scholarly journals The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Clinical, Biochemical and Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The “Hemodynamic Recovery”

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Romano ◽  
Giuseppe Vitale ◽  
Laura Ajello ◽  
Valentina Agnese ◽  
Diego Bellavia ◽  
...  

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to be superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). However, knowledge of the impact on cardiac performance remains limited. We sought to evaluate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic parameters in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Sacubitril/valsartan was administered to 205 HFrEF patients. Results: Among 230 patients (mean age 59 ± 10 years, 46% with ischemic heart disease) 205 (89%) completed the study. After a follow-up of 10.49 (2.93 ± 18.44) months, the percentage of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III changed from 40% to 17% (p < 0.001). Median N–Type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) decreased from 1865 ± 2318 to 1514 ± 2205 pg/mL, (p = 0.01). Furosemide dose reduced from 131.3 ± 154.5 to 120 ± 142.5 (p = 0.047). Ejection fraction (from 27± 5.9% to 30 ± 7.7% (p < 0.001) and E/A ratio (from 1.67 ± 1.21 to 1.42 ± 1.12 (p = 0.002)) improved. Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (from 30.1% to 17.4%; p = 0.002) and tricuspid velocity decreased from 2.8 ± 0.55 m/s to 2.64 ± 0.59 m/s (p < 0.014). Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan induce “hemodynamic recovery” and, consistently with reduction in Nt-proBNP concentrations, improve NYHA class despite diuretic dose reduction.

Author(s):  
Giuseppe Romano ◽  
Giuseppe Vitale ◽  
Laura Ajello ◽  
Valentina Agnese ◽  
Diego Bellavia ◽  
...  

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to be superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). However the effect on cardiac performance remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical, bioumoral and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HFrEF. Methods: Sacubitril/valsartan was administered to 205 HFrEF patients. Results: Among 230 patients (mean age 59 &plusmn; 10 years, 46% with ischemic heart disease) 205 (89%) completed the study. After a follow&ndash;up of 10.49 (2.93&plusmn;18.44) months, the percentage of patients in NYHA class III changed from 40% to 17% (p&lt;0.001). Median N&ndash;Type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) decreased from 1865 &plusmn; 2318 to 1514 &plusmn; 2205 pg/mL, (p=0.01). Furosemide dose reduced from 131.3 &plusmn; 154.5 to 120 &plusmn; 142.5 (p=0.047). Ejection fraction (from 27&plusmn; 5.9% to 30 &plusmn; 7.7% (p&lt;0.001) and E/A ratio (from 1.67 &plusmn; 1.21 to 1.42 &plusmn; 1.12 (p=0.002)) improved. Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (from 30.1% to 17.4%; p=0.002) and tricuspid velocity decreased from 2.8 &plusmn; 0.55 m/sec to 2.64 &plusmn; 0.59 m/sec (p&lt;0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan induce &ldquo;hemodynamic reverse remodeling&rdquo; and in association with Nt-proBNP concentrations lowering improve NYHA class despite a diuretic dose reduction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Johnsen ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
P Joergensen ◽  
N Bruun ◽  
D Modin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Zeymer ◽  
L.H Lund ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
C Fonseca ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries. Results The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline. 83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA. Conclusions The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽  
Lars H Lund

Introduction: Changes in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been demonstrated to correlate with outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). However the prognostic value of a change in NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is unknown. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of changes in NT-proBNP on all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and their composite in an unselected population of patients with HFPEF. Methods: 643 outpatients (age 72+12 years; 41% females) with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2012 and reporting NT-proBNP levels assessment at initial registration and at follow-up were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according the median value of NT-proBNP absolute change that was 0 pg/ml. Median follow-up from first measurement was 2.25 years (IQR: 1.43 to 3.81). Adjusted Cox’s regression models were performed using total mortality, HF hospitalization (with censoring at death) and their composite as outcomes. Results: After adjustments for 19 baseline variables including baseline NT-proBNP, as compared with an increase in NT-proBNP levels at 6 months (NT-proBNP change>0 pg/ml), a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP change<0 pg/ml) was associated with a 45.2% reduction in risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.378 to 0.796; p:0.002), a 50.1% reduction in risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.362 to 0.689; p<0.001) and a 42.6% reduction in risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.574; 95% CI: 0.435 to 0.758; p<0.001)(Figure). Conclusions: Reductions in NT-proBNP levels over time are independently associated with an improved prognosis in HFPEF patients. Changes in NT-proBNP could represent a surrogate outcome in phase 2 HFPEF trials.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry A Lennie ◽  
Seongkum Heo ◽  
Susan J Pressler ◽  
Sandra B Dunbar ◽  
Misook L Chung ◽  
...  

Background : Patients with heart failure (HF) are at risk for malnutrition due to multiple factors. A simple, clinically feasible tool to identify risk for malnutrition is needed. Visual analog scales have been used in studies on appetite but it is unknown whether an appetite scale can be used to identify patients with HF at risk for malnutrition. Purpose : To determine whether differences in kcal and protein intake could be identified in patients with HF grouped by their appetite rating. Method : A total of 137 patients (63% male, 60 ± 12 years, 56% NYHA class III/IV, ejection fraction (39 ± 14%) were recruited from outpatient HF clinics in the Midwest and South. Patients provided detailed 4-day food diaries that were reviewed by a registered dietitian to verify serving sizes and preparation methods and to obtain missing information. Patients were also asked to rate their appetite over the 4 days of diet recording on a 10 mm visual analog with anchors of “no appetite” and “extremely good appetite” Diaries were analyzed by Nutrition Data Systems software. Three series of between-group comparisons of kcal and protein (total and referenced to kg body weight) were made by t-tests using 4 mm (below midpoint), 5 mm (mid-point), and 6 mm (above mid-point) cut-points. Results : Significant differences in kcal and protein intake were identified between groups using the 6 mm cut point. A total of 36% of the patients had low appetite ratings (<6mm). Patients with low appetite ratings consumed 20% fewer total kcals (1555 vs. 1936 kcal, p = .001) and 23% fewer kcal/kg (18 vs. 22 kcal, p = .005) than those with high ratings. The low appetite group also consumed 24% less protein than the high appetite group (62 g vs. 82 g, p = .001). The .71 g/kg protein intake of the low appetite group was below the recommended .8 g/kg protein intake for adults. In contrast, the .91 g/kg protein intake of the high appetite group was above the recommended level. Conclusion : Patients with lower appetite ratings had kcal and protein intakes below recommended levels while those with high appetite ratings had adequate intake. These results provide evidence that rating appetite on a visual analog scale may be a simple tool that could be used clinically to identify patients with HF at risk for malnutrition. This research has received full or partial funding support from the American Heart Association, AHA Great Rivers Affiliate (Delaware, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania & West Virginia).


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tone Rustøen ◽  
Jill Howie ◽  
Ingrid Eidsmo ◽  
Torbjørn Moum

• Background Hope is seldom described in patients with heart failure, despite high morbidity and mortality for this population. • Objectives To describe hope in hospitalized patients with heart failure and to evaluate influences of demographic and health-related variables on hope. • Methods Ninety-three patients with heart failure and 441 healthy control subjects completed questionnaires about sociodemographics, health indices, disease severity, and the Herth Hope Index. • Results The patients with heart failure had a mean age of 75 years; 65% were men, and 47% lived alone. Lung diseases and diabetes were the most common comorbid diseases, with 58% classified as New York Heart Association class III. The mean global hope score among patients with heart failure was 37.69 (SD 5.3). Patients with skin (P = .01) and psychiatric (P = .02) disorders reported lower hope scores. Number of comorbid diseases was the only predictor of hope related to disease-specific variables (P = .01). Mean age of the control subjects was 60 years, and 66 (15%) lived alone. Once demographic variables were controlled for, patients with heart failure had significantly higher global hope scores than did control subjects. • Conclusions Adaptation to a life-threatening illness may induce a “response shift” that causes such patients to have more hope than the general population. Patients with heart failure may be more concerned with the past than the future. How patients judge their health and satisfaction with life influences their hope. Interventions supporting hope in patients with heart failure may influence treatment goals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Arfsten ◽  
A Cho ◽  
S Prausmueller ◽  
G Spinka ◽  
J Novak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Elevated inflammatory markers and malnutrition are characteristic for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) correlating with disease severity and prognosis. Nutritional decline is closely linked to inflammation. Evidence emerges that heart failure can be triggered by inflammation directly, meaning that progression of HF is a function of individual inflammatory host response. We aimed to investigate and compare the impact of well-established inflammation based scores and inflammation-related nutritional scores on survival in HFrEF. Methods Stable HFrEF-patients undergoing routine ambulatory care between 2011 and 2017 have been identified from a prospective registry. Comorbidities and laboratory data at baseline were assessed. All-cause mortality was defined the primary endpoint. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS: 0/1/2 based on CRP and albumin), the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as well as the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI = (1.519 × serum albumin, g/dL) + (41.7 × present weight (kg)/ideal body weight (kg)) and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI = albumin (g l–1) × total lymphocyte count × 109 l–1) were calculated. The association of the scores with HF severity and impact on overall survival were determined. Results Data of 443 patients receiving well titrated guideline directed HF therapy have been analyzed. Median age was 64 years (IQR 53–72), 73% were male. Median body mass index (BMI) was 26.6kg/m2 (IQR 23.8–30.2), median NT-proBNP was 2053pg/ml (IQR 842–4345) with most patients presenting in NYHA class II (178, 40%) and III (173, 39%). The mGPS was 0 for 352 (80%), 1 for 76 (17%) and 2 for 14 (3%) patients, respectively. All scores correlated with HF severity reflected by NT-proBNP [p<0.001 for mGPS, r=−0.48; p<0.001 for PNI] and NYHA class [p<0.001 for mGPS and PNI]. All scores were associated with all-cause mortality in univariate analysis. After adjustment for age, gender and kidney function only mGPS, PLR, NRI and PNI remained significantly associated with outcome. Out of these the ROC were highest for PNI and mGPS [0.674 and 0.652 respectively] and solely these scores remained significantly associated with mortality after including NT-proBNP in the multivariate model [adj.HR 1.87 (95% CI: 1.20–2.91), p=0.006 for mGPS; 0.62 (95% CI: 0.40–0.96), p=0.032 for PNI]. Kaplan Meier analysis confirmed the discriminatory power of mGPS and PNI (Figure 1). Conclusions Enhanced inflammation and malnutrition are more common in advanced heart failure. Among established inflammation and nutritional scores merely mGPS and PNI are associated with survival in HFrEF patients independently of NT-proBNP. This relationship emphasizes the significance of the individual proinflammatory response on prognosis.This easily available score may help clinicians to identify HFrEF patients with worse prognosis with urgent need for intensified therapy and/or alternate treatment options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M V Polito ◽  
A Rispoli ◽  
V Vitulano ◽  
F D"auria ◽  
A Silverio ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements none Aims. To evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in a real-world population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results. Prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.The primary outcome was HF rehospitalization;secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death and the composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization at 12 months follow up.The clinical outcome was compared with a retrospective cohort of 90 HFrEF patients treated with standard medical therapy by using propensity score weighting. At 6 months follow-up, changes in symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, eGFR and furosemide dose were also evaluated. The study population consisted of 90 patients (66.1 ± 11.7 years). At 6 months FU, a significant improvement in NYHA class, LVEF (from 31.0% to 34.0%; p = 0.001), LVESV (from 115.0 to 101.0 mL; p = 0.033) and sPAP (from 31.0 to 25.0 mmHg; p = 0.024) was observed. Moreover, S/V did not affect negatively eGFR and was associated with a significantly lower dose of furosemide prescribed. The propensity score weighting adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly lower risk for HF rehospitalization (HR, 0.131; 95% CI, 0.034-0.503; p = 0.003) and the composite outcome (HR, 0.162; 95% CI, 0.053-0.492; p = 0.001) among patients treated with S/V as compared to the standard therapy group. Conclusions In this real-world HFrEF population, S/V reduced HF rehospitalization and cardiac death at 1 year. Moreover, S/V improved significantly NYHA class, LVEF, LVESV and sPAP at 6 months, preserving renal function and reducing the need of furosemide. Table Study outcomes Unadjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.273 0.101-0.740 0.011 Cardiac death 0.443 0.137-1.440 0.176 Composite outcome 0.331 0.155-0.710 0.005 All-cause death 0.666 0.272-1.628 0.372 Adjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.131 0.034-0.503 0.003 Cardiac death 0.259 0.047-1.415 0.119 Composite outcome 0.162 0.053-0.492 0.001 All-cause death 0.713 0.201-2.529 0.601 Adjusted and unadjusted HR for the study outcomes. Abstract 412 Figure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document