scholarly journals Evaluation of Social Cognition Measures for Japanese Patients with Schizophrenia Using an Expert Panel and Modified Delphi Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Hiroki Okano ◽  
Ryotaro Kubota ◽  
Ryo Okubo ◽  
Naoki Hashimoto ◽  
Satoru Ikezawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Clinical Scenarios

Social cognition is strongly linked to social functioning outcomes, making it a promising treatment target. Because social cognition measures tend to be sensitive to linguistic and cultural differences, existing measures should be evaluated based on their relevance for Japanese populations. We aimed to establish an expert consensus on the use of social cognition measures in Japanese populations to provide grounds for clinical use and future treatment development. We assembled a panel of experts in the fields of schizophrenia, social psychology, social neuroscience, and developmental disorders. The panel engaged in a modified Delphi process to (1) affirm expert consensus on the definition of social cognition and its constituent domains, (2) determine criteria to evaluate measures, and (3) identify measures appropriate for Japanese patients with a view toward future quantitative research. Through two online voting rounds and two online video conferences, the panel agreed upon a definition and four-domain framework for social cognition consistent with recent literature. Evaluation criteria for measures included feasibility and tolerability, reliability, clinical effectiveness, validity, and international comparability. The panel finally identified nine promising measures, including one task originally developed in Japan. In conclusion, we established an expert consensus on key discussion points in social cognition and arrived at an expert-selected set of measures. We hope that this work facilitates the use of these measures in Japanese clinical scenarios. We plan to further examine these measures in a psychometric evaluation study.

scholarly journals The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation Study: Results of the Expert Survey and RAND Panel

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 813-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E. Pinkham ◽  
David L. Penn ◽  
Michael F. Green ◽  
Benjamin Buck ◽  
Kristin Healey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Expert Survey ◽  
The Social ◽  
Study Results

scholarly journals Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Hussain ◽  
Gabriele Via ◽  
Lawrence Melniker ◽  
Alberto Goffi ◽  
Guido Tavazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
The Past ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Grade Methodology

AbstractCOVID-19 has caused great devastation in the past year. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) including lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) as a clinical adjunct has played a significant role in triaging, diagnosis and medical management of COVID-19 patients. The expert panel from 27 countries and 6 continents with considerable experience of direct application of PoCUS on COVID-19 patients presents evidence-based consensus using GRADE methodology for the quality of evidence and an expedited, modified-Delphi process for the strength of expert consensus. The use of ultrasound is suggested in many clinical situations related to respiratory, cardiovascular and thromboembolic aspects of COVID-19, comparing well with other imaging modalities. The limitations due to insufficient data are highlighted as opportunities for future research.

scholarly journals Expert Consensus on Clinical Application of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Results From a Modified Delphi Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110126
Author(s):  
Yong Hai ◽  
Jingwei Liu ◽  
Yuzeng Liu ◽  
Tie Liu ◽  
Xinuo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Chinese Study

Study Design: Modified Delphi study. Objective: The objective of this study was to establish expert consensus on the application of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) by using the modified Delphi study. Methods: From June 2019 to March 2020, Members of the Chinese Study Group for Lateral Lumbar Spine Surgery were selected to collect expert feedback using the modified Delphi method where 65 spine surgeons from all over China agreed to participate. Four rounds were performed: 1 face-to-face meeting and 3 subsequent survey rounds. The consensus was achieved with ≥a 70.0% agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade A was defined as ≥90.0% of the agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade B was defined as 80.0-89.9% of the agreement for each question. The recommendation of grade C was defined as 70.0-79.9% of the agreement for each question. Results: A total of 65 experts formed a panelist group, and the number of questionnaires collected was 63, 59, and 62 in the 3 rounds. In total, 5 sections, 71 questions, and 382 items achieved consensus after the Delphi rounds including summary; preoperative evaluation; application at the lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, adult degenerative scoliosis, postoperative adjacent segmental degeneration, and revision surgery; complications; and postoperative follow-up evaluation of LLIF. Conclusion: The modified Delphi method was utilized to ascertain an expert consensus from the Chinese Study Group for Lateral Lumbar Spine Surgery to inform clinical decision-making in the application of LLIF. The salient grade A recommendations of the survey are enumerated.

scholarly journals Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E. Pinkham ◽  
David L. Penn ◽  
Michael F. Green ◽  
Philip D. Harvey
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Psychometric Study

Abstract 10336: ECPR 2 : Expert Consensus on PeRcutaneous Cannulation for Extracorporeal CardioPulmonary Resuscitation

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian F Schmitzberger ◽  
Nathan L Haas ◽  
Ryan A Coute ◽  
Jason Bartos ◽  
Amy E Hackmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Snowball Sampling ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
International Panel ◽  
Patient Arrival

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged as a promising resuscitation strategy for select patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), though limited data exists regarding detailed best practices for the complex process of initiating ECPR following OHCA. Hypothesis: Expert consensus using a modified Delphi process can systematically identify detailed best practices for ECPR initiation following adult non-traumatic OHCA. Methods: We utilized a modified Delphi process consisting of two survey rounds and a virtual consensus meeting to systematically identify best practices for ECPR initiation following adult non-traumatic OHCA. A modified Delphi process builds content validity and is an accepted method to develop consensus by eliciting expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires. Consensus was achieved when items reached a high level of agreement, defined as greater than 80% responses for a particular item rated a 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Snowball sampling generated a panel of 14 content experts, composed of physicians from four continents and four primary specialties. Seven existing institutional protocols for ECPR cannulation following OHCA were identified and merged into a single comprehensive list of 216 items. The panel ultimately reached consensus on 95 items: Prior to Patient Arrival (8 items), Inclusion Criteria (8), Exclusion Criteria (7), Patient Arrival (8), ECPR Cannulation (21), Go On Pump (17), and Post-Cannulation (26). Conclusion: We present a list of essential items for initiation of ECPR following adult non-traumatic OHCA, generated using a modified Delphi process from an international panel of content experts. These findings can benefit centers currently performing ECPR for OHCA in quality assurance and performance improvement, and can serve as a template for new ECPR programs to follow.

The EVACO Project: A new battery for assessing social cognition disorders and related psychiatric disability in schizophrenia

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S78-S78 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Roux ◽  
M. Urbach ◽  
S. Fonteneau ◽  
B. Aouizerate ◽  
F. Berna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Cognitive Disorders ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Functional Expression ◽  
Cognitive Neuropsychology ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Competing Interest

The relation of social cognitive disorders and schizophrenic symptoms are well-established. Yet, assessment methods have not reached a consensus. In addition, causal paths between neurocognition, social cognition, symptoms and functional expression are not clearly understood. During the past few years, some authoritative accounts proposed specialized batteries of tests and emphasized theory of mind, emotion recognition, and interpretation bias constructs:– NIMH's “Social cognition psychometric evaluation” battery (Pinkham AE, Penn DL, Green MF, Harvey PD. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2015);– “Social cognition and functioning in schizophrenia” (Green MF, Lee J, Ochsner KN. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2013).Interestingly, these accounts stemming either from expert consensus and psychometric considerations or from neuroscience knowledge recognized some difficulties in providing a fully usable set of instruments. The project described here (EVACO protocol, funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique national) follows an alternative approach and aims at providing a psychometrically validated battery. Based on a cognitive neuropsychology view on schizophrenic functional disability, several tests were gathered and are assessed in a 12-months multi-center follow-up of 160 individuals with schizophrenia. The FondaMental foundation network of Expert Centers is involved in recruiting patients from eight centers (Clermont-Ferrand, Colombes, Créteil, Grenoble, Marseille, Montpellier, Strasbourg, Versailles). To-date, the first evaluation of the population has been achieved. Experience reports and inclusions follow-up demonstrate the good acceptability of this battery both on the patients and the evaluator's side. We emphasize the usefulness of this project to meet the clinicians’ needs of validated social cognition tools, by describing different scenarios of use.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document