scholarly journals Estimating Leaf Area Index with a New Vegetation Index Considering the Influence of Rice Panicles

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
He ◽  
Zhang ◽  
Su ◽  
Lu ◽  
Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Spectral Reflectance ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Visible Region ◽  
Canopy Reflectance ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Red Edge ◽  
Rice Panicles

The emergence of rice panicle substantially changes the spectral reflectance of rice canopy and, as a result, decreases the accuracy of leaf area index (LAI) that was derived from vegetation indices (VIs). From a four-year field experiment with using rice varieties, nitrogen (N) rates, and planting densities, the spectral reflectance characteristics of panicles and the changes in canopy reflectance after panicle removal were investigated. A rice “panicle line”—graphical relationship between red-edge and near-infrared bands was constructed by using the near-infrared and red-edge spectral reflectance of rice panicles. Subsequently, a panicle-adjusted renormalized difference vegetation index (PRDVI) that was based on the “panicle line” and the renormalized difference vegetation index (RDVI) was developed to reduce the effects of rice panicles and background. The results showed that the effects of rice panicles on canopy reflectance were concentrated in the visible region and the near-infrared region. The red band (670 nm) was the most affected by panicles, while the red-edge bands (720–740 nm) were less affected. In addition, a combination of near-infrared and red-edge bands was for the one that best predicted LAI, and the difference vegetation index (DI) (976, 733) performed the best, although it had relatively low estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.60, RMSE = 1.41 m2/m2). From these findings, correcting the near-infrared band in the RDVI by the panicle adjustment factor (θ) developed the PRDVI, which was obtained while using the “panicle line”, and the less-affected red-edge band replaced the red band. Verification data from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) showed that the PRDVI could minimize the panicle and background influence and was more sensitive to LAI (R2 = 0.77; RMSE = 1.01 m2/m2) than other VIs during the post-heading stage. Moreover, of all the assessed VIs, the PRDVI yielded the highest R2 (0.71) over the entire growth period, with an RMSE of 1.31 (m2/m2). These results suggest that the PRDVI is an efficient and suitable LAI estimation index.

scholarly journals Spaceborne Estimation of Leaf Area Index in Cotton, Tomato, and Wheat Using Sentinel-2

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 505
Author(s):  
Gregoriy Kaplan ◽  
Offer Rozenstein
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Estimation Performance ◽  
Red Edge ◽  
Sentinel 2

Satellite remote sensing is a useful tool for estimating crop variables, particularly Leaf Area Index (LAI), which plays a pivotal role in monitoring crop development. The goal of this study was to identify the optimal Sentinel-2 bands for LAI estimation and to derive Vegetation Indices (VI) that are well correlated with LAI. Linear regression models between time series of Sentinel-2 imagery and field-measured LAI showed that Sentinel-2 Band-8A—Narrow Near InfraRed (NIR) is more accurate for LAI estimation than the traditionally used Band-8 (NIR). Band-5 (Red edge-1) showed the lowest performance out of all red edge bands in tomato and cotton. A novel finding was that Band 9 (Water vapor) showed a very high correlation with LAI. Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, and 12 were saturated at LAI ≈ 3 in cotton and tomato. Bands 6, 7, 8, 8A, and 9 were not saturated at high LAI values in cotton and tomato. The tomato, cotton, and wheat LAI estimation performance of ReNDVI (R2 = 0.79, 0.98, 0.83, respectively) and two new VIs (WEVI (Water vapor red Edge Vegetation Index) (R2 = 0.81, 0.96, 0.71, respectively) and WNEVI (Water vapor narrow NIR red Edge Vegetation index) (R2 = 0.79, 0.98, 0.79, respectively)) were higher than the LAI estimation performance of the commonly used NDVI (R2 = 0.66, 0.83, 0.05, respectively) and other common VIs tested in this study. Consequently, reNDVI, WEVI, and WNEVI can facilitate more accurate agricultural monitoring than traditional VIs.

scholarly journals A Transformed Triangular Vegetation Index for Estimating Winter Wheat Leaf Area Index

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naichen Xing ◽  
Wenjiang Huang ◽  
Qiaoyun Xie ◽  
Yue Shi ◽  
Huichun Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Saturation Effect ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Growth Monitoring ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Multispectral Data ◽  
Red Edge

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter in plant growth monitoring. For several decades, vegetation indices-based empirical method has been widely-accepted in LAI retrieval. A growing number of spectral indices have been proposed to tailor LAI estimations, however, saturation effect has long been an obstacle. In this paper, we classify the selected 14 vegetation indices into five groups according to their characteristics. In this study, we proposed a new index for LAI retrieval-transformed triangular vegetation index (TTVI), which replaces NIR and red bands of triangular vegetation index (TVI) into NIR and red-edge bands. All fifteen indices were calculated and analyzed with both hyperspectral and multispectral data. Best-fit models and k-fold cross-validation were conducted. The results showed that TTVI performed the best predictive power of LAI for both hyperspectral and multispectral data, and mitigated the saturation effect. The R2 and RMSE values were 0.60, 1.12; 0.59, 1.15, respectively. Besides, TTVI showed high estimation accuracy for sparse (LAI < 4) and dense canopies (LAI > 4). Our study provided the value of the Red-edge bands of the Sentinel-2 satellite sensors in crop LAI retrieval, and demonstrated that the new index TTVI is applicable to inverse LAI for both low-to-moderate and moderate-to-high vegetation cover.

Leaf area index retrieval based on canopy reflectance and vegetation index in eastern China

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjun Jiang ◽  
Suozhong Chen ◽  
Shunxian Cao ◽  
Hongan Wu ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Eastern China ◽  
Canopy Reflectance ◽  
Area Index

scholarly journals Simulating the Leaf Area Index of Rice from Multispectral Images

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 3663
Author(s):  
Shenzhou Liu ◽  
Wenzhi Zeng ◽  
Lifeng Wu ◽  
Guoqing Lei ◽  
Haorui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Red Edge ◽  
Extreme Gradient Boosting

Accurate estimation of the leaf area index (LAI) is essential for crop growth simulations and agricultural management. This study conducted a field experiment with rice and measured the LAI in different rice growth periods. The multispectral bands (B) including red edge (RE, 730 nm ± 16 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 840 nm ± 26 nm), green (560 nm ± 16 nm), red (650 nm ± 16 nm), blue (450 nm ± 16 nm), and visible light (RGB) were also obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with multispectral sensors (DJI-P4M, SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.). Based on the bands, five vegetation indexes (VI) including Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI), Leaf Chlorophyll Index (LCI), Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Optimization Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (OSAVI) were calculated. The semi-empirical model (SEM), the random forest model (RF), and the Extreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost) were used to estimate rice LAI based on multispectral bands, VIs, and their combinations, respectively. The results indicated that the GNDVI had the highest accuracy in the SEM (R2 = 0.78, RMSE = 0.77). For the single band, NIR had the highest accuracy in both RF (R2 = 0.73, RMSE = 0.98) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.88). Band combination of NIR + red improved the estimation accuracy in both RF (R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.65) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 0.63). NDRE and LCI were the first two single VIs for LAI estimation using both RF and XGBoost. However, putting more than one VI together could only increase the LAI estimation accuracy slightly. Meanwhile, the bands + VIs combinations could improve the accuracy in both RF and XGBoost. Our study recommended estimating rice LAI by a combination of red + NIR + OSAVI + NDVI + GNDVI + LCI + NDRE (2B + 5V) with XGBoost to obtain high accuracy and overcome the potential over-fitting issue (R2 = 0.91, RMSE = 0.54).

scholarly journals Estimation of leaf area index using an angular vegetation index based on in situ measurements and CHRIS/PROBA data

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B7 ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Lijuan Wang ◽  
Guimin Zhang ◽  
Hui Lin ◽  
Liang Liang ◽  
Zheng Niu
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Dark Spot ◽  
Canopy Reflectance ◽  
In Situ Experiment ◽  
Area Index

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is widely used for Leaf Area Index (LAI) estimation. It is well documented that the NDVI is extremely subject to the saturation problem when LAI reaches a high value. A new multi-angular vegetation index, the Hotspot-darkspot Difference Vegetation Index (HDVI) is proposed to estimate the high density LAI. The HDVI, defined as the difference between the hot and dark spot NDVI, relative to the dark spot NDVI, was proposed based on the Analytical two-layer Canopy Reflectance Model (ACRM) model outputs. This index is validated using both in situ experimental data in wheat and data from the multi-angular optical Compact High-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) satellite. Both indices, the Hotspot-Darkspot Index (HDS) and the NDVI were also selected to analyze the relationship with LAI, and were compared with new index HDVI. The results show that HDVI is an appropriate proxy of LAI with higher determination coefficients (R2) for both the data from the in situ experiment (R2=0.7342, RMSE=0.0205) and the CHRIS data (R2=0.7749, RMSE=0.1013). Our results demonstrate that HDVI can make better the occurrence of saturation limits with the information of multi-angular observation, and is more appropriate for estimating LAI than either HDS or NDVI at high LAI values. Although the new index needs further evaluation, it also has the potential under the condition of dense canopies. It provides the effective improvement to the NDVI and other vegetation indices that are based on the red and NIR spectral bands.

scholarly journals Estimating the Seasonal Dynamics of the Leaf Area Index Using Piecewise LAI-VI Relationships Based on Phenophases

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Qiao ◽  
Wenquan Zhu ◽  
Zhiying Xie ◽  
Peixian Li
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
The Other ◽  
Active Period ◽  
Near Infrared Reflectance ◽  
Area Index ◽  
The Mean

The leaf area index (LAI) is not only an important parameter used to describe the geometry of vegetation canopy but also a key input variable for ecological models. One of the most commonly used methods for LAI estimation is to establish an empirical relationship between the LAI and the vegetation index (VI). However, the LAI-VI relationships had high seasonal variability, and they differed among phenophases and VIs. In this study, the LAI-VI relationships in different phenophases and for different VIs (i.e., the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv)) were investigated based on 82 site-years of LAI observed data and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) VI products. Significant LAI-VI relationships were observed during the vegetation growing and declining periods. There were weak LAI-VI relationships (p > 0.05) during the flourishing period. The accuracies for the LAIs estimated with the piecewise LAI-VI relationships based on different phenophases were significantly higher than those estimated based on a single LAI-VI relationship for the entire vegetation active period. The average root mean square error (RMSE) ± standard deviation (SD) value for the LAIs estimated with the piecewise LAI-VI relationships was 0.38 ± 0.13 (based on the NDVI), 0.41 ± 0.13 (based on the EVI) and 0.41 ± 0.14 (based on the NIRv), respectively. In comparison, it was 0.46 ± 0.13 (based on the NDVI), 0.55 ± 0.15 (based on the EVI) and 0.55 ± 0.15 (based on the NIRv) for those estimated with a single LAI-VI relationship. The performance of the three VIs in estimating the LAI also varied among phenophases. During the growing period, the mean RMSE ± SD value for the estimated LAIs was 0.30 ± 0.11 (LAI-NDVI relationships), 0.37 ± 0.11 (LAI-EVI relationships) and 0.36 ± 0.13 (LAI-NIRv relationships), respectively, indicating the NDVI produced significantly better LAI estimations than those from the other two VIs. In contrast, the EVI produced slightly better LAI estimations than those from the other two VIs during the declining period (p > 0.05), and the mean RMSE ± SD value for the estimated LAIs was 0.45 ± 0.16 (LAI-NDVI relationships), 0.43 ± 0.23 (LAI-EVI relationships) and 0.45 ± 0.25 (LAI-NIRv relationships), respectively. Hence, the piecewise LAI-VI relationships based on different phenophases were recommended for the estimations of the LAI instead of a single LAI-VI relationship for the entire vegetation active period. Furthermore, the optimal VI in each phenophase should be selected for the estimations of the LAI according to the characteristics of vegetation growth.

scholarly journals Estimation of leaf area index using an angular vegetation index based on in situ measurements and CHRIS/PROBA data

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B7 ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Wang ◽  
Guimin Zhang ◽  
Hui Lin ◽  
Liang Liang ◽  
Zheng Niu
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Dark Spot ◽  
Canopy Reflectance ◽  
In Situ Experiment ◽  
Area Index

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is widely used for Leaf Area Index (LAI) estimation. It is well documented that the NDVI is extremely subject to the saturation problem when LAI reaches a high value. A new multi-angular vegetation index, the Hotspot-darkspot Difference Vegetation Index (HDVI) is proposed to estimate the high density LAI. The HDVI, defined as the difference between the hot and dark spot NDVI, relative to the dark spot NDVI, was proposed based on the Analytical two-layer Canopy Reflectance Model (ACRM) model outputs. This index is validated using both in situ experimental data in wheat and data from the multi-angular optical Compact High-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (CHRIS) satellite. Both indices, the Hotspot-Darkspot Index (HDS) and the NDVI were also selected to analyze the relationship with LAI, and were compared with new index HDVI. The results show that HDVI is an appropriate proxy of LAI with higher determination coefficients (R2) for both the data from the in situ experiment (R2=0.7342, RMSE=0.0205) and the CHRIS data (R2=0.7749, RMSE=0.1013). Our results demonstrate that HDVI can make better the occurrence of saturation limits with the information of multi-angular observation, and is more appropriate for estimating LAI than either HDS or NDVI at high LAI values. Although the new index needs further evaluation, it also has the potential under the condition of dense canopies. It provides the effective improvement to the NDVI and other vegetation indices that are based on the red and NIR spectral bands.

Estimation of Eucalypt Forest Leaf Area Index on the South Coast of New South Wales using Landsat MSS Data

1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Coops ◽  
Antoine Delahaye ◽  
Eddy Pook
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
New South ◽  
New South Wales ◽  
Monitoring Site ◽  
Area Index ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Normalised Difference Vegetation Index

Research over the last decade has shown that regional estimation of Leaf Area Index (LAI) is possible using the ratio of red and near infrared radiation derived from satellite or airborne sensors. At landscape levels, however, this relationship has been more difficult to establish due to (i) logistic difficulties in measuring seasonal variation in LAI across the landscape over an extended period of time and (ii) difficulties in establishing the effect of understorey, canopy closure, and soil on the spectral radiation at fine spatial resolutions (< 100 m). This paper examines the first issue by utilising a temporal sequence of LAI data of a Eucalyptus mixed hardwood forest (E. maculata Hook., E. paniculata Sm., E. globoidea Blakely, E. pilularis Sm., E. sieberi L.Johnson) in south-eastern New South Wales and comparing it to historical Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) data covering a 9 year period. Field LAI was compared to the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the Simple Ratio (SR) derived from the MSS data. Linear relationships were shown to be appropriate to relate both transformations to the LAI data with r2 -values of 0.71 and 0.53 respectively. Using the NDVI relationship, LAI values were estimated along a transect originating from the monitoring site and these were compared to percentage canopy cover values derived from aerial photography.

scholarly journals Comparison of different methods for measuring leaf area index in a mixed grassland

2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhong He ◽  
Xulin Guo ◽  
John F Wilmshurst
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Remote Sensing Data ◽  
Canopy Reflectance ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Grassland Ecosystems ◽  
Grass Communities

Available LAI instruments have greatly increased our ability to estimate leaf area index (LAI) non-destructively. However, it is difficult to infer from existing studies which instrument has the advantages in measuring LAI over other instruments for grassland ecosystems. The objective of our study was to compare the LAI estimates by two instruments (AccuPAR, and LAI2000), and correlate the LAI measurements to remote sensing data for a mixed grassland. Leaf area index of four grass communities was measured by both the destructive method and instruments. Ground canopy reflectance was measured and further calculated to be LAI-related vegetation indices. Statistical analysis showed that destructively sampled LAI ranged from 0.61 to 5.7 in the study area. Both instruments underestimated LAI in comparison with the destructive method. However, the LAI2000 is better than AccuPAR for estimating LAI. Comparison of four grass communities indicated that the lower the grass LAI, the greater the underestimated percentage of LAI values collected by both instruments. The adjusted transformed soil-adjusted vegetation index (ATSAVI), was the best LAI estimator in the mixed grassland. Key words: Leaf area index, sward structure, nondestructive vegetation sampling, hyperspectral remote sensing, mixed grass prairie

scholarly journals Potential of Red Edge Spectral Bands in Future Landsat Satellites on Agroecosystem Canopy Green Leaf Area Index Retrieval

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoyu Cui ◽  
John P. Kerekes
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Green Leaf ◽  
Landsat 8 ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Spectral Bands ◽  
Red Edge ◽  
Green Leaf Area

Vegetation biophysical parameter retrieval is an important earth remote sensing system application. In this paper, we studied the potential impact of the addition of new spectral bands in the red edge region in future Landsat satellites on agroecosystem canopy green leaf area index (LAI) retrieval. The test data were simulated from SPARC ‘03 field campaign HyMap hyperspectral data. Three retrieval approaches were tested: empirical regression based on vegetation index, physical model-based look-up-table (LUT) inversion, and machine learning. The results of all three approaches showed that a potential new spectral band located between the Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) red and NIR bands slightly improved the agroecosystem green LAI retrieval accuracy (R2 of 0.787 vs. 0.810 for vegetation index approach, 0.806 vs. 0.828 for LUT inversion approach, and 0.925 vs. 0.933 for machine learning approach). The results of this work are consistent with the conclusions from previous research on the value of Sentinel-2 red edge bands for agricultural green LAI retrieval.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document