scholarly journals Treatment of Blepharospasm and Oromandibular Dystonia with Botulinum Toxins

Toxins ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis J.W. Hassell ◽  
David Charles

Blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia are focal dystonias characterized by involuntary and often patterned, repetitive muscle contractions. There is a long history of medical and surgical therapies, with the current first-line therapy, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), becoming standard of care in 1989. This comprehensive review utilized MEDLINE and PubMed and provides an overview of the history of these focal dystonias, BoNT, and the use of toxin to treat them. We present the levels of clinical evidence for each toxin for both, focal dystonias and offer guidance for muscle and site selection as well as dosing.

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. ix150 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Planchard ◽  
M. Boyer ◽  
J.-S. Lee ◽  
A. Dechaphunkul ◽  
P. Cheema ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Kapur ◽  
Moussa Mansour

Cardioembolic stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the prominent source of clot formation. While systemic anticoagulation is the current standard of care, anticoagulants carry many contraindications and possible complications. Techniques for elimination of the LAA are in various stages of development and early clinical use. In the coming years, accumulating data will help guide the management of AF patients at risk of bleeding as well as potentially become first-line therapy to reduce the risk of thromboembolic stroke. The purpose of this article is to review current endovascular and epicardial catheter-based LAA occlusion devices and the clinical data supporting their use.


Author(s):  
Greg Nowakowski ◽  
Fabian Frontzek ◽  
Norbert Schmitz

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4-LBA4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Kai-Keen Shiu ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Benny Vittrup Jensen ◽  
Lars Henrik Jensen ◽  
...  

LBA4 Background: KEYNOTE-177 (NCT02563002) is a phase 3, randomized open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus standard of care chemotherapy ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (chemo) as first-line therapy for patients (pts) with microsatellite-instability high/mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We present results of the final PFS analysis. Methods: A total of 307 pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC as determined locally and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years or investigator’s choice of mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI Q2W ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (chemo chosen prior to randomization). Treatment continued until PD, unacceptable toxicity, pt/investigator decision to withdraw, or completion of 35 cycles (pembro only). Patients receiving chemo could crossover to pembro for up to 35 cycles after confirmed PD. Primary end points were PFS (RECIST v1.1, central review) and OS. Key secondary end points included ORR (RECIST v1.1, central review), and safety. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was Feb 19, 2020. The study will continue without changes to evaluate OS. Results: At data cutoff, 153 pts were randomized to pembro and 154 to chemo. Median (range) study follow-up was 28.4 mo (0.2-48.3) with pembro vs 27.2 mo (0.8-46.6) with chemo. Pembro was superior to chemo for PFS (median 16.5 mo vs 8.2 mo; HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.80; P=0.0002). The 12- and 24-mo PFS rates were 55.3% and 48.3% with pembro vs 37.3% and 18.6% with chemo. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% vs 33.1%; median (range) duration of response was not reached (2.3+ to 41.4+) with pembro vs 10.6 mo (2.8 to 37.5+) with chemo. Grade 3-5 treatment related adverse event (AE) rates were 22% vs 66% for pembro vs chemo. One pt in the chemo arm died due to a treatment-related AE. Conclusions: Pembro provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS versus chemo as first-line therapy for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, with fewer treatment-related AEs observed and should be the new standard of care for these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02563002 .


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v635 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
T. Reungwetwattana ◽  
B. Chewaskulyong ◽  
A. Dechaphunkul ◽  
K.H. Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prayuth Sudathip ◽  
Aungkana Saejeng ◽  
Nardlada Khantikul ◽  
Thannikar Thongrad ◽  
Suravadee Kitchakarn ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundIntegrated drug efficacy surveillance (iDES) was formally introduced nationally across Thailand in fiscal year 2018 (FY2018), building on a history of drug efficacy monitoring and interventions. According to the National Malaria Elimination Strategy for Thailand 2017–2026, diagnosis is microscopically confirmed, treatment is prescribed, and patients are followed up four times to ensure cure.MethodsRoutine patient data were extracted from the malaria information system for FY2018–FY2020. Treatment failure of first-line therapy was defined as confirmed parasite reappearance within 42 days for Plasmodium falciparum and 28 days for Plasmodium vivax. The primary outcome was the crude drug efficacy rate, estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods, at day 42 for P. falciparum treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus primaquine, and day 28 for P. vivax treated with chloroquine plus primaquine; day 60 and day 90 efficacy were secondary outcomes for P. vivax.ResultsThe proportion of patients with outcomes recorded at day 42 for P. falciparum malaria and at day 28 for P. vivax malaria has been increasing, with FY2020 follow-up rates of 61.5% and 57.2%, respectively. For P. falciparum malaria, day 42 efficacy in FY2018 was 92.4% (n = 249), in FY2019 93.3% (n = 379), and in FY2020 98.0% (n = 167). P. falciparum recurrences occurred disproportionally in Sisaket Province, with day 42 efficacy rates of 75.9% in FY2018 (n = 59) and 49.4% in FY2019 (n = 49), leading to an update in first-line therapy to pyronaridine-artesunate at the provincial level, rolled out in FY2020. For P. vivax malaria, day 28 efficacy was 98.5% in FY2018 (n = 2,048), 99.1% in FY2019 (n = 2,206), and 99.9% in FY2020 (n = 2,448), and day 90 efficacy was 94.8%, 96.3%, and 97.1%, respectively.ConclusionsIn Thailand, iDES provided operationally relevant data on drug efficacy, enabling the rapid amendment of treatment guidelines to improve patient outcomes and reduce the potential for the spread of drug-resistant parasites. A strong case-based surveillance system, integration with other health system processes, supporting biomarker collection and molecular analyses, and cross-border collaboration may maximize the potential of iDES in countries moving towards elimination.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20014-e20014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Bilitou ◽  
Zhongyun Zhao ◽  
Beth L. Barber ◽  
Genevieve Sian Clapton ◽  
Deborah Saltman

e20014 Background: Since 2011, two therapies that provide novel approaches to the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma have been introduced to the market: ipilimumab for second line and vemurafenib for BRAF mutation-positive melanoma. It is not known how the new drugs influence treatment; this study investigated current treatment patterns in advanced melanoma. Methods: A clinician-validated, web-based survey was administered between August and November 2012 to clinicians who treat advanced melanoma in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Respondents were asked about their treatment of patients in the previous 12 months, including treatment modalities and pharmaceutical therapies used, and factors that affect treatment choice. Results: 150 oncologists and dermatologists completed the survey, 30 in each country. Pharmaceutical therapy was more commonly used than other treatment modalities and varied by stage of disease. A high proportion of patients with late stage of disease were treated with pharmaceutical therapy in Germany (85% in M1B) and France (83% in M1C). Among the countries, 51% (Italy) to 87% (France) of respondents test BRAF mutation status. In patients with wild-type BRAF tumors, dacarbazine, which has not been shown to provide any overall survival benefit, was the most commonly used drug for first-line therapy in all countries. In mutated BRAF tumors, vemurafenib was the most commonly used drug in first line therapy in 3 of 5 countries. There was no standard of care in second line for either patients with wild-type or mutated-BRAFtumors; therapies used included fotemustine, temozolomide, interferon, paclitaxel, and ipilimumab. Conclusions: Treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma are limited, particularly for patients with wild-type BRAF disease. In second line, there does not appear to be an established standard of care: a range of treatments are used, including several not indicated for melanoma.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084
Author(s):  
Damianos Sotiropoulos ◽  
Argiris Symeonidis ◽  
Vassilios K Papadopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Tsirigotis ◽  
Maria Pagoni ◽  
...  

Abstract The Greek Registry of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) is implemented under the auspices of the Acute Leukemias and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Study Group of the Hellenic Society of Haematology. Hereby, we present results after four years of retrospective data collection. The total number of patients included is 1078, from 14 Greek sites; ET was diagnosed between 1982 and 2012. The male to female ratio is 1:1.19. Median age at diagnosis is 63 years, median platelet counts (PLT) 826x109/L, hemoglobin (Hb) 13.6 g/dL, white blood cell counts (WBC) 9.4x109/L. The presenting symptoms were a thrombotic event in 6.8%, a hemorrhagic event in 1.5% of patients. In 79.8% of the patients the diagnosis was made after incidental finding of elevated platelet counts on routine laboratory investigation. Molecular studies were performed in 677 patients and 42.8% of them were positive for the JAK2-V617F mutation. The presence of JAK2-V617F mutation (mutant vs wild type allele) was associated with baseline platelet counts (757.5 vs 882 x109/L) and hemoglobin levels (14.4 vs 13.4 g/dL), p<0.001 (Mann-Whitney U-test). A history of thrombosis or hemorrhage was present in 18.6% and 6.6% of patients respectively. Chi-square test was performed to assess whether platelet counts at diagnosis (<600, 600-800, >800 x109/L), Hb<13.8g/dL, WBC>9.5x109/L, or splenomegaly are associated with thrombotic or hemorrhagic events in the past medical history or during the follow-up of ET patients. The only statistically significant difference was observed in the occurrence of thrombosis during the follow up: 10.1% of those with PLT between 600-800 x109/L, 4.5% in PLT<600 and 5.6% in PLT>800 x109/L. To assess for possible confounders the multivariable logistic regression model was used, with independent variables the PLT at diagnosis, age >60 years, history of thrombosis and first line therapy. The history of thrombosis was the only statistically significant risk factor with odds ratio (OR) 3.9 (p=0.0005), while PLT was not a statistically significant risk factor (OR=2.5, p=0.074). Antiplatelet therapy was offered in 80% of patients (aspirin in 59.1%, clopidogrel in 4.7%, and combination therapy in 6.5%); anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin or warfarin) were given in 2.3%, while the remaining 17.8% of patients did not receive any antithrombotic therapy. During the first six months post diagnosis, 31.6% of patients did not need any cytoreductive therapy. The rest 68.4% of the patients received first line therapy (hydroxyurea 80.6%, anagrelide 11.4% and interferon 5.4%). The response rates were 89.9%, 82.1% and 85.7%, respectively. Second-line therapy was received by 25.8% of the patients (hydroxyurea 23%, anagrelide 44.6%, interferon 9.5%), while the off-label combination of hydroxyurea and anagrelide was administered to 21.2% of the patients. Of the 852 patients treated with hydroxyurea as first line therapy, 12.1% switched to anagrelide and 1.2% to interferon. Of those initially treated with anagrelide, 27.6% switched to hydroxyurea and 8.2% to interferon. During the follow up phase, secondary solid tumor occurred in 4% and hematological malignancy in 2.7% of the patients. The aim of the registry and the subsequent data analysis is to convey the practice of managing the disease. Moreover, useful conclusions can be reached regarding to the patients’ responsiveness to therapy and the minimization of thrombotic and hemorrhagic adverse events. Disclosures: Spanoudakis: Genesis Hellas: Honoraria. Kotsianidis:Genesis Hellas: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document