scholarly journals Error Analysis of LAI Measurements with LAI-2000 Due to Discrete View Angular Range Angles for Continuous Canopies

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Jun Geng ◽  
Gang Yuan ◽  
J. M. Chen ◽  
Chunguang Lyu ◽  
Lili Tu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Weight Coefficient ◽  
Plant Canopy ◽  
Discrete Form ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Gap Fraction ◽  
Inclination Angles ◽  
Leaf Inclination ◽  
Specific Error

As a widely used ground-based optical instrument, the LAI-2000 or LAI-2200 plant canopy analyzer (PCA) (Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE) is designed to measure the plant effective leaf area index (Le) by measuring the canopy gap fraction at several limited or discrete view zenith angles (VZAs) (usually five VZAs: 7, 23, 38, 53, and 68°) based on Miller’s equation. Miller’s equation requires the probability of radiative transmission through the canopy to be measured over the hemisphere, i.e., VZAs in the range from 0 to 90°. However, the PCA view angle ranges are confined to several limited ranges or discrete sectors. The magnitude of the error produced by the discretization of VZAs in the leaf area index measurements remains difficult to determine. In this study, a theoretical deduction was first presented to definitely prove why the limited or discrete VZAs or ranges can affect the Le measured with the PCA, and the specific error caused by the limited or discrete VZAs was described quantitatively. The results show that: (1) the weight coefficient of the last PCA ring is the main cause of the error; (2) the error is closely related to the leaf inclination angles (IAs)—the Le measured with the PCA can be significantly overestimated for canopies with planophile IAs, whereas it can be underestimated for erectophile IAs; and (3) the error can be enhanced with the increment of the discrete degree of PCA rings or VZAs, such as using four or three PCA rings. Two corrections for the error are presented and validated in three crop canopies. Interestingly, although the leaf IA type cannot influence the Le calculated by Miller’s equation in the hemispheric space, it affects the Le measured with the PCA using the discrete form of Miller’s equation for several discrete VZAs.

scholarly journals Extracting Leaf Area Index Using Viewing Geometry Effects - A New Perspective on High-Resolution Unmanned Aerial System Photography.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Roth ◽  
Helge Aasen ◽  
Achim Walter ◽  
Frank Liebisch
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Plant Ecology ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Unmanned Aerial System ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Handheld Device ◽  
Gap Fraction ◽  
Rgb Images ◽  
New Perspective

Abstract Extraction of leaf area index (LAI) is an important prerequisite in numerous studies related to plant ecology, physiology and breeding. LAI is indicative for the performance of a plant canopy and of its potential for growth and yield. In this study, a novel method to estimate LAI based on RGB images taken by an unmanned aerial system (UAS) is introduced. Soybean was taken as the model crop of investigation. The method integrates viewing geometry information in an approach related to gap fraction theory. A 3-D simulation of virtual canopies helped developing and verifying the underlying model. In addition, the method includes techniques to extract plot based data from individual oblique images using image projection, as well as image segmentation applying an active learning approach. Data from a soybean field experiment were used to validate the method. The thereby measured LAI 14 prediction accuracy was comparable with the one of a gap fraction-based handheld device (R2 of 0.92, RMSE of 0.42 m2 m2) and correlated well with destructive LAI measurements (R2 of 0.89, RMSE of 0.41 m2 m2). These results indicate that, if respecting the range (LAI ≤3) the method was tested for, extracting LAI from UAS derived RGB images using viewing geometry information represents a valid alternative to destructive and optical handheld device LAI measurements in soybean. Thereby, we open the door for automated, high-throughput assessment of LAI in plant and crop science.

scholarly journals Performance of LAI-2200 Plant Canopy Analyzer on Leaf Area Index of Jatropha Nut Estimation

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P. Lena ◽  
M.V. Folegatti ◽  
J.P. Francisco ◽  
O.N.A. Santos ◽  
I.P.S. Andrade
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Plant Canopy ◽  
Area Index

Use of airborne lidar for estimating canopy gap fraction and leaf area index of tropical montane forests

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 2569-2583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janne Heiskanen ◽  
Lauri Korhonen ◽  
Jesse Hietanen ◽  
Petri K.E. Pellikka
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Canopy Gap ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Montane Forests ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Tropical Montane Forests ◽  
Gap Fraction

Performance of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer in estimating leaf area index of some Scots pine stands

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7-8-9) ◽  
pp. 981-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Stenberg ◽  
S. Linder ◽  
H. Smolander ◽  
J. Flower-Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Scots Pine ◽  
Plant Canopy ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Pine Stands ◽  
Scots Pine Stands

scholarly journals Leaf area index of ground covers in a subtropical watershed

2003 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Cândido Xavier ◽  
Carlos Alberto Vettorazzi
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Sugar Cane ◽  
Riparian Forest ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Plant Canopy ◽  
Structural Variable ◽  
Forest Patches ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Plant Characteristics

Leaf Area Index (LAI), an important structural variable descriptive of vegetation, is directly related to evapotranspiration and productivity. The objective of this work was to measure and analyze monthly LAI of different ground covers in a subtropical watershed. A field campaign to collect monthly LAI data was carried out during the year 2001, with a LAI-2000 (plant canopy analyzer) device, in sugarcane, pasture, corn, eucalypt, and riparian forest patches. Riparian forest presented a maximum LAI of 4.90; LAI values decreased as precipitation decreased, as it is a characteristic of this type of semideciduous vegetation. LAI for sugar cane presented the greatest variability throughout the year, related to plant characteristics and crop management in the study area. Results represent an initial step for the understanding of LAI dynamics in the study area and areas under similar conditions.

scholarly journals Quantitative Evaluation of Leaf Inclination Angle Distribution on Leaf Area Index Retrieval of Coniferous Canopies

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Guangjian Yan ◽  
Hailan Jiang ◽  
Jinghui Luo ◽  
Xihan Mu ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Inclination Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Optical Remote Sensing ◽  
Angle Distribution ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Leaf Inclination

Both leaf inclination angle distribution (LAD) and leaf area index (LAI) dominate optical remote sensing signals. The G-function, which is a function of LAD and remote sensing geometry, is often set to 0.5 in the LAI retrieval of coniferous canopies even though this assumption is only valid for spherical LAD. Large uncertainties are thus introduced. However, because numerous tiny leaves grow on conifers, it is nearly impossible to quantitatively evaluate such uncertainties in LAI retrieval. In this study, we proposed a method to characterize the possible change of G-function of coniferous canopies as well as its effect on LAI retrieval. Specifically, a Multi-Directional Imager (MDI) was developed to capture stereo images of the branches, and the needles were reconstructed. The accuracy of the inclination angles calculated from the reconstructed needles was high. Moreover, we analyzed whether a spherical distribution is a valid assumption for coniferous canopies by calculating the possible range of the G-function from the measured LADs of branches of Larch and Spruce and the true G-functions of other species from some existing inventory data and three-dimensional (3D) tree models. Results show that the constant G assumption introduces large errors in LAI retrieval, which could be as large as 53% in the zenithal viewing direction used by spaceborne LiDAR. As a result, accurate LAD estimation is recommended. In the absence of such data, our results show that a viewing zenith angle between 45 and 65 degrees is a good choice, at which the errors of LAI retrieval caused by the spherical assumption will be less than 10% for coniferous canopies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document