January 26 — International Day «Let's Talk»

Author(s):  
Oksana Aleksandrovna Rybachok ◽  

January marks the beginning of the new year and the middle of winter, therefore, the holidays this month are celebrated accordingly, for example, in Canada and the United States, Walrus Day is celebrated on January 1 with the organization of traditional swims in ice water, but on January 5, it was proposed to celebrate Fasting Day, obviously, with the purpose of saving the body tired from the festive feasts. On January 14, in some countries, it is customary to celebrate an unusual day — the Day of Combating Procrastination, which in psychology means «constantly putting things off for later», some experts have already dubbed this fairly common feature «the disease of the 21st century». January 16 isWorld SnowDay and January 21 is International Hug Day. Besides, on the last Wednesday of January, concerned people proposed to establish Let's Talk Day, dedicated to the problem of difficult relationships between healthy people and patients with mental disorders. Canada was the initiator of the celebration of this day. Experts suggest that ordinary people protect themselves from mental illness by leading an active lifestyle, but does it always help? Let's try to figure it out in this article.

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Dvoskin ◽  
James L. Knoll ◽  
Mollie Silva

This article traces the history of the way in which mental disorders were viewed and treated, from before the birth of Christ to the present day. Special attention is paid to the process of deinstitutionalization in the United States and the failure to create an adequately robust community mental health system to care for the people who, in a previous era, might have experienced lifelong hospitalization. As a result, far too many people with serious mental illnesses are living in jails and prisons that are ill-suited and unprepared to meet their needs.


Author(s):  
Nancy Kang ◽  
Silvio Torres-Saillant

Dominican American literature comprises the body of creative writing in various genres by US-based authors of Dominican ancestry. Here, “Dominican” refers to people who trace their origins by birth or descent to the Dominican Republic, not to the island of Dominica in the Anglophone West Indies. “Dominican American,” in turn, applies to writers born, raised, and/or socialized in the United States, who received their schooling in general and, in particular, their literary education in this country irrespective of the extent of their involvement in the life of their ancestral homeland. Writing by Dominicans in the United States has a long history. Its existence reaches back at least to the first half of the 19th century, shining forth meaningfully in the 1990s, and showing little sign of abatement in the early decades of the 21st century. While this article concerns itself primarily with Dominican American writing, it seeks to answer predictable questions regarding the rapport of this corpus with the literary production of Dominican Republic-based writers and Dominican authors who have settled in the United States largely as immigrants, using Spanish as their literary language. The article distinguishes Dominican American literature from the writings of people who, beginning in the 19th century, came to the United States from the Dominican Republic as travelers, adventurers, and individual settlers, having left home for political or economic reasons. They could be exiles escaping danger or immigrants seduced by the possibility of enhancing their lives in the proverbial “land of milk and honey.” They tended to regard their time in the United States as temporary and yearned for the change of fortune—political or economic—that would bring them back home. However, having had their return either thwarted or delayed, they would often build families or raise any offspring that came with them to the receiving society. Their children, US-born or brought to the land while young enough to be socialized as US citizens, became Dominican American by default. US-born children of foreign parents who have pursued writing as a vocation have been able to vie for recognition in the American literary mainstream. English speakers by virtue of their US upbringing, they would have their ears attuned to the rhythms of US literature writ large. Dominican American writers in the 21st century have shown their mettle, making themselves heard in the ethnically partitioned map of the country’s letters. As with other Caribbean-descended American writers, they typically inhabit their US citizenship with an awareness of the contested nature of their civic belonging. Family legacies, personal memories, and their own process of self-discovery keep them reminded of the effects of US foreign policy on the land of their forbears. As a result, their texts tend to reflect not only an ethnic American voice, but also a diasporic perspective.


Author(s):  
I.R. Parkhomey ◽  
V.A. Druzhynin ◽  
N.V. Tsopa ◽  
G.B. Zhyrov

Today, a new direction in medical science is developing rapidly - nanomedicine. Most of the methods in this area so far exist only in the form of projects. However, most experts believe that these methods will become fundamental in the 21st century. For example, the National Institutes of Health of the United States included nanomedicine in the top five areas of medical development in the 21st century, and the National Cancer Institute of the United States intends to apply the achievements of nanomedicine in the treatment of cancer. A number of foreign research centers have already demonstrated prototypes in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, prosthetics and implantation. Nanomedicine seeks to provide a significant set of research tools and clinically useful devices in the near future. This paper discusses the technique of using nanoscale robotic systems to accurately diagnose the condition of an organism. The proposed topic combines two aspects: purely technical and biological - the state of the organism. These aspects in themselves are important scientific problems, and their combination requires the creation of a technical and biological concept of diagnosis, without damaging the functions of the living organism and its tissues. The proposed technique for diagnosing a living organism by means of a nanobot includes three main components that are presented in the work, namely: the sequence of actions for manipulation of the nanobot in the body; calculation of quantitative characteristics of the diagnosis process and schematic implementation of the appropriate diagnostic scanner. The practical implementation of the proposed scanner is easy to implement and operate, and the logic of the above methodology allows us to formulate a common approach (concept) in the future when creating the latest diagnostic tools. The analysis of preliminary results of the study suggests that the introduction, removal and use of nanobots in living tissue is safe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document