scholarly journals Integration of AHP and GTMA to Make a Reliable Decision in Complex Decision-Making Problems: Application of the Logistics Provider Selection Problem as a Case Study

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
Danijela Tuljak-Suban ◽  
Patricija Bajec
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
New Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision

When solving a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problem of any degree of complexity, many researchers rely on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). To consider mutual connections between criteria and clusters at the same level and not only the hierarchical structure between criteria and subcriteria, researchers often upgrade from AHP to the Analytic Network Process (ANP), which also examines the interdependency of criteria. However, the ANP method requires a large number of pairwise comparisons. In the case of a complex decision-making problem, the authors of this paper suggest upgrading the AHP method with the graph theory and matrix approach (GTMA) for several reasons: (1) The new method is based on digraphs and permanent value computation, which does not require a hypothesis about interdependency; (2) in case of similar alternatives, the distinguishable coefficient of the new method is higher than those computed for AHP and ANP; (3) the new method allows decision makers to rank comparable alternatives and to combine structurally similar methods without increasing the number of comparisons and the understanding of the results. The developed method (AH-GTMA) is validated by a numerical example of a complex decision-making problem based on a symmetrical set of similar alternatives, a third party logistic provider (3PLP) selection problem.

scholarly journals MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
A. I. Mehdialiyev ◽  
H. M. Misirov
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Optimum Solution ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Process Method

In the presented paper to solve the problem was used the "Analytic Hierarchy Process" method developed by Tomas L. Saaty. AHP is one of the most popular analytical techniques for complex decision-making problems. In this method a decision-making problem decomposes into a system of hierarchies of objectives, attributes (or criteria), and alternatives. Then to obtain optimum solution uses judgements of experts with a special scale for measuring non-quantitative and method of establishing priorities.

scholarly journals Application of the AHP-BWM Model for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety: A Case Study for Budapest

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarbast Moslem ◽  
Danish Farooq ◽  
Omid Ghorbanzadeh ◽  
Thomas Blaschke
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Road Safety ◽  
Driver Behavior ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Complex Decision Making

The use of driver behavior has been considered a complex way to solve road safety complications. Car drivers are usually involved in various risky driving factors which lead to accidents where people are fatally or seriously injured. The present study aims to dissect and rank the significant driver behavior factors related to road safety by applying an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, which is structured as a hierarchy with at least one 5 × 5 (or bigger) pairwise comparison matrix (PCM). A real-world, complex decision-making problem was selected to evaluate the possible application of the proposed model (driver behavior preferences related to road safety problems). The application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) alone, by precluding layman participants, might cause a loss of reliable information in the case of the decision-making systems with big PCMs. Evading this tricky issue, we used the Best Worst Method (BWM) to make the layman’s evaluator task easier and timesaving. Therefore, the AHP-BWM model was found to be a suitable integration to evaluate risky driver behavior factors within a designed three-level hierarchical structure. The model results found the most significant driver behavior factors that influence road safety for each level, based on evaluator responses on the driver behavior questionnaire (DBQ). Moreover, the output vector of weights in the integrated model is more consistent, with results for 5 × 5 PCMs or bigger. The proposed AHP-BWM model can be used for PCMs with scientific data organized by traditional means.

scholarly journals Evaluación comparativa multifuncional de sistemas agrarios mediante AHP: Aplicación al olivar ecológico, integrado y convencional de Andalucía

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Parra López ◽  
Javier Calatrava Requena ◽  
Tomás De Haro Giménez
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Farming Systems ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Olive Groves ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Even though multifunctionality concept is reflected, implicit or explicitly, in the design of actual agrarian policies, its consideration when analysing and assessing farming systems is relatively limited in the scientific literature. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed with this aim. AHP is a multicriteria discrete decision support technique that is used in complex decision making. This methodology is stated jointly with a proposed procedure to measure relative agreement among decision makers and uniformity of alternatives’ performances in group decision making. Finally AHP is implemented in the assessment of organic, integrated and conventional olive groves in Andalusia considering criteria of a different nature – economic, technical, sociocultural and environmental –. The final purpose is determining the more interesting growing techniques from a holistic point of view for all the society in the medium/long-term on the basis of knowledge of experts on olive.

scholarly journals Matrix of pairwise comparison: decision making with the analytic network process

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02042
Author(s):  
Aliya Akhmadullina ◽  
Svetlana Vasilyeva ◽  
Tatyana Yakovleva ◽  
Svetlana Vopiyashina ◽  
Raisa Kraineva
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Environmental Planning ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Qualitative Factors ◽  
The Right

This article describes a method for analyzing hierarchies; identifies the problems with inconsistent judgments. The proof is given that the most effective tool allowing one to make the right decisions with inconsistencies is the introduction of the eigenvector on environmental planning and management. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a method for decision making, which includes qualitative factors. In this method, ratio scales are obtained from ordinal scales, which are derived from individual judgments for qualitative factors using the pairwise comparison matrix. This paper describes the applicability of a multicriteria decision-making method, specifically, the analytic network process.

The Analytic Network Process – Dependence and Feedback in Decision-Making

2011 ◽  
pp. 360-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Saaty
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Market Share ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Fundamental Scale ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Independence Assumptions ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pair Wise Comparison

Simple multi-criteria decisions are made by deriving priorities of importance for the criteria in terms of a goal and of the alternatives in terms of the criteria. Often one also considers benefits, opportunities, costs and risks and their synthesis in an overall outcome. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with its independence assumptions, and its generalization to dependence among and within the clusters of a decision — the Analytic Network Process (ANP), are theories of prioritization and decision-making. Here we show how to derive priorities from pair-wise comparison judgments, give the fundamental scale for representing the judgments numerically and by way of validation illustrate its use with examples and then apply it to make a simple hierarchic decision in two ways: pair-wise comparisons of the alternatives and rating the alternatives with respect to an ideal. Network decisions are discussed and illustrated with market share examples. A mathematical appendix is also included.

scholarly journals Energy Supply Preferences as Multicriteria Decision Problems: Developing a System of Criteria from Survey Data

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3767
Author(s):  
Endre Börcsök ◽  
Zoltán Ferencz ◽  
Veronika Groma ◽  
Ágnes Gerse ◽  
János Fülöp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Decision Support Techniques ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Energy Sector ◽  
Strategic Decisions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Problems

Decision support techniques have a key role in investment and strategic decisions in the energy sector. As complex decision-making problems involve the simultaneous consideration of an extensive set of different factors, it is an essential part of the methodology to define, structure, and integrate the criteria. The main purpose of the study was to develop a system of criteria and weights that are suitable for general application in the energy sector and can best describe the decision-making mechanisms present in society and various social groups. When developing the system of criteria, we moved away from the hierarchical approach related to the three pillars of sustainability; therefore, a wide range of notions were assessed based on a population representative survey data collected in Hungary. We used algebraic methods to explore the internal structure of the set of criteria that had been previously defined by means of social sciences, while the importance weights were specified by applying the method of analytic network process. Furthermore, the ranking of heating and electricity generation alternatives were determined.

scholarly journals Differences in prioritization of the BSC’s strategic goals using AHP and ANP methods

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksander Janeš ◽  
Nina Begičević Ređep
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
The Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The development and empirical verification of the balanced scorecard (BSC) model, using the multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) called the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the analytic network process (ANP), are the key issues of the presented research. The paper presents the methodology of the prioritization of the BSC goals with the AHP and ANP methods. Even though the prioritization of the goals is possible with both, findings from the empirical analysis showed that the ANP is more complementary with the BSC because of the influences among the goals in the BSC. The ANP supports the modelling of those influences (through dependencies) and the AHP does not. The paper discusses special situations in prioritizing the BSC goals (understanding the ANP from the perspective of the user and the BSC with strategic goals that do not directly influence any other strategic goal) and proposes solutions. Therefore, it can be asserted that introducing the ANP to implement the BSC and vice versa, improved the decision-making approach and the quality of the obtained results. The research was based on a case study of modelling the BSC for Ydria Motors LL (YM), a manufacturing company.

scholarly journals AN INTEGRATED DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF THE FORKLIFTS IN WAREHOUSING SYSTEMS

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 537
Author(s):  
Eldina Mahmutagić ◽  
Željko Stević ◽  
Zdravko Nunić ◽  
Prasenjit Chatterjee ◽  
Ilija Tanackov
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Business Applications ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Warehousing Systems ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Decision Making Model

In the logistics world, special attention should be given to warehousing systems, cost rationalization, and improvement of all the factors that affect efficiency and contribute to smooth functioning of logistics subsystems. In real time industrial practice, the issue of evaluating and selecting the most appropriate forklift involves a complex decision-making problem that should be formulated through an efficient analytical model. The forklifts efficiency plays a very important role in the company. The forklifts are being used on a daily basis and no logistical processes could be done without them. Therefore, it has been decided to determine their efficiency, which will contribute to the optimization of the process in this logistics subsystem. This study puts forward an integrated forklift selection model using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) and Measurement Alternatives and Ranking According to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods. Five input parameters (regular servicing costs, fuel costs, exceptional servicing costs, total number of all minor accidents and damage caused by forklifts) and one output parameter (number of operating hours) were first identified to assess efficiency of eight forklifts in a warehousing system of the Natron-Hayat company using the DEA model. This step allows sorting of efficient forklifts which are subsequently evaluated and ranked using FUCOM and MARCOS methods. A sensitivity analysis is also performed in order to check reliability and accuracy of the results. The findings of this research clearly show that the proposed decision-making model can significantly contribute to all spheres of business applications.

scholarly journals Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Valipour ◽  
Hadi Sarvari ◽  
Jolanta Tamošaitiene
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Risk Assessment Method ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Comparative Results ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting

Recently, risk assessment has become one of the most challenging issues in the areas of construction and public-private partnerships (PPPs). To address risk assessment issues, various decision-making techniques have been proposed, each with its own specific disadvantages and advantages. This paper investigates step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), fuzzy analytic network process (FANP), fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS), simple additive weighting (SAW) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) in order to define how various multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods compare when used for risk assessment in PPP projects. For this study, 5 risk assessment criteria and 10 types of risk used in Iranian highway PPP projects were selected. Four suitability and applicability tests were used to measure agreement between the rankings derived from the MADM methods. Final results show that all techniques had approximately the same rankings of risk assessment, with the SWARA, COPRAS, and EDAS methods performing slightly better. The findings of this study will help the parties in PPP and construction projects to select the best risk assessment method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document