scholarly journals Banks’ Foreign Claims in the Aftermath of the 2008 Crisis: Institutional Response, Financial Efficiency, and Integration of Cross-Border Banking in the Euro Area

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Thierry Warin ◽  
Aleksandar Stojkov
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Market Integration ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Institutional Response ◽  
Capital Market Integration ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Business Networking ◽  
Recent Financial Crisis

Beyond financial stability as the European Banking Union’s primary objective, the European capital market integration provides an impetus for deepening bank integration and greater financial market efficiency. This article proposes an empirical framework to assess the dynamics of euro area banks’ business networking. We use banks’ foreign claims across Europe, particularly the euro area, to see how banks react to various macroeconomic signals. Banks’ foreign claims are particularly interesting due to their sensitivity. One of the main conclusions is that the euro area has seen a reallocation of capital in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. The financial picture of Europe is different after the recent financial crisis. Although we observe a re-concentration of capital from the periphery to the core countries, we also observe some signs of recovered confidence within the European banking framework for macro-prudential reasons.

scholarly journals European Banking Network in Light of the Single Supervisory Mechanism from the Network Analysis Perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mária Širaňová
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Geographic Distance ◽  
Topological Properties ◽  
Economic Space ◽  
Single Supervisory Mechanism ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Positive Step ◽  
Over Time

In this paper we discuss the topological properties of the European banking network and its evolution over time based on the BIS consolidated banking statistics data exploiting information from complex network analysis. Our conclusions are discussed in light of the soon-to-be-launched Single Supervisory Mechanism that takes into account, among other things, the significance of cross-border activity as a precondition for specifying the systemically important European credit institutions. According to our results, the banking network of the EU13 economic space can be characterized as highly asymmetric with a tendency to create clusters based on geographic distance and cultural and social similarities. Additionally, the highly exposed countries are usually dependent on a small number of major creditors while creditor countries tend to spread their power over dependent countries more equally. We advocate that the presence of heterogeneity and asymmetry in the network and a decrease in the level of foreign banking across Europe could be mitigated by the introduction of SSM, and from this perspective it should be viewed as a positive step towards greater financial stability.

scholarly journals Multilevel cooperation in the EU resolution of cross-border bank groups: lessons from the non-euro area Member States joining the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Smoleńska
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Essential Condition ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Administrative Oversight ◽  
The Eu

AbstractCross-border banking presents a unique set of challenges in the EU from the perspective of arranging administrative oversight structures. Structuring cooperation between different EU and national authorities in a way which is conducive to trust-building and mutual engagement is an essential condition for overcoming disintegrative tendencies in the internal market. To assess how the existing EU arrangements fare in this regard in the context of EU resolution law, this article comparatively analyses the different models of multilevel administrative cooperation in the post-crisis EU framework. These are specifically the centralised model of the European Banking Union (Single Resolution Mechanism) and the relatively looser networked model of the resolution colleges. The multilevel cooperation under both models is nuanced given the distinct roles of the national resolution authorities, EU agencies and the differentiated status of non-euro area Member States in the EBU (Croatia, Bulgaria). The article’s findings allow to identify specific problems of constitutional nature pertaining to the accountability of administrative cooperation, equality of Member States and the implications of Meroni doctrine’s distortive effects.

scholarly journals Capital Market Integration in Euroland: The Role of Banks

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia M. Buch
Keyword(s):  
Financial Market ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Market Integration ◽  
Home Bias ◽  
Capital Market Integration ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Financial Market Integration

Abstract The introduction of the euro marks a milestone in the process of European financial market integration. This paper analyzes the implications of the euro for cross-border banking activities. A portfolio model is used which captures the role of banks as providers of informational and of risk-diversification services. By eliminating exchange rate risks, the euro enhances the incentives of banks to expand within Euroland. Yet, while the currency bias in bank portfolios will be eliminated, the home bias will remain. Implications of market integration for the risk-taking and the monitoring of banks are not clear-cut.

4 European Banking Union

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kleftouri Nikoletta
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Spillover Effects ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Bank Supervision ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
European Bank ◽  
Bank Resolution ◽  
European Banking

Having a multiplicity of financial regulators, supervisors, and resolution authorities in Europe can weaken supervision, heighten legal uncertainty, and impede effective resolution. European officials recently agreed that further steps are needed to tackle the specific risks in particular within the euro area, where pooled monetary responsibilities had increased the possibility of cross-border spillover effects in the event of bank crises. As a result, they created a union aimed to centralize bank supervision, deposit insurance, and bank resolution. This chapter sets out two components of the European banking union: single supervision, and single deposit insurance. Single resolution is separately discussed in Chapter 8, where international and European bank resolution frameworks are examined. The chapter concludes that deeper reforms are needed, in conjunction with effective cooperation arrangements.

Statement by the Managing Director to the International Monetary and Financial Committee on the IMF Reform Agenda

Policy Papers ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (96) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Reform Agenda ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Recent Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Groups ◽  
Made In

The recent financial crisis has given renewed urgency to the need for resolution systems for financial institutions, which both safeguard financial stability and limit moral hazard. However, experience demonstrates that these systems will not be effective unless progress is also made in developing a framework that applies on a cross-border basis. Since many systemically important financial groups operate globally, an uncoordinated application of resolution systems by national authorities will make it much more difficult to both secure the continuity of essential functions (thereby limiting contagion), and ensure that shareholders and creditors bear the financial burden of the resolution process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document