scholarly journals Instantaneous, Dual-Frequency, Multi-GNSS Precise RTK Positioning Using Google Pixel 4 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Smartphones for Zero and Short Baselines

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 8318
Author(s):  
ChienZheng Yong ◽  
Robert Odolinski ◽  
Safoora Zaminpardaz ◽  
Michael Moore ◽  
Eldar Rubinov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Short Baseline ◽  
Integer Least Squares ◽  
Short Baselines ◽  
Zero Baseline ◽  
Single Baseline ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Lying Down

The recent development of the smartphone Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) chipsets, such as Broadcom BCM47755 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 embedded, makes instantaneous and cm level real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning possible with Android-based smartphones. In this contribution we investigate the instantaneous single-baseline RTK performance of Samsung Galaxy S20 and Google Pixel 4 (GP4) smartphones with such chipsets, while making use of dual-frequency L1 + L5 Global Positioning System (GPS), E1 + E5a Galileo, L1 + L5 Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) and B1 BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) code and phase observations in Dunedin, New Zealand. The effects of locating the smartphones in an upright and lying down position were evaluated, and we show that the choice of smartphone configuration can affect the positioning performance even in a zero-baseline setup. In particular, we found non-zero mean and linear trends in the double-differenced carrier-phase residuals for one of the smartphone models when lying down, which become absent when in an upright position. This implies that the two assessed smartphones have different antenna gain pattern and antenna sensitivity to interferences. Finally, we demonstrate, for the first time, a near hundred percent (98.7% to 99.9%) instantaneous RTK integer least-squares success rate for one of the smartphone models and cm level positioning precision while using short-baseline experiments with internal and external antennas, respectively.

scholarly journals Initial assessment of single- and dual-frequency BDS-3 RTK positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbin Yuan ◽  
Xiaolong Mi ◽  
Baocheng Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Integer Ambiguity ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Short Baselines ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

AbstractThe BeiDou navigation satellite system with global coverage (BDS-3) has been fully operational since July 2020 and provides comprehensive services to global users. BDS-3 transmits several new navigational signals based on the signals inherited from the BeiDou navigation satellite (regional) system (BDS-2). Previous studies focused on the positioning performance of BDS-2 plus BDS-3 and that of combining BDS-3 and other Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), but there was no in-depth discussion on the positioning performance of the BDS-3-only. In this contribution, the BDS-3-only Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning is analysed using the data collected in zero and short baselines in Wuhan, China. The RTK model based on Single-Differenced is first presented, and the BDS-3-only RTK positioning in cases of single and dual-frequencies is evaluated with the model in terms of the empirical integer ambiguity resolution success rates and positioning accuracy. Our numerical tests suggest two major findings. First, the positioning performance for the B1I and B3I retained from BDS-2 and the new frequency B1C is comparable, while that for the new frequency B2a is poorer. Second, the positioning performance of the new frequency combination of the B1C + B2a is not as good as that of the B1C only, owing to the unrealistic stochastic model used.

GPS-BDS-Galileo double-differenced stochastic model refinement based on least-squares variance component estimation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Hong Hu ◽  
Xuefeng Xie ◽  
Jingxiang Gao ◽  
Shuanggen Jin ◽  
Peng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Stochastic Model ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Stochastic Models ◽  
Variance Component ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Variance Component Estimation ◽  
Short Baseline ◽  
Component Estimation ◽  
Zero Baseline ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Abstract Stochastic models are essential for precise navigation and positioning of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS). A stochastic model can influence the resolution of ambiguity, which is a key step in GNSS positioning. Most of the existing multi-GNSS stochastic models are based on the GPS empirical model, while differences in the precision of observations among different systems are not considered. In this paper, three refined stochastic models, namely the variance components between systems (RSM1), the variances of different types of observations (RSM2) and the variances of observations for each satellite (RSM3) are proposed based on the least-squares variance component estimation (LS-VCE). Zero-baseline and short-baseline GNSS experimental data were used to verify the proposed three refined stochastic models. The results show that, compared with the traditional elevation-dependent model (EDM), though the proposed models do not significantly improve the ambiguity resolution success rate, the positioning precision of the three proposed models has been improved. RSM3, which is more realistic for the data itself, performs the best, and the precision at elevation mask angles 20°, 30°, 40°, 50° can be improved by 4⋅6%, 7⋅6%, 13⋅2%, 73⋅0% for L1-B1-E1 and 1⋅1%, 4⋅8%, 16⋅3%, 64⋅5% for L2-B2-E5a, respectively.

scholarly journals Estimation of fractional cycle bias for GPS/BDS-2/Galileo based on international GNSS monitoring and assessment system observations using the uncombined PPP model

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Guanwen Huang
Keyword(s):  
Estimation Method ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Fractional Cycle Bias ◽  
The Stability ◽  
High Consistency ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

AbstractThe Fractional Cycle Bias (FCB) product is crucial for the Ambiguity Resolution (AR) in Precise Point Positioning (PPP). Different from the traditional method using the ionospheric-free ambiguity which is formed by the Wide Lane (WL) and Narrow Lane (NL) combinations, the uncombined PPP model is flexible and effective to generate the FCB products. This study presents the FCB estimation method based on the multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) precise satellite orbit and clock corrections from the international GNSS Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS) observations using the uncombined PPP model. The dual-frequency raw ambiguities are combined by the integer coefficients (4,− 3) and (1,− 1) to directly estimate the FCBs. The details of FCB estimation are described with the Global Positioning System (GPS), BeiDou-2 Navigation Satellite System (BDS-2) and Galileo Navigation Satellite System (Galileo). For the estimated FCBs, the Root Mean Squares (RMSs) of the posterior residuals are smaller than 0.1 cycles, which indicates a high consistency for the float ambiguities. The stability of the WL FCBs series is better than 0.02 cycles for the three GNSS systems, while the STandard Deviation (STD) of the NL FCBs for BDS-2 is larger than 0.139 cycles. The combined FCBs have better stability than the raw series. With the multi-GNSS FCB products, the PPP AR for GPS/BDS-2/Galileo is demonstrated using the raw observations. For hourly static positioning results, the performance of the PPP AR with the three-system observations is improved by 42.6%, but only 13.1% for kinematic positioning results. The results indicate that precise and reliable positioning can be achieved with the PPP AR of GPS/BDS-2/Galileo, supported by multi-GNSS satellite orbit, clock, and FCB products based on iGMAS.

Implementation of a Dual-Frequency GLONASS and GPS L1 C/A Software Receiver

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Abbasian Nik ◽  
M. G. Petovello
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Software Receiver ◽  
The Public ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

These days, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology plays a critical role in positioning and navigation applications. Use of GNSS is becoming more of a need to the public. Therefore, much effort is needed to make the civilian part of the system more accurate, reliable and available, especially for the safety-of-life purposes. With the recent revitalization of Russian Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS), with a constellation of 20 satellites in August 2009 and the promise of 24 satellites by 2010, it is worthwhile concentrating on the GLONASS system as a method of GPS augmentation to achieve more reliable and accurate navigation solutions.

scholarly journals Fast Time Synchronization on Tens of Picoseconds Level Using Uncombined GNSS Carrier Phase of Zero/Short Baseline

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4882
Author(s):  
Yinghao Zhao ◽  
Letao Zhou ◽  
Wei Feng ◽  
Shaoguang Xu
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Time Synchronization ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Fast Time ◽  
Short Baseline ◽  
Variation Characteristics ◽  
Single Difference ◽  
Short Baselines ◽  
Transfer Method ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Since the observation precision of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) carrier phase is on the order of millimeters, if the phase ambiguity is correctly solved, while calibrating the receiver inter-frequency bias, time synchronization on the order of tens of picoseconds is expected. In this contribution, a method that considers the prior constraints of the between-receiver inter-frequency bias (IFB) and its random variation characteristics is proposed for the estimation of the between-receiver clock difference, based on the uncombined GNSS carrier phase and pseudorange observations of the zero and short baselines. The proposed method can rapidly achieve the single-difference ambiguity resolution of the zero and short baselines, and then obtain the high-precision relative clock offset, by using only the carrier phase observations, along with the between-receiver IFBs being simultaneously determined. Our numerical tests, carried out using GNSS observations sampled every 30 s by a dedicatedly selected set of zero and short baselines, show that the method can fix the between-receiver single-difference ambiguity successfully within an average of fewer than 2 epochs (interval 30 s). Then, a clock difference between two receivers with millimeter precision is obtained, achieving time synchronization on tens of picoseconds level, and deriving a frequency stability of 5 × 10−14 for averaging times of 30,000 s. Furthermore, the proposed approach is compared with the precise point positioning (PPP) time transfer method. The results show that, for different types of receivers, the agreement between the two methods is between −6.7 ns and 0.2 ns.

scholarly journals Characterisation of GNSS Carrier Phase Data on a Moving Zero-Baseline in Urban and Aerial Navigation

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 4046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Ruwisch ◽  
Ankit Jain ◽  
Steffen Schön
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Double Difference ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Zero Baseline ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

We present analyses of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) carrier phase observations in multiple kinematic scenarios for different receiver types. Multi-GNSS observations are recorded on high sensitivity and geodetic-grade receivers operating on a moving zero-baseline by conducting terrestrial urban and aerial flight experiments. The captured data is post-processed; carrier phase residuals are computed using the double difference (DD) concept. The estimated noise levels of carrier phases are analysed with respect to different parameters. We find DD noise levels for L1 carrier phase observations in the range of 1.4–2 mm (GPS, Global Positioning System), 2.8–4.6 mm (GLONASS, Global Navigation Satellite System), and 1.5–1.7 mm (Galileo) for geodetic receiver pairs. The noise level for high sensitivity receivers is at least higher by a factor of 2. For satellites elevating above 30 ∘ , the dominant noise process is white phase noise. For the flight experiment, the elevation dependency of the noise is well described by the exponential model, while for the terrestrial urban experiment, multipath and diffraction effects overlay; hence no elevation dependency is found. For both experiments, a carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N 0 ) dependency for carrier phase DDs of GPS and Galileo is clearly visible with geodetic-grade receivers. In addition, C/N 0 dependency is also visible for carrier phase DDs of GLONASS with geodetic-grade receivers for the terrestrial urban experiment.

scholarly journals Comparison of Multi-GNSS Time and Frequency Transfer Performance Using Overlap-Frequency Observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3130
Author(s):  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Rui Tu ◽  
Yuping Gao ◽  
Ju Hong ◽  
Junqiang Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Transfer Performance ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Time Transfer ◽  
Difference Series ◽  
Frequency Transfer ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The modernized GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou global navigation satellite system (BDS3) offers new potential for time transfer using overlap-frequency (L1/E1/B1, L5/E5a/B2a) observations. To assess the performance of time and frequency transfer with overlap-frequency observations for GPS, Galileo, and BDS3, the mathematical models of single- and dual-frequency using the carrier-phase (CP) technique are discussed and presented. For the single-frequency CP model, the three-day average RMS values of the L5/E5a/B2a clock difference series were 0.218 ns for Galileo and 0.263 ns for BDS3, of which the improvements were 36.2% for Galileo and 43.9% for BDS3 when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution at BRUX–PTBB. For the hydrogen–cesium time link BRUX–KIRU, the RMS values of the L5/E5a/B2a solution were 0.490 ns for Galileo and 0.608 ns for BDS3, improving Galileo by 6.4% and BDS3 by 12.5% when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution. For the dual-frequency CP model, the average stability values of the L5/E5a/B2a solution at the BRUX–PTBB time link were 3.54∙× 10−12 for GPS, 2.20 × 10−12 for Galileo, and 2.69 × 10−12 for BDS3, of which the improvements were 21.0%, 45.1%, and 52.3%, respectively, when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution. For the BRUX–KIRU time link, the improvements were 4.2%, 30.5%, and 36.1%, respectively.

Performance Evaluation of the CNAV Broadcast Ephemeris

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1331-1344
Author(s):  
Ahao Wang ◽  
Junping Chen ◽  
Yize Zhang ◽  
Jiexian Wang ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Navigation Message ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The new Global Positioning System (GPS) Civil Navigation Message (CNAV) has been transmitted by Block IIR-M and Block IIF satellites since April 2014, both on the L2C and L5 signals. Compared to the Legacy Navigation Message (LNAV), the CNAV message provides six additional parameters (two orbit parameters and four Inter-Signal Correction (ISC) parameters) for prospective civil users. Using the precise products of the International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS), we evaluate the precision of satellite orbit, clock and ISCs of the CNAV. Additionally, the contribution of the six new parameters to GPS Single Point Positioning (SPP) is analysed using data from 22 selected Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System Experiment (MGEX) stations from a 30-day period. The results indicate that the CNAV/LNAV Signal-In-Space Range Error (SISRE) and orbit-only SISRE from January 2016 to March 2018 is of 0·5 m and 0·3 m respectively, which is improved in comparison with the results from an earlier period. The ISC precision of L1 Coarse/Acquisition (C/A) is better than 0·1 ns, and those of L2C and L5Q5 are about 0·4 ns. Remarkably, ISC correction has little effect on the single-frequency SPP for GPS users using civil signals (for example, L1C, L2C), whereas dual-frequency SPP with the consideration of ISCs results have an accuracy improvement of 18·6%, which is comparable with positioning accuracy based on an ionosphere-free combination of the L1P (Y) and L2P (Y) signals.

scholarly journals Assessment of Dual Frequency GNSS Observations from a Xiaomi Mi 8 Android Smartphone and Positioning Performance Analysis

Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Robustelli ◽  
Valerio Baiocchi ◽  
Giovanni Pugliano
Keyword(s):  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

On May 2018 the world’s first dual-frequency Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) smartphone produced by Xiaomi equipped with a Broadcom BCM47755 chip was launched. It is able to receive L1/E1/ and L5/E5 signals from GPS, Galileo, Beidou, and GLONASS (GLObal NAvigation Satellite System) satellites. The main aim of this work is to achieve the phone’s position by using multi-constellation, dual frequency pseudorange and carrier phase raw data collected from the smartphone. Furthermore, the availability of dual frequency raw data allows to assess the multipath performance of the device. The smartphone’s performance is compared with that of a geodetic receiver. The experiments were conducted in two different scenarios to test the smartphone under different multipath conditions. Smartphone measurements showed a lower C/N0 and higher multipath compared with those of the geodetic receiver. This produced negative effects on single-point positioning as showed by high root mean square error (RMS). The best positioning accuracy for single point was obtained with the E5 measurements with a DRMS (horizontal root mean square error) of 4.57 m. For E1/L1 frequency, the 2DRMS was 5.36 m. However, the Xiaomi Mi 8, thanks to the absence of the duty cycle, provided carrier phase measurements used for a static single frequency relative positioning with an achieved 2DRMS of 1.02 and 1.95 m in low and high multipath sites, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document