scholarly journals Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: case presentation and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Mori ◽  
Fumihiko Ogata ◽  
Ryusuke Tsunoda
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractJanus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been developed as disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Despite the positive therapeutic impacts of JAK inhibitors, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A recent post hoc safety analysis of placebo-controlled trials of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported an imbalance in the incidence of VTE for a 4-mg daily dose of baricitinib versus placebo. In a recent postmarketing surveillance trial for RA, a significantly higher incidence of PE was reported in treatment with tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) compared with tofacitinib 5 mg or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. We also experienced a case of massive PE occurring 3 months after starting baricitinib (4 mg once daily) for multiple biologic-resistant RA. Nevertheless, the evidence to support the role of JAK inhibitors in VTE risk remains insufficient. There are a number of predisposing conditions and risk factors for VTE. In addition to the known risk factors that can provoke VTE, advanced age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking can also contribute to its development. Greater VTE risk is noted in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, particularly RA patients with uncontrolled disease activity and any comorbidity. Prior to the initiation of JAK inhibitors, clinicians should consider both the number and strength of VTE risk factors for each patient. In addition, clinicians should advise patients to seek prompt medical help if they develop clinical signs and symptoms that suggest VTE/PE. Key Points• Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially those with uncontrolled, high disease activity and those with comorbidities.• In addition to the well-known risk factors that provoke VTE events, advanced age and cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking, should be considered risk factors for VTE.• Although a signal of VTE/pulmonary embolism (PE) risk with JAK inhibitors has been noted in RA patients who are already at high risk, the evidence is currently insufficient to support the increased risk of VTE during RA treatment with JAK inhibitors.• If there are no suitable alternatives, clinicians should prescribe JAK inhibitors with caution, considering both the strength of individual risk factors and the cumulative weight of all risk factors for each patient.

scholarly journals OP0034 DOES THE RISK OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM VARY WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 23.2-24
Author(s):  
V. Molander ◽  
H. Bower ◽  
J. Askling
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Das28 Score ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Das28 Remission ◽  
One Year

Background:Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (1). Several established risk factors of VTE, such as age, immobilization and comorbid conditions, occur more often patients with RA (2). In addition, inflammation may in itself also increase VTE risk by upregulating procoagolatory factors and causing endothelial damage (3). Recent reports indicate an increased risk of VTE in RA patients treated with JAK-inhibitors (4), pointing to the need to better understand how inflammation measured as clinical RA disease activity influences VTE risk.Objectives:To investigate the relationship between clinical RA disease activity and incidence of VTE.Methods:Patients with RA were identified from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (SRQ) between July 1st2006 and December 31st2017. Clinical rheumatology data for these patients were obtained from the visits recorded in SRQ, and linked to national registers capturing data on VTE events and comorbid conditions. For each such rheumatologist visit, we defined a one-year period after the visit and determined whether a VTE event had occurred within this period or not. A visit followed by a VTE event was categorized as a case, all other visits were used as controls. Each patient could contribute to several visits. The DAS28 score registered at the visit was stratified into remission (0-2.5) vs. low (2.6-3.1), moderate (3.2-5.1) and high (>5.1) disease activity. Logistic regression with robust cluster standard errors was used to estimate the association between the DAS28 score and VTE.Results:We identified 46,311 patients with RA who contributed data from 320,094 visits. Among these, 2,257 visits (0.7% of all visits) in 1345 unique individuals were followed by a VTE within the one-year window. Of these, 1391 were DVT events and 866 were PE events. Figure 1 displays the absolute probabilities of a VTE in this one-year window, and odds ratios for VTE by each DAS28 category, using DAS28 remission as reference. The one-year risk of a VTE increased from 0.5% in patients in DAS28 remission, to 1.1% in patients with DAS28 high disease activity (DAS28 above 5.1). The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio for a VTE event in highly active RA compared to RA in remission was 2.12 (95% CI 1.80-2.47). A different analysis, in which each patient could only contribute to one visit, yielded similar results.Figure 1.Odds ratios (OR) comparing the odds of VTE for DAS28 activity categories versus remission. Grey estimates are from unadjusted logistic regression models, black estimates are from logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. Absolute one-year risk of VTE are estimated from unadjusted models.Conclusion:This study demonstrates a strong association between clinical RA inflammatory activity as measured through DAS28 and risk of VTE. Among patients with high disease activity one in a hundred will develop a VTE within the coming year. These findings highlight the need for proper VTE risk assessment in patients with active RA, and confirm that patients with highly active RA, such as those recruited to trials for treatment with new drugs, are already at particularly elevated risk of VTE.References:[1]Holmqvist et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and association with disease duration and hospitalization. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1350-6.[2]Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin Hematol. 2007;44(2):62-9.[3]Xu J et al. Inflammation, innate immunity and blood coagulation. Hamostaseologie. 2010;30(1):5-6, 8-9.[4]FDA. Safety trial finds risk of blood clots in the lungs and death with higher dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Xeljanz XR) in rheumatoid arthritis patients; FDA to investigate. 2019.Acknowledgments:Many thanks to all patients and rheumatologists persistently filling out the SRQ.Disclosure of Interests:Viktor Molander: None declared, Hannah Bower: None declared, Johan Askling Grant/research support from: JA acts or has acted as PI for agreements between Karolinska Institutet and the following entities, mainly in the context of the ARTIS national safety monitoring programme of immunomodulators in rheumatology: Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma

scholarly journals Identifying Vulnerable Plaque in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Novel Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Ultrasonography and Serum Biomarkers

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-310
Author(s):  
Linda F. Wang ◽  
Yaming Li ◽  
Douglas P. Landsittel ◽  
Steven E. Reis ◽  
Marc C. Levesque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Adhesion Molecule ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Vasa Vasorum ◽  
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule ◽  
Plaque Vulnerability ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Increased Risk

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Adventitial vasa vasorum density (aVVD), the vessel density of the vasa vasorum, is a surrogate measure for atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. The purpose of this study was to compare the adventitial vasa vasorum density (aVVD) in RA and non-RA control participants using novel carotid artery contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In addition, we investigate associations of aVVD with traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, vascular and inflammatory biomarkers, and RA disease activity. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of patients with RA and control participants without RA or other autoimmune disease. CV disease risk, biomarkers, and CEUS images were collected on all patients. Results: aVVD was quantified in 86 patients with RA and 95 non-RA control participants. Nitrite, CD40L, E-selectin, matrix metalloproteinase 9, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, myeloperoxidase (MPO), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were measured. Median aVVD was higher in patients with RA (0.59 [0.47–0.69] vs 0.64 [0.54–0.62]; P = .02). In patients with RA, MPO was lower (253.5 [153.2–480] vs 470.8 [274.2–830.1] ng/mL; P = .0002) and ESR was higher (15.5 [11–25] vs 13 [9–20] mm/h; P = .02). aVVD was correlated with MPO ( r = −0.33, P = .001) and hsCRP ( r = 0.25, P = .02) in control participants only, associations that remained significant after adjusting for number of CV risk factors and age. No significant correlations were found between aVVD and RA disease activity measures. Conclusions: Using a novel application of CEUS, we found that aVVD, an early measure of plaque vulnerability, was significantly higher in RA than control subjects, even after adjusting for CV risk factors. Differences in correlation of aVVD with vascular biomarkers and CV risk factors suggest RA-related differences in atherosclerotic progression.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib versus baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice: analyses with propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-219699
Author(s):  
Yusuke Miyazaki ◽  
Kazuhisa Nakano ◽  
Shingo Nakayamada ◽  
Satoshi Kubo ◽  
Yoshino Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Selection Bias ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Resistant Group

ObjectivesThe differences of efficacy between each Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have not been clarified in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. Here, we compared the efficacy between tofacitinib (TOFA) and baricitinib (BARI) in clinical practice.MethodsThe efficacy of TOFA (n=156) in patients with RA was compared with BARI (n=138). Selection bias was reduced to a minimum using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) trajectory for patients who started TOFA or BARI was analysed using growth mixture modelling (GMM).ResultsNo significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between the TOFA and BARI groups in after adjustment by propensity score-based IPTW. The BARI group had a significantly higher rate of CDAI remission at week 24 after the introduction of JAK inhibitors than the TOFA group. The treatment-resistant group defined by GMM, comprising patients who did not achieve low disease activity at week 24, was more likely to include those who had received many biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) before the introduction of JAK inhibitors and those who received TOFA. Among patients with RA who received TOFA, those who had received ≥4 bDMARDs before the introduction of TOFA were more likely to be classified into the treatment-resistant group.ConclusionsBARI showed a similar safety profile and better clinical outcome when compared with TOFA after reduction to a minimum of selection bias. However, these were observed in a small population. Accordingly, further investigation is required in an accurately powered head-to-head trial.

scholarly journals Incidence and risk factors for herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving upadacitinib: a pooled analysis of six phase III clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-213
Author(s):  
Kevin L Winthrop ◽  
Peter Nash ◽  
Kunihiro Yamaoka ◽  
Eduardo Mysler ◽  
Nasser Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Herpes Zoster ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Event Rates

BackgroundUpadacitinib (UPA) is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors have been associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with RA.ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence and risk factors for HZ in UPA-treated patients with RA from the UPA phase III clinical trial programme.MethodsExposure-adjusted incidence/event rates for HZ were determined in patients receiving UPA (monotherapy or combination therapy) in six randomised phase III trials (data cut-off on 30 June 2020). HZ incidence and event rates were also determined in patients receiving methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or adalimumab (ADA) + MTX. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify HZ risk factors in UPA-treated patients.ResultsA total of 5306 patients were included in this analysis. The incidence rate of HZ/100 patient-years (95% CI) was 0.8 (0.3 to 1.9), 1.1 (0.5 to 1.9), 3.0 (2.6 to 3.5) and 5.3 (4.5 to 6.2), in the MTX monotherapy, ADA + MTX, UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg groups, respectively. The majority of HZ cases with UPA (71%) involved a single dermatome. Prior history of HZ and Asian region were HZ risk factors in UPA-treated patients.ConclusionIn the UPA phase III RA clinical programme, HZ incidence and event rates were higher with UPA versus ADA + MTX or MTX monotherapy, and higher with the 30 mg versus 15 mg dose. Patients from Asia and those with a history of HZ may be at increased risk of HZ while receiving UPA.

scholarly journals Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2019-216653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Sepriano ◽  
Andreas Kerschbaumer ◽  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Maxime Dougados ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

ObjectivesTo perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic (s) and biological (b) disease-modifying anti rheumatic dugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsAn SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention for the management of RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments still without registry data (eg, sarilumab and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors baricitinib, upadacitinib), randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term extensions (LTEs) were used. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed according to standard procedures.ResultsForty-two observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, addressing safety outcomes with bDMARDs and sDMARDs. Nine studies showed no difference in the risk of serious infections across bDMARDs and two studies (high RoB) showed an increased risk with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (adjusted incidence rate ratio 3.1–3.9). The risk of Herpes zoster infection was similar across bDMARDs, but one study showed an increased risk with tofacitinib compared with abatacept (adjusted HR (aHR) 2.0). Five studies showed no increased risk of cancer for bDMARDs compared with csDMARDs. An increased risk of lower intestinal perforation was found for tocilizumab compared with csDMARDs (aHR 4.5) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (aHR 2.6–4.0). Sixty manuscripts reported safety data from RCTs/LTEs. Overall, no unexpected safety outcomes were found, except for the possibly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with JAK inhibitors.ConclusionData obtained by this SLR confirm the known safety profile of bDMARDs. The risk of VTE in RA, especially in patients on JAK inhibitors, needs further evaluation.

FRI0141 CHARACTERIZATION OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS WITH UPADACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 654-655
Author(s):  
K. Winthrop ◽  
L. Calabrese ◽  
F. Van den Bosch ◽  
K. Yamaoka ◽  
C. Selmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Oral Candidiasis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Increased Risk

Background:Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with an approved dose of 15 mg once daily (QD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients (pts) receiving JAK inhibitors have been reported to be at increased risk of developing serious infection events (SIE) and opportunistic infections (OI).Objectives:To evaluate the incidence of SIEs and OIs in pts with RA receiving UPA and active comparators in the Phase 3 SELECT clinical trial program.Methods:The exposure-adjusted event rate (EAER) per 100 patient-years (E/100 PY) of SIEs and OIs was determined in pts receiving UPA in five randomized Phase 3 trials (SELECT-EARLY, SELECT-MONOTHERAPY, SELECT-NEXT, SELECT-COMPARE, and SELECT-BEYOND), of which four evaluated both UPA 15 mg and 30 mg QD doses and one (SELECT-COMPARE) evaluated only UPA 15 mg QD. Incidences of SIEs and OIs were also determined in pts receiving adalimumab (ADA) + methotrexate (MTX) in SELECT-COMPARE and MTX monotherapy in SELECT-EARLY. Data were analyzed descriptively, with no statistical comparisons between groups or doses. Risk factors for SIEs were determined using a univariate Cox regression model. The data cut-off was June 30, 2019.Results:Overall, 2629 pts who received UPA 15 mg, 1204 pts who received UPA 30 mg, 579 pts who received ADA + MTX, and 314 pts who received MTX monotherapy were included in this analysis. The EAERs (E/100 PYs [95% CI]) of SIEs were 3.2 (2.7–3.7) in the UPA 15 mg group, 5.7 (4.8–6.8) in the UPA 30 mg group, 3.9 (2.6–5.6) in pts receiving ADA + MTX, and 3.1 (1.7–5.2) in pts receiving MTX monotherapy. Pneumonia was the most common SIE, with EAERs (E/100 PYs [95% CI]) of 0.7 (0.5–1.0), 1.3 (0.9–1.9), 0.7 (0.2–1.5), and 0.7 (0.1–1.9) in the UPA 15 mg, UPA 30 mg, ADA + MTX, and MTX monotherapy groups, respectively. Rates of OIs (including oral candidiasis and disseminated herpes zoster [HZ]) (E/100 PYs [95% CI]) were 0.7 (0.5–1.0), 1.3 (0.9–1.9), 0.4 (0.1–1.1), and 0 (0–0) in the UPA 15 mg, UPA 30 mg, ADA + MTX, and MTX monotherapy groups, respectively. Oral candidiasis was the most frequent OI with EAERs (E/100 PYs [95% CI]) of 0.4 (0.2–0.6) in the UPA 15 mg group, 0.6 (0.3–1.0) in the UPA 30 mg group, 0.4 (0.1–1.1) in the ADA + MTX group, and 0 (0–0) in the MTX monotherapy group. Serious adverse events of HZ were only reported in the UPA groups (0.2 E/100 PYs [95% CI: 0.1–0.3] and 0.6 E/100 PYs [95% CI: 0.4–1.1] in the UPA 15 mg and 30 mg groups, respectively). Overall, there were 3 (4 coded events), 3, 1, and 0 pts who had active tuberculosis events in the UPA 15 mg, UPA 30 mg, ADA + MTX, and MTX monotherapy groups, respectively. Risk factors for SIEs are shown in the Figure. For both UPA doses, age ≥75 years and smoking were noted to have hazard ratios >1.Conclusion:The incidence rate of SIEs and OIs was higher in the UPA 30 mg group than the UPA 15 mg group. SIEs observed with UPA 15 mg were similar to that seen with ADA although the rates of HZ were higher on UPA. Pts with RA who are ≥75 years old and/or smokers may be at higher risk than other pts with RA for SIEs while receiving UPA.Figure.Univariate analysis of SIE risk factorsDisclosure of Interests:Kevin Winthrop Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB, Leonard Calabrese Consultant of: AbbVie, GSK, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, Horizon, Crescendo, and Gilead, Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Horizon, Crescendo, Novartis, Genentech, Janssen, and AbbVie, Filip van den Bosch Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Kunihiro Yamaoka Speakers bureau: AbbVie GK, Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Carlo Selmi Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, and Leo Pharma, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi-Regeneron, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Aesku, Alfa-Wassermann, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Biogen, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Grifols, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB Pharma, Yanna Song Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Barbara Hendrickson Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Ivan Lagunes-Galindo Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB

scholarly journals POS0469 FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 466.1-466
Author(s):  
O. Jomaa ◽  
H. Migaw ◽  
I. Loubiri ◽  
M. Slama ◽  
S. Zrour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Falls ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tinetti Test

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis patients may have an increased risk of falls due to changes caused by the disease such as muscle weakness, joint impairment, reduced mobility and postural instability.Objectives:The aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence of falls in RA patients and its risk factors.Methods:Between January2020 and July 2020, 51 patients with RA were included in the study. fall history, and the number of falls within the past 12 month were questioned. All participants were assessed with Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), One-Leg Stand Test (OLST), Walking and Talking Test (WTT), Sternal Push Test (SPT), Tinetti Test (TT), Four Test Balance Scale (FTBS), The Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Pain Severity and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), disability by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and disease activity by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were evaluated in for for each patient. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests were performed with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05.Results:22 patients had at least one or more falls. The average age was 54.9±11.5 years with a female predominance (sex ratio = 0.13). Comparing the two groups of patients: those with a history of falls and those without, patients with previous falls were mainly married women (p=0.57), with a low intellectual level (p=0.63). The body mass index in this group was higher (p=0.01) with respectively a higher number of painful and swollen joints (p=0.16, p=0.07); the mean HAQ was higher (p=0.03), and the mean VAS was more important (p=0.05). 12/22 patients had co-morbidities and were poly-medicated.20/22 had joint feet deformities (hallux valgus was the most common deformity). 21/22 were on low dosage corticosteroid therapy. The mean TUGT was 18.5 seconds (>14 seconds). The OLST was less than 5 seconds in 12/22, the sternal push test was positive in 9/22, WTT was positive in 6/22 and the mean tinetti test was 22.4±5.4 suggesting a high risk of falls. The average Short FES-I was 14.6 ±4.4 reflecting a high fear of falls in this group of patients.Conclusion:Knowledge about risk factors can help to identify high-risk patients in order to decrease their risk of falling, thus preventing fall-related injuries.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals POS0096 SPLENIC METABOLIC UPTAKE IN FDG-PET/CT PREDICTS RISK OF FUTURE CARDIOVASCULAR THROMBOSIS EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 258.2-259
Author(s):  
S. J. Lee ◽  
C. M. Hong ◽  
Y. M. Kang
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Background:Patients with the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to general population. However there are insufficient modality to predict future CVD risk in RA.Objectives:This study assessed whether splenic and arterial activity measured by positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) predict the risk of CVD thrombosis events beyond conventional risk factors in patients with RA.Methods:We enrolled 84 patients with active RA who underwent fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and disease activity evaluation at the same time. CVD thrombosis events were independently evaluated, while blinded to activity of PET/CT, during follow up periods. FDG uptake by nuclear medicine physician was examined in the spleen and ascending aorta and blood pool activity of superior vena cava as SUV (standardized uptake values) and target-to-background-ratio (TBR) while blinded to CVD events.Results:During follow-up periods, 19 patients developed CVD thrombosis events. Both splenic and arterial TBR were significantly increased in patients with subsequent CVD events compared to in patients without (2.19 ± 0.60 vs 1.80 ± 0.34, p < 0.013, 1.72 ± 0.22 vs 1.57 ± 0.22, p< 0.012). Splenic TBR was associated with an increased risk of CVD events after adjustment for conventional CVD risk factors [hazard ratio (HR): 3.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46 to 6.79; p = 0.003]. Moreover, the association between splenic TBR and CVD events remained significant after adjustment for disease activity (HR: 3.00; CI: 1.36 to 6.63; p = 0.007) and after adjustment for arterial TBR (HR: 3.00; CI: 1.36 to 6.63; p = 0.007).Conclusion:Our results show splenic metabolic uptake in FDG-PET/CT in patients with RA provide information for subsequent CVD events beyond conventional risk factors.References:[1]Lee SJ, Jeong JH, Lee CH, et al. Development and validation of an (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography-based tool for the evaluation of joint counts and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1232-1240.Disclosure of Interests: :None declared

scholarly journals Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism after unprovoked pulmonary embolism: the PADIS-PE randomised trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 1701202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Tromeur ◽  
Olivier Sanchez ◽  
Emilie Presles ◽  
Gilles Pernod ◽  
Laurent Bertoletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Lung Scan ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after unprovoked pulmonary embolism.Analyses were based on the double-blind randomised PADIS-PE trial, which included 371 patients with a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism initially treated during 6 months who were randomised to receive an additional 18 months of warfarin or placebo and followed up for 2 years after study treatment discontinuation. All patients had ventilation/perfusion lung scan at inclusion (i.e. at 6 months of anticoagulation).During a median follow-up of 41 months, recurrent VTE occurred in 67 out of 371 patients (6.8 events per 100 person-years). In main multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for recurrence was 3.65 (95% CI 1.33–9.99) for age 50–65 years, 4.70 (95% CI 1.78–12.40) for age >65 years, 2.06 (95% CI 1.14–3.72) for patients with pulmonary vascular obstruction index (PVOI) ≥5% at 6 months and 2.38 (95% CI 1.15–4.89) for patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. When considering that PVOI at 6 months would not be available in practice, PVOI ≥40% at pulmonary embolism diagnosis (present in 40% of patients) was also associated with a 2-fold increased risk of recurrence.After a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism, age, PVOI at pulmonary embolism diagnosis or after 6 months of anticoagulation and antiphospholipid antibodies were found to be independent predictors for recurrence.

Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Mechanistic Links: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Fragoulis ◽  
Ismini Panayotidis ◽  
Elena Nikiphorou
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
The Past ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cv Disease ◽  
Obesity Hypertension ◽  
Inflammatory Burden

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. Inflammation, however, can spread beyond the joints to involve other organs. During the past few years, it has been well recognized that RA associates with increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) compared with the general population. This seems to be due not only to the increased occurrence in RA of classical CVD risk factors and comorbidities like smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and others but also to the inflammatory burden that RA itself carries. This is not unexpected given the strong links between inflammation and atherosclerosis and CVD. It has been shown that inflammatory cytokines which are present in abundance in RA play a significant role in every step of plaque formation and rupture. Most of the therapeutic regimes used in RA treatment seem to offer significant benefits to that end. However, more studies are needed to clarify the effect of these drugs on various parameters, including the lipid profile. Of note, although pharmacological intervention significantly helps reduce the inflammatory burden and therefore the CVD risk, control of the so-called classical risk factors is equally important. Herein, we review the current evidence for the underlying pathogenic mechanisms linking inflammation with CVD in the context of RA and reflect on the possible impact of treatments used in RA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document