scholarly journals Sleep and Delirium in Pediatric Critical Illness: What Is the Relationship?

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Calandriello ◽  
Joanna Tylka ◽  
Pallavi Patwari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Setting ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Disturbed Sleep ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

With growing recognition of pediatric delirium in pediatric critical illness there has also been increased investigation into improving recognition and determining potential risk factors. Disturbed sleep has been assumed to be one of the key risk factors leading to delirium and is commonplace in the pediatric critical care setting as the nature of intensive care requires frequent and invasive monitoring and interventions. However, this relationship between sleep and delirium in pediatric critical illness has not been definitively established and may, instead, reflect significant overlap in risk factors and consequences of underlying neurologic dysfunction. We aim to review the existing tools for evaluation of sleep and delirium in the pediatric critical care setting and review findings from recent investigations with application of these measures in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Psychopharmacology in the Critical Care Setting

2021 ◽  
pp. 235-250
Author(s):  
Sandeep Nayak ◽  
Jonathan Brigham ◽  
Ted Avi Gerstenblith ◽  
Elizabeth Prince
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Psychotropic Medications ◽  
Oral Medication ◽  
Critical Care Setting ◽  
Confounding Factors

Psychotropic medications can be a powerful tool for enabling treatment of critically ill patients. However, a careful approach to psychopharmacology is necessary in the critical care setting. Special considerations include interactions with other medications and treatments, high levels of physiologic stress that alter metabolism, and the challenges of obtaining diagnostic clarity due to limitations in assessment and confounding factors during critical illness. This chapter outlines common consult questions posed by intensive care teams to psychiatry consultation teams, including management of agitation and sedation, poor participation in care, anxiety, continuation of outpatient medication regimens, and alternatives to oral medication.

Skin Integrity in Critically Ill and Injured Children

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 568-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Schindler ◽  
Theresa A. Mikhailov ◽  
Kay Fischer ◽  
Gloria Lukasiewicz ◽  
Evelyn M. Kuhn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Respiratory Illnesses ◽  
Skin Breakdown ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

Background Skin breakdown increases the cost of care, may lead to increased morbidity, and has negative psychosocial implications because of secondary scarring or alopecia. The scope of this problem has not been widely studied in critically ill and injured children. Objectives To determine the incidence of skin breakdown in critically ill and injured children and to compare the characteristics of patients who experience skin breakdown with those of patients who do not. Methods Admission and follow-up data for a 15-week period were collected retrospectively on children admitted to a large pediatric intensive care unit. The incidence of skin breakdown was calculated. The risk for skin breakdown associated with potential risk factors (relative risk) and 95% confidence intervals were determined. Results The sample consisted of 401 distinct stays in the intensive care unit for 373 patients. During the 401 stays, skin breakdown occurred in 34 (8.5%), redness in 25 (6.2%), and breakdown and redness in 13 (3.2%); the overall incidence was 18%. Patients who had skin breakdown or redness were younger, had longer stays, and were more likely to have respiratory illnesses and require mechanical ventilatory support than those who did not. Patients who had skin breakdown or redness had a higher risk of mortality than those who did not. Conclusions Risk factors for skin breakdown were similar to those previously reported. Compared with children of other ages, children 2 years or younger are at higher risk for skin breakdown.

scholarly journals Incidence and predictors of mortality among children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia: A prospective observational cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahom Worku Teshager ◽  
Ashenafi Tazebew Amare ◽  
koku Tamirat
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality

Abstract Background Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) tremendously improves the success of saving patients having potentially life-threatening illness. An accurate estimate of lives saved through pediatric critical care intervention is important to evaluate the quality of the health care system. Data on pediatric critical care in developing countries remain scarce yet is much needed to improve clinical practices and outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit in the study setting.Method An institution based prospective cohort study was conducted from February 2018 to July 2019. We collected data by interview, chart and registration book review. Life table was used to estimate the cumulative survival of patients and Log rank test was used to compare survival curves between different categories of the explanatory variables. Survival trend over the follow up time was described using the Kaplan Meier graph. Bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify predictors.Result Based on the 10 th version of international classifications of disease (ICD) of WHO, neurologic disorders (22.7%) infectious disease (18.8%) and environmental hazards (11.8%) account for the top three diagnoses. The median observation time was 3 days with IQR of 1 to 6 days. Of the total of 313 participants, 102 (32.6%) died during the follow-up time. This gives the incidence of mortality of 6.9 deaths per 100 person day observation. Caregivers’ occupation of government-employed (AHR=0.35, 95%CI: 0.14, 0.89), weekend admission (AHR=1.63, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.62), critical illness (AHR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.13, 2.85) Mechanical ventilation AHR=2.36,95%CI: 1.39, 4.01)and PIM2 score (AHR=1.53, 95%CI: 1.36, 1.72) were predictors of mortality in the pediatric ICU.Conclusion Neurologic disorder was the leading causes of admission followed by infectious diseases, and environmental hazards. Rate of mortality was high and admission over weekends, caregivers' occupation, mechanical ventilation, critical illness diagnosis, and higher PIM2 scores were found to be significant and independent predictors of mortality at the PICU. This suggests that ICU medical equipment, diagnostics, and interventions should be available up to the standard. Intensivist and full staffing around the clock has to be available in the PICU.

Guidelines and Levels of Care for Pediatric Intensive Care Units

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

Pediatric critical care medicine has matured dramatically during the past two decades. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of life-threatening processes and the technologic capacity to monitor and treat pediatric patients suffering from them have advanced rapidly during this period. Along with the scientific and technical advances has been the evolution of the pediatric intensive care unt (PICU), where the special needs of critically ill or injured children can be met by pediatric specialists. In 1985, the American Board of Pediatrics recognized the new subspecialty of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine and established criteria for subspecialty certification. The American Boards of Medicine, Surgery, and Anesthesiology gave similar recognition to the subspecialty. In 1990, the Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education completed its first accreditation of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Training Programs. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit. This policy represents the consensus of the three above-mentioned groups who believe the recommendations that follow are current, necessary, and attainable in 1993. The guidelines are not intended as a statement of the ideal or ultimate requirements for PICUs. We expect standards for PICUs to rise as critical care medicine continues to develop and appropriately trained providers become more readily available. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit.

The Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110478
Author(s):  
Laura A. Watkins ◽  
Sharon P. Dial ◽  
Seth J. Koenig ◽  
Dalibor N. Kurepa ◽  
Paul H. Mayo
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
New Therapy

Objectives: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in adult critical care environments has become the standard of care in many hospitals. A robust literature shows its benefits for both diagnosis and delivery of care. The utility of POCUS in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), however, is understudied. This study describes in a series of PICU patients the clinical indications, protocols, findings and impact of pediatric POCUS on clinical management. Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive POCUS scans performed by a PICU physician. Patients: Pediatric critical care patients who required POCUS scans over a 15-month period. Setting: The pediatric and cardiac ICUs at a tertiary pediatric care center. Interventions: Performance of a POCUS scan by a pediatric critical care attending with advanced training in ultrasonography. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 200 POCUS scans comprised of one or more protocols (lung and pleura, cardiac, abdominal, or vascular diagnostic protocols) were performed on 155 patients over a 15-month period. The protocols used for each scan reflected the clinical question to be answered. These 200 scans included 133 thoracic protocols, 110 cardiac protocols, 77 abdominal protocols, and 4 vascular protocols. In this series, 42% of scans identified pathology that required a change in therapy, 26% confirmed pathology consistent with the ongoing plans for new therapy, and 32% identified pathology that did not result in initiation of a new therapy. Conclusions: POCUS performed by a trained pediatric intensivist provided useful clinical information to guide patient management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document