scholarly journals Polyadenylated RNA and RNA-Binding Proteins Exhibit Unique Response to Hyperosmotic Stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Zaepfel ◽  
Jeffrey D. Rothstein
Keyword(s):  
Osmotic Stress ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Polyadenylated Rna ◽  
And Function

Stress granule formation is a complex and rapidly evolving process that significantly disrupts cellular metabolism in response to a variety of cellular stressors. Recently, it has become evident that different chemical stressors lead to the formation of compositionally distinct stress granules. However, it is unclear which proteins are required for the formation of stress granules under different conditions. In addition, the effect of various stressors on polyadenylated RNA metabolism remains enigmatic. Here, we demonstrate that G3BP1/2, which are common stress granule components, are not required for the formation of stress granules specifically during osmotic stress induced by sorbitol and related polyols. Furthermore, sorbitol-induced osmotic stress leads to significant depletion of nuclear polyadenylated RNA, a process that we demonstrate is dependent on active mRNA export, as well as cytoplasmic and subnuclear shifts in the presence of many nuclear RNA-binding proteins. We assessed the function of multiple shifted RBPs and found that hnRNP U, but not TDP-43 or hnRNP I, exhibit reduced function following this cytoplasmic shift. Finally, we observe that multiple stress pathways lead to a significant reduction in transcription, providing a possible explanation for our inability to observe loss of TDP-43 or hnRNP I function. Overall, we identify unique outcomes following osmotic stress that provide important insight into the regulation of RNA-binding protein localization and function.

scholarly journals G3BP–Caprin1–USP10 complexes mediate stress granule condensation and associate with 40S subunits

2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kedersha ◽  
Marc D. Panas ◽  
Christopher A. Achorn ◽  
Shawn Lyons ◽  
Sarah Tisdale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Osmotic Stress ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Partner Proteins

Mammalian stress granules (SGs) contain stalled translation preinitiation complexes that are assembled into discrete granules by specific RNA-binding proteins such as G3BP. We now show that cells lacking both G3BP1 and G3BP2 cannot form SGs in response to eukaryotic initiation factor 2α phosphorylation or eIF4A inhibition, but are still SG-competent when challenged with severe heat or osmotic stress. Rescue experiments using G3BP1 mutants show that G3BP1-F33W, a mutant unable to bind G3BP partner proteins Caprin1 or USP10, rescues SG formation. Caprin1/USP10 binding to G3BP is mutually exclusive: Caprin binding promotes, but USP10 binding inhibits, SG formation. G3BP interacts with 40S ribosomal subunits through its RGG motif, which is also required for G3BP-mediated SG formation. We propose that G3BP mediates the condensation of SGs by shifting between two different states that are controlled by binding to Caprin1 or USP10.

scholarly journals m6A-binding YTHDF proteins promote stress granule formation by modulating phase separation of stress granule proteins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Fu ◽  
Xiaowei Zhuang
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Resolution Imaging

AbstractDiverse RNAs and RNA-binding proteins form phase-separated, membraneless granules in cells under stress conditions. However, the role of the prevalent mRNA methylation, m6A, and its binding proteins in stress granule (SG) assembly remain unclear. Here, we show that m6A-modified mRNAs are enriched in SGs, and that m6A-binding YTHDF proteins are critical for SG formation. Depletion of YTHDF1/3 inhibits SG formation and recruitment of m6A-modified mRNAs to SGs. Both the N-terminal intrinsically disordered region and the C-terminal m6A-binding YTH domain of YTHDF proteins are crucial for SG formation. Super-resolution imaging further reveals that YTHDF proteins are in a super-saturated state, forming clusters that reside in the periphery of and at the junctions between SG core clusters, and promote SG phase separation by reducing the activation energy barrier and critical size for condensate formation. Our results reveal a new function and mechanistic insights of the m6A-binding YTHDF proteins in regulating phase separation.

scholarly journals Distinct stages in stress granule assembly and disassembly

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua R Wheeler ◽  
Tyler Matheny ◽  
Saumya Jain ◽  
Robert Abrisch ◽  
Roy Parker
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

Stress granules are non-membrane bound RNA-protein (RNP) assemblies that form when translation initiation is limited and contain a biphasic structure with stable core structures surrounded by a less concentrated shell. The order of assembly and disassembly of these two structures remains unknown. Time course analysis of granule assembly suggests that core formation is an early event in granule assembly. Stress granule disassembly is also a stepwise process with shell dissipation followed by core clearance. Perturbations that alter liquid-liquid phase separations (LLPS) driven by intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDR) of RNA binding proteins in vitro have the opposite effect on stress granule assembly in vivo. Taken together, these observations argue that stress granules assemble through a multistep process initiated by stable assembly of untranslated mRNPs into core structures, which could provide sufficient high local concentrations to allow for a localized LLPS driven by IDRs on RNA binding proteins.

O4-12-05: Interaction between microtubule-associated protein tau and RNA binding proteins stimulates tau misfolding and stress granule formation

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_6) ◽  
pp. P300-P301
Author(s):  
Tara Vanderweyde ◽  
Kathrerine Youmans-Kidder ◽  
Daniel J. Apicco ◽  
Peter E.A. Ash ◽  
Casey Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Protein Tau ◽  
Microtubule Associated Protein Tau

scholarly journals RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 2734-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana Van Treeck ◽  
David S. W. Protter ◽  
Tyler Matheny ◽  
Anthony Khong ◽  
Christopher D. Link ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Self Assembly ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
In Cells

Stress granules are higher order assemblies of nontranslating mRNAs and proteins that form when translation initiation is inhibited. Stress granules are thought to form by protein–protein interactions of RNA-binding proteins. We demonstrate RNA homopolymers or purified cellular RNA forms assemblies in vitro analogous to stress granules. Remarkably, under conditions representative of an intracellular stress response, the mRNAs enriched in assemblies from total yeast RNA largely recapitulate the stress granule transcriptome. We suggest stress granules are formed by a summation of protein–protein and RNA–RNA interactions, with RNA self-assembly likely to contribute to other RNP assemblies wherever there is a high local concentration of RNA. RNA assembly in vitro is also increased by GR and PR dipeptide repeats, which are known to increase stress granule formation in cells. Since GR and PR dipeptides are involved in neurodegenerative diseases, this suggests that perturbations increasing RNA–RNA assembly in cells could lead to disease.

The expanding world of metabolic enzymes moonlighting as RNA binding proteins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole J. Curtis ◽  
Constance J. Jeffery
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Molecular Structures ◽  
Intermediary Metabolism ◽  
The Many ◽  
And Function

RNA binding proteins play key roles in many aspects of RNA metabolism and function, including splicing, transport, translation, localization, stability and degradation. Within the past few years, proteomics studies have identified dozens of enzymes in intermediary metabolism that bind to RNA. The wide occurrence and conservation of RNA binding ability across distant branches of the evolutionary tree suggest that these moonlighting enzymes are involved in connections between intermediary metabolism and gene expression that comprise far more extensive regulatory networks than previously thought. There are many outstanding questions about the molecular structures and mechanisms involved, the effects of these interactions on enzyme and RNA functions, and the factors that regulate the interactions. The effects on RNA function are likely to be wider than regulation of translation, and some enzyme–RNA interactions have been found to regulate the enzyme's catalytic activity. Several enzyme–RNA interactions have been shown to be affected by cellular factors that change under different intracellular and environmental conditions, including concentrations of substrates and cofactors. Understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the interactions between the enzymes and RNA, the factors involved in regulation, and the effects of the enzyme–RNA interactions on both the enzyme and RNA functions will lead to a better understanding of the role of the many newly identified enzyme–RNA interactions in connecting intermediary metabolism and gene expression.

PUB1 is a major nuclear and cytoplasmic polyadenylated RNA-binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 6102-6113
Author(s):  
J T Anderson ◽  
M R Paddy ◽  
M S Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Polyadenylated Rna ◽  
Polyadenylated Rnas

Proteins that directly associate with nuclear polyadenylated RNAs, or heterogeneous nuclear RNA-binding proteins (hnRNPs), and those that associate with cytoplasmic mRNAs, or mRNA-binding proteins (mRNPs), play important roles in regulating gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Previous work with a variety of eukaryotic cells has demonstrated that hnRNPs are localized predominantly within the nucleus whereas mRNPs are cytoplasmic. While studying proteins associated with polyadenylated RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we discovered an abundant polyuridylate-binding protein, PUB1, which appears to be both an hnRNP and an mRNP. PUB1 and PAB1, the polyadenylate tail-binding protein, are the two major proteins cross-linked by UV light to polyadenylated RNAs in vivo. The deduced primary structure of PUB1 indicates that it is a member of the ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence family of RNA-binding proteins and is structurally related to the human hnRNP M proteins. Even though the PUB1 protein is a major cellular polyadenylated RNA-binding protein, it is nonessential for cell growth. Indirect cellular immunofluorescence combined with digital image processing allowed a detailed comparison of the intracellular distributions of PUB1 and PAB1. While PAB1 is predominantly, and relatively uniformly, distributed within the cytoplasm, PUB1 is localized in a nonuniform pattern throughout both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The cytoplasmic distribution of PUB1 is considerably more discontinuous than that of PAB1. Furthermore, sucrose gradient sedimentation analysis demonstrates that PAB1 cofractionates with polyribosomes whereas PUB1 does not. These results suggest that PUB1 is both an hnRNP and an mRNP and that it may be stably bound to a translationally inactive subpopulation of mRNAs within the cytoplasm.

Targeting of transcripts encoding membrane proteins in polarized epithelia: RNA–protein binding studies of the SGLT1 3′-UTR

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Pedder ◽  
Dianne Ford ◽  
John E. Hesketh
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Polarized Epithelia ◽  
Apical Localization

mRNA stability, mRNA translation and spatial localization of mRNA species within a cell can be governed by signals in the 3′-UTR (3′-untranslated region). Local translation of proteins is essential for the development of many eukaryotic cell types, such as the Drosophila embryo, where the spatial and temporal localization of bicoid and gurken mRNAs, among others, is required to establish morphogen gradients. More recent studies have suggested that mRNA localization also occurs with transcripts coding for membrane-based or secreted proteins, and that localization at organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum directs translation more efficiently to specific subdomains, so as to aid correct protein localization. In human epithelial cells, the mRNA coding for SGLT1 (sodium–glucose co-transporter 1), an apical membrane protein, has been shown to be localized apically in polarized cells. However, the nature of the signals and RNA-binding proteins involved are unknown. Ongoing work is aimed at identifying the localization signals in the SGLT1 3′-UTR and the corresponding binding proteins. Using a protein extract from polarized Caco-2 cells, both EMSAs (electrophoretic mobility-shift assays) and UV cross-linking assays have shown that a specific protein complex is formed with the first 300 bases of the 3′-UTR sequence. MFold predictions suggest that this region folds into a complex structure and ongoing studies using a series of strategic deletions are being carried out to identify the precise nature of the motif involved, particularly the role of the sequence or RNA secondary structure, as well as to identify the main proteins present within the complex. Such information will provide details of the post-transcriptional events that lead to apical localization of the SGLT1 transcript and may reveal mechanisms of more fundamental importance in the apical localization of proteins in polarized epithelia.

scholarly journals Stress Granule-Mediated Oxidized RNA Decay in P-Body: Hypothetical Role of ADAR1, Tudor-SN, and STAU1

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Kumar Alluri ◽  
Zhongwei Li ◽  
Keith R. McCrae
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Inverted Repeat ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
P Bodies ◽  
Docking Mechanism

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated under oxidative stress (OS) cause oxidative damage to RNA. Recent studies have suggested a role for oxidized RNA in several human disorders. Under the conditions of oxidative stress, mRNAs released from polysome dissociation accumulate and initiate stress granule (SG) assembly. SGs are highly enriched in mRNAs, containing inverted repeat (IR) Alus in 3′ UTRs, AU-rich elements, and RNA-binding proteins. SGs and processing bodies (P-bodies) transiently interact through a docking mechanism to allow the exchange of RNA species. However, the types of RNA species exchanged, and the mechanisms and outcomes of exchange are still unknown. Specialized RNA-binding proteins, including adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR1-p150), with an affinity toward inverted repeat Alus, and Tudor staphylococcal nuclease (Tudor-SN) are specifically recruited to SGs under OS along with an RNA transport protein, Staufen1 (STAU1), but their precise biochemical roles in SGs and SG/P-body docking are uncertain. Here, we critically review relevant literature and propose a hypothetical mechanism for the processing and decay of oxidized-RNA in SGs/P-bodies, as well as the role of ADAR1-p150, Tudor-SN, and STAU1.

scholarly journals Middle-down proteomics reveals dense sites of methylation and phosphorylation in arginine-rich RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean R. Kundinger ◽  
Isaac Bishof ◽  
Eric B. Dammer ◽  
Duc M. Duong ◽  
Nicholas T. Seyfried
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Electron Transfer Dissociation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Metabolism ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Motif Analysis ◽  
Proteomic Approach ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
And Function

AbstractArginine (Arg)-rich RNA-binding proteins play an integral role in RNA metabolism. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) within Arg-rich domains, such as phosphorylation and methylation, regulate multiple steps in RNA metabolism. However, the identification of PTMs within Arg-rich domains with complete trypsin digestion is extremely challenging due to the high density of Arg residues within these proteins. Here, we report a middle-down proteomic approach coupled with electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry to map previously unknown sites of phosphorylation and methylation within the Arg-rich domains of U1-70K and structurally similar RNA-binding proteins from nuclear extracts of HEK293 cells. Remarkably, the Arg-rich domains in RNA-binding proteins are densely modified by methylation and phosphorylation compared with the remainder of the proteome, with di-methylation and phosphorylation favoring RSRS motifs. Although they favor a common motif, analysis of combinatorial PTMs within RSRS motifs indicate that phosphorylation and methylation do not often co-occur, suggesting they may functionally oppose one another. Collectively, these findings suggest that the level of PTMs within Arg-rich domains may be among the highest in the proteome, and a possible unexplored regulator of RNA metabolism. These data also serve as a resource to facilitate future mechanistic studies of the role of PTMs in RNA-binding protein structure and function.BriefsMiddle-down proteomics reveals arginine-rich RNA-binding proteins contain many sites of methylation and phosphorylation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document