Faculty Opinions recommendation of Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond.

Author(s):  
Klaus Ley
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Vettegren’ ◽  
A. Ya. Bashkarev ◽  
R. I. Mamalimov ◽  
A. V. Savitskii ◽  
I. P. Shcherbakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Ultrasonics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Singher ◽  
Y. Segal ◽  
J. Shamir
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 548 ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizandra Nogami ◽  
Antenor B. Paraguassú ◽  
José E. Rodrigues ◽  
Rogério P. Ribeiro

Rock plate setting can be performed with metal inserts or by mortar adhesion. For mortar setting, the adhesion bond strength values, as a rule, should be above 1 MPa. In the present work, tests with eight types of “granite” tiles were performed to compare the adherence of five types of mortars. The rocks chosen were: Red Brasilia (syenogranite), Black Indian (migmatite), Green Labrador (charnockite), Black Sao Gabriel (hypersthene diorite), Rose Jacaranda (nebulitic migmatite syenogranite), Fantastic Blue (biotite monzogranite megaporphyritic serial gneissified), Grey Swallow (monzogranite) and Yellow Ornamental (garnet porphyroblastic gneiss), which do not have similar petrographic and sawability characteristics, thereby resulting in different initial roughness values of the plates obtained by breaking apart the blocks on the gangsaw machine, which use granulated steel as an abrasive element. The adherence of these rocks with the mortars was determined in the rough surface as well as in the polished surface by the pullout traction test, standardized for ceramics. The results showed that the mortar adhesion is related to roughness, to mineralogy and to the texture of these rocks. To verify this relationship, tensile bond strength tests were performed with the main mineral components of these rocks using single crystals with known optical orientation. Moreover, the microstructure study of the standard substrate/mortar/rock set was also performed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-162
Author(s):  
S. Weaver ◽  
E. A. Grulke

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (31) ◽  
pp. 11281-11286 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Evans ◽  
A. Leung ◽  
V. Heinrich ◽  
C. Zhu
Keyword(s):  

1960 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1180-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Morozova ◽  
N. A. Krotova

Abstract 1. The nature of the adhesion bonds in different cases can be determined by investigations of the mechanical characteristics of adhesion, of electrical effects observed on destruction of the bond, and microscopical investigation of the separation boundaries in various systems consisting of polymer pairs, and polymer-metal and polymer-glass systems held together by forces of adhesion. 2. The adhesion bonds between polymer and metal and polymer and glass are electrical in character, as shown by the form of the adhesiogram, the occurrence of electron emission on separation, and the existence of electric charges on the separated surfaces. 3. After separation, the polymer film continues to emit electrons and carries a negative residual charge. The substrate (glass, metal) does not emit electrons and has a positive charge. 4. The breakdown of the adhesion bond between two polar polymers of different structure, or a polar and nonpolar polymer, is accompanied by the same characteristic effects as the separation of a polymer from glass or metal. A sharp boundary is observed in microscopic specimens. 5. Determinations of the velocities of electrons emitted during separation show that breakdown of a firm adhesion bond is accompanied by emission of electrons with higher velocities than those emitted in the breakdown of a weak bond. These results arc in good agreement with the electrical theory of adhesion. 6. The reaction of the substrate (glass) has a strong influence on the adhesion of a polymer (chlorinated polyvinyl chloride) to it. The maximum adhesion is found in the neutral region. The detached polymer film shows a reversal of residual charge in the strongly acid and strongly alkaline regions, accompanied by a sharp decrease of the work of adhesion; this can only be attributed to a decrease of the surface electrification density of the layers of the electric double layer in the charge reversal region. 7. Mechanical treatment of the metal surface increases the adhesion of polymers to it and intensifies electron emission from the regions of the polymer film which were attached to the treated regions of the metal surface. 8. The formation of an adhesion bond between two nonpolar polymers of similar structure is caused by diffusion processes in the contact zone. In such cases no electrical effects are observed during separation, the boundary in microscopic specimens is diffuse, and the work of separation depends relatively little on the rate of separation. 9. The systems studied can be subdivided into two groups: the adhesion bond in systems of the first group is the result of formation of an electric double layer at the boundary; in systems of the second group the adhesion bond is produced by diffusion processes at the boundary.


1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Niven

The collapsible structure of ice is stressed. The adhesion bond is visualized as being associated with a readjustment of a partially collapsed or distorted molecular structure when cooling sets in after plastic flow has occurred in the asperity. With this general idea in view the friction mechanism on ice is compared in detail with that on a non-collapsible material, and explanations for observations are suggested.


1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1986-1991
Author(s):  
V.L. Vakula ◽  
E.B. Orlov ◽  
N.A. Konstantinova ◽  
N.V. Kanatchikova ◽  
V.V. Lavrent'ev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document