The Spread of Bread Wheat over the Old World since the Neolithicum as Indicated by its Genotype for Hybrid Necrosis

Author(s):  
A.C. Zeven
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
A. V. Galaev ◽  
M. V. Galaeva

Hybrid necrosis is the gradual premature death of leaves or plants in certain F1-2hybrids of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and it is caused by the interaction of two dominant complementary genes Ne1 and Ne2 located on chromosome arms 5BL and 2BS, respectively. To date, necrotic genotypes in most varieties of Ukrainian breeding have not been identified. Aim. This study was conducted to determine the necrotic genotypes in varieties Ukrainian breeding of different regions. Methods. Microsatellite analysis, PAAgel-electrophoresis. Results. 150 genotypes of bread wheat varieties from Ukrainian breeding were identified by loci Xbarc74-5В and Xbarc55-2В closely linked to hybrid necrosis genes Ne1 and Ne2, respectively. Conclusions. The most common in the South of Ukraine is the genotypes Ne1wNe2w/m and Ne1mNe2w/m were revealed. The most of varieties in the North of Ukraine had the genotypes ne1Ne2ms. These genotypes can have breeding and adaptive value for specific geographical conditions. Keywords: Triticum aestivum L., hybride necrosis genes Ne1 and Ne2, microsatellite analysis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Pukhalskiy ◽  
E. N. Bilinskaya ◽  
S. P. Martynov ◽  
T. V. Dobrotvorskaya ◽  
G. A. Obolenkova

Author(s):  
R. W. Cole ◽  
J. C. Kim

In recent years, non-human primates have become indispensable as experimental animals in many fields of biomedical research. Pharmaceutical and related industries alone use about 2000,000 primates a year. Respiratory mite infestations in lungs of old world monkeys are of particular concern because the resulting tissue damage can directly effect experimental results, especially in those studies involving the cardiopulmonary system. There has been increasing documentation of primate parasitology in the past twenty years.


1969 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 622-624
Author(s):  
R. J. HERRNSTEIN
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis ◽  
Philip Spinhoven ◽  
Richard van Dyck ◽  
Onno van der Hart ◽  
Johan Vanderlinden

2019 ◽  
Vol 326 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-161
Author(s):  
G.M. Hasanova ◽  
◽  
Kh.N. Rustamov ◽  

Moreana ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (Number 205- (3-4) ◽  
pp. 73-94
Author(s):  
Guillaume Navaud

Utopia as a concept points towards a world essentially alien to us. Utopia as a work describes this otherness and confronts us with a world whose strangeness might seem disturbing. Utopia and Europe differ in their relationship to what is other (Latin alienus) – that is, that which belongs to someone else, that which is foreign, that which is strange. These two worlds are at odds in regards to their foreign policy and way of life: Utopia aspires to self-sufficiency but remains open to whatever good may arrive from beyond its borders, while the Old World appears alienated by exteriority yet refuses to welcome any kind of otherness. This issue also plays a major part in the reception of More’s work. Book I invites the reader to distance himself from a European point of view in order to consider what is culturally strange not as logically absurd but merely as geographically remote. Utopia still makes room for some exoticism, but mostly in its paratexts, and this exoticism needs to be deciphered. All in all, Utopia may invite us to transcend the horizontal dialectics of worldly alterity in order to open our eyes to a more radical, metaphysical otherness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document