scholarly journals Horses for Courses in the Era of CARs: Advancing CAR T and CAR NK Cell Therapies

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Sergey Kulemzin ◽  
Igor Evsyukov ◽  
Tatiana Belovezhets ◽  
Alexander Taranin ◽  
Andrey Gorchakov

The adoptive transfer of allogeneic CAR NK cells holds great promise as an anticancer modality due to the relative ease of manufacturing and genetic modification of NK cells, which translates into affordable pricing. Compared to the pronounced efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in the treatment of B cell malignancies, rigorous clinical and preclinical assessment of the antitumor properties of CAR NK cells has been lagging behind. In this brief review, we summarize the biological features of NK cells that may help define the therapeutic niche of CAR NK cells as well as create more potent NK cell-based anticancer products. In addition, we compare T cells and NK cells as the carriers of CARs using the data of single-cell transcriptomic analysis.

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Mhaidly ◽  
Els Verhoeyen

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents a revolutionary treatment for hematological malignancies. However, improvements in CAR T-cell therapies are urgently needed since CAR T cell application is associated with toxicities, exhaustion, immune suppression, lack of long-term persistence, and low CAR T-cell tumor infiltration. Major efforts to overcome these hurdles are currently on the way. Incrementally improved xenograft mouse models, supporting the engraftment and development of a human hemato-lymphoid system and tumor tissue, represent an important fundamental and preclinical research tool. We will focus here on several CAR T and CAR NK therapies that have benefited from evaluation in humanized mice. These models are of great value for the cancer therapy field as they provide a more reliable understanding of sometimes complicated therapeutic interventions. Additionally, they are considered the gold standard with regard to assessment of new CAR technologies in vivo for safety, efficacy, immune response, design, combination therapies, exhaustion, persistence, and mechanism of action prior to starting a clinical trial. They help to expedite the critical translation from proof-of-concept to clinical CAR T-cell application. In this review, we discuss innovative developments in the CAR T-cell therapy field that benefited from evaluation in humanized mice, illustrated by multiple examples.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4560-4560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireya Paulina Velasquez ◽  
Arpad Szoor ◽  
Challice L. Bonifant ◽  
Abishek Vaidya ◽  
Lorenzo Brunetti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: T-cell therapy with CD19-CAR T cells has been very successful for the treatment of B-cell derived malignancies in humans. However, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and development of CD19- escape variants have emerged as potential limitations. Developing CAR NK-cell based therapies might overcome some of these side effects since NK cells do not rapidly expand or persist long-term after adoptive transfer. However, CAR NK-cell therapies are less effective than CAR T-cell therapies in preclinical models. To overcome these limitations we have devised a strategy to genetically modify NK cells with CD22-CARs and CD19/CD3-bispecific T-cell engager (CD19-ENG) molecules. These NK cells should not only kill CD22+ B cells directly, but also redirect bystander T cells to malignant CD19+ B cells, enhancing antitumor effects and preventing immune escape. Methods: NK cells were generated using K562s expressing 41BBL and membrane bound IL15, and genetically modified with a retroviral vector encoding a CD22-CAR with a 41BB.ζ endodomain and/or a retroviral vector encoding CD19-ENG and mOrange separated by an IRES. To mimic immune escape, CD19 or CD22 knockout (ko) Ph+ leukemia cells (BV173) were generated by CRISPR/cas9. The effector function of genetically modified NK cells was evaluated using standard immunological assays. Results: After transduction 70-80% of NK cells expressed CD22-CARs, and ~50% expressed CD22-CARs and CD19-ENGs as judged by FACS analysis. We performed coculture and cytotoxicity assays using non-transduced (NT), CD22-CAR, CD19-ENG, and CD22-CAR/CD19-ENG NK cells as effectors and BV173 (CD19+/CD22+), BV173.koCD19, BV173.koCD22, Daudi (CD19+/CD22+), and KG1a (CD19-,CD22-) as targets. Cocultures were preformed +/- T cells and after 24 hours IFNγ and IL2 was determined by ELISA. In the absence of T cells, CD22-CAR and CD22-CAR/CD19-ENG NK cells only recognized CD22+ targets as judged by IFNγ production. Moreover, CD22-CAR/CD19-ENG and CD19-ENG NK cells efficiently redirected T cells to secrete IFNγ in the presence of CD19+/CD22- targets. No NK-cell population produced IL2, however CD22-CAR/CD19-ENG and CD19-ENG NK cells induced IL2 production of T cells in the presence of CD19+ targets. No significant cytokine production was observed in the absence of antigen (media, KG1a). Specificity of generated NK cells was confirmed in cytotoxicity assays. In vivo studies to confirm our in vitro findings are in progress. Conclusions: We have generated for the first time NK cells that kill B-cell malignancies through a CAR (CD22) and simultaneously redirect bystander T cells to a 2nd B-cell antigen (CD19) to enhance antitumor effects and prevent immune escape. Genetic modification of NK cells to enhance their antitumor activity and redirect bystander T cells may present a promising addition to current cell therapies for B-cell malignancies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Adeel ◽  
Nathan Fergusson ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
Harry Atkins ◽  
Kevin Anthony Hay

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fail to respond or relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B-cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials.Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T-cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B-cell malignancies.Methods:We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and catalogued. Interventional studies investigating CD22 CAR T-cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conferences abstracts, letters and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results.Discussion:The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22 CAR T-cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T-cells.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42020193027.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Adeel ◽  
Nathan J. Fergusson ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
Harold Atkins ◽  
Kevin A. Hay

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fails to respond or relapse after CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials. Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B cell malignancies. Methods We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and cataloged. Interventional studies investigating CD22 CAR T cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conference abstracts, letters, and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results. Discussion The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22 CAR T cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T cells. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193027


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096296
Author(s):  
Qing Cai ◽  
Mingzhi Zhang ◽  
Zhaoming Li

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a rapidly developing method for adoptive immunotherapy of tumours in recent years. CAR T-cell therapies have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in the treatment of patients with haematological malignancies. A 90% complete response (CR) rate has been reported in patients with advanced relapse or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, while >50% CR rates have been reported in cases of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and partial B-cell lymphoma. Despite the high CR rates, a subset of the patients with complete remission still relapse. The mechanism of development of resistance is not clearly understood. Some patients have been reported to demonstrate antigen-positive relapse, whereas others show antigen-negative relapses. Patients who relapse following CAR T-cell therapy, have very poor prognosis and novel approaches to overcome resistance are required urgently. Herein, we have reviewed current literature and research that have investigated the strategies to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Li ◽  
Lili Zhou ◽  
Shiguang Ye ◽  
Wenjun Zhang ◽  
Junbang Wang ◽  
...  

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a novel treatment modality for hematologic malignancies and is predicted to experience widespread use in the near future. However, not all risks associated with this novel approach are well defined. There are few data in the risk of HBV reactivation and limited experience in management in patients with resolved HBV infection who undergo CAR-T cell therapy.MethodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial of anti-CD19 CAR-T (CART19) cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies, and aimed at exploring the actual risk of HBV reactivation in a cohort of patients with resolved HBV infection receiving CART19 cell therapy in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis.ResultsIn this study, we investigated the risk of HBV reactivation after CART19 cell therapy in 30 consecutive patients with B-cell malignancies and resolved HBV infection without antiviral prophylaxis, in the Tongji Hospital of Tongji University. In this cohort, two patients developed HBV reactivation 2 months and 14 months after CAR-T cell infusion, respectively, the latter of whom developed severe hepatitis. These findings showed that the incidence of HBV reactivation was 6.67% (95% CI, 0.8–22.1). Specifically, none of the 21 patients who were HBsAb positive (0.0%) versus two of nine patients who were HBsAb negative (22.2%) experienced HBV reactivation (p = 0.03), suggesting HbsAb seronegativity at baseline is a possible risk factor in this population. Although use of tocilizumab or corticosteroids has been associated with increased risk of HBV reactivation, none of the patients who received these agents had HBV reactivation in this study.ConclusionThis is the first and largest study to assess the true incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection receiving CART19 cell therapy without antiviral prophylaxis. This study highlights that this population are at risk of developing HBV reactivation and indicates that close monitoring of HBV DNA is required in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. In addition, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in the HBsAb-negative subpopulation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096657
Author(s):  
Weijia Wu ◽  
Yan Huo ◽  
Xueying Ding ◽  
Yuhong Zhou ◽  
Shengying Gu ◽  
...  

Aims: Within the past few years, there has been tremendous growth in clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Unlike those of many small-molecule pharmaceuticals, CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials are fraught with risks due to the use of live cell products. The aim of this study is to reach a consensus with experts on the most relevant set of risks that practically occur in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials. Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used to identify the risks in CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, comprising three survey rounds. The expert panel consisted of principal investigators, clinical research physicians, members of institutional ethics committees, and Good Clinical Practice managers. Results: Of the 24 experts invited to participate in this Delphi study, 20 participants completed Round 1, Round 2, and Round 3. Finally, consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was achieved for 54 risks relating to CAR T-cell clinical trials. Effective interventions related to these risks are needed to ensure the proper protection of subject health and safety. Conclusion: The Delphi method was successful in gaining a consensus on risks relevant to CAR T-cell clinical trials in a geographically diverse expert association. It is hoped that this work can benefit future risk-based quality management in clinical trials and can potentially promote the better development of CAR T-cell therapy products.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy J. Petty ◽  
Benjamin Heyman ◽  
Yiping Yang

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are fusion proteins engineered from antigen recognition, signaling, and costimulatory domains that can be used to reprogram T cells to specifically target tumor cells expressing specific antigens. Current CAR-T cell technology utilizes the patient’s own T cells to stably express CARs and has achieved exciting clinical success in the past few years. However, current CAR-T cell therapy still faces several challenges, including suboptimal persistence and potency, impaired trafficking to solid tumors, local immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment and intrinsic toxicity associated with CAR-T cells. This review focuses on recent strategies to improve the clinical efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy and other exciting CAR approaches currently under investigation, including CAR natural killer (NK) and NKT cell therapies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Fischer ◽  
Nirjal Bhattarai

Engineered T cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells (CAR-T cells) have great potential to treat many human diseases; however, inflammatory toxicities associated with these therapies present safety risks and can greatly limit its widespread use. This article briefly reviews our current understanding of mechanisms for inflammatory toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy, current strategies for management and mitigation of these risks and highlights key areas of knowledge gap for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document