Faculty Opinions recommendation of What difference does a year of schooling make? Maturation of brain response and connectivity between 2nd and 3rd grades during arithmetic problem solving.

Author(s):  
Jane Holmes Bernstein
2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lemaire ◽  
M. Lecacheur

Author(s):  
Hani Rizkia Putri ◽  
Rooselyna Ekawati

This study aims to develop a mathematics handout based on local wisdom nuanced to increase the mathematical problem-solving skill of the Secondary students. This research is motivated by the student’s ability to solve the social arithmetic problem. This study used four phases of developmental research such as Investigation, Design, Realization, and Test, Evaluation, and Revision. The characteristics of local wisdom were acquired within the design or context in the mathematics handout to develop secondary students problem-solving skills. The results show that the students do the stages of problem-solving by Polya, get the maximum score and show students’ positive responses in the questionnaire given. Therefore, it met the proper handout criteria such as valid, practice, and effective. In the future studies, we encouraged to develop learning materials which have a guide to do phases of problem-solving and apply the way to solve some problems in mathematics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémy Besnard ◽  
Philippe Allain ◽  
Ghislaine Aubin ◽  
Valérie Chauviré ◽  
Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Logie ◽  
Kenneth J. Gilhooly ◽  
Valerie Wynn

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Marco Marzocchi ◽  
Daniela Lucangeli ◽  
Tiziana De Meo ◽  
Federica Fini ◽  
Cesare Cornoldi

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-583
Author(s):  
Hamdollah Manzari Tavakoli

The relationship between children’s accuracy during numerical magnitude comparisons and arithmetic ability has been investigated by many researchers. Contradictory results have been reported from these studies due to the use of many different tasks and indices to determine the accuracy of numerical magnitude comparisons. In the light of this inconsistency among measurement techniques, the present study aimed to investigate this relationship among Iranian second grade children (n = 113) using a pre-established test (known as the Numeracy Screener) to measure numerical magnitude comparison accuracy. The results revealed that both the symbolic and non-symbolic items of the Numeracy Screener significantly correlated with arithmetic ability. However, after controlling for the effect of working memory, processing speed, and long-term memory, only performance on symbolic items accounted for the unique variances in children’s arithmetic ability. Furthermore, while working memory uniquely contributed to arithmetic ability in one-and two-digit arithmetic problem solving, processing speed uniquely explained only the variance in single-digit arithmetic skills and long-term memory did not contribute to any significant additional variance for one-digit or two-digit arithmetic problem solving.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document