scholarly journals Databases and Bioinformatics Tools for the Study of DNA Repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaja Milanowska ◽  
Kristian Rother ◽  
Janusz M. Bujnicki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Environmental Chemicals ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Base Excision

DNA is continuously exposed to many different damaging agents such as environmental chemicals, UV light, ionizing radiation, and reactive cellular metabolites. DNA lesions can result in different phenotypical consequences ranging from a number of diseases, including cancer, to cellular malfunction, cell death, or aging. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have developed various repair systems, including biochemical pathways responsible for the removal of single-strand lesions such as base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) or specialized polymerases temporarily taking over lesion-arrested DNA polymerases during the S phase in translesion synthesis (TLS). There are also other mechanisms of DNA repair such as homologous recombination repair (HRR), nonhomologous end-joining repair (NHEJ), or DNA damage response system (DDR). This paper reviews bioinformatics resources specialized in disseminating information about DNA repair pathways, proteins involved in repair mechanisms, damaging agents, and DNA lesions.

scholarly journals Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongrui Guo ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Hongbin Wu ◽  
Hengmin Cui ◽  
Jing Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Occupational And Environmental Exposure ◽  
Base Excision

Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers. Currently, the molecular mechanisms of Ni carcinogenicity remain unclear, but studies have shown that Ni-caused DNA damage is an important carcinogenic mechanism. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of DNA damage associated with Ni exposure and summarized known Ni-caused DNA damage effects. In vitro and vivo studies demonstrated that Ni can induce DNA damage through direct DNA binding and reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulation. Ni can also repress the DNA damage repair systems, including direct reversal, nucleotide repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous-recombination repair (HR), and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathways. The repression of DNA repair is through direct enzyme inhibition and the downregulation of DNA repair molecule expression. Up to now, the exact mechanisms of DNA damage caused by Ni and Ni compounds remain unclear. Revealing the mechanisms of DNA damage from Ni exposure may contribute to the development of preventive strategies in Ni carcinogenicity.

scholarly journals miR-27b-3p a Negative Regulator of DSB-DNA Repair

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1333
Author(s):  
Ricardo I. Peraza-Vega ◽  
Mahara Valverde ◽  
Emilio Rojas
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Pathway Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Base Excision

Understanding the regulation of DNA repair mechanisms is of utmost importance to identify altered cellular processes that lead to diseases such as cancer through genomic instability. In this sense, miRNAs have shown a crucial role. Specifically, miR-27b-3 biogenesis has been shown to be induced in response to DNA damage, suggesting that this microRNA has a role in DNA repair. In this work, we show that the overexpression of miR-27b-3p reduces the ability of cells to repair DNA lesions, mainly double-stranded breaks (DSB), and causes the deregulation of genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), base excision repair (BER), and the cell cycle. DNA damage was induced in BALB/c-3T3 cells, which overexpress miR-27b-3p, using xenobiotic agents with specific mechanisms of action that challenge different repair mechanisms to determine their reparative capacity. In addition, we evaluated the expression of 84 DNA damage signaling and repair genes and performed pathway enrichment analysis to identify altered cellular processes. Taken together, our results indicate that miR-27b-3p acts as a negative regulator of DNA repair when overexpressed.

The Clustered DNA Lesions – Types, Pathways of Repair and Relevance to Human Health

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 2722-2735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Bukowska ◽  
Boleslaw T. Karwowski
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Mutual Distribution

The clustered DNA lesions are a characteristic feature of ionizing radiation and are defined as two or more damage sites formed within 20 bps after the passage of a single radiation track. The clustered DNA lesions are divided into two major groups: double-stranded breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB clusters also known as Oxidatively-induced Clustered DNA Lesions (OCDLs), which could involve either two opposing strands or the same strand. As irradiation is gaining greater interest in cancer treatment as well as in imaging techniques, the detailed knowledge of its genotoxicity and the mechanisms of repair of radiation-induced DNA damage remain issues to explore. In this review we look at the ways the cell copes with clustered DNA lesions, especially with 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxypurines. As the base excision repair deals with isolated lesions, complex damage is more difficult to repair. Depending on the number of lesions within a cluster, their types and mutual distribution, long-patch BER or NER are activated. During the repair of opposing lesions, DSBs could be generated, which are repaired either by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The repair of individual lesions within a cluster progresses gradually. This slower processing of particular damage might lead to severe biological consequences such as misrepair, mutations and chromosomal rearrengement as it enhances the plausibility of a cluster encountering a replication fork prior to its repair. The consequences of clustered DNA lesions on cell survival and their relevance to the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy and radiodiagnosis will also be discussed.

scholarly journals A Multi-Endpoint Approach to Base Excision Repair Incision Activity Augmented by PARylation and DNA Damage Levels in Mice: Impact of Sex and Age

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 6600
Author(s):  
Nicola Winkelbeiner ◽  
Viktoria K. Wandt ◽  
Franziska Ebert ◽  
Kristina Lossow ◽  
Ezgi E. Bankoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Murine Liver ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Cellular Dna

Investigation of processes that contribute to the maintenance of genomic stability is one crucial factor in the attempt to understand mechanisms that facilitate ageing. The DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair mechanisms are crucial to safeguard the integrity of DNA and to prevent accumulation of persistent DNA damage. Among them, base excision repair (BER) plays a decisive role. BER is the major repair pathway for small oxidative base modifications and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites. We established a highly sensitive non-radioactive assay to measure BER incision activity in murine liver samples. Incision activity can be assessed towards the three DNA lesions 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), 5-hydroxy-2’-deoxyuracil (5-OHdU), and an AP site analogue. We applied the established assay to murine livers of adult and old mice of both sexes. Furthermore, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) was assessed, which is an important determinant in DDR and BER. Additionally, DNA damage levels were measured to examine the overall damage levels. No impact of ageing on the investigated endpoints in liver tissue were found. However, animal sex seems to be a significant impact factor, as evident by sex-dependent alterations in all endpoints investigated. Moreover, our results revealed interrelationships between the investigated endpoints indicative for the synergetic mode of action of the cellular DNA integrity maintaining machinery.

Associations between DNA Damage, DNA Base Excision Repair Gene Variability and Alzheimer's Disease Risk

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 152-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Kwiatkowski ◽  
Piotr Czarny ◽  
Monika Toma ◽  
Natalia Jurkowska ◽  
Agnieszka Sliwinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Polymorphic Variants ◽  
Base Excision

Background: Increased oxidative damage to DNA is one of the pathways involved in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Insufficient base excision repair (BER) is in part responsible for increased oxidative DNA damage. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of polymorphic variants of BER-involved genes and the peripheral markers of DNA damage and repair in patients with AD. Material and Methods: Comet assays and TaqMan probes were used to assess DNA damage, BER efficiency and polymorphic variants of 12 BER genes in blood samples from 105 AD patients and 130 controls. The DNA repair efficacy (DRE) was calculated according to a specific equation. Results: The levels of endogenous and oxidative DNA damages were higher in AD patients than controls. The polymorphic variants of XRCC1 c.580C>T XRCC1 c.1196A>G and OGG1 c.977C>G are associated with increased DNA damage in AD. Conclusion: Our results show that oxidative stress and disturbances in DRE are particularly responsible for the elevated DNA lesions in AD. The results suggest that oxidative stress and disruption in DNA repair may contribute to increased DNA damage in AD patients and risk of this disease. In addition, disturbances in DRE may be associated with polymorphisms of OGG1 and XRCC1.

scholarly journals The TFIIH subunits p44/p62 act as a damage sensor during nucleotide excision repair

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
JT Barnett ◽  
J Kuper ◽  
W Koelmel ◽  
C Kisker ◽  
NM Kad
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
The Core ◽  
Nucleotide Excision

AbstractNucleotide excision repair (NER) protects the genome following exposure to diverse types of DNA damage, including UV light and chemotherapeutics. Mutations in mammalian NER genes lead to diseases such as xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. In eukaryotes, the major transcription factor TFIIH is the central hub of NER. The core components of TFIIH include the helicases XPB, XPD, and five ‘structural’ subunits. Two of these structural TFIIH proteins, p44 and p62 remain relatively unstudied; p44 is known to regulate the helicase activity of XPD during NER whereas p62’s role is thought to be structural. However, a recent cryo-EM structure shows that p44, p62, and XPD make extensive contacts within TFIIH, with part of p62 occupying XPD’s DNA binding site. This observation implies a more extensive role in DNA repair beyond the structural integrity of TFIIH. Here, we show that p44 stimulates XPD’s ATPase but upon encountering DNA damage, further stimulation is only observed when p62 is part of the ternary complex; suggesting a role for the p44/p62 heterodimer in TFIIH’s mechanism of damage detection. Using single molecule imaging, we demonstrate that p44/p62 independently interacts with DNA; it is seen to diffuse, however, in the presence of UV-induced DNA lesions the complex stalls. Combined with the analysis of a recent cryo-EM structure we suggest that p44/p62 acts as a novel DNA-binding entity within TFIIH that is capable of recognizing DNA damage. This revises our understanding of TFIIH and prompts more extensive investigation into the core subunits for an active role during both DNA repair and transcription.

scholarly journals DICER- and MMSET-catalyzed H4K20me2 recruits the nucleotide excision repair factor XPA to DNA damage sites

2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalaka Chitale ◽  
Holger Richly
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Damage Site ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Lesion Recognition

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation triggers the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the lesion sites and the deposition of histone marks as part of the DNA damage response. The major DNA repair pathway removing DNA lesions caused by exposure to UV light is nucleotide excision repair (NER). We have previously demonstrated that the endoribonuclease DICER facilitates chromatin decondensation during lesion recognition in the global-genomic branch of NER. Here, we report that DICER mediates the recruitment of the methyltransferase MMSET to the DNA damage site. We show that MMSET is required for efficient NER and that it catalyzes the dimethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20me2). H4K20me2 at DNA damage sites facilitates the recruitment of the NER factor XPA. Our work thus provides evidence for an H4K20me2-dependent mechanism of XPA recruitment during lesion recognition in the global-genomic branch of NER.

Five repair pathways in one context: chromatin modification during DNA repairThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 27th International West Coast Chromatin and Chromosome Conference, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeganeh Ataian ◽  
Jocelyn E. Krebs
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Chromatin Modification ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Nonhistone Proteins ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Base Excision

The eukaryotic cell is faced with more than 10 000 various kinds of DNA lesions per day. Failure to repair such lesions can lead to mutations, genomic instability, or cell death. Therefore, cells have developed 5 major repair pathways in which different kinds of DNA damage can be detected and repaired: homologous recombination, nonhomologous end joining, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and mismatch repair. However, the efficient repair of DNA damage is complicated by the fact that the genomic DNA is packaged through histone and nonhistone proteins into chromatin, a highly condensed structure that hinders DNA accessibility and its subsequent repair. Therefore, the cellular repair machinery has to circumvent this natural barrier to gain access to the damaged site in a timely manner. Repair of DNA lesions in the context of chromatin occurs with the assistance of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes and histone-modifying enzymes, which allow access of the necessary repair factors to the lesion. Here we review recent studies that elucidate the interplay between chromatin modifiers / remodelers and the major DNA repair pathways.

scholarly journals CometChip Enables Parallel Analysis of Multiple DNA Repair Activities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ge ◽  
Le P. Ngo ◽  
Simran Kaushal ◽  
Ian J. Tay ◽  
Elina Thadhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Comet Assay ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parallel Analysis ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

ABSTRACTDNA damage can be cytotoxic and mutagenic and is directly linked to aging, cancer, and heritable diseases. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have evolved highly conserved DNA repair pathways. Many commonly used DNA repair assays are relatively low throughput and are limited to analysis of one protein or one pathway. Here, we have explored the capacity of the CometChip platform for parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities. Taking advantage of the versatility of the traditional comet assay and leveraging micropatterning techniques, the CometChip platform offers increased throughput and sensitivity compared to the traditional comet assay. By exposing cells to DNA damaging agents that create substrates of Base Excision Repair, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Non-Homologous End Joining, we show that the CometChip is an effective method for assessing repair deficiencies in all three pathways. With these advanced applications of the CometChip platform, we expand the efficacy of the comet assay for precise, high-throughput, parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document