scholarly journals Molecular Mechanisms of the Whole DNA Repair System: A Comparison of Bacterial and Eukaryotic Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rihito Morita ◽  
Shuhei Nakane ◽  
Atsuhiro Shimada ◽  
Masao Inoue ◽  
Hitoshi Iino ◽  
...  

DNA is subjected to many endogenous and exogenous damages. All organisms have developed a complex network of DNA repair mechanisms. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported: direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, and recombination repair pathways. Recent studies of the fundamental mechanisms for DNA repair processes have revealed a complexity beyond that initially expected, with inter- and intrapathway complementation as well as functional interactions between proteins involved in repair pathways. In this paper we give a broad overview of the whole DNA repair system and focus on the molecular basis of the repair machineries, particularly inThermus thermophilusHB8.

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaja Milanowska ◽  
Kristian Rother ◽  
Janusz M. Bujnicki

DNA is continuously exposed to many different damaging agents such as environmental chemicals, UV light, ionizing radiation, and reactive cellular metabolites. DNA lesions can result in different phenotypical consequences ranging from a number of diseases, including cancer, to cellular malfunction, cell death, or aging. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have developed various repair systems, including biochemical pathways responsible for the removal of single-strand lesions such as base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) or specialized polymerases temporarily taking over lesion-arrested DNA polymerases during the S phase in translesion synthesis (TLS). There are also other mechanisms of DNA repair such as homologous recombination repair (HRR), nonhomologous end-joining repair (NHEJ), or DNA damage response system (DDR). This paper reviews bioinformatics resources specialized in disseminating information about DNA repair pathways, proteins involved in repair mechanisms, damaging agents, and DNA lesions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Ghosh ◽  
Tapas Saha

Faithful transmission of genetic information through generations ensures genomic stability and integrity. However, genetic alterations occur every now and then during the course of genome duplication. In order to repair these genetic defects and lesions, nature has devised several repair pathways which function promptly to prevent the cell from accumulating permanent mutations. These repair mechanisms seem to be significantly impacted by posttranslational modifications of proteins like phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Protein ubiquitination is emerging as a critical regulatory mechanism of DNA damage response. Non-proteolytic, proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin involving monoubiquitination and polyubiquitination of DNA repair proteins contribute significantly to the signaling of DNA repair pathways. In this paper, we will particularly highlight the work on ubiquitin-mediated signaling in the repair processes involving the Fanconi anemia pathway, translesional synthesis, nucleotide excision repair, and repair of double-strand breaks. We will also discuss the role of ubiquitin ligases in regulating checkpoint mechanisms, the role of deubiquitinating enzymes, and the growing possibilities of therapeutic intervention in this ubiquitin-conjugation system.


Genetics ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-161
Author(s):  
Sohei Kondo

ABSTRACT Recent knowledge of UV-resistance mechanisms in microorganisms is reviewed in perspective, with emphasis on E. coli. Dark-repair genes are classified into "excision" and "tolerance" (ability to produce a normal copy of DNA from damaged DNA). The phenotype of DNA repair is rather common among the microorganisms compared, and yet their molecular mechanisms are not universal. In contrast, DNA photoreactivation is the simplest and the most general among these three repair systems. It is proposed that DNA repair mechanisms evolved in the order: photoreactivation, excision repair, and tolerance repair. The UV protective capacity and light-inducible RNA photoreactivation possessed by some plant viruses are interpreted to be the result of solar UV selection during a rather recent era of evolution.


Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilde Clarissa Malfatti ◽  
Giulia Antoniali ◽  
Marta Codrich ◽  
Silvia Burra ◽  
Giovanna Mangiapane ◽  
...  

Abstract Alterations of DNA repair enzymes and consequential triggering of aberrant DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are thought to play a pivotal role in genomic instabilities associated with cancer development, and are further thought to be important predictive biomarkers for therapy using the synthetic lethality paradigm. However, novel unpredicted perspectives are emerging from the identification of several non-canonical roles of DNA repair enzymes, particularly in gene expression regulation, by different molecular mechanisms, such as (i) non-coding RNA regulation of tumour suppressors, (ii) epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of genes involved in genotoxic responses and (iii) paracrine effects of secreted DNA repair enzymes triggering the cell senescence phenotype. The base excision repair (BER) pathway, canonically involved in the repair of non-distorting DNA lesions generated by oxidative stress, ionising radiation, alkylation damage and spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of nucleotide bases, represents a paradigm for the multifaceted roles of complex DDR in human cells. This review will focus on what is known about the canonical and non-canonical functions of BER enzymes related to cancer development, highlighting novel opportunities to understand the biology of cancer and representing future perspectives for designing new anticancer strategies. We will specifically focus on APE1 as an example of a pleiotropic and multifunctional BER protein.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (8) ◽  
pp. 2104-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asli Memisoglu ◽  
Leona Samson

ABSTRACT DNA damage is unavoidable, and organisms across the evolutionary spectrum possess DNA repair pathways that are critical for cell viability and genomic stability. To understand the role of base excision repair (BER) in protecting eukaryotic cells against alkylating agents, we generated Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains mutant for the mag1 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase gene. We report that S. pombe mag1 mutants have only a slightly increased sensitivity to methylation damage, suggesting that Mag1-initiated BER plays a surprisingly minor role in alkylation resistance in this organism. We go on to show that other DNA repair pathways play a larger role than BER in alkylation resistance. Mutations in genes involved in nucleotide excision repair (rad13) and recombinational repair (rhp51) are much more alkylation sensitive thanmag1 mutants. In addition, S. pombe mutant for the flap endonuclease rad2 gene, whose precise function in DNA repair is unclear, were also more alkylation sensitive thanmag1 mutants. Further, mag1 andrad13 interact synergistically for alkylation resistance, and mag1 and rhp51 display a surprisingly complex genetic interaction. A model for the role of BER in the generation of alkylation-induced DNA strand breaks in S. pombe is discussed.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4799-4799
Author(s):  
April M. Reed ◽  
Melissa L. Fishel ◽  
Mark R. Kelley ◽  
Rafat Abonour

Abstract Melphalan (M) is an active agent against multiple myeloma (MM). One of the obstacles with M treatment is the patient’s ability to tolerate side effects such as mucositis and pancytopenia. This is especially true for those patients >70 years of age. We hypothesize that potentiation of M-induced cytotoxicity is possible in MM with agents that target, and therefore further imbalance, multiple DNA repair pathways. A key protein in the Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway, Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease/ redox factor (APE1/Ref-1 or APE1) plays a major role in the repair of damage caused by chemotherapeutic agents including M and Temozolomide (TMZ), interacts with a number of transcription factors (HIF1-a, p53, AP1, NFkB, etc) to regulate their function through oxidation/reduction (redox) signaling, and is overexpressed in refractory/relapsed MM cells. Furthermore, a reduction in APE1 protein sensitizes MM cells to melphalan indicating that inhibition of this protein may have therapeutic potential in MM. In order to decipher the importance of APE1’s redox and repair functions in MM cells’ response to DNA damage via melphalan and TMZ, we have available to us small molecule APE1 inhibitors that affect only the repair activity or only the redox activity of APE1. The mechanism of action of MLP is primarily via monoadduct leading to DNA interstrand cross-link (ICL) formation which is processed by the Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway. MLP also causes N7methyl-G and N3methyl-A adduct formation which are repaired by the BER pathway. For these studies, we treated RPMI 8226 cells with several chemotherapeutic agents: M; TMZ, which creates primarily N7methyl-G and N3methyl-A adducts; Methoxyamine (MX), which has been shown to inhibit further processing by the BER pathway; and a small molecule which blocks the redox function of APE1. Our purpose was to overwhelm the DNA repair pathways by causing the accumulation of DNA repair intermediates and inducing apoptosis. M-induced cytotoxicity is enhanced by TMZ (CI=0.08), MX (CI=0.89), and E3330 (CI=0.06), and this effect was synergistic as determined by CalcuSyn software which generates median effect and combinational index (CI) values, with CI<1 indicative of synergy. Using MX to inhibit APE1 in combination with TMZ results in an increase in DNA damage and an increase in apoptosis in 8226 cells. Furthermore, the combination of the redox inhibitor + MX which blocks both functions of APE1 also results in an increase in apoptosis in the MM cells. Further studies include the addition of M to these combinations that are demonstrating an increase in efficacy in MM cells. These results indicate that using these DNA repair-targeted agents in addition to MLP may be a feasible way to increase the effect of the M on MM cells. The potential advantages to patients would be that they would be able to tolerate more treatments and that the combination treatments would be more effective than treatment with M alone. We anticipate that effective modulation of M and/or TMZ will overcome resistance without compromising efficacy and help to alleviate some of the side effects patients have to endure with melphalan treatment. This may be particularly advantageous to the more elderly patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 432 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Thierbach ◽  
Gunnar Drewes ◽  
Markus Fusser ◽  
Anja Voigt ◽  
Doreen Kuhlow ◽  
...  

DNA-repair mechanisms enable cells to maintain their genetic information by protecting it from mutations that may cause malignant growth. Recent evidence suggests that specific DNA-repair enzymes contain ISCs (iron–sulfur clusters). The nuclearencoded protein frataxin is essential for the mitochondrial biosynthesis of ISCs. Frataxin deficiency causes a neurodegenerative disorder named Friedreich's ataxia in humans. Various types of cancer occurring at young age are associated with this disease, and hence with frataxin deficiency. Mice carrying a hepatocyte-specific disruption of the frataxin gene develop multiple liver tumours for unresolved reasons. In the present study, we show that frataxin deficiency in murine liver is associated with increased basal levels of oxidative DNA base damage. Accordingly, eukaryotic V79 fibroblasts overexpressing human frataxin show decreased basal levels of these modifications, while prokaryotic Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium TA104 strains transformed with human frataxin show decreased mutation rates. The repair rates of oxidative DNA base modifications in V79 cells overexpressing frataxin were significantly higher than in control cells. Lastly, cleavage activity related to the ISC-independent repair enzyme 8-oxoguanine glycosylase was found to be unaltered by frataxin overexpression. These findings indicate that frataxin modulates DNA-repair mechanisms probably due to its impact on ISC-dependent repair proteins, linking mitochondrial dysfunction to DNA repair and tumour initiation.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upasna Thapar ◽  
Bruce Demple

Since the discovery of the base excision repair (BER) system for DNA more than 40 years ago, new branches of the pathway have been revealed at the biochemical level by in vitro studies. Largely for technical reasons, however, the confirmation of these subpathways in vivo has been elusive. We review methods that have been used to explore BER in mammalian cells, indicate where there are important knowledge gaps to fill, and suggest a way to address them.


2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M.A. Costa ◽  
W.C. Lima ◽  
C.I.G. Vogel ◽  
C.M. Berra ◽  
D.D. Luche ◽  
...  

There is much interest in the identification and characterization of genes involved in DNA repair because of their importance in the maintenance of the genome integrity. The high level of conservation of DNA repair genes means that these genetic elements may be used in phylogenetic studies as a source of information on the genetic origin and evolution of species. The mechanisms by which damaged DNA is repaired are well understood in bacteria, yeast and mammals, but much remains to be learned as regards plants. We identified genes involved in DNA repair mechanisms in sugarcane using a similarity search of the Brazilian Sugarcane Expressed Sequence Tag (SUCEST) database against known sequences deposited in other public databases (National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS) Arabidopsis thaliana database). This search revealed that most of the various proteins involved in DNA repair in sugarcane are similar to those found in other eukaryotes. However, we also identified certain intriguing features found only in plants, probably due to the independent evolution of this kingdom. The DNA repair mechanisms investigated include photoreactivation, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination repair and DNA lesion tolerance. We report the main differences found in the DNA repair machinery in plant cells as compared to other organisms. These differences point to potentially different strategies plants employ to deal with DNA damage, that deserve further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document