Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Anti-arrhythmia drugs for cardiac arrest: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Author(s):  
Jan Amlie
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-381
Author(s):  
Junhong Wang ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Zongxuan Zhao ◽  
Kaifeng Wen ◽  
Yaoke Xu ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:This systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the impact of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-BCPR) on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) probability, survival, and neurological outcomes with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods:Electronically searching of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, along with manual retrieval, were done for clinical trials about the impact of DA-BCPR which were published from the date of inception to December 2018. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the baseline information, and interested outcomes were extracted. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by STATA version 13.1.Results:In 13 studies, 235,550 patients were enrolled. Compared with no dispatcher instruction, DA-BCPR tended to be effective in improving BCPR rate (I2 = 98.2%; OR = 5.84; 95% CI, 4.58-7.46; P <.01), return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before admission (I2 = 36.0%; OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; P <.01), discharge or 30-day survival rate (I2 = 47.7%; OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P <.01), and good neurological outcome (I2 = 30.9%; OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.48; P = .01). However, no significant difference in hospital admission was found (I2 = 29.0%; OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.30; P = .36).Conclusion:This review shows DA-BPCR plays a positive role for OHCA as a critical section in the life chain. It is effective in improving the probability of BCPR, survival, ROSC before admission, and neurological outcome.


Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. R173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Huang ◽  
Qing He ◽  
Min Yang ◽  
Lei Zhan

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15131-e15131
Author(s):  
Sheeba Habeeb Ba Aqeel ◽  
Prasanth Lingamaneni ◽  
Shristi Upadhyay Banskota ◽  
Muhammad Zain Farooq ◽  
Rayli Pichardo ◽  
...  

e15131 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with multiple immune related adverse events (irAE). Cardiotoxicities are rare but fatal complications. Since PD-1 and PD-L1 are expressed on human cardiomyocyte, there is an increased risk of cardiotoxicity with use of ICI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess cardiotoxicities associated with PDL1 and CTLA4 inhibitors. Methods: The Embase, Ovid, Pubmed and Scopus were searched from inception to 2019 by two independent reviewers. All Phase II and III clinical trials reporting cardiotoxicities with the combination of, or monotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and/or anti-CTLA4 were included. Our primary outcome was assessment of cardiotoxicity of all grades that included, hypertension, arrythmias, pericardial effusion, myocardial infarction, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrest. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using I2 statistics. The publication bias was assessed with Eggers regression test. The estimates were reported as odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect model. Results: A total of 2,876 trials retrieved in the initial database search were analyzed according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. A total of 8,905 patients were included in these trials. There was no statistically significant difference in reported overall cardiotoxicity with ICI compared to placebo or standard of care (OR 0.953 95% CI 0.542-1.675, I2 89.49 p < 0.001). Also, no statistical significance associated with myocardial infarction (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.76-3.298 I2 0%, P = 0.83), pericardial effusion (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.72-2.90. I2= 0%, P = 0.613) or hypertension (OR 0.543, 95% CI 0.219-1.346. I2 = 94.98, P < 0.001). Myocarditis was reported in 8 patients with a statistically non-significant increased risk compared to standard of care or placebo (OR 2.16, 95% CI 0.719-6.828 I2= 0%, P = 0.885). Other reported cardiac irAE included cardiac arrest in 4 patients, QT prolongation in 2 patients and cardiac tamponade in 1 patient. Conclusions: The overall risk of cardiac related irAE is not significantly higher with ICI when compared with placebo or standard of care. The reported events of severe cardiac irAE like myocarditis and cardiac arrest are very low in the reported trials.


Resuscitation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
Hoon Kim ◽  
Suk Woo Lee ◽  
Jung Soo Park ◽  
Jin-Hong Min ◽  
Kyu-Hong Han ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 125-126
Author(s):  
Olubukola Ajala ◽  
Freda Mold ◽  
Charlotte Broughton ◽  
Debbie Cooke ◽  
Martin Whyte

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 790-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Wasawat Vutthikraivit ◽  
Sittinun Thangjui ◽  
Thiratest Leesutipornchai ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vishnuvardhan Reddy ◽  
◽  
Syed Ali Aasim ◽  
Rajendra Prasad ◽  
Karthik Satya ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document