scholarly journals Methodology to Calculate the CO2 Emission Reduction at the Coal-Fired Power Plant: CO2 Capture and Utilization Applying Technology of Mineral Carbonation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 7402
Author(s):  
Bong Jae Lee ◽  
Jeong Il Lee ◽  
Soo Young Yun ◽  
Beom Gu Hwang ◽  
Cheol-Soo Lim ◽  
...  

This study introduces a novel methodology to calculate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction related to residual emissions, calculating the CO2 emission reduction through a 2 MW (40 tCO2/day) carbon capture and utilization (CCU) plant installed at a 500 MW coal-fired power plant in operation, to evaluate the accuracy, maintainability, and reliability of the quantified reduction. By applying the developed methodology to calculate the CO2 emission reduction, the established amount of CO2 reduction in the mineral carbonation was evaluated through recorded measurement and monitoring data of the 2 MW CCU plant at the operating coal-fired plant. To validate the reduction, the accuracy, reproducibility, consistency, and maintainability of the reduction should be secured, and based on these qualifications, it is necessary to evaluate the contribution rate of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in each country. This fundamental study establishes the concept of CCU CO2 reduction and quantifies the reduction to obtain the validation of each country for the reduction. The established concept of the CCU in this study can also be applied to other CCU systems to calculate the reduction, thereby providing an opportunity for CCU technology to contribute to the NDCs in each country and invigorate the technology.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Alaa Hasan ◽  
Osama M. Selim ◽  
Mohamed Abousabae ◽  
Ryoichi S. Amano ◽  
Wilkistar Otieno

Abstract This paper highlights the expected versus actual outcomes of 152 energy analyses that were performed between 2011 and 2020. The 1,317 energy assessment recommendations (ARs) are grouped into eight categories. This study adopted four measures per category: annual electricity savings, annual gas savings, annual cost savings, and annual CO2 emission reduction. The first part of the analysis compares the expected recommendations to each measure's actually implemented values for the eight categories. It was found that the percentages of the actual to the expected electricity, gas, and cost savings are 26.6%, 11.4%, and 17.1%, respectively. In contrast, the percentage of the actual to the expected CO2 reduction is 22%. Moreover, the second part of the analysis presents each category's implementation rate and the reasons for rejecting the unimplemented ARs. Cash flow and expensive initial investment resulted in rejecting 25% of ARs. Finally, the study proposes techniques and strategies to increase ARs' implementation rate and improve all private energy services industries' implementation rate. An exergy analysis is added to show the improvement that energy assessment achieves regarding exergy and exergy efficiencies of different industrial applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document