scholarly journals Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Jabir Shabbir Malik
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning

AbstractIn addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.

scholarly journals Study on Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning Performance with Adverse Effects of Satellite Signals on Android Smartphone

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6447
Author(s):  
Hongyu Zhu ◽  
Linyuan Xia ◽  
Dongjin Wu ◽  
Jingchao Xia ◽  
Qianxia Li
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Phase Error ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Gnss Observations

The emergence of dual frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) chip actively promotes the progress of precise point positioning (PPP) technology in Android smartphones. However, some characteristics of GNSS signals on current smartphones still adversely affect the positioning accuracy of multi-GNSS PPP. In order to reduce the adverse effects on positioning, this paper takes Huawei Mate30 as the experimental object and presents the analysis of multi-GNSS observations from the aspects of carrier-to-noise ratio, cycle slip, gradual accumulation of phase error, and pseudorange residual. Accordingly, we establish a multi-GNSS PPP mathematical model that is more suitable for GNSS observations from a smartphone. The stochastic model is composed of GNSS step function variances depending on carrier-to-noise ratio, and the robust Kalman filter is applied to parameter estimation. The multi-GNSS experimental results show that the proposed PPP method can significantly reduce the effect of poor satellite signal quality on positioning accuracy. Compared with the conventional PPP model, the root mean square (RMS) of GPS/BeiDou (BDS)/GLONASS static PPP horizontal and vertical errors in the initial 10 min decreased by 23.71% and 62.06%, respectively, and the horizontal positioning accuracy reached 10 cm within 100 min. Meanwhile, the kinematic PPP maximum three-dimensional positioning error of GPS/BDS/GLONASS decreased from 16.543 to 10.317 m.

scholarly journals GPS AND GLONASS COMBINED STATIC PRECISE POINT POSITIONING (PPP)

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B1 ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pandey ◽  
R. Dwivedi ◽  
O. Dikshit ◽  
A. K. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Dilution Of Precision ◽  
Satellite Visibility ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Gps Observations

With the rapid development of multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), satellite navigation is undergoing drastic changes. Presently, more than 70 satellites are already available and nearly 120 more satellites will be available in the coming years after the achievement of complete constellation for all four systems- GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. The significant improvement in terms of satellite visibility, spatial geometry, dilution of precision and accuracy demands the utilization of combining multi-GNSS for Precise Point Positioning (PPP), especially in constrained environments. Currently, PPP is performed based on the processing of only GPS observations. Static and kinematic PPP solutions based on the processing of only GPS observations is limited by the satellite visibility, which is often insufficient for the mountainous and open pit mines areas. One of the easiest options available to enhance the positioning reliability is to integrate GPS and GLONASS observations. This research investigates the efficacy of combining GPS and GLONASS observations for achieving static PPP solution and its sensitivity to different processing methodology. Two static PPP solutions, namely standalone GPS and combined GPS-GLONASS solutions are compared. The datasets are processed using the open source GNSS processing environment <i>gLAB</i> 2.2.7 as well as <i>magicGNSS</i> software package. The results reveal that the addition of GLONASS observations improves the static positioning accuracy in comparison with the standalone GPS point positioning. Further, results show that there is an improvement in the three dimensional positioning accuracy. It is also shown that the addition of GLONASS constellation improves the total number of visible satellites by more than 60% which leads to the improvement of satellite geometry represented by Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) by more than 30%.

scholarly journals Multi-GNSS Combined Precise Point Positioning Using Additional Observations with Opposite Weight for Real-Time Quality Control

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenju Fu ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Yuanxi Zhang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Bobin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The emergence of multiple global navigation satellite systems (multi-GNSS), including global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS), and Galileo, brings not only great opportunities for real-time precise point positioning (PPP), but also challenges in quality control because of inevitable data anomalies. This research aims at achieving the real-time quality control of the multi-GNSS combined PPP using additional observations with opposite weight. A robust multiple-system combined PPP estimation is developed to simultaneously process observations from all the four GNSS systems as well as single, dual, or triple systems. The experiment indicates that the proposed quality control can effectively eliminate the influence of outliers on the single GPS and the multiple-system combined PPP. The analysis on the positioning accuracy and the convergence time of the proposed robust PPP is conducted based on one week’s data from 32 globally distributed stations. The positioning root mean square (RMS) error of the quad-system combined PPP is 1.2 cm, 1.0 cm, and 3.0 cm in the east, north, and upward components, respectively, with the improvements of 62.5%, 63.0%, and 55.2% compared to those of single GPS. The average convergence time of the quad-system combined PPP in the horizontal and vertical components is 12.8 min and 12.2 min, respectively, while it is 26.5 min and 23.7 min when only using single-GPS PPP. The positioning performance of the GPS, GLONASS, and BDS (GRC) combination and the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GRE) combination is comparable to the GPS, GLONASS, BDS and Galileo (GRCE) combination and it is better than that of the GPS, BDS, and Galileo (GCE) combination. Compared to GPS, the improvements of the positioning accuracy of the GPS and GLONASS (GR) combination, the GPS and Galileo (GE) combination, the GPS and BDS (GC) combination in the east component are 53.1%, 43.8%, and 40.6%, respectively, while they are 55.6%, 48.1%, and 40.7% in the north component, and 47.8%, 40.3%, and 34.3% in the upward component.

scholarly journals Performance of Open Source Precise Point Positioning Software Using Single-Frequency GPS Data

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalermchon Satirapod ◽  
Somchai Kriengkraiwasin
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Gps Data ◽  
Differential Gps ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Station Location

Performance of Open Source Precise Point Positioning Software Using Single-Frequency GPS Data This research aims to assess the performance of GPS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with code and carrier phase observations from L1 signal collected from geodetic GPS receiver around the world. A simple PPP software developed for processing the single frequency GPS data is used as a main tool to assess a positioning accuracy. The precise orbit and precise satellite clock corrections were introduced into the software to reduce the orbit and satellite clock errors, while ionosphere-free code and phase observations were constructed to mitigate the ionospheric delay. The remaining errors (i.e. receiver clock error, ambiguity term) are estimated using Extended Kalman Filter technique. The data retrieved from 5 IGS stations located in different countries were used in this study. In addition, three different periods of data were downloaded for each station. The obtained data were then cut into 5-min, 10-min, 15-min and 30-min data segments, and each data segment was individually processed with the developed PPP software to produce final coordinates. Results indicate that the use of 5-min data span can provide a horizontal positioning accuracy at the same level as a pseudorange-based differential GPS technique. Furthermore, results confirm effects of station location and seasonal variation on obtainable accuracies.

scholarly journals Analysis on the Potential Performance of GPS and Galileo Precise Point Positioning using Simulated Real-Time Products

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Basile ◽  
Terry Moore ◽  
Chris Hill
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Binary Offset Carrier ◽  
Time Service ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
The Impact

With the evolving Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) landscape, the International GNSS Service (IGS) has started the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) to produce precise products for new generation systems. Various analysis centres are working on the estimation of precise orbits, clocks and bias for Galileo, Beidou and Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) satellites. However, at the moment these products can only be used for post-processing applications. Indeed, the IGS Real-Time service only broadcasts Global Positioning System (GPS) and Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema (GLONASS) corrections. In this research, a simulator of multi-GNSS observations and real-time precise products has been developed to analyse the performance of GPS-only, Galileo-only and GPS plus Galileo Precise Point Positioning (PPP). The error models in the simulated orbits and clocks were based on the difference between the GPS Real-Time and the Final products. Multiple scenarios were analysed, considering different signals combined in the Ionosphere Free linear combination. Results in a simulated open area environment show better performance of the Galileo-only case over the GPS-only case. Indeed, up 33% and 29% of improvement, respectively, in the accuracy level and convergence time can be observed when using the full Galileo constellation compared to GPS. The dual constellation case provides good improvements, in particular in the convergence time (47% faster than GPS). This paper will also consider the impact of different linear combinations of the Galileo signals, and the potential of the E5 Alternative Binary Offset Carrier (AltBOC) signal. Even though it is significantly more precise than E5a, the PPP performance obtained with the Galileo E1-E5a combination is either better or similar to the one with Galileo E1-E5. The reason for this inconsistency was found in the use of the ionosphere free combination with E1. Finally, alternative methods of ionosphere error mitigation are considered in order to ensure the best possible positioning performance from the Galileo E5 signal in multi-frequency PPP.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Inter-System Bias between BDS-2 and BDS-3 Satellites and Its Impact on Precise Point Positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhao ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Yang Gao ◽  
Weiping Jiang ◽  
Xuexi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Beidou Navigation Satellite System ◽  
System Bias ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Ppp ◽  
The Impact

The BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) currently has 41 satellites in orbits and will reach its full constellation following the launch of the last BDS satellite in June 2020 to provide navigation, positioning, and timing (PNT) services for global users. In this contribution, we investigate the characteristics of inter-system bias (ISB) between BDS-2 and BDS-3 and verify whether an additional ISB parameter should be introduced for the BDS-2 and BDS-3 precise point positioning (PPP). The results reveal that because of different clock references applied for BDS-2 and BDS-3 in the International GNSS Service (IGS) precise satellites clock products and the inconsistent code hardware delays of BDS-2 and BDS-3 for some receiver types, an ISB parameter needs to be introduced for BDS-2 and BDS-3 PPP. Further, the results show that the ISB can be regarded as a constant within a day, the value of which is closely related to the receiver type. The ISB values of the stations with the same receiver type are similar to each other, but a great difference may be presented for different receiver types, up to several meters. In addition, the impact of ISB on PPP has also been studied, which demonstrates that the performance of kinematic PPP could be improved when ISB is introduced.

scholarly journals Integration of multi-constellation GNSS precise point positioning and MEMS-based inertial system for precise applications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abd Rabbou
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Inertial System ◽  
Integrated Navigation ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Phase Measurements ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Inertial Measurements

This dissertation develops a low-cost integrated navigation system, which integrates multi-constellation global navigation satellite system (GNSS) precise point positioning (PPP) with a low-cost micro-electro-mechanical sensor (MEMS)-based inertial system for precise applications. Both undifferenced and between-satellite single-difference (BSSD) ionosphere-free linear combinations of pseudorange and carrier phase measurements from three GNSS constellations, namely GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, are processed. An improved version of the PF, the unscented particle filter (UPF), which combines the UKF and the PF, is developed to merge the corrected GNSS satellite difference observations and inertial measurements and estimate inertial measurements biases and errors. The performance of the proposed integrated system is analyzed using real test scenarios. A tightly coupled GPS PPP/MEMS-based inertial system is first developed using EKF, which shows that decimeter-level positioning accuracy is achievable with both undifferenced and BSSD modes. However, in general, better positioning precision is obtained when BSSD linear combination is used. During GPS outages, the integrated system shows submeter-level accuracy in most cases when a 60-second outage is introduced. However, the positioning accuracy is improved to a few decimeter- and decimeter-level accuracy when 30- and 10-second GPS outages are introduced, respectively. The use of UPF, on the other hand, reduces the number of samples significantly, in comparison with the traditional PF. Additionally, in comparison with EKF, the use of UPF improves the positioning accuracy during the 60-second GPS outages by 14%, 13% and 15% in latitude, longitude and altitude, respectively. The addition of GLONASS and Galileo observations to the developed integrated system shows that decimeter- to centimeter-level positioning accuracy is achievable when the GNSS measurement updates are available. In comparison with the GPS-based integrated system, the multi-constellation GNSS PPP/MEMS-based inertial system improves the latitude, longitude and altitude components precision by 24%, 41% and 41%, respectively. In addition, the use of BSSD mode improves the precision of the latitude, longitude and altitude components by 23%, 15% and 13%, respectively, in comparison with the undifferenced mode. During complete GNSS outages, the developed integrated system continues to achieve decimeter-level accuracy for up to 30 seconds, while it achieves submeter-level accuracy when a 60-second outage is introduced.

Performance Evaluation of Kinematic BDS/GNSS Real-Time Precise Point Positioning for Maritime Positioning

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuxin Yang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Liang Li ◽  
Shaojun Feng ◽  
Jianhua Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Kinematic Data ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Cost Effective Technique ◽  
Point Positioning

Real-time Precise Point Positioning (PPP) has been evolved as a cost-effective technique for highly precise maritime positioning. For a long period, maritime PPP technology has mainly relied on the Global Positioning System (GPS). With the revitalisation of GLONASS and the emerging BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), it is now feasible to investigate real-time navigation performance of multi-constellation maritime PPP with GPS, BDS and GLONASS. In this contribution, we focus on maritime PPP performance using real world maritime kinematic data and real-time satellite correction products. The results show that BDS has lower position accuracy and slower convergence time than GPS. The BDS and GPS combination has the best performance among the dual-constellation configurations. Meanwhile, the integration of BDS, GLONASS and GPS significantly improves the position accuracy and the convergence time. Some outliers in the single constellation configuration can be mitigated when multi-constellation observations are utilised.

scholarly journals Assessment of BeiDou-3 and Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning Performance

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Jiao ◽  
Shuli Song ◽  
Yulong Ge ◽  
Ke Su ◽  
Yangyang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Kinematic Positioning ◽  
Global Coverage ◽  
Point Positioning

With the launch of BDS-3 and Galileo new satellites, the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) has developed from the regional to global system, and the Galileo constellation will consist of 26 satellites in space. Thus, BDS, GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo all have the capability of global positioning services. It is meaningful to evaluate the ability of global precise point positioning (PPP) of the GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo. This paper mainly contributes to the assessment of BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo PPP with the observations that were provided by the international Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS). The Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) value was utilized to research the global coverage of GPS, BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo. In particular, GPS-only, BDS-2-only, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS-only, Galileo-only, and multi-GNSS combined PPP solutions were analyzed to verify the capacity of the PPP performances in terms of positioning accuracy, convergence time, and zenith troposphere delay (ZTD) accuracy. In view of PDOP, the current BDS and Galileo are capable of global coverage. The BDS-2/BDS-3 and Galileo PDOP values are fairly evenly distributed around the world similar to GPS and GLONASS. The root mean square (RMS) of positioning errors for static BDS-2/BDS-3 PPP and Galileo-only PPP are 10.7, 19.5, 20.4 mm, and 6.9, 18.6, 19.6 mm, respectively, in the geographic area of the selected station, which is the same level as GPS and GLONASS. It is worth mentioning that, by adding BDS-3 observations, the positioning accuracy of static BDS PPP is improved by 17.05%, 24.42%, and 35.65%, and the convergence time is reduced by 27.15%, 27.87%, and 35.76% in three coordinate components, respectively. Similar to the static positioning, GPS, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo have the basically same kinematic positioning accuracy. Multi-GNSS PPP significantly improves the positioning performances in both static and kinematic positioning. In terms of ZTD accuracy, the difference between GPS, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, and Galileo is less than 1 mm, and the BDS-2/BDS-3 improves ZTD accuracy by 20.48% over the BDS-2. The assessment of GPS, BDS-2, BDS-2/BDS-3, GLONASS, Galileo, and multi-GNSS global PPP performance are shown to make comments for the development of multi-GNSS integration, global precise positioning, and the construction of iGMAS.

scholarly journals Improving the Performance of Galileo Uncombined Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution Using Triple-Frequency Observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Liu ◽  
Xiaohong Zhang ◽  
Pan Li
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Processing Mode ◽  
Beidou Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Point Positioning

Compared with the traditional ionospheric-free linear combination precise point positioning (PPP) model, the un-differenced and uncombined (UDUC) PPP model using original observations can keep all the information of the observations and be easily extended to any number of frequencies. However, the current studies about the multi-frequency UDUC-PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) were mainly based on the triple-frequency BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations or simulated data. Limited by many factors, for example the accuracy of BDS precise orbit and clock products, the advantages of triple-frequency signals to UDUC-PPP AR were not fully exploited. As Galileo constellations have been upgraded by increasing the number of 19 useable satellites, it makes using Galileo satellites to further study the triple-frequency UDUC-PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) possible. In this contribution, we proposed the method of multi-frequency step-by-step ambiguity resolution based on the UDUC-PPP model and gave the reason why the performance of PPP AR can be improved using triple-frequency observations. We used triple-frequency Galileo observations on day of year (DOY) 201, 2018 provided by 166 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations to estimate original uncalibrated phase delays (UPD) on each frequency and to conduct both dual- and triple-frequency UDUC-PPP AR. The performance of UDUC-PPP AR based on post-processing mode was assessed in terms of the time-to-first-fix (TTFF) as well as positioning accuracy with 2-hour observations. It was found that triple-frequency observations were helpful to reduce TTFF and improve the positioning accuracy. The current statistic results showed that triple-frequency PPP-AR reduced the averaged TTFF by 19.6 % and also improved the positioning accuracy by 40.9, 31.2 and 23.6 % in the east, north and up directions respectively, compared with dual-frequency PPP-AR. With an increasing number of Galileo satellites, it is expected that the robustness and accuracy of the triple-frequency UCUD-PPP AR can be improved further.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document