scholarly journals The Spectrum of Teleparallel Gravity

Universe ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomi Koivisto ◽  
Georgios Tsimperis

The observer’s frame is the more elementary description of the gravitational field than the metric. The most general covariant, even-parity quadratic form for the frame field in arbitrary dimension generalises the New General Relativity by nine functions of the d’Alembertian operator. The degrees of freedom are clarified by a covariant derivation of the propagator. The consistent and viable models can incorporate an ultra-violet completion of the gravity theory, an additional polarisation of the gravitational wave, and the dynamics of a magnetic scalar potential.

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2193-2240 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. I. ARCOS ◽  
J. G. PEREIRA

The role played by torsion in gravitation is critically reviewed. After a description of the problems and controversies involving the physics of torsion, a comprehensive presentation of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity is made. According to this theory, curvature and torsion are alternative ways of describing the gravitational field, and consequently related to the same degrees of freedom of gravity. However, more general gravity theories, like for example Einstein–Cartan and gauge theories for the Poincaré and the affine groups, consider curvature and torsion as representing independent degrees of freedom. By using an active version of the strong equivalence principle, a possible solution to this conceptual question is reviewed. This solution ultimately favors the teleparallel point of view, and consequently the completeness of general relativity. A discussion of the consequences for gravitation is presented.


Author(s):  
Bahram Mashhoon

Nonlocal general relativity (GR) requires an extension of the mathematical framework of GR. Nonlocal GR is a tetrad theory such that the orthonormal tetrad frame field of a preferred set of observers carries the sixteen gravitational degrees of freedom. The spacetime metric is then defined via the orthonormality condition. The preferred frame field is used to define a new linear Weitzenböck connection in spacetime. The non-symmetric Weitzenböck connection is metric compatible, curvature-free and renders the preferred (fundamental) frame field parallel. This circumstance leads to teleparallelism. The fundamental parallel frame field defined by the Weitzenböck connection is the natural generalization of the parallel frame fields of the static inertial observers in a global inertial frame in Minkowski spacetime. The Riemannian curvature of the Levi-Civita connection and the torsion of the Weitzenböck connection are complementary aspects of the gravitational field in extended GR.


2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (29) ◽  
pp. 4161-4166
Author(s):  
J. FONSECA

The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) is an alternative formulation of Einstein's equations in the framework of Riemann-Cartan spacetimes. The gravitational field can be described either by the curvature of the torsion-free connection of general relativity (GR) or by the torsion of the curvature-free connection of the TEGR. Both in GR and TEGR the freedom in the choice of coordinates gives rise to the equivalence problem of deciding whether two solutions of the field equations are the same. This problem is solved by means of a invariant description of the gravitational field. We investigate whether the equivalence between GR and TEGR also holds at the level of these invariant descriptions. We show that the GR description assures equivalence in TEGR only in very special situations. These results are illustrated on teleparallel spacetimes with torsion and Gödel metric.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Capozziello ◽  
Andrew Finch ◽  
Jackson Levi Said ◽  
Alessio Magro

AbstractTeleparallel and symmetric teleparallel gravity offer platforms in which gravity can be formulated in interesting geometric approaches, respectively given by torsion and nonmetricity. In this vein, general relativity can be expressed in three dynamically equivalent ways which may offer insights into the different properties of these decompositions such as their Hamiltonian structure, the efficiency of numerical analyses, as well as the classification of gravitational field degrees of freedom. In this work, we take a $$3+1$$ 3 + 1 decomposition of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity which are both dynamically equivalent to curvature based general relativity. By splitting the spacetime metric and corresponding tetrad into their spatial and temporal parts as well as through finding the Gauss-like equations, it is possible to set up a general foundation for the different formulations of gravity. Based on these results, general 3-tetrad and 3-metric evolution equations are derived. Finally through the choice of the two respective connections, the metric $$3+1$$ 3 + 1 formulation for general relativity is recovered as well as the tetrad $$3+1$$ 3 + 1 formulation of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity and the metric $$3+1$$ 3 + 1 formulation of symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity. The approach is capable, in principle, of resolving common features of the various formulations of general relativity at a fundamental level and pointing out characteristics that extensions and alternatives to the various formulations can present.


2019 ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Steven Carlip

So far, general relativity has been viewed from the four-dimensional Lagrangian perspective. This chapter introduces the (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism, starting with the ADM form of the metric and extrinsic curvature. The Hamiltonian form of the action is served, and the nature of the constraints—and, more generally, of constraints and gauge invariance in Hamiltonian systems—is discussed. The formalism is used to count the physical degrees of freedom of the gravitational field. The chapter ends with a discussion of boundary terms and the ADM energy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Ulhoa ◽  
R. G. G. Amorim

We use the theory of teleparallelism equivalent to general relativity based on noncommutative spacetime coordinates. In this context, we write the corrections of the Schwarzschild solution. We propose the existence of a Weitzenböck spacetime that matches the corrected metric tensor. As an important result, we find the corrections of the gravitational energy in the realm of teleparallel gravity due to the noncommutativity of spacetime. Then we interpret such corrections as a manifestation of quantum theory in gravitational field.


2019 ◽  
Vol 952 (10) ◽  
pp. 2-9
Author(s):  
Yu.M. Neiman ◽  
L.S. Sugaipova ◽  
V.V. Popadyev

As we know the spherical functions are traditionally used in geodesy for modeling the gravitational field of the Earth. But the gravitational field is not stationary either in space or in time (but the latter is beyond the scope of this article) and can change quite strongly in various directions. By its nature, the spherical functions do not fully display the local features of the field. With this in mind it is advisable to use spatially localized basis functions. So it is convenient to divide the region under consideration into segments with a nearly stationary field. The complexity of the field in each segment can be characterized by means of an anisotropic matrix resulting from the covariance analysis of the field. If we approach the modeling in this way there can arise a problem of poor coherence of local models on segments’ borders. To solve the above mentioned problem it is proposed in this article to use new basis functions with Mahalanobis metric instead of the usual Euclidean distance. The Mahalanobis metric and the quadratic form generalizing this metric enables us to take into account the structure of the field when determining the distance between the points and to make the modeling process continuous.


Author(s):  
Nathalie Deruelle ◽  
Jean-Philippe Uzan

This chapter embarks on a study of the two-body problem in general relativity. In other words, it seeks to describe the motion of two compact, self-gravitating bodies which are far-separated and moving slowly. It limits the discussion to corrections proportional to v2 ~ m/R, the so-called post-Newtonian or 1PN corrections to Newton’s universal law of attraction. The chapter first examines the gravitational field, that is, the metric, created by the two bodies. It then derives the equations of motion, and finally the actual motion, that is, the post-Keplerian trajectories, which generalize the post-Keplerian geodesics obtained earlier in the chapter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document