scholarly journals From Prions to Stress Granules: Defining the Compositional Features of Prion-Like Domains That Promote Different Types of Assemblies

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1251
Author(s):  
Anastasia Fomicheva ◽  
Eric D. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Macromolecular Assemblies ◽  
Yeast Prions ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Heterotypic Interactions ◽  
Distinct Sequence

Stress granules are ribonucleoprotein assemblies that form in response to cellular stress. Many of the RNA-binding proteins found in stress granule proteomes contain prion-like domains (PrLDs), which are low-complexity sequences that compositionally resemble yeast prion domains. Mutations in some of these PrLDs have been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, and are associated with persistent stress granule accumulation. While both stress granules and prions are macromolecular assemblies, they differ in both their physical properties and complexity. Prion aggregates are highly stable homopolymeric solids, while stress granules are complex dynamic biomolecular condensates driven by multivalent homotypic and heterotypic interactions. Here, we use stress granules and yeast prions as a paradigm to examine how distinct sequence and compositional features of PrLDs contribute to different types of PrLD-containing assemblies.

scholarly journals Distinct stages in stress granule assembly and disassembly

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua R Wheeler ◽  
Tyler Matheny ◽  
Saumya Jain ◽  
Robert Abrisch ◽  
Roy Parker
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

Stress granules are non-membrane bound RNA-protein (RNP) assemblies that form when translation initiation is limited and contain a biphasic structure with stable core structures surrounded by a less concentrated shell. The order of assembly and disassembly of these two structures remains unknown. Time course analysis of granule assembly suggests that core formation is an early event in granule assembly. Stress granule disassembly is also a stepwise process with shell dissipation followed by core clearance. Perturbations that alter liquid-liquid phase separations (LLPS) driven by intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDR) of RNA binding proteins in vitro have the opposite effect on stress granule assembly in vivo. Taken together, these observations argue that stress granules assemble through a multistep process initiated by stable assembly of untranslated mRNPs into core structures, which could provide sufficient high local concentrations to allow for a localized LLPS driven by IDRs on RNA binding proteins.

scholarly journals Identification of the stress granule transcriptome via RNA-editing in single cells and in vivo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wessel van Leeuwen ◽  
Michael VanInsberghe ◽  
Nico Battich ◽  
Fredrik Salmen ◽  
Alexander van Oudenaarden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Rna Content ◽  
Editing Enzyme

Stress granules are phase separated assemblies formed around mRNAs whose identities remain elusive. The techniques available to identify the RNA content of stress granules rely on their physical purification, and are therefore not suitable for single cells and tissues displaying cell heterogeneity. Here, we adapted TRIBE (Target of RNA-binding proteins Identified by Editing) to detect stress granule RNAs by fusing a stress granule RNA-binding protein (FMR1) to the catalytic domain of an RNA-editing enzyme (ADAR). RNAs colocalized with this fusion are edited, producing mutations that are detectable by sequencing. We first optimized the expression of this fusion protein so that RNA editing preferentially occurs in stress granules. We then show that this purification-free method can reliably identify stress granule RNAs in bulk and single S2 cells, and in Drosophila tissues, such as 398 neuronal stress granule mRNAs encoding ATP binding, cell cycle and transcription factors. This new method opens the possibility to identify the RNA content of stress granules as well other RNA based assemblies in single cells derived from tissues.

scholarly journals G3BP–Caprin1–USP10 complexes mediate stress granule condensation and associate with 40S subunits

2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kedersha ◽  
Marc D. Panas ◽  
Christopher A. Achorn ◽  
Shawn Lyons ◽  
Sarah Tisdale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Osmotic Stress ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Partner Proteins

Mammalian stress granules (SGs) contain stalled translation preinitiation complexes that are assembled into discrete granules by specific RNA-binding proteins such as G3BP. We now show that cells lacking both G3BP1 and G3BP2 cannot form SGs in response to eukaryotic initiation factor 2α phosphorylation or eIF4A inhibition, but are still SG-competent when challenged with severe heat or osmotic stress. Rescue experiments using G3BP1 mutants show that G3BP1-F33W, a mutant unable to bind G3BP partner proteins Caprin1 or USP10, rescues SG formation. Caprin1/USP10 binding to G3BP is mutually exclusive: Caprin binding promotes, but USP10 binding inhibits, SG formation. G3BP interacts with 40S ribosomal subunits through its RGG motif, which is also required for G3BP-mediated SG formation. We propose that G3BP mediates the condensation of SGs by shifting between two different states that are controlled by binding to Caprin1 or USP10.

scholarly journals Polyadenylated RNA and RNA-Binding Proteins Exhibit Unique Response to Hyperosmotic Stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Zaepfel ◽  
Jeffrey D. Rothstein
Keyword(s):  
Osmotic Stress ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Polyadenylated Rna ◽  
And Function

Stress granule formation is a complex and rapidly evolving process that significantly disrupts cellular metabolism in response to a variety of cellular stressors. Recently, it has become evident that different chemical stressors lead to the formation of compositionally distinct stress granules. However, it is unclear which proteins are required for the formation of stress granules under different conditions. In addition, the effect of various stressors on polyadenylated RNA metabolism remains enigmatic. Here, we demonstrate that G3BP1/2, which are common stress granule components, are not required for the formation of stress granules specifically during osmotic stress induced by sorbitol and related polyols. Furthermore, sorbitol-induced osmotic stress leads to significant depletion of nuclear polyadenylated RNA, a process that we demonstrate is dependent on active mRNA export, as well as cytoplasmic and subnuclear shifts in the presence of many nuclear RNA-binding proteins. We assessed the function of multiple shifted RBPs and found that hnRNP U, but not TDP-43 or hnRNP I, exhibit reduced function following this cytoplasmic shift. Finally, we observe that multiple stress pathways lead to a significant reduction in transcription, providing a possible explanation for our inability to observe loss of TDP-43 or hnRNP I function. Overall, we identify unique outcomes following osmotic stress that provide important insight into the regulation of RNA-binding protein localization and function.

scholarly journals Fission Yeast Puf2, a Pumilio and FBF Family RNA-Binding Protein, Links Stress Granules to Processing Bodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Yi Hsiao ◽  
Yi-Ting Wang ◽  
Shao-Win Wang
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Processing Bodies ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

ABSTRACT Stress granules (SGs) are cytoplasmic aggregates formed upon stress when untranslated messenger ribonucleoproteins accumulate in the cells. In a green fluorescent protein library screening of the fission yeast SG proteins, Puf2 of the PUF family of RNA-binding proteins was identified that is required for SG formation after deprivation of glucose. Accordingly, the puf2 mutant is defective in recovery from glucose starvation with a much longer lag to reenter the cell cycle. In keeping with these results, Puf2 contains several low-complexity and intrinsically disordered protein regions with a tendency to form aggregates and, when overexpressed, it represses translation to induce aggregation of poly(A) binding protein Pabp, the signature constituent of SGs. Intriguingly, overexpression of Puf2 also enhances the structure of processing bodies (PBs), another type of cytoplasmic RNA granule, a complex of factors involved in mRNA degradation. In this study, we demonstrate a function of the fission yeast PB in SG formation and show Puf2 may provide a link between these two structures.

scholarly journals RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 2734-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana Van Treeck ◽  
David S. W. Protter ◽  
Tyler Matheny ◽  
Anthony Khong ◽  
Christopher D. Link ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Self Assembly ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
In Cells

Stress granules are higher order assemblies of nontranslating mRNAs and proteins that form when translation initiation is inhibited. Stress granules are thought to form by protein–protein interactions of RNA-binding proteins. We demonstrate RNA homopolymers or purified cellular RNA forms assemblies in vitro analogous to stress granules. Remarkably, under conditions representative of an intracellular stress response, the mRNAs enriched in assemblies from total yeast RNA largely recapitulate the stress granule transcriptome. We suggest stress granules are formed by a summation of protein–protein and RNA–RNA interactions, with RNA self-assembly likely to contribute to other RNP assemblies wherever there is a high local concentration of RNA. RNA assembly in vitro is also increased by GR and PR dipeptide repeats, which are known to increase stress granule formation in cells. Since GR and PR dipeptides are involved in neurodegenerative diseases, this suggests that perturbations increasing RNA–RNA assembly in cells could lead to disease.

scholarly journals RNA Binding Proteins and the Pathogenesis of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 469-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Hofmann ◽  
William W. Seeley ◽  
Eric J. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Compelling Evidence ◽  
Abnormal Protein ◽  
Early Onset Dementia ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Frontotemporal dementia is a group of early onset dementia syndromes linked to underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology that can be classified based on the formation of abnormal protein aggregates involving tau and two RNA binding proteins, TDP-43 and FUS. Although elucidation of the mechanisms leading to FTLD pathology is in progress, recent advances in genetics and neuropathology indicate that a majority of FTLD cases with proteinopathy involving RNA binding proteins show highly congruent genotype–phenotype correlations. Specifically, recent studies have uncovered the unique properties of the low-complexity domains in RNA binding proteins that can facilitate liquid–liquid phase separation in the formation of membraneless organelles. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that mutations in FTLD genes lead to dysfunction in diverse cellular pathways that converge on the endolysosomal pathway, autophagy, and neuroinflammation. Together, these results provide key mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets of FTLD.

scholarly journals RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in health and disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (8) ◽  
pp. 1417-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Ford Harrison ◽  
James Shorter
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Fused In Sarcoma ◽  
Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Approximately 70 human RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) contain a prion-like domain (PrLD). PrLDs are low-complexity domains that possess a similar amino acid composition to prion domains in yeast, which enable several proteins, including Sup35 and Rnq1, to form infectious conformers, termed prions. In humans, PrLDs contribute to RBP function and enable RBPs to undergo liquid–liquid phase transitions that underlie the biogenesis of various membraneless organelles. However, this activity appears to render RBPs prone to misfolding and aggregation connected to neurodegenerative disease. Indeed, numerous RBPs with PrLDs, including TDP-43 (transactivation response element DNA-binding protein 43), FUS (fused in sarcoma), TAF15 (TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15), EWSR1 (Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1), and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A1 and A2 (hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2), have now been connected via pathology and genetics to the etiology of several neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, and multisystem proteinopathy. Here, we review the physiological and pathological roles of the most prominent RBPs with PrLDs. We also highlight the potential of protein disaggregases, including Hsp104, as a therapeutic strategy to combat the aberrant phase transitions of RBPs with PrLDs that likely underpin neurodegeneration.

scholarly journals Nonclassical nuclear localization signals mediate nuclear import of CIRBP

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (15) ◽  
pp. 8503-8514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bourgeois ◽  
Saskia Hutten ◽  
Benjamin Gottschalk ◽  
Mario Hofweber ◽  
Gesa Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signals ◽  
Cargo Proteins

The specific interaction of importins with nuclear localization signals (NLSs) of cargo proteins not only mediates nuclear import but also, prevents their aberrant phase separation and stress granule recruitment in the cytoplasm. The importin Transportin-1 (TNPO1) plays a key role in the (patho-)physiology of both processes. Here, we report that both TNPO1 and Transportin-3 (TNPO3) recognize two nonclassical NLSs within the cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRBP). Our biophysical investigations show that TNPO1 recognizes an arginine-glycine(-glycine) (RG/RGG)–rich region, whereas TNPO3 recognizes a region rich in arginine-serine-tyrosine (RSY) residues. These interactions regulate nuclear localization, phase separation, and stress granule recruitment of CIRBP in cells. The presence of both RG/RGG and RSY regions in numerous other RNA-binding proteins suggests that the interaction of TNPO1 and TNPO3 with these nonclassical NLSs may regulate the formation of membraneless organelles and subcellular localization of numerous proteins.

scholarly journals Stress Granule-Mediated Oxidized RNA Decay in P-Body: Hypothetical Role of ADAR1, Tudor-SN, and STAU1

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Kumar Alluri ◽  
Zhongwei Li ◽  
Keith R. McCrae
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Inverted Repeat ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
P Bodies ◽  
Docking Mechanism

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated under oxidative stress (OS) cause oxidative damage to RNA. Recent studies have suggested a role for oxidized RNA in several human disorders. Under the conditions of oxidative stress, mRNAs released from polysome dissociation accumulate and initiate stress granule (SG) assembly. SGs are highly enriched in mRNAs, containing inverted repeat (IR) Alus in 3′ UTRs, AU-rich elements, and RNA-binding proteins. SGs and processing bodies (P-bodies) transiently interact through a docking mechanism to allow the exchange of RNA species. However, the types of RNA species exchanged, and the mechanisms and outcomes of exchange are still unknown. Specialized RNA-binding proteins, including adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR1-p150), with an affinity toward inverted repeat Alus, and Tudor staphylococcal nuclease (Tudor-SN) are specifically recruited to SGs under OS along with an RNA transport protein, Staufen1 (STAU1), but their precise biochemical roles in SGs and SG/P-body docking are uncertain. Here, we critically review relevant literature and propose a hypothetical mechanism for the processing and decay of oxidized-RNA in SGs/P-bodies, as well as the role of ADAR1-p150, Tudor-SN, and STAU1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document