scholarly journals Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic Options for Romanian SMEs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 7007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alin Stancu ◽  
Alina Filip ◽  
Mihai Roșca ◽  
Daniela Ioniță ◽  
Raluca Căplescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Value Creation ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Customer Experience ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
Customer Delight ◽  
Value Propositions ◽  
Strategic Options

Value proposition can be an important source of competitive advantage for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Unlike large companies which follow a rational and sequential process, developing a value proposition in an SME is instead a trial and error process. Therefore, those companies are experimenting with various options. The purpose of this paper was to identify the value strategies used by SMEs based on value dimensions and attributes and to find specific groups of SMEs with a similar market approach. We present a theoretical framework on customer value creation and customer value communication, followed by a quantitative research on 399 Romanian SMEs. We used a principal component analysis to reduce the number of choices and afterwards we ran a cluster analysis to identify the distinct groups of SMEs using specific value propositions. We found that there are three major strategic options based on customer experience, affordability and customization, and four distinct clusters: customer delight (A), multiple sources of differentiation (B), one-to-one marketing (C) and cost—effectiveness (D). Three groups use distinct value propositions—A focuses on customer experience, C on customization, D on affordability—while B mixes all of them.

Design Thinking for Creating an Increased Value Proposition to Improve Customer Experience

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Marco-Stefan Kleber
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Design Thinking ◽  
Customer Experience ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Value Propositions ◽  
Service Oriented ◽  
Conceptual Study

Purpose of this conceptual study is the identification of design thinking approaches and underlying logic for increasing the value proposition to improve customer experience in today´s dynamic and fast-changing business environment. Method of research based on content analysis of distinctive streams in the literature on design thinking for delivering the increased value proposition. Core elements of design thinking were identified and combined with service-oriented thinking logics aiming at providing superior value proposition and thus to improve customer experience. Furthermore, the article elaborates on the delimitation of Design thinking from Designerly thinking, and a new model for enhancing customer value propositions, the wheel of Design thinking, was developed based on core elements of Design thinking approaches. This approach has a potential to shape and redefine existing markets and to improve adjustment of products and services to dynamic customers´ needs and demands.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v17i2.7311

scholarly journals Customer value creation via business model implementation

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2580-2584
Author(s):  
Karaoulanis Andreas
Keyword(s):  
Business Model ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Model Concept ◽  
Customer Value Proposition

Business models are the blueprints upon which the whole structure and operation of the company is based. The aim of this paper is to underline the importance of business models in value creation for the company and to dig a bit deeper by revealing the synthesis of an abstract business model concept. The importance of customer value proposition via the customer value creation is very well underlined in order to pinpoint the author’s prevalent idea that focusing on customers’ needs should be the alpha and the omega for the eurythmic operation of every contemporary company.

scholarly journals Incorporating the Value Proposition for Society with Business Models of Health Tourism Enterprises

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 6711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Butler ◽  
Adam R. Szromek
Keyword(s):  
Business Model ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
Health Tourism ◽  
Tourism Enterprises

This article discusses the need to expand the concept of the value proposition, in order that this business model component includes the value for a customer, the value captured by the enterprise, and the value for the community, as well as benefits for the natural environment. The objective of the article is to identify sustainable development components that have been proposed for tourist enterprises in the research literature. The article proposes actions to complement existing tourist enterprises business models in order to give them the characteristics of a sustainable business model and to implement practices of value creation for the community. The research notes that the value captured by an enterprise determines the level of implementation of its economic objectives resulting from the value creation for the customer and implementation of social objectives (including pro-ecologic ones). The revenues of an enterprise depend, first of all, on meeting the expectations of the customer, meaning that they depend on the value proposition for the customer, and their volume will allow researchers to determine the possibility of creating value for the community. The expected tendency to create value for the community is argued to be proportional to the effectiveness of customer value influence, less the value captured by the enterprise. After an initial review of relevant literature, attention is focused on health tourism enterprises and how these principals can be applied in that context.

New-Technology Startups Seeking Pilot Customers: Crafting a Pair of Value Propositions

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Wouters ◽  
James C. Anderson ◽  
Markus Kirchberger
Keyword(s):  
Customer Value ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Significant Problem ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Value Propositions ◽  
Technology Startups ◽  
Customer Value Proposition

A corporation that employs an “outside-in” startup program needs to screen a large number of potential startups and assess each time: What is the value of the startup’s offering to our business, and what resources and support will the startup need so we can actually obtain its offering? However, many startups are not very good at communicating their customer value proposition in a way that helps the customer firm making such assessments. This article recommends that startups construct two sequential value propositions. The Innovative Offering Value Proposition communicates how the startup’s offering creates superior value for the customer. It answers the question: What is extraordinary about the startup’s offering that will enable the customer to solve a significant problem it has or achieve a top priority it has? The Leveraging Assistance Value Proposition conveys what the customer firm will get in return for providing support and resources to the startup. It answers the question: What will make it worthwhile from the customer’s perspective to support the startup to realize its innovative offering?

scholarly journals Creating sustainable value through food waste management: does retail customer value proposition matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iona Yuelu Huang ◽  
Louise Manning ◽  
Vicky Wood ◽  
Katy L. James ◽  
Anthony Millington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Food Waste ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sustainable Value ◽  
Retail Managers ◽  
Customer Value Proposition

PurposeThis research aims to explore retail managers' views on how food waste (FW) management activities contribute to sustainable value creation and how the customer value proposition (CVP) for a given food retailer interacts with their approaches to FW management.Design/methodology/approachA three-stage exploratory qualitative approach to data collection and analysis was adopted, involving in-depth interviews with retail managers, documentary analysis of multiple years of relevant corporate reports and email validation by seven major UK grocery retailers. Thematic content analysis supplemented by word similarity cluster analysis, two-step cluster analysis and crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis was undertaken.FindingsFW management practices have been seen by retail managers to contribute to all forms of sustainable value creation, as waste reduction minimises environmental impact, saves costs and/or serves social needs, whilst economic value creation lies at the heart of retail FW management. However, retail operations are also framed by CVP and size of a retailer that enable or inhibit the adoption of certain FW management practices. Low-price retailers were more likely to adopt practices enabling them to save costs. Complicated cost-incurring solutions to FW were more likely to be adopted by retailers associated with larger size, high quality and a range of services.Originality/valueThis study is the first of its kind to empirically explore retail managers' perception of sustainable value creation through FW management activities and to provide empirical evidence of the linkages between retail CVP and sustainable value creation in the context of retail FW management.

The need for a project governance body

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hallgrim Hjelmbrekke ◽  
Ola Lædre ◽  
Jardar Lohne
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Construction Industry ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Customer Value ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Project Governance ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Customer Value Proposition

Purpose – From a project owner's perspective, it is obvious that a project shall contribute to achieving the organisation's strategic goals. The purpose of this paper is to find out what project owners can do to ensure value creation in their projects, what owners actually do in the few cases in which they are actively involved in ensuring value creation and what is the result of their choice. Design/methodology/approach – The authors have analysed 12 projects in the Norwegian construction industry, using a qualitative approach. A general business framework for understanding projects has been applied in order to identify possible shortcomings and success factors. The authors have used semi-structured in-depth interviews combined with questionnaires for data collection. Findings – The study reveals an absence of project strategy, resulting in projects which only to a small extent achieve strategic goals. This lack of strategic perspective in project management is also recognised by the research literature as a common tendency. Traditional project management approaches concentrate on time, cost and quality, instead of on providing strategic success. Based on business literature, the authors identify the value proposition and the customer value proposition as being essential. Practical implications – The authors recommend construction project owners – as described in the literature – to appoint a project sponsor responsible for communicating a value proposition and business rationale to the project supplier. The sponsor should also be responsible for aligning the suppliers’ customer value proposition with the owner's strategy. The authors recommend that the project sponsor be supported by a project governance body. This will help project owners to ensure value creation in their projects, as described in the literature. The authors pinpoint a need for bridging theory and practice. Originality/value – The originality of the paper lies in introducing insights from business literature to the construction industry. In the value proposition the owner defines the benefits the project is to provide. The customer value proposition is the statement where the supplier aligns the proposed project output with the project owner's needs. The project governance body is responsible for ensuring this communication process.

scholarly journals VALUE PROPOSITION: APPLICATION OF VALUE CREATION ACTIVITIES MODEL IN THE SUPERMARKET (VCAM-S)

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
PAULO R. CONDI ◽  
DARIO DE O. LIMA-FILHO ◽  
CAROLINE P. S. FINOCCHIO ◽  
FILIPE QUEVEDO-SILVA
Keyword(s):  
Value Creation ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Current Debate ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Product Categories ◽  
A Value ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Value Propositions

ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this writing is to analyze the activities of the retail supermarket in order to propose value to its clients, describing and associating them in their respective sources of value identified by a Value Creation Activities Model-Supermarket (VCAM-S). Additionally, we seek to identify the words that best represent the meaning of “proposing value” and the product categories of the supermarket that most clients value. Originality/value: The development and implementation of VCAM-S works to identify new value activities in the supermarket. Based on this application, it is intended to suggest activities that enhance the delivery of value to the client. Design/methodology/approach: Bibliographical research and field research were carried out. Twelve retail supermarket specialists were interviewed, including managers, entrepreneurs and consultants with at least eight years of experience in the supermarket sector. Through the qualitative approach, a script of semi-structured interviews with open questions was used. Later, the statements were transcribed and analyzed through the technique of content analysis. Findings: The VCAM-S identified 8 value proposition activities, 71 subactivities and five value sources. It was found that the product categories “FFV”, “Butcher” and “Bakery” were the sections that most proposed value to customers. The words that best represent the meaning of “proposing value” are service, convenience, location, variety and price. The results of the research contribute to the current debate on value and adapt the traditional VCAM to the retail supermarket. The VCAM-S allows for the identification and prospection of value propositions from the perspective of companies, associating them with valuable sources and activities.

scholarly journals Servitization and operations management: a service dominant-logic approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Smith ◽  
Roger Maull ◽  
Irene C.L. Ng
Keyword(s):  
Enterprise Resource Planning ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Operations Management ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Call Centre ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Systems Perspective ◽  
Product Service ◽  
Value Propositions

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide further insight into operations management of the product-service (P-S) transition, known as servitization, and the resulting product service system (PSS) offerings. In exploring the P-S transition, this paper adopts a service-dominant (S-D) logic view of value creation, using it as a lens through which to explore value propositions of the P-S transition and their operations design. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents an in-depth case study of an original equipment manufacturer of durable capital equipment who, over the last five years, has expanded its offerings to include use- and result-orientated PSS. The research design uses a multi-method approach; employing 28 in-depth qualitative interviews with customers and employees and analysis of texts, documents and secondary data including five years of enterprise resource planning (ERP), call centre and contract data. Findings – The paper identifies ten generic P-S attributes that are abstracted into four nested value propositions: asset value proposition; recovery value proposition; availability value proposition; and outcome value proposition. In examining the operations design for delivery of these value propositions, it is found that the role and importance of contextual variety increases as the organisation moves through the value propositions. Interdependencies amongst the value propositions and differences in operational design for each value proposition are also found. Research limitations/implications – The paper investigates PSS through a S-D logic mindset. First, the paper considers value propositions of PSS not according to “product” or “service” but in terms of how resources (both material and human) are optimally designed to co-create customer value. Second, a value co-creation system of nested value propositions is illustrated. In so doing, the findings have a number of implications for literature on both PSS and S-D logic. In addition, the research adds to the PSS literature through the identification and consideration of the concept of contextual use variety. Practical implications – The paper demonstrates the complexity of the transition from product to service. Specifically, service cannot be seen as a bolt-on extra to their product offering; complexity caused by interactions and changes to the core offering require a systems perspective and consideration of both firm and customer skills and resources. Originality/value – This paper extends existing literature on the P-S transition and its implications for operations management. Notably, it takes an S-D logic perspective of value creation and in so doing highlights the importance and role of contextual use variety in the P-S transition. It also provides further empirical evidence that the P-S transition cannot be treated as discrete stages but is evolutionary and requires a complex systems perspective.

scholarly journals What Customer Wants to Read in Your Proposal

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Value Creation ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Value Proposition ◽  
Strategic Partner ◽  
Creation Process ◽  
The Core ◽  
Multiple Dimensions ◽  
Value Propositions ◽  
Selling Process ◽  
Value Creation Process

Earlier sales executives using their interpersonal - social skills built and cemented relationships with procurement officials over golf games, theatre outings and major events. That era is slowly but surely coming to an end. Today in the digital age, the context is completely different. Every organisation has access to vendors across the globe. Thanks to Artificial Intelligence (AI), organisations can compare their procurement performance in unprecedented detail. Procurement teams have relevant tools and technology to gather insights about seller’s product or service offerings to the minutest detail. However, organisations are also under constant pressure to generate value to their stakeholders on quarter-on-quarter basis. Organisations are looking towards sellers to create value to their stakeholders. Sellers should innovate and help organisations grow in multiple dimensions. Empower organisations generate value to their stakeholders. In short become their strategic partner. In this new arrangement, seller-buyer relationship is no more a transactional, order- taking and resource supplying activity. Selling process is transformed with focus on value creation. Value proposition is the core of value creation. Infact it is a disciplined concept. Sellers who use it as strategic asset create win - win situation. This research paper walks through value creation process and details how value propositions are developed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document