scholarly journals Combining Cryo-EM Density Map and Residue Contact for Protein Secondary Structure Topologies

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 7049
Author(s):  
Maytha Alshammari ◽  
Jing He
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Density Map

Although atomic structures have been determined directly from cryo-EM density maps with high resolutions, current structure determination methods for medium resolution (5 to 10 Å) cryo-EM maps are limited by the availability of structure templates. Secondary structure traces are lines detected from a cryo-EM density map for α-helices and β-strands of a protein. A topology of secondary structures defines the mapping between a set of sequence segments and a set of traces of secondary structures in three-dimensional space. In order to enhance accuracy in ranking secondary structure topologies, we explored a method that combines three sources of information: a set of sequence segments in 1D, a set of amino acid contact pairs in 2D, and a set of traces in 3D at the secondary structure level. A test of fourteen cases shows that the accuracy of predicted secondary structures is critical for deriving topologies. The use of significant long-range contact pairs is most effective at enriching the rank of the maximum-match topology for proteins with a large number of secondary structures, if the secondary structure prediction is fairly accurate. It was observed that the enrichment depends on the quality of initial topology candidates in this approach. We provide detailed analysis in various cases to show the potential and challenge when combining three sources of information.

In Silico Study of Secondary Structure of Hemoglobin Protein

2021 ◽  
pp. 6245-6249
Author(s):  
Roma Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Protein Sequence ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Alpha Helix ◽  
Prediction Methods ◽  
Protein Secondary Structures

Protein structure prediction is one of the important goals in the area of bioinformatics and biotechnology. Prediction methods include structure prediction of both secondary and tertiary structures of protein. Protein secondary structure prediction infers knowledge related to presence of helixes, sheets and coils in a polypeptide chain whereas protein tertiary structure prediction infers knowledge related to three dimensional structures of proteins. Protein secondary structures represent the possible motifs or regular expressions represented as patterns that are predicted from primary protein sequence in the form of alpha helix, betastr and and coils. The secondary structure prediction is useful as it infers information related to the structure and function of unknown protein sequence. There are various secondary structure prediction methods used to predict about helixes, sheets and coils. Based on these methods there are various prediction tools under study. This study includes prediction of hemoglobin using various tools. The results produced inferred knowledge with reference to percentage of amino acids participating to produce helices, sheets and coils. PHD and DSC produced the best of the results out of all the tools used.

scholarly journals Protein Secondary Structure Prediction

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1370-1373
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Ionic Bond

Proteins are made up of basic units called amino acids which are held together by bonds namely hydrogen and ionic bond. The way in which the amino acids are sequenced has been categorized into two dimensional and three dimensional structures. The main advantage of predicting secondary structure is to produce tertiary structure likelihoods that are in great demand for continuous detection of proteins. This paper reviews the different methods adopted for predicting the protein secondary structure and provides a comparative analysis of accuracies obtained from various input datasets [1].

Using long-range contact number information for protein secondary structure prediction

2014 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 1450052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonge Feng ◽  
Liaofu Luo
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Contact Number ◽  
Protein Secondary Structures

In this paper, we first combine tetra-peptide structural words with contact number for protein secondary structure prediction. We used the method of increment of diversity combined with quadratic discriminant analysis to predict the structure of central residue for a sequence fragment. The method is used tetra-peptide structural words and long-range contact number as information resources. The accuracy of Q3 is over 83% in 194 proteins. The accuracies of predicted secondary structures for 20 amino acid residues are ranged from 81% to 88%. Moreover, we have introduced the residue long-range contact, which directly indicates the separation of contacting residue in terms of the position in the sequence, and examined the negative influence of long-range residue interactions on predicting secondary structure in a protein. The method is also compared with existing prediction methods. The results show that our method is more effective in protein secondary structures prediction.

scholarly journals Protein Secondary Structure Prediction With a Reductive Deep Learning Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Lyu ◽  
Zhijin Wang ◽  
Fangfang Luo ◽  
Jianwei Shuai ◽  
Yandong Huang
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Data Set ◽  
X Ray Crystallography ◽  
Protein Secondary Structures

Protein secondary structures have been identified as the links in the physical processes of primary sequences, typically random coils, folding into functional tertiary structures that enable proteins to involve a variety of biological events in life science. Therefore, an efficient protein secondary structure predictor is of importance especially when the structure of an amino acid sequence fragment is not solved by high-resolution experiments, such as X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which are usually time consuming and expensive. In this paper, a reductive deep learning model MLPRNN has been proposed to predict either 3-state or 8-state protein secondary structures. The prediction accuracy by the MLPRNN on the publicly available benchmark CB513 data set is comparable with those by other state-of-the-art models. More importantly, taking into account the reductive architecture, MLPRNN could be a baseline for future developments.

A Systematic Review on Popularity, Application and Characteristics of Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Tools

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Kashani-Amin ◽  
Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy ◽  
Amirhossein Sakhteman ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
Azadeh Ebrahim-Habibi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Protein Secondary Structure ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
Insight Into

Background: Prediction of proteins’ secondary structure is one of the major steps in the generation of homology models. These models provide structural information which is used to design suitable ligands for potential medicinal targets. However, selecting a proper tool between multiple Secondary Structure Prediction (SSP) options is challenging. The current study is an insight into currently favored methods and tools, within various contexts. Objective: A systematic review was performed for a comprehensive access to recent (2013-2016) studies which used or recommended protein SSP tools. Methods: Three databases, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched and 99 out of the 209 studies were finally found eligible to extract data. Results: Four categories of applications for 59 retrieved SSP tools were: (I) prediction of structural features of a given sequence, (II) evaluation of a method, (III) providing input for a new SSP method and (IV) integrating an SSP tool as a component for a program. PSIPRED was found to be the most popular tool in all four categories. JPred and tools utilizing PHD (Profile network from HeiDelberg) method occupied second and third places of popularity in categories I and II. JPred was only found in the two first categories, while PHD was present in three fields. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive insight into the recent usage of SSP tools which could be helpful for selecting a proper tool.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document