scholarly journals Plant Organellar DNA Polymerases Evolved Multifunctionality through the Acquisition of Novel Amino Acid Insertions

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1370
Author(s):  
Antolín Peralta-Castro ◽  
Paola L. García-Medel ◽  
Noe Baruch-Torres ◽  
Carlos H. Trasviña-Arenas ◽  
Víctor Juarez-Quintero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Strand Displacement ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Apparent Contradiction ◽  
Organellar Dna ◽  
Base Excision

The majority of DNA polymerases (DNAPs) are specialized enzymes with specific roles in DNA replication, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), or DNA repair. The enzymatic characteristics to perform accurate DNA replication are in apparent contradiction with TLS or DNA repair abilities. For instance, replicative DNAPs incorporate nucleotides with high fidelity and processivity, whereas TLS DNAPs are low-fidelity polymerases with distributive nucleotide incorporation. Plant organelles (mitochondria and chloroplast) are replicated by family-A DNA polymerases that are both replicative and TLS DNAPs. Furthermore, plant organellar DNA polymerases from the plant model Arabidopsis thaliana (AtPOLIs) execute repair of double-stranded breaks by microhomology-mediated end-joining and perform Base Excision Repair (BER) using lyase and strand-displacement activities. AtPOLIs harbor three unique insertions in their polymerization domain that are associated with TLS, microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), strand-displacement, and lyase activities. We postulate that AtPOLIs are able to execute those different functions through the acquisition of these novel amino acid insertions, making them multifunctional enzymes able to participate in DNA replication and DNA repair.

Identification of a unique insertion in plant organellar DNA polymerases responsible for 5′-dRP lyase and strand-displacement activities: Implications for Base Excision Repair

DNA Repair ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos H. Trasviña-Arenas ◽  
Noe Baruch-Torres ◽  
Francisco J. Cordoba-Andrade ◽  
Víctor M. Ayala-García ◽  
Paola L. García-Medel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Strand Displacement ◽  
Organellar Dna ◽  
Base Excision

scholarly journals Databases and Bioinformatics Tools for the Study of DNA Repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaja Milanowska ◽  
Kristian Rother ◽  
Janusz M. Bujnicki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Environmental Chemicals ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Base Excision

DNA is continuously exposed to many different damaging agents such as environmental chemicals, UV light, ionizing radiation, and reactive cellular metabolites. DNA lesions can result in different phenotypical consequences ranging from a number of diseases, including cancer, to cellular malfunction, cell death, or aging. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have developed various repair systems, including biochemical pathways responsible for the removal of single-strand lesions such as base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) or specialized polymerases temporarily taking over lesion-arrested DNA polymerases during the S phase in translesion synthesis (TLS). There are also other mechanisms of DNA repair such as homologous recombination repair (HRR), nonhomologous end-joining repair (NHEJ), or DNA damage response system (DDR). This paper reviews bioinformatics resources specialized in disseminating information about DNA repair pathways, proteins involved in repair mechanisms, damaging agents, and DNA lesions.

scholarly journals Plant DNA Polymerases

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose-Antonio Pedroza-Garcia ◽  
Lieven De Veylder ◽  
Cécile Raynaud
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Variable Number ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Plant Dna ◽  
Organellar Dna

Maintenance of genome integrity is a key process in all organisms. DNA polymerases (Pols) are central players in this process as they are in charge of the faithful reproduction of the genetic information, as well as of DNA repair. Interestingly, all eukaryotes possess a large repertoire of polymerases. Three protein complexes, DNA Pol α, δ, and ε, are in charge of nuclear DNA replication. These enzymes have the fidelity and processivity required to replicate long DNA sequences, but DNA lesions can block their progression. Consequently, eukaryotic genomes also encode a variable number of specialized polymerases (between five and 16 depending on the organism) that are involved in the replication of damaged DNA, DNA repair, and organellar DNA replication. This diversity of enzymes likely stems from their ability to bypass specific types of lesions. In the past 10–15 years, our knowledge regarding plant DNA polymerases dramatically increased. In this review, we discuss these recent findings and compare acquired knowledge in plants to data obtained in other eukaryotes. We also discuss the emerging links between genome and epigenome replication.

scholarly journals Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongrui Guo ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Hongbin Wu ◽  
Hengmin Cui ◽  
Jing Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Occupational And Environmental Exposure ◽  
Base Excision

Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers. Currently, the molecular mechanisms of Ni carcinogenicity remain unclear, but studies have shown that Ni-caused DNA damage is an important carcinogenic mechanism. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of DNA damage associated with Ni exposure and summarized known Ni-caused DNA damage effects. In vitro and vivo studies demonstrated that Ni can induce DNA damage through direct DNA binding and reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulation. Ni can also repress the DNA damage repair systems, including direct reversal, nucleotide repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous-recombination repair (HR), and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathways. The repression of DNA repair is through direct enzyme inhibition and the downregulation of DNA repair molecule expression. Up to now, the exact mechanisms of DNA damage caused by Ni and Ni compounds remain unclear. Revealing the mechanisms of DNA damage from Ni exposure may contribute to the development of preventive strategies in Ni carcinogenicity.

scholarly journals CometChip Enables Parallel Analysis of Multiple DNA Repair Activities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ge ◽  
Le P. Ngo ◽  
Simran Kaushal ◽  
Ian J. Tay ◽  
Elina Thadhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Comet Assay ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parallel Analysis ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

ABSTRACTDNA damage can be cytotoxic and mutagenic and is directly linked to aging, cancer, and heritable diseases. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have evolved highly conserved DNA repair pathways. Many commonly used DNA repair assays are relatively low throughput and are limited to analysis of one protein or one pathway. Here, we have explored the capacity of the CometChip platform for parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities. Taking advantage of the versatility of the traditional comet assay and leveraging micropatterning techniques, the CometChip platform offers increased throughput and sensitivity compared to the traditional comet assay. By exposing cells to DNA damaging agents that create substrates of Base Excision Repair, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Non-Homologous End Joining, we show that the CometChip is an effective method for assessing repair deficiencies in all three pathways. With these advanced applications of the CometChip platform, we expand the efficacy of the comet assay for precise, high-throughput, parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities.

scholarly journals CRISPR-Associated Primase-Polymerases are implicated in prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Zabrady ◽  
Matej Zabrady ◽  
Peter Kolesar ◽  
Arthur W. H. Li ◽  
Aidan J. Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Acquired Immunity ◽  
Strand Displacement ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Type Iiia ◽  
Maintain Genome Stability ◽  
Cas Proteins

AbstractCRISPR-Cas pathways provide prokaryotes with acquired “immunity” against foreign genetic elements, including phages and plasmids. Although many of the proteins associated with CRISPR-Cas mechanisms are characterized, some requisite enzymes remain elusive. Genetic studies have implicated host DNA polymerases in some CRISPR-Cas systems but CRISPR-specific replicases have not yet been discovered. We have identified and characterised a family of CRISPR-Associated Primase-Polymerases (CAPPs) in a range of prokaryotes that are operonically associated with Cas1 and Cas2. CAPPs belong to the Primase-Polymerase (Prim-Pol) superfamily of replicases that operate in various DNA repair and replication pathways that maintain genome stability. Here, we characterise the DNA synthesis activities of bacterial CAPP homologues from Type IIIA and IIIB CRISPR-Cas systems and establish that they possess a range of replicase activities including DNA priming, polymerisation and strand-displacement. We demonstrate that CAPPs operonically-associated partners, Cas1 and Cas2, form a complex that possesses spacer integration activity. We show that CAPPs physically associate with the Cas proteins to form bespoke CRISPR-Cas complexes. Finally, we propose how CAPPs activities, in conjunction with their partners, may function to undertake key roles in CRISPR-Cas adaptation.

scholarly journals An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
K W Caldecott ◽  
C K McKeown ◽  
J D Tucker ◽  
S Ljungquist ◽  
L H Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Affinity Chromatography ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Dna Ligase ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Dna Ligase Iii

XRCC1, the human gene that fully corrects the Chinese hamster ovary DNA repair mutant EM9, encodes a protein involved in the rejoining of DNA single-strand breaks that arise following treatment with alkylating agents or ionizing radiation. In this study, a cDNA minigene encoding oligohistidine-tagged XRCC1 was constructed to facilitate affinity purification of the recombinant protein. This construct, designated pcD2EHX, fully corrected the EM9 phenotype of high sister chromatid exchange, indicating that the histidine tag was not detrimental to XRCC1 activity. Affinity chromatography of extract from EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EHX resulted in the copurification of histidine-tagged XRCC1 and DNA ligase III activity. Neither XRCC1 or DNA ligase III activity was purified during affinity chromatography of extract from EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EX, a cDNA minigene that encodes untagged XRCC1, or extract from wild-type AA8 or untransfected EM9 cells. The copurification of DNA ligase III activity with histidine-tagged XRCC1 suggests that the two proteins are present in the cell as a complex. Furthermore, DNA ligase III activity was present at lower levels in EM9 cells than in AA8 cells and was returned to normal levels in EM9 cells transfected with pcD2EHX or pcD2EX. These findings indicate that XRCC1 is required for normal levels of DNA ligase III activity, and they implicate a major role for this DNA ligase in DNA base excision repair in mammalian cells.

Incorporation of 5’,8-cyclo-2’deoxyadenosines by DNA repair polymerases via base excision repair

DNA Repair ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 103258
Author(s):  
Pawlos S. Tsegay ◽  
Daniela Hernandez ◽  
Christopher Brache ◽  
Chryssostomos Chatgilialoglu ◽  
Marios G. Krokidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Base Excision

scholarly journals Molecular Mechanisms of the Whole DNA Repair System: A Comparison of Bacterial and Eukaryotic Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rihito Morita ◽  
Shuhei Nakane ◽  
Atsuhiro Shimada ◽  
Masao Inoue ◽  
Hitoshi Iino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Thermus Thermophilus ◽  
Repair System ◽  
System A ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Base Excision

DNA is subjected to many endogenous and exogenous damages. All organisms have developed a complex network of DNA repair mechanisms. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported: direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, and recombination repair pathways. Recent studies of the fundamental mechanisms for DNA repair processes have revealed a complexity beyond that initially expected, with inter- and intrapathway complementation as well as functional interactions between proteins involved in repair pathways. In this paper we give a broad overview of the whole DNA repair system and focus on the molecular basis of the repair machineries, particularly inThermus thermophilusHB8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document