scholarly journals Galileo Single Point Positioning Assessment Including FOC Satellites in Eccentric Orbits

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Robustelli ◽  
Giovanni Pugliano
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Software Tool ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
System Availability ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Broadcast Ephemeris ◽  
Precise Ephemeris ◽  
Vertical Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning

On August 2016, the Milena (E14) and Doresa (E18) satellites started to broadcast ephemeris in navigation message for testing purposes. As the Galileo constellation is not yet complete. It is very important to have two more satellites available since the position accuracy increases as the number of visible satellites increases. In this article, we examine how the inclusion of the Milena (E14) and Doresa (E18) satellites impacts the position accuracy. The analysis was carried out on 20 days of 1-Hz observations collected by a receiver placed in YEL2IGS (International GNSS service) station. Two different scenarios are considered: the first excludes the measurements coming from the analyzed satellites, while the second one includes them. The analysis was conducted by using a suitable software tool developed in the MATLAB® environment able to compute satellites position from both the broadcast and precise ephemerides, to assess DOP (Dilution Of Precision) parameters and to compute single-point positioning for all Galileo frequencies. The analyses are conducted by using both broadcast and precise ephemeris. The inclusion of the two satellites improves the system availability, varying it from 94.1–97.94%, the DOP parameters, and the percentages of achieved positioning solutions by about 5% regardless of the frequency used. Nevertheless, in the positioning domain, when the broadcast ephemerides are used, the inclusion of the satellites worsens both the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the solution. The deterioration of the horizontal accuracy goes from 0.17 m with E5a frequency measurements to 0.74 m with E1 measurements. The reduction of vertical accuracy goes from 0.68 m for E5a to 1.2 m for E1 measurements. However, if precise ephemerides are used, both the horizontal and the vertical accuracy remain stable, actually for the E5b frequency, the DRMS (Distance Root Mean Squared) improves by almost 0.5 m. The results achieved show that the real drawback to overcome is related to the quality of broadcast ephemeris as, when precise ephemeris are used, the number of solutions achieved is increased by about 5% with an accuracy similar to that obtained when the satellites are excluded.

scholarly journals Global Assessment of the GNSS Single Point Positioning Biases Produced by the Residual Tropospheric Delay

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Ling Yang ◽  
Jinfang Wang ◽  
Haojun Li ◽  
Timo Balz
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Vertical Direction ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Distributed Monitoring ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Point Positioning

The tropospheric delay is one of the main error sources that degrades the accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Single Point Positioning (SPP). Although an empirical model is usually applied for correction and thereby to improve the positioning accuracy, the residual tropospheric delay is still drowned in measurement noise, and cannot be further compensated by parameter estimation. How much this type of residual error would sway the SPP positioning solutions on a global scale are still unclear. In this paper, the biases on SPP solutions introduced by the residual tropospheric delay when using nine conventionally Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) models are analyzed and discussed, including Saastamoinen+norm/Global Pressure and Temperature (GPT)/GPT2/GPT2w/GPT3, University of New Brunswick (UNB)3/UNB3m, European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System (EGNOS) and Vienna Mapping Functions (VMF)3 models. The accuracies of the nine ZTD models, as well as the SPP biases caused by the residual ZTD (dZTD) after model correction are evaluated using International GNSS Service (IGS)-ZTD products from around 400 globally distributed monitoring stations. The seasonal, latitudinal, and altitudinal discrepancies are analyzed respectively. The results show that the SPP solution biases caused by the dZTD mainly occur on the vertical direction, nearly to decimeter level, and significant discrepancies are observed among different models at different geographical locations. This study provides references for the refinement and applications of the nine ZTD models for SPP users.

scholarly journals Analysis and Assessment of BDS-2 and BDS-3 Broadcast Ephemeris: Accuracy, the Datum of Broadcast Clocks and Its Impact on Single Point Positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
pp. 2081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Jiao ◽  
Shuli Song ◽  
Yangyang Liu ◽  
Ke Su ◽  
Na Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Broadcast Ephemeris ◽  
North East ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Broadcast Orbit

For the global ordinary users, the broadcast ephemeris plays important roles in positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) services. With the construction of a new generation of the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), the development of BDS has entered the era of globalization. It is meaningful for global users to analyze and assess the BDS-2 and BDS-3 broadcast ephemeris. Therefore, the satellite orbits and clock offsets calculated by broadcast ephemeris are compared with the precise orbit and clock offset products provided by three analysis centers (i.e., Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Center for Geosciences (GFZ), Wuhan University (WHU) and Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHA)), and the corresponding signal-in-space range error (SISRE) and the orbit-only SISRE are analyzed to assess the accuracy of BDS broadcast ephemeris. Due to the upgrade of BDS-3 satellite hardware technology and inter-satellite links payload and the development of satellite orbit determination algorithm, the accuracy of broadcast orbit and clock offsets has been greatly improved. The root mean square (RMS) of BDS-3 broadcast orbit errors is improved by 86.30%, 89.47% and 76.86%, and the standard deviation (STD) is improved by 79.41%, 77.00% and 76.78% compared with BDS-2 in the radial, along-track and cross-track directions. The corresponding RMS and STD of all BDS-3 satellite clock offsets are improved by 40.34% and 52.49% than that of BDS-2, respectively. Meanwhile, the mean RMS and STD are 1.78 m and 0.40 m for BDS-2 SISRE, 1.72 m and 0.34 m for BDS-2 orbit-only SISRE, 0.50 m and 0.14 m for BDS-3 SISRE, and 0.17 m and 0.04 m for BDS-3 orbit-only SISRE. It is noteworthy that the average broadcast-minus-precise (BMP) clock values of BDS-2 and BDS-3 are inconsistent, which can indirectly prove that the datum of broadcast clock offsets for BDS-2 and BDS-3 are inconsistent. The inconsistency of the datum of satellite clock offsets and receiver hardware delay bias between BDS-2 and BDS-3 will result in the inter-system bias (ISB) on the receiver segment. For JAVAD TRE_3 receivers, the ISB is relatively small and thus can be ignored. However, for the TRIMBLE ALLOY, SEPT POLARX5, CETC-54-GMR-4016, CETC-54-GMR-4011, GNSS-GGR and UB4B0-13478 receivers, estimating ISB can improve the positioning accuracy of single point positioning (SPP) by 20.15%, 19.81% and 12.76% in north, east and up directions, respectively.

Variations of Doppler results with software and time

1980 ◽  
Vol 294 (1410) ◽  
pp. 237-244
Keyword(s):  
Meteorological Parameters ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Good Balance ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
True Value ◽  
Precise Ephemeris ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Better Than

The variations of station coordinates deduced from Doppler observations with the use of a single point positioning method based on a precise ephemeris are estimated according to different models and softwares. An identical set of Doppler observations produces station coordinates whose coherence is generally better than 1 m. However, greater differences of 1.5 or 3 m can exceptionally be detected. Apart from the incoherence caused by the differences of models and criteria of data rejection, the reproducibility of Doppler results depends also, through the ephemeris used, on the epoch of measurements. From consecutive periods of 10 days of observations performed on the same site and analysed with the precise ephemeris computed by D. M. A., a set of station coordinates with a scatter of less than 1 m results. To keep the results near their true value it is also necessary to apply the model to a set of data having as characteristics a good balance between N-S and S-N passes, an approximate knowledge of the true meteorological parameters and at least 40 passes.

scholarly journals Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Jabir Shabbir Malik
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning

AbstractIn addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.

On the improvements of the single point positioning accuracy with Locata technology

GPS Solutions ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Montillet ◽  
Lukasz K. Bonenberg ◽  
Craig M. Hancock ◽  
Gethin W. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Point Positioning

scholarly journals Single Point Positioning Using GPS, GLONASS and BeiDou Satellites

Positioning ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rock Santerre ◽  
Lin Pan ◽  
Changsheng Cai ◽  
Jianjun Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Beidou Satellites

scholarly journals Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception)

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
A. Farah
Keyword(s):  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Code Single Point Positioning Using Nominal Gnss Constellations (Future Perception) Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have an endless number of applications in industry, science, military, transportation and recreation & sports. Two systems are currently in operation namely GPS (the USA Global Positioning System) and GLONASS (the Russian GLObal NAvigation Satellite System), and a third is planned, the European satellite navigation system GALILEO. The potential performance improvements achievable through combining these systems could be significant and expectations are high. The need is inevitable to explore the future of positioning from different nominal constellations. In this research paper, Bernese 5.0 software could be modified to simulate and process GNSS observations from three different constellations (GPS, Glonass and Galileo) using different combinations. This study presents results of code single point positioning for five stations using the three constellations and different combinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document