR-T-cell monitoring can be reliably performed by both flow cytometry and qPCR. In flow cytometry, reagents with low background staining should be preferred.

109 Dominant-negative TGFβ receptor 2 enhances GPC3-targeting CAR-T cell efficacy against hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A121-A121
Author(s):  
Nina Chu ◽  
Michael Overstreet ◽  
Ryan Gilbreth ◽  
Lori Clarke ◽  
Christina Gesse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are engineered synthetic receptors that reprogram T cell specificity and function against a given antigen. Autologous CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated potent efficacy against various hematological malignancies, but has yielded limited success against solid cancers. MEDI7028 is a CAR that targets oncofetal antigen glypican-3 (GPC3), which is expressed in 70–90% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but not in normal liver tissue. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) secretion is increased in advanced HCC, which creates an immunosuppressive milieu and facilitates cancer progression and poor prognosis. We tested whether the anti-tumor efficacy of a GPC3 CAR-T can be enhanced with the co-expression of dominant-negative TGFβRII (TGFβRIIDN).MethodsPrimary human T cells were lentivirally transduced to express GPC3 CAR both with and without TGFβRIIDN. Western blot and flow cytometry were performed on purified CAR-T cells to assess modulation of pathways and immune phenotypes driven by TGFβ in vitro. A xenograft model of human HCC cell line overexpressing TGFβ in immunodeficient mice was used to investigate the in vivo efficacy of TGFβRIIDN armored and unarmored CAR-T. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte populations were analyzed by flow cytometry while serum cytokine levels were quantified with ELISA.ResultsArmoring GPC3 CAR-T with TGFβRIIDN nearly abolished phospho-SMAD2/3 expression upon exposure to recombinant human TGFβ in vitro, indicating that the TGFβ signaling axis was successfully blocked by expression of the dominant-negative receptor. Additionally, expression of TGFβRIIDN suppressed TGFβ-driven CD103 upregulation, further demonstrating attenuation of the pathway by this armoring strategy. In vivo, the TGFβRIIDN armored CAR-T achieved superior tumor regression and delayed tumor regrowth compared to the unarmored CAR-T. The armored CAR-T cells infiltrated HCC tumors more abundantly than their unarmored counterparts, and were phenotypically less exhausted and less differentiated. In line with these observations, we detected significantly more interferon gamma (IFNγ) at peak response and decreased alpha-fetoprotein in the serum of mice treated with armored cells compared to mice receiving unarmored CAR-T, demonstrating in vivo functional superiority of TGFβRIIDN armored CAR-T therapy.ConclusionsArmoring GPC3 CAR-T with TGFβRIIDN abrogates the signaling of TGFβ in vitro and enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of GPC3 CAR-T against TGFβ-expressing HCC tumors in vivo, proving TGFβRIIDN to be an effective armoring strategy against TGFβ-expressing solid malignancies in preclinical models.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by AstraZeneca’s Ethics Board and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

scholarly journals Establishment and validation of in-house cryopreserved CAR/TCR-T cell flow cytometry quality control

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihua Cai ◽  
Michaela Prochazkova ◽  
Chunjie Jiang ◽  
Hannah W. Song ◽  
Jianjian Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Transduction Efficiency ◽  
Quality Controls ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Vector Identity

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T-cell therapy has recently emerged as a promising adoptive immunotherapy approach for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Multiparametric flow cytometry-based assays play a critical role in monitoring cellular manufacturing steps. Since manufacturing CAR/TCR T-cell products must be in compliance with current good manufacturing practices (cGMP), a standard or quality control for flow cytometry assays should be used to ensure the accuracy of flow cytometry results, but none is currently commercially available. Therefore, we established a procedure to generate an in-house cryopreserved CAR/TCR T-cell products for use as a flow cytometry quality control and validated their use. Methods Two CAR T-cell products: CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR T-cells and FGFR4 CAR T-cells and one TCR-engineered T-cell product: KK-LC-1 TCR T-cells were manufactured in Center for Cellular Engineering (CCE), NIH Clinical Center. The products were divided in aliquots, cryopreserved and stored in the liquid nitrogen. The cryopreserved flow cytometry quality controls were tested in flow cytometry assays which measured post-thaw viability, CD3, CD4 and CD8 frequencies as well as the transduction efficiency and vector identity. The long-term stability and shelf-life of cryopreserved quality control cells were evaluated. In addition, the sensitivity as well as the precision assay were also assessed on the cryopreserved quality control cells. Results After thawing, the viability of the cryopreserved CAR/TCR T-cell controls was found to be greater than 50%. The expression of transduction efficiency and vector identity markers by the cryopreserved control cells were stable for at least 1 year; with post-thaw values falling within ± 20% range of the values measured at time of cryopreservation. After thawing and storage at room temperature, the stability of these cryopreserved cells lasted at least 6 h. In addition, our cryopreserved CAR/TCR-T cell quality controls showed a strong correlation between transduction efficiency expression and dilution factors. Furthermore, the results of flow cytometric analysis of the cryopreserved cells among different laboratory technicians and different flow cytometry instruments were comparable, highlighting the reproducibility and reliability of these quality control cells. Conclusion We developed and validated a feasible and reliable procedure to establish a bank of cryopreserved CAR/TCR T-cells for use as flow cytometry quality controls, which can serve as a quality control standard for in-process and lot-release testing of CAR/TCR T-cell products.

scholarly journals P08.05 Combined pharmacological targeting of adenosine 2a- and 2b-receptor enhances CAR T cell function

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A26.2-A27
Author(s):  
M Seifert ◽  
M Benmebarek ◽  
B Cadilha ◽  
J Jobst ◽  
J Dörr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Cytokine Secretion ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Cell Effector

BackgroundDespite remarkable response rates mediated by anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in selected B cell malignancies, CAR T cell therapy still lacks efficacy in the vast majority of tumors. A substantial limiting factor of CAR T cell function is the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Among other mechanisms, the accumulation of adenosine within the tumor can contribute to disease progression by suppressing anti-tumor immune responses. Adenosine 2a- and 2b-receptor (A2A and A2B)-mediated cAMP build-up suppresses T cell effector functions. In the present study we hypothesize, that combination therapy with the selective A2A/A2B dual antagonist AB928 (etrumadenant) enhances CAR T cell efficacy.Materials and MethodsSecond generation murine (anti-EPCAM) and human (anti-MSLN) CAR constructs, containing intracellular CD28 and CD3ζ domains, were fused via overlap extension PCR cloning. Murine or human T cells were retrovirally transduced to stably express the CAR constructs. A2A/A2B signaling in CAR T cells was analyzed by phospho-specific flow cytometry of CREB (pS133)/ATF-1 (pS63). CAR T cell activation was quantified by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α. CAR T cell proliferation was assessed by flow cytometry. CAR T cell cytotoxicity was assessed by impedance based real-time cell analysis.ResultsAB928 protected murine CAR T cells from cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation in the presence of stable adenosine analogue 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA). NECA inhibited antigen-dependent CAR T cell cytokine secretion in response to four murine tumor cell lines. CAR T cell-mediated tumor cell lysis as well as proliferation were decreased in the presence of NECA or adenosine. Importantly, AB928 fully restored CAR T cell cytotoxicity, proliferation, and cytokine secretion in a dose dependent manner. Further, AB928 also restored antigen dependent cytokine secretion of human CAR T cells in the presence of NECA.ConclusionsHere we used the A2A/A2B dual antagonist AB928 to overcome adenosine-mediated suppression of CAR T cells. We found that AB928 enhanced important CAR T cell effector functions in the presence of the adenosine analogue, suggesting that combination therapy with AB928 may improve CAR T cell efficacy. This study was limited to in vitro experiments. To confirm the relevance of our findings, this combination therapy must be further investigated in an in vivo setting.Disclosure InformationM. Seifert: None. M. Benmebarek : None. B. Cadilha : None. J. Jobst: None. J. Dörr: None. T. Lorenzini: None. D. Dhoqina: None. J. Zhang: None. J. Zhang: None. U. Schindler: E. Ownership Interest (stock, stock options, patent or other intellectual property); Modest; Amgen Inc., Arcus Biosciences. Other; Significant; Arcus Biosciences. S. Endres: None. S. Kobold: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Significant; Arcus Biosciences.

scholarly journals B-CLL Mediated Resistance to CAR T Cell Therapy Via Insufficient Activation Is CAR-Independent

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
McKensie Collins ◽  
Weimin Kong ◽  
Inyoung Jung ◽  
Stefan M Lundh ◽  
J. Joseph Melenhorst
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cytokine Production ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a B cell malignancy that accounts for nearly 1/3rd of adult leukemia diagnoses in the Western world. Conventional chemo-immunotherapies initially control progression, but in the absence of curative options patients ultimately succumb to their disease. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is potentially curative, but only 26% of CLL patients have a complete response. CLL-stimulated T cells have reduced effector functions and B-CLL cells themselves are believed to be immunosuppressive. Our work demonstrates that insufficient activation of CAR T cells by CLL cells mediates some of these effects and that the results are conserved between ROR1- and CD19-targeting CARs. Results: In this study we used an in vitro system to model the in vivo anti-tumor response in which CAR T cells serially engage with CLL cells. Multiple stimulations of CD19 or ROR1-targeting CAR T cells with primary CLL cells recapitulated many aspects of known T cell dysfunction including reduced proliferation, cytokine production, and activation. While the initial stimulation induced low level proliferation, subsequent stimulations failed to elicit additional effector functions. We further found that these functional defects were not permanent, and that CAR T cell function could be restored by switching to a stimulus with an aAPC (artificial Antigen Presenting Cell) control cell line. The aAPCs are well-characterized as potent stimulators of CAR T cell effector responses. Flow cytometry revealed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells retained a non-activated, baseline differentiation profile, suggesting that CLL cells fail to stimulate CAR T cells rather than rendering them non-functional. One mechanism that could dampen activation is immune suppression. We assessed this at a high level by stimulating CAR T cells with CLL cells and aAPCs mixed at known ratios. However, even cultures containing 75% CLL cells stimulated proliferation and cytokine production. Extensive immune-phenotyping revealed high level expression of the IL-2 Receptor on 90% (18/20) of the B-CLL cells tested. Since cytokine sinking via IL-2 receptor expression is a well-known mechanism of regulatory T cell suppression, we hypothesized that CLL cells similarly sink IL-2, blunting T cell activation. To test this, we supplemented IL-2 into CLL/CAR T cell co-cultures and showed that this rescued proliferation but only partially restored cytokine production. In contrast to our hypothesis, analysis of cytokine production by flow cytometry showed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells did not produce IL-2 following a 6- or 12-hour stimulus, but TNFα was expressed after 12-hours. Similarly, CAR T cell degranulation, a prerequisite for target cell lysis was triggered after CLL recognition. These data again suggested that CLL cells insufficiently stimulate CAR T cell cytokine production, but also showed that cytolytic activity against CLL cells is intact. We further proposed that CLL cells express insufficient levels of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules to activate CAR T cells. Flow cytometry showed that most CLL cells expressed co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules at low levels; we hypothesized that up-regulating these molecules would enhance CAR T cell targeting of CLL cells. CLL cells were activated with CD40L and IL-4, which increased expression of CD54, CD58, CD80, and CD86. Stimulating CAR T cells with activated CLL cells enhanced CAR T cell proliferation and induced cell conjugate formation, indicating cell activation. Therefore, improving CLL stimulatory capacity can rescue T cell dysfunctions. To assess whether IL-2 addition and CD40 ligation were synergistic, we combined the two assays; however, we saw no additional improvement over IL-2 addition alone, suggesting that the two interventions may act upon the same pathway. Importantly, we also showed that rescue of CAR T cell function via IL-2 addition or CD40 ligation was not CAR-specific, as we observed the functional defects and subsequent rescue with both a ROR1-targeting CAR and the gold standard CD19-targeting CAR. Conclusions: Together, these data show that CAR T cell "defects" in CLL are actually insufficient activation, and improving the stimulatory capacity of CLL cells may enable better clinical responses. Further, this effect is not CAR-specific and these results may therefore be broadly applicable to multiple therapies for this disease. Disclosures Melenhorst: IASO Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Speaker, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Other: Speaker; Simcere of America: Consultancy; Poseida Therapeutics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Advanced Flow Cytometry Assays for Immune Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Applications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Blache ◽  
Ronald Weiss ◽  
Andreas Boldt ◽  
Michael Kapinsky ◽  
André-René Blaudszun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

Adoptive immunotherapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells has achieved successful remissions in refractory B-cell leukemia and B-cell lymphomas. In order to estimate both success and severe side effects of CAR-T cell therapies, longitudinal monitoring of the patient’s immune system including CAR-T cells is desirable to accompany clinical staging. To conduct research on the fate and immunological impact of infused CAR-T cells, we established standardized 13-colour/15-parameter flow cytometry assays that are suitable to characterize immune cell subpopulations in the peripheral blood during CAR-T cell treatment. The respective staining technology is based on pre-formulated dry antibody panels in a uniform format. Additionally, further antibodies of choice can be added to address specific clinical or research questions. We designed panels for the anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy and, as a proof of concept, we assessed a healthy individual and three B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells. We analyzed the presence of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells as well as residual CD19+ B cells, the activation status of the T-cell compartment, the expression of co-stimulatory signaling molecules and cytotoxic agents such as perforin and granzyme B. In summary, this work introduces standardized and modular flow cytometry assays for CAR-T cell clinical research, which could also be adapted in the future as quality controls during the CAR-T cell manufacturing process.

scholarly journals CAR2.0 Therapy for the Management of Post-Transplantation Relapse of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Juan Xiao ◽  
Zhouyang Liu ◽  
Yuan Sun ◽  
Sanfang Tu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). However ~30-40% of patients (pts) still relapse after HCT. We report a cohort of 20 r/rB-ALL pts, who relapsed after HCT, and enrolled in the CAR2.0 study receiving one or two types of CAR-T cells targeting various B-ALL antigens. METHOD: Pts with r/r B-ALL who relapsed after allo-HCT and did not have significant active comorbiditeis, were enrolled in the study. The target antigens were determined based on immunostaining of each pt's leukemia cells, and CAR-T infusions included a single, or a combination of CAR-Ts targeting the following antigens: CD19, CD22, CD123 and CD38. T cells were collected from pts (N=4) or their allogeneic donors (N=16) and transduced with an apoptosis-inducible, safety-engineered lentiviral CAR with the following intracellular signaling domains: CD28/CD27/CD3ζ-iCasp9 (4SCAR). Pts received cyclophosphamide/fludarabine lymphodepleting therapy before infusion of 0.2-5.8x106 CAR-T/kg per infusion. In addition to disease response, we carefully monitored the quality of apheresis cells, efficiency of gene transfer, T cell proliferation rate, CAR-T infusion dose, and the CAR-T copy number in peripheral blood. RESULTS: Among the 20 enrolled pts, 11 were <18 years of age, and 7 were BCR- ABL (P190) positive. Before CAR-T treatment, 7 pts had ≤grade 2 active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and 13 pts received chemotherapy or targeted therapy after their relapse post HCT. Six pts had extramedullary relapse and 2 of them also had bone marrow relapse. The tumor burden in bone marrow ranged from minimal residual disease (MRD) negative to 66% of blasts, based on flow cytometry before CAR-T therapy. Five pts had >10% blasts in bone marrow, 8 pts had <3% blasts, and 7 pts had MRD negative bone marrow (summarized in the Table below). Based on the GVHD history, chimerism state and the available T-cell sources, 16 pts used allogeneic HCT donor T-cells for CAR-T preparation. All pts were full donor chimeras prior to CAR-T infusion, except one pt who had 41% donor cells in bone marrow. Eleven pts received a single CD19 CAR-T infusion, with a mean dose of 1.6x106 CAR-T/kg, and ten achieved an MRD remission and one had progressive disease (PD) within 60 days by flow cytometry. The remaining 9 pts received 2 CAR-Ts (CD19 plus CD22, CD123 or CD38 CAR-Ts) given on the same day, and resulted in 8 CR and 1 PD within 60 days. After CAR-T infusion, no cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 8 pts, and 12 pts experienced CRS of grade 1, which was consistent with the previously described low toxicity profile of the 4SCAR design. Acute GVHD ≤ grade 2 developed in 5 pts within one month following CAR-T cell infusion but all responded well to supportive care and/or cyclosporine infusion. The 2 pts who developed PD after CAR-T infusion included the one with 41% donor chimerism and had grade 2 GVHD and active infections before CAR-T infusion. The other pt with PD following CAR-T had severe bone marrow suppression, low leukocyte count, infections and was transfusion dependent before enrollment. This emphasizes the need for controlling comorbidities before infusion of CAR-T cells. In summary, total 18 patients (90%) achieved negative MRD remission within 2 months of therapy with acceptable CRS. Four pts relapsed (after being in remission for 3 months) and 14 pts are in continued remission, 6 of which for > 1 year. None of these 20 pts received a second HCT after CAR-T infusion. GVHD developed in 5/16 (31%) pts after donor source CAR-T cell infusion within one month, but all responded well to treatment. CONCLUSION: This study focuses on CAR-T cell therapy following relapse after HCT. While the expanded study is ongoing, we present results of the first 20 pts. Use of donor-derived or recipient-derived CAR-T products in pts who relapsed after allo-HCT is well tolerated and it may prolong life expectancy of these pts while maintaining good quality of life. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Quality Control and Nonclinical Research on CAR-T Cell Products: General Principles and Key Issues

Engineering ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghong Li ◽  
Yan Huo ◽  
Lei Yu ◽  
Junzhi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Key Issues

The effect of pembrolizumab in combination with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Maude ◽  
George E Hucks ◽  
Alix Eden Seif ◽  
Mala Kiran Talekar ◽  
David T. Teachey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Expansion ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Cell Detection ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
T Cell Expansion

103 Background: CD19-targeted CAR T cells show CR rates of 70-95% in B-ALL. Yet a subset of patients do not respond or relapse due to poor CAR T cell expansion and persistence. We hypothesized that PD-1 checkpoint pathway inhibition may improve CAR T cell expansion, function and persistence. Methods: Four children with relapsed B-ALL treated with murine (CTL019) or humanized (CTL119) anti-CD19 CAR T cells received 1-3 doses of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (PEM) for partial/no response or prior history of poor CAR T cell persistence starting 14d-2mo post CAR T cell infusion. Results: PEM increased and/or prolonged detection of circulating CAR T cells in all 4 children, with objective responses in 2/4. It was well tolerated, with fever in 2 pts and no autoimmune toxicity. Pts 1-3 received CTL119 for CD19+ relapse after prior murine CD19 CAR T cells. Pt 1 had 1.2% CD19+ residual disease despite expansion with detectable CTL119 by D28 and received PEM at 2mo for progressive disease with decreasing circulating CTL119. CTL119 became detectable at 0.2% of CD3+ cells by flow cytometry, but disease progressed. Pt 2 had no response after initial CTL119 expansion with a rapid disappearance by D28. After CTL119 reinfusion with PEM added 14d later, circulating CAR T cells remained detectable at 4.4% by D28, but disease progressed with decreased CD19 expression. In Pt 3, prior treatment with both CTL019 and CTL119 produced CR with poor CAR T cell persistence followed by CD19+ relapse. CTL119 reinfusion combined with PEM at D14 resulted in CR with prolonged CTL119 persistence (detectable at D50 compared to loss by D36 after 1st CTL119 infusion). Pt 4 received PEM for widespread extramedullary (EM) involvement at D28 post CTL019 infusion despite marrow remission. Initial CTL019 expansion peaked at 63% at D10 and fell to 20% at D28. Resurgence of CTL019 expansion, with a 2nd peak of 70% 11d after PEM, was associated with dramatic reduction in PET-avid disease by 3mo post CTL019. Conclusions: PEM was safely combined with CAR T cells and increased or prolonged CAR T cell detection, with objective responses seen. Immune checkpoint pathways may impact response to CAR T cell treatments and warrant further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02374333, NCT02906371.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document