scholarly journals Genetic Background of Fetal Growth Restriction

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Beata Anna Nowakowska ◽  
Katarzyna Pankiewicz ◽  
Urszula Nowacka ◽  
Magdalena Niemiec ◽  
Szymon Kozłowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Metabolic Diseases ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Current State

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the most formidable challenges in present-day antenatal care. Pathological fetal growth is a well-known factor of not only in utero demise in the third trimester, but also postnatal morbidity and unfavorable developmental outcomes, including long-term sequalae such as metabolic diseases, diabetic mellitus or hypertension. In this review, the authors present the current state of knowledge about the genetic disturbances responsible for FGR diagnosis, divided into fetal, placental and maternal causes (including preeclampsia), as well as their impact on prenatal diagnostics, with particular attention on chromosomal microarray (CMA) and noninvasive prenatal testing technique (NIPT).

INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION - A REVIEW ARTICLE

2018 ◽  
pp. 184-195
Author(s):  
Minh Son Pham ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen ◽  
Dinh Vinh Tran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
No Gold Standard

Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) is difficult to define exactly. In this pregnancy condition, the fetus does not reach its biological growth potential as a consequence of impaired placental function, which may be because of a variety of factors. Fetuses with FGR are at risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor long-term health outcomes, such as impaired neurological and cognitive development, and cardiovascular and endocrine diseases in adulthood. At present no gold standard for the diagnosis of SGA/FGR exists. The first aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines. Another aim to summary a number of interventions which are being developed or coming through to clinical trial in an attempt to improve fetal growth in placental insufficiency. Key words: fetal growth restriction (FGR), Small for gestational age (SGA)

scholarly journals The Genetic Etiology Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Using Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu'e Chen ◽  
Yingjun Xie ◽  
Yuying Jiang ◽  
Qi Luo ◽  
Lijing Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Microarray Analysis ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Karyotype Analysis ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Background: An increase in pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) has been recognized to associate with fetal growth restriction (FGR). Here, we aim to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of FGR.Methods: Prenatal ultrasound was applied to identify FGR. A total of 149 pregnant women with FGR were enrolled in our study. All subjects underwent karyotype analysis and CMA to reveal the chromosomal abnormalities.Results: In this study, all subjects were successfully detected by karyotype and CMA analyses. Of these subjects, the chromosomal abnormalities detection rate was 5.37% (8/149) for karyotyping and 13.42% (20/149) for CMA, respectively. Among them, an 8.05% (12/149) incremental yield of CMA over karyotype analysis was observed (p = 0.004). In addition, a significant difference of pCNV detection rate was observed between the groups with different high-risk factors (p = 0.005). The FGR with structural anomalies group showed the highest pCNV detection rate (33.33%), followed by the FGR with non-structural anomalies group (8.77%) and the isolated FGR group (8.06%).Conclusion: In conclusion, CMA technology showed an effective application value in etiology diagnosis of FGR. We believe that CMA should be recommended as first-line detection technology for prenatal diagnosis in FGR.

scholarly journals Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with and without Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Prior to Fetoscopic Laser Surgery: Short and Long-Term Outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Groene ◽  
Tollenaar ◽  
van Klink ◽  
Haak ◽  
Klumper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Laser Surgery ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Perinatal Survival

As twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) are both prevalent complications of monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, its coexistence is not uncommon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term outcome in TTTS with and without sFGR prior to fetoscopic laser coagulation. All TTTS cases treated with laser surgery at our center between 2001–2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of sFGR, defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th centile. We compared two groups: TTTS-only and TTTS + sFGR. Primary outcomes were perinatal survival and long-term severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Of the 527 pregnancies eligible for analysis, 40.8% (n = 215) were categorized as TTTS-only and 59.2% (n = 312) as TTTS + sFGR. Quintero stage at presentation was higher in the TTTS + sFGR group compared to the TTTS-only group (57% compared to 44% stage III). Separate analysis of donors showed significantly lower perinatal survival for donors in the TTTS + sFGR group (72% (224/311) compared to 81% (173/215), p = 0.027). Severe NDI at follow-up in long-term survivors in the TTTS-only and TTTS + sFGR group was present in 7% (13/198) and 9% (27/299), respectively (p = 0.385). Both sFGR (OR 1.5;95% CI 1.1–2.0, p = 0.013) and lower gestational age at laser (OR 1.1;95% CI 1.0–1.1, p = 0.001) were independently associated with decreased perinatal survival. Thus, sFGR prior to laser surgery is associated with a more severe initial presentation and decreased donor perinatal survival. The long-term outcome was not affected.

INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION - A REVIEW ARTICLE

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 184-195
Author(s):  
Son Pham Minh ◽  
Huy Nguyen Vu Quoc ◽  
Vinh Tran Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
No Gold Standard

Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) is difficult to define exactly. In this pregnancy condition, the fetus does not reach its biological growth potential as a consequence of impaired placental function, which may be because of a variety of factors. Fetuses with FGR are at risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor long-term health outcomes, such as impaired neurological and cognitive development, and cardiovascular and endocrine diseases in adulthood. At present no gold standard for the diagnosis of SGA/FGR exists. The first aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines. Another aim to summary a number of interventions which are being developed or coming through to clinical trial in an attempt to improve fetal growth in placental insufficiency. Key words: fetal growth restriction (FGR), Small for gestational age (SGA)

scholarly journals The Role of Proteoglycans in Contributing to Placental Thrombosis and Fetal Growth Restriction

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne M. Said
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Pregnancy Complication ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Fetus And Neonate

Fetal growth restriction is an important pregnancy complication that has major consequences for the fetus and neonate as well as an increased risk of long-term morbidity extending into adulthood. The precise aetiology of most cases of fetal growth restriction is unknown although placental thrombosis is a common feature in many of these cases. This paper will outline the potential role of proteoglycans in contributing to placental thrombosis and fetal growth restriction.

Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weightvsa combined screening model in the third trimester

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Miranda ◽  
M. Rodriguez-Lopez ◽  
S. Triunfo ◽  
M. Sairanen ◽  
H. Kouru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
The Third ◽  
Screening Model

scholarly journals Application of chromosomal microarray to investigate genetic causes of isolated fetal growth restriction

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang An ◽  
Yuan Lin ◽  
Liang Pu Xu ◽  
Hai Long Huang ◽  
Si Ping Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Genetic Causes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document