Faculty Opinions recommendation of The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of Hox genes.

Author(s):  
Peter Reddien
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 706-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Larroux ◽  
Bryony Fahey ◽  
Sandie M. Degnan ◽  
Marcin Adamski ◽  
Daniel S. Rokhsar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Burke ◽  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
C. Tabin

A common form of evolutionary variation between vertebrate taxa is the different numbers of segments that contribute to various regions of the anterior-posterior axis; cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, etc. The term ‘transposition’ is used to describe this phenomenon. Genetic experiments with homeotic genes in mice have demonstrated that Hox genes are in part responsible for the specification of segmental identity along the anterior-posterior axis, and it has been proposed that an axial Hox code determines the morphology of individual vertebrae (Kessel, M. and Gruss, P. (1990) Science 249, 347–379). This paper presents a comparative study of the developmental patterns of homeobox gene expression and developmental morphology between animals that have homologous regulatory genes but different morphologies. The axial expression boundaries of 23 Hox genes were examined in the paraxial mesoderm of chick, and 16 in mouse embryos by in situ hybridization and immunolocalization techniques. Hox gene anterior expression boundaries were found to be transposed in concert with morphological boundaries. This data contributes a mechanistic level to the assumed homology of these regions in vertebrates. The recognition of mechanistic homology supports the historical homology of basic patterning mechanisms between all organisms that share these genes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1635-1646 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Song ◽  
R. A. Anderson ◽  
R. A. Bayne ◽  
J. Gromoll ◽  
S. Shimasaki ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1994 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 61-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Robert Manak ◽  
Matthew P. Scott

Dramatic successes in identifying vertebrate homeobox genes closely related to their insect relatives have led to the recognition of classes within the homeodomain superfamily. To what extent are the homeodomain protein classes dedicated to specific functions during development? Although information on vertebrate gene functions is limited, existing evidence from mice and nematodes clearly supports conservation of function for the Hox genes. Less compelling, but still remarkable, is the conservation of other homeobox gene classes and of regulators of homeotic gene expression and function. It is too soon to say whether the cases of conservation are unique and exceptional, or the beginning of a profoundly unified view of gene regulation in animal development. In any case, new questions are raised by the data: how can the differences between mammals and insects be compatible with conservation of homeobox gene function? Did the evolution of animal form involve a proliferation of new homeodomain proteins, new modes of regulation of existing gene types, or new relationships with target genes, or is evolutionary change largely the province of other classes of genes? In this review, we summarize what is known about conservation of homeobox gene function.


Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Izon ◽  
Sofia Rozenfeld ◽  
Stephen T. Fong ◽  
László Kömüves ◽  
Corey Largman ◽  
...  

Abstract Hox homeobox genes play a crucial role in specifying the embryonic body pattern. However, a role for Hox genes in T-cell development has not been explored. The Hoxa-9 gene is expressed in normal adult and fetal thymuses. Fetal thymuses of mice homozygous for an interruption of the Hoxa-9 gene are one eighth normal size and have a 25-fold decrease in the number of primitive thymocytes expressing the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R, CD25). Progression to the double positive (CD4+CD8+) stage is dramatically retarded in fetal thymic organ cultures. This aberrant development is associated with decreased amounts of intracellular CD3 and T-cell receptor β (TCRβ) and reduced surface expression of IL-7R and E-cadherin. Mutant thymocytes show a significant increase in apoptotic cell death and premature downregulation of bcl-2 expression. A similar phenotype is seen in primitive thymocytes from adult Hoxa-9−/− mice and from mice transplanted with Hoxa-9−/−marrow. Hoxa-9 appears to play a previously unsuspected role in T-cell ontogeny by modulating cell survival of early thymocytes and by regulating their subsequent differentiation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R Bürglin ◽  
Gary Ruvkun

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1706-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart A. Fabb ◽  
Gemma Haines ◽  
Seb Dworkin ◽  
Paul J. Simmons ◽  
Lorraine J. Gudas ◽  
...  

Abstract There is increasing evidence that homeobox (Hox) genes play critical roles in the regulation of hematopoiesis. We found that both forms of the earliest HoxA gene, HoxA1 and its alternatively spliced transcript, HoxA1-T, which lacks the homeobox domain, are expressed in immature populations of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and progenitor cells. In more mature bone marrow cell (BM) populations the levels of HoxA1-T increases relative to HoxA1 with both transcripts absent in mature peripheral blood (PB) cells. Roles for either of these Hox transcripts in hematopoiesis have not yet been described. We overexpressed either HoxA1 or HoxA1-T in BM using a modified GFP-containing MSCV vector (MXIE). Overexpression of either HoxA1 transcript did not affect expression levels of other Hox genes relative to control (empty vector). Overexpression of HoxA1-T significantly reduced the numbers of colony-forming cells (CFCs) produced by 500 GFP+ BM compared to control GFP+ BM (mean±SEM control 73±6.4; HoxA1 57±6.8; HoxA1-T 26.7±5.4; n=6; P<0.01 control vs. HoxA1-T). Interestingly, colonies generated by HoxA1 GFP+ BM contained ~3-fold more cells (mean±SEM: control 22,000±900 cells; HoxA1 61,700±12,000 cells; HoxA1-T 20,600±6,360 cells; n=6; P<0.005 HoxA1 vs. control and HoxA1-T). In each of 2 experiments 10,000 HoxA1 overexpressing BM grew in liquid suspension culture for up to 15 weeks, increasing by ~239-fold weekly. In contrast, control BM proliferated for only 3 weeks, with weekly ~53-fold increases, whereas HoxA1-T BM expired after 2 weeks of culture, with weekly cell increases of only ~7-fold (control v HoxA1 P<0.01; HoxA1 v HoxA1-T P<0.001). There was no difference in the number of day 12 colony-forming unit-spleen (CFU-S) formed from 2500 control or HoxA1 GFP+ BM (11.2±0.47 and 12.6±1.26 respectively). In contrast, 2500 HoxA1-T GFP+ BM produced significantly fewer CFU-S (8.9±0.61) compared to both control and HoxA1 BM (n=4, P<0.02). To assess HSC potential, lethally irradiated CD45.2+ recipients (n=6/group) were injected with 5x106 congenic CD45.1+ BM immediately post-transduction without selection (all groups had similar transduction efficiencies). All recipients had >75% donor cells (CD45.1+, GFP+/−) in their PB at 3 months post-transplant. The average %GFP+ cells in recipients were similar for control (24.5±7.0%) and HoxA1 cells (20.8±2.5%). Strikingly, HSCs overexpressing HoxA1-T had markedly reduced repopulating ability (3.5±0.6% GFP+, P<0.05 HoxA1-T vs. control or HoxA1). Poisson statistics were used to quantitate HSC frequency in secondary transplant recipients. Mice were injected with 5x103, 5x104, 2x105 or 1x106 BM from control or HoxA1 primary recipients together with 2x105 congenic CD45.2+ BM (n=10/group). The frequency of HSCs was markedly higher (~32-fold) in the HoxA1 cells (~1 HSC per 1.8x105 BM) compared to control (~1 HSC per 5.8x106 BM; P<0.001). Although secondary recipients injected with 1x106 HoxA1-T BM showed donor (CD45.1+) contribution (15.3±1.8%), none of the 10 recipients had GFP+ donor cell reconstitution. These data therefore suggest that HoxA1 enhances HSC self-renewal whereas HoxA1-T rapidly promotes HSC differentiation. These novel findings highlight important roles for the two HoxA1 transcripts in the regulation of HSCs, the mechanisms of which are currently being assessed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 3382-3394 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Oda ◽  
A. Yamagiwa ◽  
S. Yamamoto ◽  
T. Nakayama ◽  
A. Tsumura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document