Faculty Opinions recommendation of The Phenotypic Plasticity of Duplicated Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Origin of Adaptations.

Author(s):  
Carol MacKintosh
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Mattenberger ◽  
Beatriz Sabater-Muñoz ◽  
Christina Toft ◽  
Mario A. Fares

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 5132-5139
Author(s):  
D Thomas ◽  
R Rothstein ◽  
N Rosenberg ◽  
Y Surdin-Kerjan

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the SAM1 and SAM2 genes encode two distinct forms of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthetase. In a previous study we cloned and sequenced the SAM1 gene (D. Thomas and Y. Surdin-Kerjan, J. Biol. Chem. 262:16704-16709, 1987). In this work, the SAM2 gene was isolated by functional complementation of a yeast double-mutant strain, and its identity was ascertained by gene disruption. It has been sequenced and compared with the SAM1 gene. The degree of homology found between the two genes shows that SAM1 and SAM2 are duplicated genes. Using strains disrupted in one or the other SAM gene, we have studied the regulation of their expression by measuring the steady-state level of mRNA after growth under different conditions. The results show that the expression of the two SAM genes is regulated differently, SAM2 being induced by the presence of excess methionine in the growth medium and SAM1 being repressed under the same conditions. The level of mRNA in the parental strain shows that it is not the sum of the levels found in the two disrupted strains. This raises the question of how the two AdoMet synthetases in S. cerevisiae interact to control AdoMet synthesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 12293
Author(s):  
Florian Mattenberger ◽  
Mario A. Fares ◽  
Christina Toft ◽  
Beatriz Sabater-Muñoz

The cell central metabolism has been shaped throughout evolutionary times when facing challenges from the availability of resources. In the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a set of duplicated genes originating from an ancestral whole-genome and several coetaneous small-scale duplication events drive energy transfer through glucose metabolism as the main carbon source either by fermentation or respiration. These duplicates (~a third of the genome) have been dated back to approximately 100 MY, allowing for enough evolutionary time to diverge in both sequence and function. Gene duplication has been proposed as a molecular mechanism of biological innovation, maintaining balance between mutational robustness and evolvability of the system. However, some questions concerning the molecular mechanisms behind duplicated genes transcriptional plasticity and functional divergence remain unresolved. In this work we challenged S. cerevisiae to the use of lactic acid/lactate as the sole carbon source and performed a small adaptive laboratory evolution to this non-fermentative carbon source, determining phenotypic and transcriptomic changes. We observed growth adaptation to acidic stress, by reduction of growth rate and increase in biomass production, while the transcriptomic response was mainly driven by repression of the whole-genome duplicates, those implied in glycolysis and overexpression of ROS response. The contribution of several duplicated pairs to this carbon source switch and acidic stress is also discussed.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4314-4321
Author(s):  
S J Brown ◽  
D D Rhoads ◽  
M J Stewart ◽  
B Van Slyke ◽  
I T Chen ◽  
...  

We describe a Drosophila DNA clone of tandemly duplicated genes encoding an amino acid sequence nearly identical to human ribosomal protein S14 and yeast rp59. Despite their remarkably similar exons, the locations and sizes of introns differ radically among the Drosophila, human, and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) ribosomal protein genes. Transcripts of both Drosophila RPS14 genes were detected in embryonic and adult tissues and are the same length as mammalian S14 message. Drosophila RPS14 was mapped to region 7C5-9 on the X chromosome. This interval also encodes a previously characterized Minute locus, M(1)7C.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4314-4321 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Brown ◽  
D D Rhoads ◽  
M J Stewart ◽  
B Van Slyke ◽  
I T Chen ◽  
...  

We describe a Drosophila DNA clone of tandemly duplicated genes encoding an amino acid sequence nearly identical to human ribosomal protein S14 and yeast rp59. Despite their remarkably similar exons, the locations and sizes of introns differ radically among the Drosophila, human, and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) ribosomal protein genes. Transcripts of both Drosophila RPS14 genes were detected in embryonic and adult tissues and are the same length as mammalian S14 message. Drosophila RPS14 was mapped to region 7C5-9 on the X chromosome. This interval also encodes a previously characterized Minute locus, M(1)7C.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Kingma ◽  
Eveline T. Diepeveen ◽  
Leila Iñigo de la Cruz ◽  
Liedewij Laan

AbstractPhenotypic plasticity confers a fitness advantage to an organism by tailoring phenotype to environmental circumstances. The extent to which phenotypic plasticity emerges as an adaptive response is still unknown, however it is predicted that the emergence and maintenance of phenotypic plasticity occurs only during evolution in fluctuating environments. Interestingly, experimental studies have shown that phenotypic plasticity can be preserved for several generations during evolution in a constant environment. Here, we evolve a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that has reduced plasticity in a constant and fluctuating environment. Subsequently we compared the adaptive response of the evolved cell, both at the phenotype and genotype level. As predicted by current theory, we find that evolution in a fluctuating environment results in a recovery of phenotypic plasticity. Surprisingly, evolution in a constant environment can lead to a similar recovery of plasticity due to a pleiotropic coupling of different traits. Thus, plasticity can emerge in both fluctuating and constant environments and its prevalence may mainly be determined by network structure. In addition, pleiotropic interactions may be an important structural component of biological networks that can facilitate the recovery of phenotypic plasticity without the requirement to continuously encounter environmental fluctuations.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 5132-5139 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Thomas ◽  
R Rothstein ◽  
N Rosenberg ◽  
Y Surdin-Kerjan

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the SAM1 and SAM2 genes encode two distinct forms of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthetase. In a previous study we cloned and sequenced the SAM1 gene (D. Thomas and Y. Surdin-Kerjan, J. Biol. Chem. 262:16704-16709, 1987). In this work, the SAM2 gene was isolated by functional complementation of a yeast double-mutant strain, and its identity was ascertained by gene disruption. It has been sequenced and compared with the SAM1 gene. The degree of homology found between the two genes shows that SAM1 and SAM2 are duplicated genes. Using strains disrupted in one or the other SAM gene, we have studied the regulation of their expression by measuring the steady-state level of mRNA after growth under different conditions. The results show that the expression of the two SAM genes is regulated differently, SAM2 being induced by the presence of excess methionine in the growth medium and SAM1 being repressed under the same conditions. The level of mRNA in the parental strain shows that it is not the sum of the levels found in the two disrupted strains. This raises the question of how the two AdoMet synthetases in S. cerevisiae interact to control AdoMet synthesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document