scholarly journals Point-of-Care Assays Could Be Useful for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of IBD Patients in a Proactive Strategy with Adalimumab

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2739
Author(s):  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
Dominique Dutzer ◽  
Yara Nasser ◽  
Anne-Emmanuelle Berger ◽  
Xavier Roblin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Residual Rate ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether Point-of-Care (POC) assays are equivalent to ELISAs for measuring residual trough levels of adalimumab (ADA) in a cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. ADA trough levels obtained by POC assays were used to optimize patients in daily clinical practice. Different assays (three ELISAs (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) from two different suppliers and two POC assays) were compared to measure ADA trough levels in a first cohort of 31 IBD patients. All assays revealed a high correlation within the assays, ranging from 0.86 to 0.99. Cut-off values were always higher with ELISAs than with POC assays. Then, a small prospective clinical study with a second cohort of 37 IBD patients was performed to compare POC assays and ELISAs for their ability to optimize patients on the basis of the measured ADA trough levels. The use of a POC assay to monitor ADA trough levels did not improve the follow-up of patients with loss of response, as they were always optimized whatever their ADA residual rate. For patients in clinical remission, a POC assay can be useful in some clinical situations to maintain or de-escalate ADA doses according to the measured trough levels. In conclusion, different assays for ADA monitoring are quite equivalent. A POC assay could be only useful for a proactive strategy for asymptomatic patients with a sub-therapeutic dose of ADA, but new therapeutic thresholds need to be identified.

P329 Comparative Assessment of Adalimumab Trough Levels between Point-of-Care Testing and current Standard of Care (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S353-S353
Author(s):  
I Marsilio ◽  
D Maniero ◽  
G Lorenzon ◽  
A Rigo ◽  
R Cardin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Deming Regression ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Background Adalimumab (ADL) is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody that targets the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and has been shown to effectively induce and maintain disease remission in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). However, some patients fail to respond to this treatment, experiencing primary failure (no response to induction therapy), while others initially respond but lose efficacy over time (secondary failure). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), in clinical practice, may lead to maintain therapeutic drug concentration thereby optimizing individual dosage regimen and improving treatment response. Recently, a point of care testing (POCT) has been developed to rapidly measure trough levels in patients taking ADL. Comparative data with current gold standard are lacking. Aim To determine the degree of analytical correlation between a recently developed POCT (ProciseDx) ADL assay which analyze capillary whole blood and the comparative enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) from serum samples. Methods From December 2020 to February 2021, consecutive patients (aged ≥ 18 years) taking ADA (Humira, Amgevita, Imraldi) were recruited at Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University Hospital, during outpatient visits. In each patient, ADL levels from capillary whole blood collected by finger stick were performed using the ProciseDx ADL assay with reportable range between 1.3 µg/mL - 51.5 µg/mL; at the same time, a serum sample from venous blood was collected to carry out Grifols’ Promonitor ELISA test (range ≤ 0.024 – 12 µg/mL). A Deming regression test was used to identify the correlation between the two methods. Results Sixty patients were enrolled (67% males with mean age of 3±14), with 80% of them having CD, 17% UC and 3% an undetermined-Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD-U). The assessment with ProciseDx POCT was feasible and required a turnaround time of 3±0.2 minutes while serum ELISA analysis required the collection of at least 40 samples (around three weeks at our centre) and 3 hours to be performed. Thirty patients (63% males with mean age of 41±14) had therapeutic levels as assessed by ProciseDx ADL assay lower than 1.3 or greater than 12 µg/mL, in accordance with ELISA assessment. Among the remaining 30 patients (70% males with mean age of 43±15), the correlation between the two tests was high (r of 0.858 (95% CI 0.720 – 0.930)). Conclusion The ProciseDx POCT has similar accuracy but was more rapid and easy to be performed in providing the results of TDM in outpatients taking ADL. This could lead to a more rapid and effective optimization of the biological drug, thus avoiding treatment failure.

scholarly journals P408 Long-term impact of the decrease of infliximab trough levels on the disease course in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients under maintenance treatment with infliximab

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S375-S376
Author(s):  
E Orfanoudaki ◽  
M Gazouli ◽  
K Foteinogiannopoulou ◽  
E Theodoraki ◽  
E Legaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Biologic Agent ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Treatment Optimisation ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Background The measurement of infliximab trough levels (IFX-TLs) has been suggested as an important biomarker for the optimisation of treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We have previously reported that IFX-TLs of patients under maintenance treatment with IFX show decreasing patterns associated with an increasing pattern of CRP levels1. We aimed to study the clinical impact of this observation by recording the treatment changes that became necessary during a three year follow-up. Methods Consecutive asymptomatic patients on maintenance treatment with IFX were included. Two different measurements of IFX-TLs were made (ELISA, Eagle BioSciences) with a ten-month interval using serum samples drained before IFX infusion. After the second measurement patients were followed up for three years and all treatment modifications including IFX intensification, change of biologic agent or IBD-related surgical intervention were assessed. Results Among a total of 86 IBD patients under maintenance treatment with IFX, 64 [49 CD, 15 UC, 42 men, mean age 44.2 ± 15.2 years, 41 in combination therapy with immunomodulator, 6 in intensified dose], with 2 available measurements of IFX-TLs (A and B) were included in the study. Median levels of IF-TLs were 5.07 (IQR 1.60–12.73) μg/ml in measurement A and 4.68 (1.19–7.83) μg/ml in measurement B (p < 0.0001). Treatment was intensified in 8 patients after measurement A. Patients with stable IFX dose showed a significant reduction in median IFX-TLs from 5.65 to 3.8 μg/ml (p < 0.0001). Moreover, CRP levels were significantly increased in measurement B compared with measurement A [0.33 (03–4.4) mg/dl vs. 0.31 (0.3–3.8) mg/dl, p = 0.02]. During a 3 year follow-up, 22 (34%) patients needed treatment optimisation (6 IFX intensification, 7 change of agent, 6 surgery, 3 change of agent plus surgery). In three patients IFX was stopped for safety reasons. Fifty-eight hospitalisations in 19 patients were also recorded. The decrease of IFX-TLs between the two measurements was significantly more in patients with treatment optimisation compared with patients without treatment optimisation (p = 0.03). Conclusion IBD patients who are on maintenance treatment with infliximab showing decreasing patterns of IFX-TLs often need treatment optimisation during the follow-up due to clinical or endoscopic activity. These results probably suggest the importance of the proactive therapeutic drug monitoring and early treatment optimisation in these patients References

scholarly journals Rapid point-of-care anti-infliximab antibodies detection in clinical practice: comparison with ELISA and potential for improving therapeutic drug monitoring in IBD patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482199990
Author(s):  
Sonia Facchin ◽  
Andrea Buda ◽  
Romilda Cardin ◽  
Nada Agbariah ◽  
Fabiana Zingone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Drug Clearance ◽  
Elisa Test ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Anti-drug antibodies can interfere with the activity of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents by increasing drug clearance via direct neutralization. The presence of anti-drug antibodies is clinically relevant when trough drug concentrations are undetectable or sub-therapeutic. However, traditional immunoassay is not easily and rapidly accessible, making the translation of the results into treatment adjustment difficult. The availability of a point-of-care (POC) test for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might represent an important step forward for improving the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in clinical practice. In this pilot study, we compared the results obtained with POC tests with those obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a group of IBD patients treated with Infliximab (IFX). We showed that POC test can reliably detect presence of antibody-to-IFX with 100% of specificity and 76% sensitivity, in strong agreement with the ELISA test ( k-coefficient = 0.84).

scholarly journals P277 Frequency and effectiveness of empirical anti-TNF dose intensification in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: systematic review with meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S309-S309
Author(s):  
L Guberna Blanco ◽  
O P Nyssen ◽  
M Chaparro ◽  
J P Gisbert
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Dose Intensification ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Loss of response to anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. However, the precise incidence of dose intensification (DI) and its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aims were: 1) To evaluate the need of DI of anti-TNF therapy either by increasing the dose or decreasing doses’ interval; 2) To evaluate possible variables influencing its requirement; 3) To assess the effectiveness of empirical DI. Methods Bibliographical searches were performed in Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL. Selection: prospective and retrospective studies assessing loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, considered as the need of DI, in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated for at least 12 weeks with an anti-TNF drug [infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab or golimumab]. Exclusion criteria: studies using anti-TNF as prophylaxis for postoperative recurrence in CD or those where DI was based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Data synthesis: Effectiveness by intention-to-treat (random effects model). Data were stratified by medical condition (UC vs. CD), anti-TNF drug and follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Results In total, 174 studies (32,031 patients) were included. The overall rate of DI requirement after 12 months follow-up was 27% (95%CI 23-31, I2=96%, 51 studies) in naïve patients and 38% (95%CI 31-46, I2=87%, 18 studies) in non-naïve patients. The rate of DI requirement was higher in patients with prior anti-TNF exposure (c²=6.5, P=0.01) and in UC patients (c²=4.7, P=0.03). The rate of DI requirement in naïve patients after 36 months follow-up was 35% (95%CI 27-43%; I2=98%; 22 studies). The overall short-term response and remission rates to empirical DI in naïve patients were 66% (95%CI 61-71%; I2=81%; 35 studies) and 48% (95%CI 35-62%; I2=97%; 27 studies), respectively. Subgroup analyses are presented in the tables. Conclusion Loss of response to anti-TNF agents ―and consequent DI― occur frequently in IBD (approximately in 1/4 at one year and in 1/3 at 3 years). DI requirement is higher in UC patients and in those with prior anti-TNF exposure. Empirical DI is a relatively effective therapeutic option.

scholarly journals P295 Comparative Assessment of Infliximab Trough Levels between Point-of-Care Testing and current Standard of Care (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S325-S325
Author(s):  
D Maniero ◽  
G Lorenzon ◽  
I Marsilio ◽  
A Rigo ◽  
R Cardin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Deming Regression ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

Abstract Background Infliximab (IFX) is a monoclonal antibody that targets cytokine tumor necrosis factor; it is used for the treatment of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IFX induces and maintains remission and mucosal healing in patients with IBD. Measurement of trough levels (TL) of IFX is important to assess if the drug is within its therapeutic concentrationand to explain lack/loss of response. Standard laboratory tests to assess IFX trough levels (enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, ELISA) present some downsides, related to the long turnaround (about 3 hours), and the need of specialized equipment and laboratory personnel. For this reason, point-of care testing (POCT) was developed to provide results within a few minutes from blood collection, leading to a decision-making approach. Aim To determine the degree of analytical correlation between a recently developed POCT (ProciseDx) IFX assay which analyze capillary whole blood and the comparative ELISA from serum. Methods From October 2020 to January 2021, patients (aged≥18 years) taking IFX were recruited at Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University Hospital. In each patient, IFX levels from capillary whole blood collected by finger stick were performed using the ProciseDx IFX assay with reportable range between 1.7-77.2 µg/mL; at the same time, a serum sample from venous blood was collected to carry out Grifols’ Promonitor ELISA test (range 0.035–14.4 µg/mL). A Deming regression test was used to identify the correlation between the two methods. Results Eighty-seven patients were enrolled (63% males; mean age of 44±16), with 52% of them having CD, 45% UC and 3% an undetermined-Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The assessment with ProciseDx POCT was feasible in each patient and only in three cases blood collection from finger prick was repeated. Moreover, from blood collection to results we needed about 3±0.5 minutes, while serum ELISA analysis required the collection of at least 40 samples (around three weeks at our centre) and 3 hours to be performed. 39 patients (59% males; mean age of 44±16) had TL as assessed by ProciseDx IFX assay lower than 1.7 or greater than 14.4 µg/mL, in accordance with ELISA assessment. Among the remaining 48 patients (67% males with mean age of 45±17), The correlation between the two tests was high (the total results showed an R squared of 0.691 (95% CI 0.717-0.902). Conclusion The ProciseDx POCT has good accuracy but was more rapid and easy to be performed in providing the results of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in outpatients taking IFX. This could lead to a more effective optimization of the biological drug, thus avoiding treatment failure.

Comparison of Two Different Techniques to Assess Adalimumab Trough Levels in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgia Bodini ◽  
Vincenzo Savarino ◽  
Edoardo G. Giannini ◽  
Manuele Furnari ◽  
Elisa Marabotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Mobility Shift Assay ◽  
Trough Levels ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Background & Aims:  Loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is likely due to low drug serum levels, and dosing anti-TNF drug concentrations may improve patients’ outcome. However, there are limited data on the diagnostic accuracy and utility of currently available assays for measuring anti-TNF levels. In this study, our aim was to compare serum adalimumab concentrations with two different techniques. Methods: We assessed serum adalimumab concentrations in 23 patients with Crohn’s disease during a 96-week follow-up period. Adalimumab trough levels were assessed using a sandwich principle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA). Results: At week 48, adalimumab trough levels were significantly lower in patients who experienced relapse compared to patients in remission, using both ELISA and HMSA methods: 4.8 mcg/mL (2.4-7.2 mcg/mL) vs. 7.5 mcg/mL (6.6-8.4 mcg/mL) (P=0.01) and 6.5 mcg/mL (3-10 mcg/mL) vs. 11.6 mcg/mL (7-16.2 mcg/ml) (P=0.004), respectively. Similar results were obtained at week 96: 5.9 mcg/mL (3.3-8.5 mcg/mL) vs. 12.8 mcg/mL (9.4-16.2 mcg/mL) (P=0.001) and 4.1 mcg/mL (1.6-6.6 mcg/mL) vs. 7.5 mcg/mL (5.7-9.3 mcg/mL) (P=0.009), respectively. There was a significant correlation between ELISA and HMSA adalimumab trough levels at both 48 (r = 0.691, P=0.0003) and 96 week (r = 0.822, P=0.0001). Conclusions: ELISA and HMSA assays are accurate methods to assess adalimumab trough levels in patients with Crohn’s disease and those who experience loss of response. The preferential use of one of the two techniques should be based on local availability and physicians’ experience.Abbreviations: ADA: Adalimumab; AA: Anti-drug antibodies; anti-TNF: Anti-tumor necrosis factor; CD: Crohn’s disease; ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HBI: Harvey-Bradshaw Index; HMSA: Homogeneous mobility shift assay; IBD: Inflammatory bowel diseases; LOR: Loss of response.

scholarly journals P573 Frequency and effectiveness of empirical anti-TNF dose intensification in inflammatory bowel disease: an on-going systematic review with meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S482-S483
Author(s):  
L Guberna Blanco ◽  
O P Nyssen ◽  
M Chaparro ◽  
J P Gisbert
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Dose Intensification ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Loss of response to anti-TNF therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. However, the precise incidence of dose intensification (DI) and its effectiveness remain unclear. Our aims were: (1) To evaluate the need of DI of anti-TNF therapy either by increasing the dose or decreasing doses’ interval; (2) To evaluate possible variables influencing its requirement; (3) To assess the effectiveness of empirical DI. Methods Bibliographical searches were performed until January 2019. Selection: prospective and retrospective studies assessing the loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, considered as the need of DI, in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated for at least 12 weeks with an anti-TNF drug. Exclusion criteria: Studies using anti-TNF as prophylaxis for postoperative recurrence in CD or those where DI was based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Data were analyzed by means of the inverse variance method using a random effect model and stratifying by medical baseline condition (UC vs. CD), anti-TNF drug and follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed by intention-to-treat analysis. Results Up to now, 107 studies (11,377 patients) were included. The overall rate of DI requirement for naïve patients after 12 and 36 months of follow-up was 35% (95% CI=26–45%, I2=95%, 15 studies) and 48% (41–55%, I2= 77%, 9 studies); respectively. Frequencies of DI requirement stratified by subgroup analysis are presented in the table (all patients being naïve except CD patients treated with adalimumab (ADA), including naïve and no naïve). The overall short-term response and remission rates to empirical DI were 67% (95% CI: 63–72%; I2=73%; 31 studies) and 45% (95% CI: 35–55%; I2=9%; 23 studies), respectively; subgroup analyses are summarised in the table. Conclusion Loss of response to anti-TNF agents and consequent DI occurs frequently in both UC and CD, with an overall rate of DI requirement of 35% at one year and 48% at 3 years. Empirical DI is a relatively effective therapeutic option. Further data extraction and analysis is necessary to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Clinical Decision Making in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Loss of Response to Anti-TNF: A Delphi Technique-Based Consensus

Digestion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Greuter ◽  
Michel H. Maillard ◽  
Pascal Juillerat ◽  
Pierre Michetti ◽  
Frank Seibold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Drug Levels ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Antidrug Antibody ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Trough Levels

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Loss of response is frequently encountered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and antidrug antibody measurement are increasingly used in this setting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To establish a consensus on the use of TDM in the context of loss of response to anti-TNFs, we performed a vote using a Delphi-style process followed by an expert panel discussion among 8 IBD specialists practicing in Switzerland, Europe. Statements were rated on an even Likert-scale ranging from 1 (strong disagreement) to 4 (strong agreement), based on expert opinion and the available literature. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The experts agreed on the following statements: (i) loss of response is associated with inadequate drug levels in both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis; (ii) best timepoint for measuring drug levels is prior to the next application (= trough levels) with different thresholds for anti-TNF agents (infliximab 5 μg/mL, adalimumab 8 μg/mL, certolizumab pegol 10 μg/mL); (iii) antidrug antibodies are predictive for loss of response; and (iv) antidrug-antibody titers and drug trough levels are key determinants in the treatment algorithm. Data about non-anti-TNF biologics were considered too limited to propose recommendations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A Delphi-style consensus among 8 IBD experts shows that TDM and measurement of antidrug-antibody titers are useful in the context of loss of response to anti-TNF. Optimal cutoff levels depend on the type of anti-TNF. These values are critical in the decision making process. More studies are needed to address the value of such measurements for non-anti-TNF biologics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document