scholarly journals Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6176
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kuligowski ◽  
Anna Skrzek ◽  
Błażej Cieślik
Keyword(s):  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Lumbar Radiculopathy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

The aim of this study was to describe and update current knowledge of manual therapy accuracy in treating cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, to identify the limitations in current studies, and to suggest areas for future research. The study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to April 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) presence of radiculopathy; (2) treatment defined as manual therapy (i.e., traction, manipulation, mobilization); and (3) publication defined as a Randomized Controlled Trial. The electronic literature search resulted in 473 potentially relevant articles. Finally, 27 articles were accepted: 21 on cervical (CR) and 6 in lumbar radiculopathy (LR). The mean PEDro score for CR was 6.6 (SD 1.3), and for LR 6.7 (SD 1.6). Traction-oriented techniques are the most frequently chosen treatment form for CR and are efficient in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes. In LR, each of the included publications used a different form of manual therapy, which makes it challenging to summarize knowledge in this group. Of included publications, 93% were either of moderate or low quality, which indicates that quality improvement is necessary for this type of research.

scholarly journals Impact of Septic Bundle on Critically Ill Patients Outcomes: Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
Dalia Zaki Rehbeini
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Mortality Probability

Objective: This review is aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing the septic bundle on critically ill patients’ outcomes. Methodology: Cochrane Collaboration, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed were searched, covering the period 2008 to 2019. Only cohort, case-control and randomized controlled trial studies with full text in English were eligible. Studies that discussed the effect of implementing the septic bundle on critically ill patients' outcomes were only included. Results: Out of 1,551 articles searched, and after screening inclusion and exclusion criteria; ten articles only were met the inclusion criteria which have considered the effect of implementing a septic bundle on critically ill patients’ outcomes. All of these ten studies revealed a significant effect of the septic bundle on the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients especially mortality. Conclusion: This review confirmed that implementing septic bundle for critically ill patients has been significantly reduced outcomes which are length of hospital stay, length of stay at emergency department, mortality probability, admission to the intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation.

Persian manual therapy method for chronic low-back pain with lumbar radiculopathy; a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-130
Author(s):  
Mohamad Sanei ◽  
Farzin Roozafzai ◽  
Shobeir Rostami Abousaidi ◽  
Mahmood Hamze ◽  
Amir-Masoud Negarestani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Radiculopathy ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Effects of manual therapy techniques in the treatment of pain in post mastectomy patients: systematic review.

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Franciane Batista Basilio ◽  
Raphaela Medeiros Miranda Anjos ◽  
Elany Pereira Medeiros ◽  
Elaine Marques Franco Melo ◽  
Rodrigo Marcel Valentim Silva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Muscle Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Treatment Objective ◽  
External Causes

Introduction: Cancer is now the third leading cause of death in the world, surpassed only by accidents and cardiovascular deaths by external causes, among them stands mammary carcinoma. Mastectomy is in a procedure consisting of invasive breast removal due to some anatomical and functional changes previously diagnosed. With the growth of the disease and its high content in increasingly young women, Manual Therapy has been used as a new form of treatment. Objective: To show the effects of manual therapy in patients after mastectomy surgery. Method: This was a systematic review study in which secondary and tertiary sources were used, using the databases PubMed, Medline, Lilacs and SciELO. It was adopted as inclusion criteria studies classified as: a randomized controlled trial, with publication period between 2009 and 2013. Were used as search terms: "Mastectomy", "Neck", "Shoulder Pain", "Musculoskeletal Manipulations" and "Functionality". Results: Among the 37 initially selected by electronic search in the databases of articles, 25 were excluded for the title did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 12 retained studies, 5 were excluded for duplicity. 7 studies were selected for a more thorough analysis through summary, 2 of them being excluded. The remaining 5 articles were evaluated from reading the text. It can be seen that the manual therapy techniques have significant results in the alleviation of muscle pain in patients submitted to surgery mastectomia. Conclusion: It can be seen that the manual therapy techniques have significant results in the alleviation of muscle pain in patients undergoing the mastectomy surgery. However, there is still a lack of studies of type randomized controlled trial on the effects of manual therapy in patients in the postoperative period of mastectomy

Suicide Prevention E-Learning Modules Designed for Gatekeepers

Crisis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rezvan Ghoncheh ◽  
Hans M. Koot ◽  
Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof
Keyword(s):  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Learning Modules ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Different Characteristics ◽  
Google Search

Background: E-learning modules can be a useful method for educating gatekeepers in suicide prevention and awareness. Aims: To review and provide an overview of e-learning modules on suicide prevention designed for gatekeepers and assess their effectiveness. Method: Two strategies were used. First, articles were systematically searched in databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Second, Google search was used to find e-learning modules on the Web. Results: The literature search resulted in 448 papers, of which none met the inclusion criteria of this study. The Google search resulted in 130 hits, of which 23 met the inclusion criteria of this review. Organizations that owned the modules were contacted, of which 13 responded and nine were included in this study. The effectiveness of two e-learning modules is currently being tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), one organization is planning to test the effectiveness of their module, and one organization has compared their face-to-face training with their online training. Furthermore, the included modules have different characteristics. Conclusion: There is a need for RCTs to study the effectiveness of online modules in this area and to understand which characteristics are essential to create effective e-learning modules to educate gatekeepers in suicide prevention.

scholarly journals Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice at distances of 20 cm vs 40 cm

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winra Pratita ◽  
Supriatmo Supriatmo ◽  
Guslihan Dasa Tjipta
Keyword(s):  
Light Source ◽  
Neonatal Jaundice ◽  
Serum Bilirubin ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Total Serum ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Bilirubin Concentration ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Common Problems

Background Neonatal jaundice is one of the most common problems in newborns. Phototherapy is the most widespread treatment for lowering bilirubin concentration in neonates. Phototherapy may be more effective if the light source is placed closer to the neonate.Objective To compare the effectiveness of phototherapy with a 20 cm distance between the light source and the neonate vs a 40 cm distance for decreasing serum bilirubin concentrationMethods An open, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at H. Adam Malik and Pirngadi Hospitals in Medan from August 2009 to March 2010. Subjects were divided into two groups. One group (n=30) received phototherapy at a distance of 20 cm between the light source and the neonate, while the other group (n=30) received phototherapy at a distance of 40 cm. The inclusion criteria in the study were newborns presenting with neonatal jaundice in their first week of life. Serum bilirubin levels were measured at baseline, as well as after 12 hours and 24 hours of phototherapy.Results The mean total bilirubin levels of the 20 cm and 40 cm groups at baseline were 18.8 (SD 1.73) mg/dL and 17.7 (SD 1.46) mg/dL, respectively, not significantly different. After 24 hours of phototherapy, the mean decreases in total serum bilirubin levels of the 20 cm and 40 cm groups were significantly different with 7.6 (SD 1.01) mg/dL and 2.0 (SD 0.83) mg/dL, respectively, (P<0.05).Conclusion Phototherapy with a 20 cm distance between the light source and the neonate is more effective than a 40 cm distance for decreasing bilirubin levels at 24 hours in newborns with hyperbilirubinemia.

The impact of patient narratives on medical students’ perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Bientzle ◽  
Marie Eggeling ◽  
Simone Korger ◽  
Joachim Kimmerle
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Medical Training ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Information Text ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: Successful shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice requires that future clinicians learn to appreciate the value of patient participation as early as in their medical training. Narratives, such as patient testimonials, have been successfully used to support patients’ decision-making process. Previous research suggests that narratives may also be used for increasing clinicians’ empathy and responsiveness in medical consultations. However, so far, no studies have investigated the benefits of narratives for conveying the relevance of SDM to medical students.METHODS: In this randomized controlled experiment, N = 167 medical students were put into a scenario where they prepared for medical consultation with a patient having Parkinson disease. After receiving general information, participants read either a narrative patient testimonial or a fact-based information text. We measured their perceptions of SDM, their control preferences (i.e., their priorities as to who should make the decision), and the time they intended to spend for the consultation.RESULTS: Participants in the narrative patient testimonial condition referred more strongly to the patient as the one who should make decisions than participants who read the information text. Participants who read the patient narrative also considered SDM in situations with more than one treatment option to be more important than participants in the information text condition. There were no group differences regarding their control preferences. Participants who read the patient testimonial indicated that they would schedule more time for the consultation.CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that narratives can potentially be useful for imparting the relevance of SDM and patient-centered values to medical students. We discuss possible causes of this effect and implications for training and future research.

scholarly journals The The Effectiveness of Early Mobilization Time on Balance and Functional Ability after Ischemic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092
Author(s):  
Umi Budi Rahayu ◽  
Samekto Wibowo ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Ability ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Berg Balance Scale ◽  
Early Mobilisation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) after-ischemic stroke is a motor learning intervention aimed to restore nerve cells and to improve balance and functional ability. Unfortunately, the study of when this intervention began has not been widely studied. AIM: On this study was compared the effect of EM started at 24 hours and 48 hours after an ischemic stroke on balance and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients on 2 groups meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The levels of balance were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, and the functional ability was measured using the Barthel Index, at 5th and 7th day. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in both balance (p = 0.038) and functional ability (p = 0.021) obtained on the 7th day of assessment between both groups. A significant difference on the 5th day was observed only in the functional ability (p = 0.002) and not in the balance (p = 0.147), between the groups. CONCLUSION: EM started at 24 hours after the ischemic stroke has been found to have a better impact on balance and functional ability compared to that at 48 hours.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document