scholarly journals Clinical Aspects of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Cardiovascular System in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław J. Kotyla ◽  
Md Asiful Islam ◽  
Małgorzata Engelmann
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cardiovascular System ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Single Drug ◽  
Heart Performance ◽  
Progression Of Atherosclerosis

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, a novel class of targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), have shown their safety and efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are being intensively tested in other autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Targeting several cytokines with a single small compound leads to blocking the physiological response of hundreds of genes, thereby providing the background to stabilize the immune response. Unfortunately, blocking many cytokines with a single drug may also bring some negative consequences. In this review, we focused on the activity of JAK inhibitors in the cardiovascular system of patients with RA. Special emphasis was put on the modification of heart performance, progression of atherosclerosis, lipid profile disturbance, and risk of thromboembolic complications. We also discussed potential pathophysiological mechanisms that may be responsible for such JAK inhibitor-associated side effects.

scholarly journals Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 667-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senir Turan ◽  
Scot Walker
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Oral Drugs ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Janus Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Skin Conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease where the immune system attacks the linings of the joints, resulting in joint pain, stiffness, swelling, and destruction. Although many products are available for the treatment of RA, limitations such as adverse reactions and tolerance greatly affect adherence. Many of the current biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on the market are injectables, leaving a void to be filled for a product that can be taken orally. The most advanced of these approaches, the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, are oral drugs that have not only made a breakthrough in RA, but also other skin conditions.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2199956
Author(s):  
Chenghua Weng ◽  
Leixi Xue ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Wentian Lu ◽  
Jiajun Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Disease Modifying

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to April 2020. The active drugs included three JAK inhibitors and eight bDMARDs while the control drugs included placebo or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Outcomes include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using network meta-analysis with random effects. Results: Eighty-eight RCTs with 31,566 patients were included. All JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (ORs ranging between 3.05 and 5.61), DAS28 (WMDs ranging between −1.91 and −0.80) and HAQ-DI (WMDs ranging between −0.34 and −0.21). Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib showed relatively good efficacy in these three outcomes according to their relative ranking. Notably, tocilizumab was more effective than other active drugs in DAS28 (WMDs ranging between −1.11 and −0.49). Compared with the lower recommended doses, increasing the doses of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib 4 mg versus 2 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg versus 5 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg versus 15 mg) cannot provide significant additional benefits. In terms of discontinuations for AEs, all active drugs showed no significant difference compared with placebo except certolizumab pegol [OR 1.65, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.06–2.61] and rituximab (3.17, 1.11–10.80). Conclusions: Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib may have relatively good efficacy in patients with RA after treatment failure with csDMARDs. RA patients taking a JAK inhibitor may have a preference for a lower recommended dose.

scholarly journals Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology – what we know and what we do not know from randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatjana Welzel ◽  
Carolyn Winskill ◽  
Nancy Zhang ◽  
Andreas Woerner ◽  
Marc Pfister
Keyword(s):  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Paediatric Rheumatology ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Age Dependent ◽  
Disease Modifying

Abstract Background Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are prescribed in adult and paediatric rheumatology. Due to age-dependent changes, disease course, and pharmacokinetic processes paediatric patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRD) differ from adult rheumatology patients. Methods A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PiRD treated with bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors was conducted on Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu and conference abstracts as of July 2020. RCTs were included if (i) patients were aged ≤20 years, (ii) patients had a predefined rheumatic diagnosis and (iii) RCT reported predefined outcomes. Selected studies were excluded in case of (i) observational or single arm study or (ii) sample size ≤5 patients. Study characteristics were extracted. Results Out of 608 screened references, 65 references were selected, reporting 35 unique RCTs. All 35 RCTs reported efficacy while 34/3 provided safety outcomes and 16/35 provided pharmacokinetic data. The most common investigated treatments were TNF inhibitors (60%), IL-1 inhibitors (17%) and IL-6 inhibitors (9%). No RCTs with published results were identified for baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, risankizumab, rituximab, sarilumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, or upadacitinib. In patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 25/35 RCTs were conducted. The remaining 10 RCTs were performed in non-JIA patients including plaque psoriasis, Kawasaki Disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and non-infectious uveitis. In JIA-RCTs, the control arm was mainly placebo and the concomitant treatments were either methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or corticosteroids. Non-JIA patients mostly received NSAID. There are ongoing trials investigating abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tofacitinib and tildrakizumab. Conclusion Despite the FDA Modernization Act and support of major paediatric rheumatology networks, such as the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO), which resulted in drug approval for PiRD indications, there are limited RCTs in PiRD patients. As therapy response is influenced by age-dependent changes, pharmacokinetic processes and disease course it is important to consider developmental changes in bDMARDs/JAK inhibitor use in PiRD patients. As such it is critical to collaborate and conduct international RCTs to appropriately investigate and characterize efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology.

scholarly journals P460 Evaluation of potential mechanisms underlying the safety observations of filgotinib in clinical studies in rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S409
Author(s):  
A Clarke ◽  
J Di Paolo ◽  
B Downie ◽  
A Meng ◽  
N Mollova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Erythroid Progenitor ◽  
Cell Counts

Abstract Background Inhibitors of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Differences in selectivity of JAK inhibitors for JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2 may influence their respective safety profiles, and the mechanisms responsible are not currently known. Filgotinib (FIL), a JAK1 inhibitor, did not negatively impact haemoglobin, LDL:HDL ratios or natural killer (NK) cell counts in clinical trials. Here, we compare the in vitro mechanistic profiles of four JAK inhibitors at clinically relevant doses. Methods JAK inhibitors (FIL, FIL metabolite [GS-829845], baricitinib [BARI], tofacitinib [TOFA], and upadacitinib [UPA]) were evaluated in vitro in human-cell-based assays. Growth of erythroid progenitors from human cord blood CD34+ cells was assessed using a HemaTox™ liquid expansion assay, NK cell proliferation was induced by IL-15 and LXR agonist-induced cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) expression was assessed in the hepatic cell line, HepG2. Using assay-generated IC50 values and the reported human plasma concentrations from clinical studies, we calculated the target coverage for each JAK inhibitor at clinically relevant doses. The activity of FIL in humans was based on PK/PD modelling of FIL + GS-829845. Results Inhibition of cellular activity was calculated for each JAK inhibitor based on in vitro dose-response data, human exposure data and modelled PK/PD relationships. At clinically relevant doses, FIL resulted in lower calculated inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with other JAK inhibitors. FIL 100 mg and 200 mg also reduced CETP expression, whereas other JAK inhibitors had no effect. There was no difference in the effect of FIL vs. other JAK inhibitors on erythroid progenitor cell differentiation or maturation. Conclusion FIL, a JAK1 inhibitor, resulted in less inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with BARI, TOFA, and UPA. FIL also reduced LXR agonist-induced CETP expression, while the other inhibitors did not alter these levels. These results provide a potential mechanistic link between the observed reduction of CETP concentration following FIL treatment and the previously observed reduction in the LDL:HDL ratio in RA patients.

BARICITINIB: NEW PHARMACOTHERAPY OPTIONS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND OTHER IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-316
Author(s):  
E. L. Nasonov ◽  
A. M. Lila
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Oral Medications ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Promising Area ◽  
Medical Advances

Deciphering the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMIRDs) in conjunction with designing a wide range of biological agents is one of the major medical advances in the 21st century. A new promising area of pharmacotherapy for IMIRDs is associated with the design of the so-called targeted oral medications that primarily include Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. The review presents new data on the efficacy and safety of the new JAK inhibitor baricitinib in treating rheumatoid arthritis and other IMIRDs.

scholarly journals Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: case presentation and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Mori ◽  
Fumihiko Ogata ◽  
Ryusuke Tsunoda
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractJanus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been developed as disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Despite the positive therapeutic impacts of JAK inhibitors, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A recent post hoc safety analysis of placebo-controlled trials of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported an imbalance in the incidence of VTE for a 4-mg daily dose of baricitinib versus placebo. In a recent postmarketing surveillance trial for RA, a significantly higher incidence of PE was reported in treatment with tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) compared with tofacitinib 5 mg or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. We also experienced a case of massive PE occurring 3 months after starting baricitinib (4 mg once daily) for multiple biologic-resistant RA. Nevertheless, the evidence to support the role of JAK inhibitors in VTE risk remains insufficient. There are a number of predisposing conditions and risk factors for VTE. In addition to the known risk factors that can provoke VTE, advanced age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking can also contribute to its development. Greater VTE risk is noted in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, particularly RA patients with uncontrolled disease activity and any comorbidity. Prior to the initiation of JAK inhibitors, clinicians should consider both the number and strength of VTE risk factors for each patient. In addition, clinicians should advise patients to seek prompt medical help if they develop clinical signs and symptoms that suggest VTE/PE. Key Points• Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially those with uncontrolled, high disease activity and those with comorbidities.• In addition to the well-known risk factors that provoke VTE events, advanced age and cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking, should be considered risk factors for VTE.• Although a signal of VTE/pulmonary embolism (PE) risk with JAK inhibitors has been noted in RA patients who are already at high risk, the evidence is currently insufficient to support the increased risk of VTE during RA treatment with JAK inhibitors.• If there are no suitable alternatives, clinicians should prescribe JAK inhibitors with caution, considering both the strength of individual risk factors and the cumulative weight of all risk factors for each patient.

scholarly journals AB0269 ARE INTERFERON-GAMMA RELEASE ASSAYS RELIABLE TO DETECT TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS?

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1160.3-1161
Author(s):  
C. Castellani ◽  
E. Molteni ◽  
A. Altobelli ◽  
C. Garufi ◽  
S. Mancuso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Latent Tuberculosis ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Tuberculosis Infection ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Perfect Agreement

Background:The therapeutic armamentarium for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently been enriched with the family of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Because the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) following the use of these drugs seems to be similar to that seen with anti-TNF agents, screening for LTBI is recommended in patients with RA before starting treatment with JAK inhibitors. Interferon(IFN)-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are increasingly used for this purpose. However, JAK inhibitors tend to decrease the levels of IFNs, questioning the reliability of IGRAs during treatment with this novel class of drugs.Objectives:To compare the performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) test with that of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) assay in RA patients before and during treatment with JAK inhibitors.Methods:A longitudinal, prospective study has been performed in RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) candidates for tofacitinib or baricitinib treatment. All patients underwent QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T3) and 9/12 months (T9/12) of treatment with JAK inhibitors. The agreement of the two tests was calculated at all timepoints. The agreement between IGRAs and tuberculin skin test (TST) or chest radiography at baseline was also determined. Lastly, the variability of QTF-Plus results was assessed during follow-up.Results:Twenty-nine RA patients (F/M 23/6; median age/IQR 63/15.5 years; median disease duration/IQR 174/216 months) were enrolled: among them, 22 were to start baricitinib (75.9%) and 7 tofacitinib (24.1%). A perfect agreement was found between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT at all times of observation (κ=1). At baseline, no agreement was recorded between IGRAs and TST (κ=-0.08) and between TST and chest radiography (κ=-0.07), while a low agreement was found between QFT-Plus and chest radiography (κ=0.17). A variation of 33.3% in the results of the QFT-Plus test was recorded at T3 compared to T0, of 29.4% at T9/12 compared to T0, and of 11.8% at T9/12 compared to T3. The median levels of IFN-γ produced by lymphocytes in response to the mitogen of QFT-Plus decreased after 3 months of treatment (1.59/4.72 IU/ml vs 3.08/7.68 IU/ml at baseline), followed by an increase after 9/12 months (2.25/4.61 IU/ml), but these differences were not significant. No significant change in the median number of circulating lymphocytes such as to explain the variation of the QFT-Plus results after 3 months of JAK inhibitor therapy was documented (1815/690/mm3 vs 2140/750/mm3 at baseline). At baseline, both QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT showed positive results in 5 patients (17.2%), negative in 19 (65.5%), and indeterminate in 5 (17.2%). Glucocorticoids intake was associated with a higher probability of negative or indeterminate result of IGRAs at baseline (p<0.0001).Conclusion:Our data show that a response to IGRAs is detectable in the course of treatment with JAK inhibitors. However, similarly to what has been observed during treatment with TNF antagonists, the results of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus show some variability when longitudinally repeated. These fluctuations occur in the absence of correlation with clinical outcome, thus challenging their interpretation. Since we do not have a sufficiently sensitive test capable of detecting TB infection, an integrated evaluation of risk factors, clinical manifestations and multiple diagnostic tests should be considered for a proper evaluation of the risk of TB infection in immunosuppressed patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document